An Integrative, Multiparametric Approach to Mitral Regurgitation Evaluation

Clinical Impact of the Volumetric Quantification of Ventricular Secondary Mitral Regurgitation by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The assessment of ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation (v-SMR) severity through effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculations using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the two-dimensional echocardiography volumetric method (2DEVM) is prone to underestimation. Accordingly, we sought to investigate the accuracy of the three-dimensional echocardiography volumetric method (3DEVM) and its association with outcomes in v-SMR patients.

METHODS

We included 229 patients (70 ± 13 years, 74% men) with v-SMR. We compared EROA and RegVol calculated by the 3DEVM, 2DEVM, and PISA methods. The end point was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death for any cause.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 20 ±11 months, 98 patients (43%) reached the end point. Regurgitant volume and EROA calculated by 3DEVM were larger than those calculated by 2DEVM and PISA. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, both EROA (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P = .008) and RegVol (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82; P = .02) measured by 3DEVM showed the highest association with the outcome at 2 years compared to PISA and 2DEVM (P < .05 for all). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of events in patients with EROA ≥ 0.3 cm2 (cumulative survival at 2 years: 28% ± 7% vs 32% ± 10% vs 30% ± 11%) and RegVol ≥ 45 mL (cumulative survival at 2 years: 21% ± 7% vs 24% ± 13% vs 22% ± 10%) by 3DEVM compared to those by PISA and 2DEVM, respectively. In Cox multivariable analysis, 3DEVM EROA remained independently associated with the end point (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .02). The model including EROA by 3DEVM provided significant incremental value to predict the combined end point compared to those using 2DEVM (net reclassification index = 0.51, P = .003; integrated discrimination index = 0.04, P = .014) and PISA (net reclassification index = 0.80, P < .001; integrated discrimination index = 0.06, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Effective regurgitant orifice area and RegVol calculated by 3DEVM were independently associated with the end point, improving the risk stratification of patients with v-SMR compared to the 2DEVM and PISA methods.

Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Patient Selection and Optimization

Functional mitral regurgitation appears commonly among all heart failure phenotypes and can affect symptom burden and degree of maladaptive remodeling. Transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair therapies recently became an important part of the routine heart failure armamentarium for carefully selected and medically optimized candidates. Patient selection is considering heart failure staging, relevant comorbidities, as well as anatomic criteria. Indications and device platforms are currently expanding.

The Pixel Variation Score: An Echocardiographic Index to Assess Temporal Variation of Mitral Regurgitant Flow

BACKGROUND

In mitral regurgitation (MR), temporal variation of MR flow has been considered an important reason for inaccurate MR grading. Current echocardiographic methods for assessing temporal MR flow variation are complex, and their clinical relevance has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated whether assessing MR flow variation using a dimensionless index with echocardiography is feasible, clinically meaningful, and related to patient outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP, n = 244) and functional MR (FMR, n = 396) underwent comprehensive echocardiography. Mitral regurgitation severity was assessed using an integrated approach advocated by current guidelines. The MR continuous-wave Doppler envelope was divided into 3 segments of equal duration. Each segment's pixel intensity was assessed to calculate the pixel variation score (PVS).

RESULTS

The PVS was lower in FMR patients than in MVP patients. Lower PVS was associated with worse MR, larger left atrial and left ventricular dimensions, lower ejection fraction, and higher pulmonary artery pressures. In MVP, PVS was significantly associated with postoperative left ventricular reverse remodeling and was able to reclassify most patients in whom single-frame measures overestimated MR severity. Finally, PVS had incremental prognostic value on top of clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporal variation in MR flow can reliably be assessed with echocardiography through analysis of the continuous-wave Doppler signal. A high PVS value may alert the echocardiographer to defer from single-frame MR grading and also suggests that the MR is probably not severe.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed "moderate" MR.