Adding CABG to the Dual Antiplatelet Salad

Hospital Variability Drives Inconsistency in Antiplatelet Use After Coronary Bypass

BACKGROUND

Continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction is recommended by current guidelines. We sought to evaluate guideline adherence over time and factors associated with postoperative DAPT within a regional consortium.

METHODS

Isolated CABG patients from 2011 to 2017 who had a myocardial infarction within 21 days prior to surgery were included. Patients were stratified by DAPT prescription at discharge and by time period, early (2011-2014) vs late (2015-2017). Hierarchical regressions were then performed to evaluate factors influencing DAPT use after CABG.

RESULTS

A total of 7314 patients were included with an overall rate of DAPT utilization of 31.2% that increased from 29.6% in the early to 33.4% in the late era (P < .01). There was considerable variability in hospital rates of DAPT (range 9.5%-92.1%) and hospital level changes over time (26% increased, 11% decreased, and 63% remained stable). After adjustment for clinical factors, era was not associated with DAPT use but treating hospital remained significantly associated with DAPT use. Other clinical factors associated with increased DAPT utilization included off-pump surgery (odds ratio [OR] 4.48, P < .01) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 2.02, P < .01), and atrial fibrillation (OR 0.39, P < .01) was associated with decreased utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual antiplatelet use has increased between 2011 and 2017, driven primarily by evolving patient demographics. Significant hospital-level variability drives inconsistency in DAPT utilization. Efforts to promote DAPT use for patients treated with CABG after myocardial infarction in concordance with current guidelines should be targeted at the hospital level.

Impact of severe left ventricular dysfunction on in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of Chinese patients undergoing first isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

Few studies focused on evaluating the impacts of preoperative severe left ventricular dysfunction on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCAB). This single center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impacts of severe left ventricular dysfunction on in-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes of Chinese patients undergoing first, scheduled, and isolated OPCAB surgery.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2014, 2032 eligible patients were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups: a severe group (patients with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35%, n = 128), an impaired group (patients with preoperative LVEF of 36-50%, n = 680), and a normal group (patients with preoperative LVEF of >50%, n = 1224). In-hospital and follow-up clinical outcomes were investigated and compared.

Results

Patients in the severe group compared to the other 2 groups had higher in-hospital mortality and higher incidences of low cardiac output and prolonged ventilation. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a similar cumulative follow-up survival between the severe group and the impaired group (χ² = 1.980, Log-rank p = 0.159) and between the severe group and the normal group (χ² = 2.701, Log-rank p = 0.102). Multivariate Cox regression indicated that grouping was not a significant variable related to mid-term all-cause mortality. No significant difference was found in the rate of repeat revascularization between the severe group (2.4%) and the other 2 groups.

Conclusions

Patients with preoperative LVEF of ≤35% compared to preoperative LVEF of >35% increased the risk of in-hospital death and incidences of postoperative low cardiac output and prolonged ventilation, but shared similar mid-term all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization after OPCAB surgery.