Secretory Capacity of Pancreatic Beta-Cells Is Enhanced 6 Months After Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients

The current state and future of renal denervation: A review

Renal denervation as an option for difficult to treat hypertension has been a concept for several decades, with recent U.S. FDA approval of new, minimally invasive devices. However, while renal denervation has the potential to improve hypertension management, several challenges require consideration prior to widespread adoption. The effect relative to sham control is modest, and generally similar to addition of a single blood pressure lowering medication. It is possible that with additional technique refinement greater effects may be possible. Key factors to consider beyond the direction, strengths, and limitations of the renal denervation technologies themselves, are an understanding of patient groups that derive greatest benefit and phenotypes or biomarkers that predict greater response. This review provides an update on these challenges in addition to the current state and future of renal denervation within the context of hypertension management and treatment.

Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities

Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities.

Endovascular denervation (EDN): From Hypertension to Non-Hypertension Diseases

Recently, the use of endovascular denervation (EDN) to treat resistant hypertension has gained significant attention. In addition to reducing sympathetic activity, EDN might also have beneficial effects on pulmonary arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, loin pain hematuria syndrome, cancer pain and so on. In this article we will summarize the progress of EDN in clinical research.

Endovascular Celiac Denervation for Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and effects of catheter-based endovascular denervation (EDN) at the celiac artery, and the abdominal aorta around celiac artery on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With a novel catheter system, EDN was conducted at the celiac artery along with the abdominal aorta around the celiac artery in patients with T2DM whose hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was >7.5%. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 6-month. Other outcomes included safety, oral glucose tolerant test (OGTT), homeostasis-model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2hPG), and C-peptide test.

RESULTS

A total of 11 subjects were included for analysis. The technical success was 100% and no severe treatment-related adverse events or major complications were observed. Both HbA1c and HOMA-IR were significantly reduced at 6 months (9.9 vs. 8.0 %, P = 0.005; 13.3 vs. 6.0, P = 0.016). Decreases in FPG and 2hPG were observed (227.2 vs. 181.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001; 322.2 vs. 205.2 mg/dL, P = 0.001). C-peptide test indicated improved beta-cell function (area under curve [AUC] 0.23 vs. 0.28 pmol/mL, P =0.046). A reduction of daily insulin injection (P = 0.02) and improvement of liver function (alanine aminotransferase, P = 0.014; γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, P = 0.021) were also observed.

CONCLUSION

EDN at the celiac artery and the abdominal aorta around celiac artery elicited a clinically significant improvement in glycemic control and insulin resistance in patients with T2DM, with good tolerability as 6-month follow-up demonstrated.

Blood pressure changes after renal denervation are more pronounced in women and nondiabetic patients: findings from the Austrian Transcatheter Renal Denervation Registry

OBJECTIVES

Three recently published sham-controlled studies proved the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in hypertensive patients. The study presented here analyzed a nationwide multicentre registry database to clarify which patient subgroups benefit most from radiofrequency RDN.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis from the multicentre Austrian Transcatheter Renal Denervation Registry hosted by the Austrian Society of Hypertension. We correlated change of SBP after RDN to sex and presence/absence of comorbidities. Univariable correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-one patients (43% women, median age 64 years) undergoing RDN between April 2011 and September 2014 were included in this analysis. Mean baseline ambulatory 24 h BP (systolic/diastolic) was 150 ± 18/89 ± 14 mmHg and mean baseline office BP was 170 ± 16/94 ± 14 mmHg.After RDN, mean ambulatory 24 h BP reduction was 9 ± 19/6 ± 16 mmHg. The following features were associated with a good response to RDN: high baseline systolic ambulatory BP, high baseline diastolic office BP, female sex, absence of diabetes mellitus, and absence of peripheral artery disease. Multivariable analysis identified female sex and absence of diabetes mellitus as strongest predictors for ambulatory BP reduction, although those groups had the lowest baseline ambulatory BP.

DISCUSSION

Ambulatory BP reductions after RDN were substantially more pronounced in female and in nondiabetic patients despite lower baseline BP. It is concluded that in terms of efficacy female patients and nondiabetic patients might benefit more from RDN.