Percutaneous Epicardial Pacing using a Novel Insulated Multi-electrode Lead

Epicardial Ablation Complications

The percutaneous epicardial approach has become an adjunctive tool for electrophysiologists to treat disparate cardiac arrhythmias, including accessory pathways, atrial tachycardia, and particularly ventricular tachycardia. This novel technique prompted a strong impulse to perform epicardial access as an alternative strategy for pacing and defibrillation, left atrial appendage exclusion, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and genetically engineered tissue delivery. However, because of the incremental risk of major complications compared with stand-alone endocardial ablation, it is still practiced in a limited number of highly experienced centers across the world.

The Future of Percutaneous Epicardial Interventions

The pericardial space provides a unique vantage point to access different cardiac structures for diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias and other nonelectrophysiologic conditions, such as heart failure. There have been notable innovations to improve safety of percutaneous pericardial access and its use for various procedures. Percutaneous pericardial device therapies for pacing and defibrillation have been in development, success of which will be a significant advance in treatment of bradyarrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prevention of arrhythmic deaths. There is need for continued efforts in development and expansion of this technique and a systematic approach to monitor efficacy and safety outcomes.

A Novel Defibrillation Tool: Percutaneously Delivered, Partially Insulated Epicardial Defibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Epicardial defibrillation systems currently require surgical access. We aimed to develop a percutaneous defibrillation system with partially-insulated epicardial coils to focus electrical energy on the myocardium and prevent or minimize extra-cardiac stimulation.

METHODS

We tested 2 prototypes created for percutaneous introduction into the pericardial space via a steerable sheath. This included a partially-insulated defibrillation coil and a defibrillation mesh with a urethane balloon acting as an insulator to the face of the mesh not in contact with the epicardium. The average energy associated with a chance of successful defibrillation 75% of the time (ED75) was calculated for each experiment.

RESULTS

Of 16 animal experiments, 3 pig experiments had malfunctioning mesh prototypes such that results were unreliable; these were excluded. Therefore, 13 animal experiments were analyzed - 6 canines (29.8±4.0kg); 7 pigs (41.1±4.4kg). The overall ED75 was 12.8±6.7J (10.9±9.1J for canines; 14.4±3.9J in pigs [P=0.37]). The lowest ED75 obtained in canines was 2.5J while in pigs it was 9.5J. The lowest energy resulting in successful defibrillation was 2J in canines and 5J in pigs. There was no evidence of coronary vessel injury or trauma to extra-pericardial structures.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous, epicardial defibrillation using a partially insulated coil is feasible and appears to be associated with low defibrillation thresholds. Focusing insulation may limit extra-cardiac stimulation and potentially lower energy requirements for efficient defibrillation.

Comparing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial ablation in swine versus canine models

BACKGROUND

Choosing the appropriate animal model for development of novel technologies requires an understanding of anatomy and physiology of these different models. There are little data about the characteristics of different animal models for the study of technologies used for epicardial ablation. We aimed to compare the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial radiofrequency ablation between swine and canine models using novel epicardial ablation catheters.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using data obtained from epicardial ablation experiments performed on swine (Sus Scrofa) and canine (Canis familiaris) models. We compared the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during ablation between swine and canine using multivariate regression analysis. Six swine and six canine animals underwent successful epicardial radiofrequency ablation. A total of 103 ablation applications were recorded.

RESULTS

Ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardioversion occurred in 13.11% of radiofrequency ablation applications in swine and 9.75% in canine (relative risk: 117.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.97-164.69, animal-based odds ratio [OR]: .55, 95% CI: .23-61.33; P = .184). When adjusting for application position, duration of ablation and power, the odds of developing potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia in swine increased significantly compared to canine (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.35-9.55; P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

The swine myocardium is more susceptible to developing ventricular arrhythmias compared to canine model during epicardial ablation. This issue should be carefully considered in future studies.

Use of Bipolar Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Background:

Arrhythmia management is a complex process involving both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Radiofrequency ablation is the pillar of non-pharmacological arrhythmia treatment. Unipolar ablation is considered to be the gold standard in the treatment of the majority of arrhythmias; however, its efficacy is limited to specific cases. In particular, the creation of deep or transmural lesions to eliminate intramurally originating arrhythmias remains inadequate. Bipolar ablation is proposed as an alternative to overcome unipolar ablation boundaries.

Results:

Despite promising results gained from in vitro and animal studies showing that bipolar ablation is superior in creating transmural lesions, the use of bipolar ablation in daily clinical practice is limited. Several studies have been published showing that bipolar ablation is effective in the treatment of clinical arrhythmias after failed unipolar ablation, however, there is inconsistency regarding the safety of bipolar ablation within the available research papers. According to research evidence, the most common indications for bipolar ablation use are ventricular originating rhythmic disorders in patients with structural heart disease resistant to standard radiofrequency ablation.

Conclusion:

To allow wider clinical application the efficiency and safety of bipolar ablation need to be verified in future studies.

Near-field impedance accurately distinguishes among pericardial, intracavitary, and anterior mediastinal position

INTRODUCTION

Epicardial catheter ablation is increasingly used to treat arrhythmias with an epicardial component. Nevertheless, percutaneous epicardial access remains associated with a significant risk of major complications. Developing a technology capable of confirming proper placement within the pericardial space could decrease complication rates. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in bioimpedance among the pericardial space, anterior mediastinum, and right ventricle.

METHODS

An ovine model (n = 3) was used in this proof-of-concept study. A decapolar catheter was used to collect bipolar impedance readings; data were collected between each of five electrode pairs of varying distances. Data were collected from three test regions: the pericardial space, anterior mediastinum, and right ventricle. A control region in the inferior vena cava was used to normalize the data from the test regions. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences among regions.

RESULTS

A total of 10 impedance values were collected in each animal between each of the five electrode pairs in the three test regions (n = 340) and the control region (n = 145). The average normalized impedance values were significantly different among the pericardial space (1.760 ± 0.370), anterior mediastinum (3.209 ± 0.227), and right ventricle (1.024 ± 0.207; P < 0.0001). In post hoc testing, the differences between each pair of regions were significant, as well (P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Impedance values are significantly different among these three anatomical compartments. Therefore, impedance can be potentially used as a means to guide percutaneous epicardial access.