1
|
Nasir MM, Amir S, Shahid A, Rehman WU, Haris M, Ikram A, Mubariz M, Ahmed J, Khan U, Iqbal AG, Saeed H, Noori MAM. Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement versus redo-surgical mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2024; 415:132448. [PMID: 39153510 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Bioprosthetic mitral valve degeneration is traditionally treated with Redo-SMVR, but the latest ViV-TMVR procedure offers a less invasive and lower risk alternative. A systematic literature search was conducted on Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Medline (PubMed interface) electronic databases from inception till 15th April 2024. We used risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We included a total of eleven studies with 11,931 patients in the final quantitative and qualitative analysis. When comparing ViV-TMVR with Redo-SMVR, no significant difference was found for 30-day mortality (P = 0.13) and 1-year mortality (P = 0.91), whereas patients in the ViV-TMVR showed significantly reduced incidence of stroke (P < 0.00001), In-hospital mortality (P), bleeding complications (P = 0.003), AKI (P = 0.0006), arrhythmias (P = 0.01), LVOT obstruction (P = 0.04), and PPI (P < 0.00001). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between either group when comparing vascular complications (P = 0.97), 2-year mortality (P = 0.60) and 3-year mortality. ViV-TMVR was associated with a significant risk of paravalvular leakage (P = 0.008). Although, ViV-TMVR reduces the risk of complications associated with Redo-SMVR, larger studies are imperative to reach conclusive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Moiz Nasir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Suhaina Amir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ahmad Shahid
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wajeeh Ur Rehman
- Department of Internal Medicine, United Health Services Hospital, Johnson City, NY, USA
| | - Muhammad Haris
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | - Armeen Ikram
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Mubariz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Jawad Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ubaid Khan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Hasham Saeed
- RWJBarnabas Health/Trinitas Regional Medical Center, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ueyama HA, Licitra G, Gleason PT, Behbahani-Nejad O, Modi R, Rajagopal D, Byku I, Xie JX, Greenbaum AB, Paone G, Keeling WB, Grubb KJ, Hanzel GS, Devireddy CM, Block PC, Babaliaros VC. Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. Am J Cardiol 2024; 220:84-91. [PMID: 38604492 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Development of functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) because of chronic mitral disease and subsequent heart failure is common. However, the effect of TR on clinical outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline TR on outcomes after TMVR. This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring TMVR between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized into none/mild TR and moderate/severe TR based on baseline echocardiography. The primary outcome was 3 years all-cause death and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital events. Of the 135 patients who underwent TMVR, 64 (47%) exhibited none/mild TR at baseline, whereas 71 (53%) demonstrated moderate/severe TR. There were no significant differences in in-hospital events between the groups. At 3 years, the moderate/severe TR group exhibited a significantly increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio 3.37, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 8.41, p = 0.009). When patients with baseline moderate/severe TR were stratified by echocardiography at 30 days into improved (36%) and nonimproved (64%) TR groups, although limited by small sample size, there was no significant difference in 3-year all-cause mortality (p = 0.48). In conclusion, this study investigating the impact of baseline TR on clinical outcomes revealed that moderate/severe TR is prevalent in those who underwent TMVR and is an independent predictor of 3-year all-cause mortality. Earlier mitral valve intervention before the development of significant TR may play a pivotal role in improving outcomes after TMVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki A Ueyama
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Giancarlo Licitra
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Patrick T Gleason
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Omid Behbahani-Nejad
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Roshan Modi
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dhiren Rajagopal
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Isida Byku
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Joe X Xie
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adam B Greenbaum
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Gaetano Paone
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - W Brent Keeling
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kendra J Grubb
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - George S Hanzel
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Chandan M Devireddy
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Peter C Block
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Vasilis C Babaliaros
- Division of Cardiology, Emory Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|