PRKAG2 Glycogen Storage Disease Cardiomyopathy: Out of the Darkness and Into the Light

The Genetic Factors Influencing Cardiomyopathies and Heart Failure across the Allele Frequency Spectrum

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Understanding the genetic basis of HF allows for the development of disease-modifying therapies, more appropriate risk stratification, and personalised management of patients. The advent of next-generation sequencing has enabled genome-wide association studies; moving beyond rare variants identified in a Mendelian fashion and detecting common DNA variants associated with disease. We summarise the latest GWAS and rare variant data on mixed and refined HF aetiologies, and cardiomyopathies. We describe the recent understanding of the functional impact of titin variants and highlight FHOD3 as a novel cardiomyopathy-associated gene. We describe future directions of research in this field and how genetic data can be leveraged to improve the care of patients with HF.

Controversial molecular functions of CBS versus non-CBS domain variants of PRKAG2 in arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy: A case report and literature review

Background

PRKAG2 cardiac syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by a PRKAG2 gene variant. There are several major adverse cardiac presentations, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and life‐threatening arrhythmia. Two cases with pathogenic variants in the PRKAG2 gene are reported here who presents different cardiac phenotypes.

Methods

Exome sequencing and variant analysis of PRKAG2 were performed to obtain genetic data, and clinical characteristics were determined.

Results

The first proband was a 9‐month‐old female infant (Case 1), and was identified with severe DCM and resistant heart failure. The second proband was a 10‐year‐old female infant (Case 2), and presented with HCM and ventricular preexcitation. Exome sequencing identified a de novo c.425C > T (p.T142I) heterozygous variant in the PRKAG2 gene for Case 1, and a c.869A > T (p.K290I) for Case 2. The mutated sites in the protein were labeled and identified as p.K290 in the CBS domain and p.T142 in the non‐CBS domain. Differences in the molecular functions of CBS and non‐CBS domains have not been resolved, and variants might lead to the different cardiomyopathy phenotypes. Single‐cell RNA analysis demonstrated similar expression levels of PRKAG2 in cardiomyocytes and conductive tissues. These results suggest that the arrhythmia induced by the PRKAG2 variant was the primary change, and not secondary to cardiomyopathy.

Conclusion

In summary, this is the first case report to describe a DCM phenotype with early onset in patients possessing a PRKAG2 c.425C > T (p.T142I) pathogenic variant. Our results aid in understanding the molecular function of non‐CBS variants in terms of the disordered sequence of transcripts. Moreover, we used scRNA‐seq to show that electrically conductive cells express a higher level of PRKAG2 than do cardiomyocytes. Therefore, variants in PRKAG2 are expected to also alter the biological function of the conduction system.