Effects of Rapid Uptitration of Neurohormonal Blockade on Effective, Sustainable Decongestion and Outcomes in STRONG-HF

Acute Heart Failure: Transitioning From Symptom-Based Care to Remission

During the past century, the characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) and acute HF (AHF) have shifted from patients with severe pump failure due to rheumatic, hypertensive and ischemic heart disease to older and more obese patients with multiple severe comorbidities. The pathophysiology of AHF has shifted, in parallel, from that of advanced, end-stage pump failure caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction to age, obesity and comorbidity-related cardiovascular dysfunction combined with neurohormonal and inflammatory dysregulation or "inflammaging." With the advent of neurohormonal blockers leading to improved outcomes of patients with chronic HF, the focus of AHF therapy has also changed from care directed at early symptom improvement to therapies directed toward longer-term improvements in quality of life and outcomes. Studies conducted in the past 5 years suggest that the beneficial effects seen with the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF, mostly comprising neurohormonal blockade, can be extended to AHF when these therapies are initiated and rapidly uptitrated during admission and after discharge. A recent pilot study, CORTAHF (Effect of Short-Term Prednisone Therapy on CRP Change in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Elevated Inflammatory Markers), has suggested that these benefits can be extended by treating patients with AHF and markers of inflammatory activation with anti-inflammatory therapies. Future studies should further examine whether combined anti-inflammatory therapy and neurohormonal blockade can lead to the reversal of disrupted underlying pathophysiology and remission in patients with AHF.

Burst steroid therapy and quality of life in patients with acute heart failure: Insights from the CORTAHF trial

AIMS

Patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) treated with a 7 day prednisone course in the CORTAHF pilot trial had a greater improvement in health-related quality of life (QoL) at Day 7 in both the overall population and in patients with baseline interleukin 6 > 13 pg/mL. This post-hoc analysis examines the specific QoL domains and the relationship between clinical signs of congestion and QoL.

METHODS

In the CORTAHF pilot trial, patients with AHF and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > 20 mg/L were randomized 1:1 to once-daily oral 40 mg prednisone for 7 days plus usual care or usual care alone. Patients completed the EQ-5D-5L, including the EQ-VAS, at baseline and Days 7 and 31. We estimated baseline-adjusted treatment effects on each of the five QoL dimensions and evaluated the interaction between baseline EQ-VAS and treatment effect on hsCRP change at Day 7 (the primary endpoint). The correlation between changes in signs of congestion and EQ-VAS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 100 randomized patients, the improvement in QoL at Day 7 was driven by significant effects on the EQ-5D-5L mobility [win odds 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.12] and usual activities (win odds 1.50, 95% CI 1.05-2.20) domains. The treatment effect on 7 day hsCRP change was independent of baseline EQ-VAS (interaction P = 0.13). Decongestion and EQ-VAS improvement were correlated (r = -0.528, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and high hsCRP levels, 7 day burst steroid therapy improved QoL mostly by affecting the mobility and usual activities domains. QoL improvement was correlated with decongestion and may therefore not be a direct effect of steroid therapy, but mediated through improvement in HF symptoms and signs. Inflammatory activation was reduced by prednisone irrespective of baseline EQ-VAS.

Counteracting the Mechanisms of Heart Failure is the Most Effective Way to Decongest Patients while Improving Outcomes

Diuretic therapy is not associated with improved outcomes in heart failure and may cause significant side effects. Counteracting the core pathophysiological mechanisms of heart failure through neurohormonal blockade while reducing reliance on diuretics is potentially the most effective method of decongestion.

Prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in acute heart failure: The P-Value-AHF study

AIMS

Diuretic resistance (i.e., insufficient diuretic and natriuretic response to an appropriate dose of intravenously administered loop diuretic) is a major cause of insufficient decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF). Early assessment of diuretic and natriuretic response already after the first administration of loop diuretic is currently recommended, but few data exist on the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in AHF. The aim of this sub-study of the P-Value-AHF randomized clinical trial was to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in patients presenting with AHF in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of AHF, ≥1 sign of congestion, and NT-proBNP >1000 ng/L between February and June 2024 were prospectively screened. Loop diuretics were administered per protocol: 40 mg furosemide i.v. in diuretic-naïve patients and those on oral torasemide <40 mg, 80 mg furosemide i.v. in patients on oral torasemide ≥40 mg daily. Urine output was measured over the following 2 h and in patients with urine volume <300 mL, urine sodium concentration was additionally measured in a spot sample. Upfront diuretic resistance was defined as urine volume <300 mL in 2 h and urine sodium concentration <70 mmol/L.

RESULTS

From a total of 127 screened AHF patients presenting to the ED, 17 subjects were excluded after denial of informed consent and 17 could not be treated according to the protocol due to one or more exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 93 per-protocol-treated patients, 91 showed an adequate diuretic response either in terms of urine volume or urine sodium concentration. Only two of 93 patients (2.2%) met the criteria of upfront diuretic resistance. In a post-hoc analysis, patients with diuretic resistance had higher prevalence of chronic kidney or liver diseases, markedly lower blood pressure and heart rate, markedly higher serum creatinine and potassium levels, and lower serum sodium. Notably, clinical signs of congestion, circulating NT-proBNP, and left-ventricular ejection fraction were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront diuretic resistance in an unselected population of AHF patients presenting to the ED affects only a minority of patients. These data highlight the importance of a standardized, protocolized approach to decongestive treatment in AHF, which includes the rapid administration of loop diuretics in an adequate dose. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease and high creatinine levels were more prevalent in patients with diuretic resistance.

Initiation and sequencing of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum

Strong evidence supports the importance of rapid sequence or simultaneous initiation of quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for substantially reducing risk of mortality and hospitalization. Barring absolute contraindications for each individual medication, employing the strategy of rapid sequence, simultaneous, and/or in-hospital initiation at the time of HF diagnosis best ensures patients with HFrEF have the opportunity to benefit from proven medications and achieve large absolute risk reductions for adverse clinical outcomes. However, despite guideline recommendations supporting this approach, implementation in clinical practice remains persistently low, with less than one-fifth of eligible patients being prescribed the quadruple GDMT regimen. Additionally, for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) constitute foundational therapy for all eligible patients with significant clinical benefits within just weeks of medication initiation. Nonetheless, the burden of symptoms, functional limitations, and hospitalizations remains substantial for many of these patients, even with SGLT2i and non-steroidal MRA therapy. Additional evidence supports consideration of adjunctive therapies for HF with EF > 40% that can be tailored to the patient phenotype, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) for patients with obesity, as well as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) for patients with EF below normal. This article reviews the evidence-based sequencing of GDMT for HF across the spectrum of EF, emphasizing the rationale and benefits of early up-front initiation of quadruple medical therapy for HFrEF, rapid initiation of SGLT2i for HF regardless of EF, and prompt phenotype-specific tailored approach to adjunctive therapies for HF with EF > 40%.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Point-of-Care Urine Chloride Measured via Strip Test in Patients with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, patient self-monitoring is crucial in achieving therapeutic goals in various diseases. In heart failure (HF), it is particularly important due to the increasing role of urine composition. Therefore, we proposed this study to assess the accuracy of urine chloride (uCl-) assessment via strip test in relation to chloride and sodium (uNa+) measurements in a gold-standard laboratory method.

METHODS

Urine samples were collected before administering morning medications. Afterwards, they were analyzed concurrently using the strip test and gold-standard laboratory method.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 66 patients (82% male, mean age 68 ± 12 years), of whom 65% were diagnosed with HF and 35% without HF. Across the entire cohort, a strong correlation was observed between uCl- measured by both methods (r = 0.85; p < 0.001). However, the strip test was found to underestimate uCl- relative to the laboratory measurements (mean difference of 18 mmol/L). Furthermore, strong correlations were observed between the methods among patients with HF and without HF (r = 0.88 vs. r = 0.71, respectively; p < 0.001 for both), where they presented similar relationship patterns. Interestingly, in patients with a low glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), the correlation between both methods was greater compared to those with high eGFR (>60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (r = 0.94 vs. r = 0.76, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The relationship between uCl- from the strip test and uNa+ from the laboratory measurement was weaker than for uCl-, but it was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that point-of-care strip tests for assessing urinary chloride demonstrate high accuracy and potential utility, particularly in patients with reduced eGFR.

Decongestion in acute heart failure: Is it time to change diuretic-centred paradigm?

Congestion is a common cause of clinical deterioration and the most common clinical presentation at admission in acute heart failure (HF). Therefore, finding effective and sustainable ways to alleviate congestion has become a crucial goal for treating HF patients. Congestion is a result of complex underlying pathophysiology; therefore, it is not a direct cause of the disease but its consequence. Any therapy that directly promotes sodium/water removal only, thus targeting only clinical symptoms, neither modifies the natural course of the disease nor improves prognosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current decongestive therapies and propose a new (not diuretic-centred) paradigm of long-term congestion management in HF that attempts to correct the underlying pathophysiology, thus improving congestion, preventing its development, and favourably altering the natural course of the disease rather than merely treating its symptoms.

The Effects of Burst Steroid Therapy on Short-term Decongestion in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Pro-inflammatory Activation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CORTAHF Randomized, Open-label, Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of steroids on congestion in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AHF, NT-proBNP levels > 1500 pg/mL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels > 20 mg/L were randomized to once-daily oral 40 mg prednisone for 7 days or usual care. In this post hoc analysis, congestion score was calculated on the basis of orthopnea, edema and rales (0 reflecting lack of congestion, and 9 maximal congestion) at each time point. Among 100 eligible patients randomized, those assigned to prednisone had a greater improvement in congestion score at day 31 (win odds for the prednisone group compared to usual care at day 31 was 1.77 (95% CI 1.17-2.84; P = 0.0066) in all patients and 2.41 (95% CI 1.37-5.05; P = 0.0016) in patients with IL-6 > 13 pg/mL at baseline. In patients with congestion scores ≥ 7 at baseline, the effects of prednisone therapy on the EQ-5D visual analog scale score were 4.30 (95% CI 0.77-7.83) points at day 7 and 5.40 (0.51-10.29) points at day 31, accompanied by lower heart rate and respiratory rate and higher oxygen saturation compared to usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and inflammatory activation, 7-day steroid therapy was associated with reduction in signs of congestion up to day 31. These results need confirmation in larger studies examining potential effects of steroids on congestion, diuresis, fluid redistribution and vascular permeability as well as clinical effects in AHF.

High-intensity care for GDMT titration

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.