Risk Stratification of Patients Undergoing Mitral TEER

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) using MitraClip was more effective than surgery or medical therapy for long-term morbidity and mortality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) databases to identify relevant studies that recruited adult patients with functional or secondary mitral valve regurgitation who underwent PMVr with MitraClip implantation using appropriate search terms and Boolean operators. The odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using the random-effects model. A total of 14 studies recruiting 2,593 patients were included. Within 12 months of follow-up, patients who underwent PMVr did not maintain mitral valve regurgitation grade 2+ (OR 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12 to 0.41, p <0.0001, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.52) or symptom-free heart failure (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.77, p = 0.0028, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.66) compared with their surgical counterparts. Patients were more likely to be rehospitalized for heart failure (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.05, p = 0.0007, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.51). However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Whereas, in comparison with medical therapy, PMVr significantly reduced all-cause mortality at 12 and ≥24 months of follow-up (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24, 0.69, p = 0.0009, I2 = 32%, p = 0.23 and OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40, 0.75, p = 0.0002, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.45, respectively). In conclusion, there was no difference in all-cause death at 12 or 24 months of follow-up between PMVr and the surgical approach, but the durability of valvular repair was inferior with PMVr. In comparison with medical therapy, there was a significant reduction in mortality with PMVr.

Safety and Feasibility of Staged Versus Concomitant Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The data on the safety and feasibility of performing concomitant or staged transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains limited. The Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify TEER and TAVI procedures from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification administrative data. A total of 627 weighted cases of TEER and TAVI procedures were included in the analysis. Of those cases, 453 underwent staged TEER after TAVI, whereas 174 had concomitant TAVI and TEER during the same admission. Patients who underwent staged procedures were mostly men (64.8%, p = 0.02) and had a higher median age of 85 years (interquartile range 79 to 88) versus 82 years (interquartile range 72 to 86) in the concomitant procedure group. The adjusted propensity-matched mortality rate was similar for staged versus same-admission procedures (6.1% vs 7.0%, p = 0.79). In-hospital complication rates, including acute kidney injury, vascular complications, need for percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical support, and pacemaker implantation, were higher for the same-admission TEER and TAVI group than TEER performed as a staged procedure. Nonhome facility discharges and length of hospital stay (15 vs 4 days) were also significantly higher for the concomitant same-admission TEER and TAVI groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality rate between patients who underwent concomitant or staged TEER and TAVI procedures, whereas complication rates were significantly higher in the concomitant group.

Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for COAPT-Ineligible Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

Up to half of real-world patients with secondary mitral regurgitation who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) do not meet the highly selective COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) criteria. No randomized trials or standardized and validated tools exist to evaluate the risk: benefit ratio of TEER in this specific population. We sought to derive and externally validate a clinical risk score to predict the risk of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization for COAPT-ineligible patients who underwent TEER (CITE score). The study population consisted of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation having at least 1 exclusion criterion of the COAPT trial. The derivation cohort included 489 patients from the GIOTTO (GIse registry of Transcatheter treatment of Mitral Valve regurgitaTiOn) registry. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of 2-year death/HF hospitalization and develop a numerical risk score. The predictive performance was assessed in the derivation cohort and validated in 268 patients from the MiZüBr (Milan-Zürich-Brescia) registry. The CITE score (hemodynamic instability, left ventricular impairment, New York Heart Association class III/IV, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, brain natriuretic peptide, and hemoglobin) showed a c-index for 2-year death or HF hospitalization of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.73) in the derivation cohort, and 0.68 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.73) in the validation cohort. A cutoff of <12 points was selected to identify patients at lower risk of adverse outcomes, hazard ratio of 0.35 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.46). In conclusion, the CITE score is a simple 7-item tool for the prediction of death or HF hospitalization at 2 years after TEER in COAPT-ineligible patients. The score may support clinical decision-making by identifying those patients who, even if excluded from clinical trials, can still benefit from TEER.