Location of Aortic Enlargement and Risk of Type A Dissection at Smaller Diameters

Patient-specific ascending aortic intervention criteria

OBJECTIVES

Ascending aortic aneurysms pose a different risk to each patient. We aim to provide personalized risk stratification for such patients based on sex, age, body surface area and aneurysm location (root versus ascending).

METHODS

Root and ascending diameters, and adverse aortic events (dissection, rupture, death) of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm patients were analysed. Aortic diameter was placed in context vis-a-vis the normal distribution in the general population with similar sex, age and body surface area, by conversion to z scores. These were correlated of major adverse aortic events, producing risk curves with 'hinge points' of steep risk, constructed separately for the aortic root and mid-ascending aorta.

RESULTS

A total of 1162 patients were included. Risk curves unveiled generalized thresholds of z = 4 for the aortic root and z = 5 for the mid-ascending aorta. These correspond to individualized thresholds of less than the standard criterion of 5.5 cm in the vast majority of patients. Indicative results include a 75-year-old typical male with 2.1 m2 body surface area, who was found to be at increased risk of adverse events if root diameter exceeds 5.15 cm, or mid ascending exceeds 5.27 cm. An automated calculator is presented, which identifies patients at high risk of adverse events based on sex, age, height, weight, and root and ascending size.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis exploits a large sample of aneurysmal patients, demographic features of the general population, pre-dissection diameter, discrimination of root and supracoronary segments, and statistical tools to extract thresholds of increased risk tailor-made for each patient.

A predictive model of 30-day mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease that requires an effective predictive model to predict and assess a patient's risk of death. Our study aimed to construct a model for predicting the risk of 30-day death in patients with ATAAD and the prediction accuracy of the German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) Score and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II) was verified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2019 and June 2023, 109 patients with ATAAD underwent surgical treatment at our hospital (35 in the death group and 74 in the survival group). The differences in image parameters between the two groups were compared. Search for independent predictors and develop models that predict 30-day mortality in patients with ATAAD. GERAADA Score and EuroSCORE II were retrospectively calculated and indicated mortality was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis showed that ascending aortic length and pericardial effusion were independent predictors of death within 30 days in patients with ATAAD. We constructed four models, GERAADA Score (Model 1), EuroSCORE II (Model 2), Model 1, ascending aorta length, and pericardial effusion (Model 3), and Model 2, ascending aorta length, and pericardial effusion (Model 4). The area under the curve (AUC = 0.832) of Model 3 was significantly different from those of Models 1 (AUC = 0.683) and 2 (AUC = 0.599), respectively (p < 0.05, DeLong test).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ascending aorta length and pericardial effusion to the GERAADA Score can improve the predictive power of 30-day mortality in patients with ATAAD.

Mechanisms of Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart disease and exposes patients to an increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection. Aortic dilation is a slow, silent process, leading to a greater risk of aortic dissection. The prevention of adverse events together with optimization of the frequency of the required lifelong imaging surveillance are important for both clinicians and patients and motivated extensive research to shed light on the physiopathologic processes involved in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. Two main research hypotheses have been consolidated in the last decade: one supports a genetic basis for the increased prevalence of dilation, in particular for the aortic root, and the second supports the damaging impact on the aortic wall of altered flow dynamics associated with these structurally abnormal valves, particularly significant in the ascending aorta. Current opinion tends to rule out mutually excluding causative mechanisms, recognizing both as important and potentially clinically relevant.

Nonsize Criteria for Surgical Intervention on the Ascending Thoracic Aorta

For decades, aortic surgery has relied on size criteria for intervention on the ascending aorta. While diameter has served well, diameter alone falls short of an ideal criterion. Herein, we examine the potential application of other, nondiameter criteria in aortic decision-making. These findings are summarized in this review. We have conducted multiple investigations of specific alternate nonsize criteria by leveraging our extensive database, which includes complete, verified anatomic, clinical, and mortality data on 2,501 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and dissections (198 Type A, 201 Type B, and 2102 TAAs). We examined 14 potential intervention criteria. Each substudy had its own specific methodology, reported individually in the literature. The overall findings of these studies are presented here, with a special emphasis on how the findings can be incorporated into enhanced aortic decision-making-above and beyond sheer diameter. The following nondiameter criteria have been found useful in decision-making regarding surgical intervention. (1) Pain: In the absence of other specific cause, substernal chest pain mandates surgery. Well-developed afferent neural pathways carry warning signals to the brain. (2) Aortic length/tortuosity: Length is emerging as a mildly better predictor of impending events than diameter. (3) Genes: Specific genetic aberrations provide a powerful predictor of aortic behavior; malignant genetic variants obligate earlier surgery. (4) Family history: Aortic events closely follow those in relatives with a threefold increase in likelihood of aortic dissection for other family members once an index family dissection has occurred. (5) Bicuspid aortic valve: Previously thought to increase aortic risk (as a "Marfan light" situation), current data show that bicuspid valve is not a predictor of higher risk. (6) Diabetes actually protects against aortic events, via mural thickening and fibrosis. (7) Biomarkers: A specialized "RNA signature test" identifies aneurysm-bearing patients in the general population and promises to predict impending dissection. (8) Aortic stress: Blood pressure (BP) elevation from anxiety/exertion precipitates dissection, especially with high-intensity weightlifting. (9) Root dilatation imposes higher dissection risk than supracoronary ascending aneurysm. (10) Inflammation on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging implies high rupture risk and merits surgical intervention. (11) A KIF6 p.Trp719Arg variant elevates aortic dissection risk nearly two-fold. (12) Female sex confers some increased risk, which can be largely accommodated by using body-size-based nomograms (especially height nomograms). (13) Fluoroquinolones predispose to catastrophic dissection events and should be avoided rigorously in aneurysm patients. (14) Advancing age makes the aorta more vulnerable, increasing likelihood of dissection. In conclusion, nondiameter criteria can beneficially be brought to bear on the decision to observe or operate on specific TAA.

Editor-in-Chief's Top Picks From 2022

Each week, I record audio summaries for every paper in JACC, as well as an issue summary. This process has become a true labor of love due to the time they require, but I am motivated by the sheer number of listeners (16 million plus), and it has allowed me to familiarize myself with every paper that we publish. Thus, I have selected the top 100 papers (both Original Investigations and Review Articles) from distinct specialties each year. In addition to my personal choices, I have included papers that have been the most accessed or downloaded on our websites, as well as those selected by the JACC Editorial Board members. In order to present the full breadth of this important research in a consumable fashion, we will present these abstracts in this issue of JACC, as well as their Central Illustrations and podcasts. The highlights comprise the following sections: Basic & Translational Research, Cardiac Failure & Myocarditis, Cardiomyopathies & Genetics, Cardio-Oncology, Congenital Heart Disease, Coronary Disease & Interventions, Coronavirus, Hypertension, Imaging, Metabolic & Lipid Disorders, Neurovascular Disease & Dementia, Promoting Health & Prevention, Rhythm Disorders & Thromboembolism, and Valvular Heart Disease.^1-100.