Association of Age and Sex With Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in France

Gender-based Disparity in Performing Aortic Valve Surgery in the United State Before Availability of Percutaneous Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve surgery has been performed increasingly in high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate this trend based on gender in the United States before the availability of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.

METHOD

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to calculate the age-adjusted utilization rate for aortic valve surgery from 1988 to 2011 in the United States using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding for aortic valve surgery.

RESULTS

A total population of 258,506 patients who underwent aortic valve between 1988 and 2011 were available for our study over the age of 20. We found that the age-adjusted rate of aortic valve surgery gradually increased from 1988 until 2009 and stabilized thereafter with a persistently higher rate for men. For men, age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 13.3 per 100,000 versus 27.0 in year in the year 2011 per 100,000. For women, the age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 6.07 per 100,000 versus 11.4 in year 2011 per 100,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve surgery utilization has stabilized in recent years in both genders in the United States. However, this rate has been persistently more than double in men. The cause of this higher utilization in males needs further investigation.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. It remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and portends worse outcomes in women than men. Disparities exist in every stage of science, from bench research to the editorial board of major journals and in every cardiovascular subspecialty. This review summarizes differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disparities in management and outcomes of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and atrial fibrillation. It also provides an overview of female representation as participants and leaders of clinical trials, editorial boards, and academic institutions. Strategies to overcome these disparities are proposed with examples of successful programs.