Effects of Rapid Uptitration of Neurohormonal Blockade on Effective, Sustainable Decongestion and Outcomes in STRONG-HF

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Point-of-Care Urine Chloride Measured via Strip Test in Patients with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, patient self-monitoring is crucial in achieving therapeutic goals in various diseases. In heart failure (HF), it is particularly important due to the increasing role of urine composition. Therefore, we proposed this study to assess the accuracy of urine chloride (uCl-) assessment via strip test in relation to chloride and sodium (uNa+) measurements in a gold-standard laboratory method.

METHODS

Urine samples were collected before administering morning medications. Afterwards, they were analyzed concurrently using the strip test and gold-standard laboratory method.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 66 patients (82% male, mean age 68 ± 12 years), of whom 65% were diagnosed with HF and 35% without HF. Across the entire cohort, a strong correlation was observed between uCl- measured by both methods (r = 0.85; p < 0.001). However, the strip test was found to underestimate uCl- relative to the laboratory measurements (mean difference of 18 mmol/L). Furthermore, strong correlations were observed between the methods among patients with HF and without HF (r = 0.88 vs. r = 0.71, respectively; p < 0.001 for both), where they presented similar relationship patterns. Interestingly, in patients with a low glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), the correlation between both methods was greater compared to those with high eGFR (>60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (r = 0.94 vs. r = 0.76, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The relationship between uCl- from the strip test and uNa+ from the laboratory measurement was weaker than for uCl-, but it was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that point-of-care strip tests for assessing urinary chloride demonstrate high accuracy and potential utility, particularly in patients with reduced eGFR.

Decongestion in acute heart failure: Is it time to change diuretic-centred paradigm?

Congestion is a common cause of clinical deterioration and the most common clinical presentation at admission in acute heart failure (HF). Therefore, finding effective and sustainable ways to alleviate congestion has become a crucial goal for treating HF patients. Congestion is a result of complex underlying pathophysiology; therefore, it is not a direct cause of the disease but its consequence. Any therapy that directly promotes sodium/water removal only, thus targeting only clinical symptoms, neither modifies the natural course of the disease nor improves prognosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current decongestive therapies and propose a new (not diuretic-centred) paradigm of long-term congestion management in HF that attempts to correct the underlying pathophysiology, thus improving congestion, preventing its development, and favourably altering the natural course of the disease rather than merely treating its symptoms.

The Effects of Burst Steroid Therapy on Short-term Decongestion in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Pro-inflammatory Activation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CORTAHF Randomized, Open-label, Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of steroids on congestion in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AHF, NT-proBNP levels > 1500 pg/mL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels > 20 mg/L were randomized to once-daily oral 40 mg prednisone for 7 days or usual care. In this post hoc analysis, congestion score was calculated on the basis of orthopnea, edema and rales (0 reflecting lack of congestion, and 9 maximal congestion) at each time point. Among 100 eligible patients randomized, those assigned to prednisone had a greater improvement in congestion score at day 31 (win odds for the prednisone group compared to usual care at day 31 was 1.77 (95% CI 1.17-2.84; P = 0.0066) in all patients and 2.41 (95% CI 1.37-5.05; P = 0.0016) in patients with IL-6 > 13 pg/mL at baseline. In patients with congestion scores ≥ 7 at baseline, the effects of prednisone therapy on the EQ-5D visual analog scale score were 4.30 (95% CI 0.77-7.83) points at day 7 and 5.40 (0.51-10.29) points at day 31, accompanied by lower heart rate and respiratory rate and higher oxygen saturation compared to usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and inflammatory activation, 7-day steroid therapy was associated with reduction in signs of congestion up to day 31. These results need confirmation in larger studies examining potential effects of steroids on congestion, diuresis, fluid redistribution and vascular permeability as well as clinical effects in AHF.

Prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in acute heart failure: The P-Value-AHF study

AIMS

Diuretic resistance (i.e., insufficient diuretic and natriuretic response to an appropriate dose of intravenously administered loop diuretic) is a major cause of insufficient decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF). Early assessment of diuretic and natriuretic response already after the first administration of loop diuretic is currently recommended, but few data exist on the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in AHF. The aim of this sub-study of the P-Value-AHF randomized clinical trial was to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in patients presenting with AHF in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of AHF, ≥1 sign of congestion, and NT-proBNP >1000 ng/L between February and June 2024 were prospectively screened. Loop diuretics were administered per protocol: 40 mg furosemide i.v. in diuretic-naïve patients and those on oral torasemide <40 mg, 80 mg furosemide i.v. in patients on oral torasemide ≥40 mg daily. Urine output was measured over the following 2 h and in patients with urine volume <300 mL, urine sodium concentration was additionally measured in a spot sample. Upfront diuretic resistance was defined as urine volume <300 mL in 2 h and urine sodium concentration <70 mmol/L.

RESULTS

From a total of 127 screened AHF patients presenting to the ED, 17 subjects were excluded after denial of informed consent and 17 could not be treated according to the protocol due to one or more exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 93 per-protocol-treated patients, 91 showed an adequate diuretic response either in terms of urine volume or urine sodium concentration. Only two of 93 patients (2.2%) met the criteria of upfront diuretic resistance. In a post-hoc analysis, patients with diuretic resistance had higher prevalence of chronic kidney or liver diseases, markedly lower blood pressure and heart rate, markedly higher serum creatinine and potassium levels, and lower serum sodium. Notably, clinical signs of congestion, circulating NT-proBNP, and left-ventricular ejection fraction were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront diuretic resistance in an unselected population of AHF patients presenting to the ED affects only a minority of patients. These data highlight the importance of a standardized, protocolized approach to decongestive treatment in AHF, which includes the rapid administration of loop diuretics in an adequate dose. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease and high creatinine levels were more prevalent in patients with diuretic resistance.

High-intensity care for GDMT titration

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.