1
|
Zhang A, Ding L, Zhang H, Mi L, Yu F, Tang M. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary hypertension patients with atrial flutter. ESC Heart Fail 2024; 11:883-892. [PMID: 38200382 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to evaluate the effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and the factors influencing mortality after RFCA in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-eight consecutive PH patients with AFL who underwent an electrophysiological study and RFCA between April 2013 and August 2021 were selected for this study. In the study population, pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) was the most common type of PH (n = 34, 59%), followed by idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) (n = 19, 33%). Typical atrial flutter was the most common type of atrial flutter (n = 50, 86.2%). Sinus rhythm was restored in 53 (91.4%) patients during RFCA. After a mean follow-up of 33.8 months, AFL recurred in a total of 22 patients. Nine of them underwent repeat RFCA, and the site of the repeat ablation was not exactly the same as the first. At a median follow-up of 34.6 months after the last ablation, none of the patients who underwent repeat RFCA experienced AFL recurrence, and all of these patients survived. There were no procedure-related complications during hospitalization or follow-up. Univariate Cox regression analysis suggested that AFL recurrence after the last ablation was not associated with all-cause mortality. NT-proBNP (HR: 1.00024, 95% CI: 1.00008-1.00041, P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (HR: 1.048, 95% CI: 1.020-1.076, P = 0.001), and IPAH (vs. PAH-CHD, HR 7.720, 95% CI: 1.437-41.483, P = 0.017) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality in PH patients with AFL after RFCA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) of PASP for predicting all-cause mortality was 0.708. There was no significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier curves for all-cause mortality between patients with AFL recurrence after the last ablation and those without recurrence (P = 0.851). Patients with higher PASP (≥110 mmHg) and IPAH showed the lower survival rate in Kaplan-Meier curves. CONCLUSION Repeat ablation was safe and feasible in patients with recurrent AFL and can maintain sinus rhythm. AFL recurrence was not associated with all-cause mortality, and patients with high PASP or IPAH were at higher risk for adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikai Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Ding
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongda Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lijie Mi
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fengyuan Yu
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Tang
- Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peipert BJ, Spinosa D, Howell EP, Weber JM, Truong T, Harris BS. Innovations in infertility: a comprehensive analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:1381-1390. [PMID: 34256949 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the interventional clinical trials in infertility and to assess whether trial location or industry sponsorship was associated with trial noncompletion. DESIGN Retrospective review of trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. SETTING None. PATIENT(S) None. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Descriptive statistics characterizing the attributes of the clinical trials including intervention type, topic, population, completion status, size, location, sponsor, and results. The effects of the sponsor and trial location on trial noncompletion were assessed via logistic regression. RESULT(S) In total, 505 trials initiated between 2010 and 2020 were included in our analysis. Drug interventions were the most commonly studied (45%); ovarian stimulation trials accounted for 27% of the studies. Live birth was tracked as an outcome by 20% of the studies; 3% of the trials included mental health outcomes. Few trials (15%) enrolled male participants. Only 11% of the trials reported results, and 4% of the trials reported the race or ethnicity of the participants. Most trials (82%) were conducted outside the United States. Overall, 18% of the trials were not completed, most often because of lack of accrual (47%). United States trials had over twice the odds of noncompletion in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval = [1.47, 4.17]); however, this relationship lost significance after adjusting for potential confounders (odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.42, 2.14]). Trial sponsorship was not associated with trial noncompletion. CONCLUSION(S) Infertility trials predominantly investigated drug interventions, particularly ovarian stimulation. Live birth was an infrequent outcome despite its relevance to patients. Clinical trials should aim to address the unmet needs in fertility care and be inclusive of underserved populations affected by infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J Peipert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel Spinosa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth P Howell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeremy M Weber
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tracy Truong
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Benjamin S Harris
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Khatib SM, Benjamin EJ, Buxton AE, Calkins H, Chung MK, Curtis AB, Desvigne-Nickens P, Jais P, Packer DL, Piccini JP, Rosenberg Y, Russo AM, Wang PJ, Cooper LS, Go AS. Research Needs and Priorities for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Virtual Workshop. Circulation 2019; 141:482-492. [PMID: 31744331 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.042706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Catheter ablation has brought major advances in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As evidenced by multiple randomized trials, AF catheter ablation can reduce the risk of recurrent AF and improve quality of life. In some studies, AF ablation significantly reduced cardiovascular hospitalizations. Despite the existing data on AF catheter ablation, numerous knowledge gaps remain concerning this intervention. This report is based on a recent virtual workshop convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to identify key research opportunities in AF ablation. We outline knowledge gaps related to emerging technologies, the relationship between cardiac structure and function and the success of AF ablation in patient subgroups in whom clinical benefit from ablation varies, and potential platforms to advance clinical research in this area. This report also considers the potential value and challenges of a sham ablation randomized trial. Prioritized research opportunities are identified and highlighted to empower relevant stakeholders to collaborate in designing and conducting effective, cost-efficient, and transformative research to optimize the use and outcomes of AF ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana M Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.M.A., J.P.P.)
| | - Emelia J Benjamin
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, MA (E.J.B.)
| | - Alfred E Buxton
- Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (A.E.B.)
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (H.C.)
| | - Mina K Chung
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (M.K.C.)
| | - Anne B Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, NY (A.B.C.)
| | - Patrice Desvigne-Nickens
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.)
| | - Pierre Jais
- Cardiology Hospital, University of Bordeaux, France (P.J.)
| | - Douglas L Packer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (D.L.P.)
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.M.A., J.P.P.)
| | - Yves Rosenberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.)
| | - Andrea M Russo
- Division of Cardiology, Cooper University, Camden, NJ (A.M.R.)
| | - Paul J Wang
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, CA (P.J.W.)
| | - Lawton S Cooper
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.)
| | - Alan S Go
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland (A.S.G.).,Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (A.S.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steinberg BA, Dorian P, Anstrom KJ, Hess R, Mark DB, Noseworthy PA, Spertus JA, Piccini JP. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Research: Results of a Clinicaltrials.gov Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2019; 5:599-605. [PMID: 31122382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine how frequently patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are collected in registered clinical studies of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND Improving symptom burden and quality of life are important goals in the treatment of AF and are best measured with PROs. METHODS Data from Clincaltrials.gov were studied to identify PROs in AF studies. All studies reporting AF as the disease condition were included, and PROs were identified by search terms within the outcome measures field. Generic and AF-specific PROs were identified and assessed by study type and year. Clinicaltrials.gov reporting was compared with published reports of linked studies in PubMed. RESULTS From 1999 to 2018, 1,709 studies including AF patients were posted; 238 studies (14%) included PROs. Collection of PROs was reported in 22% of trials (n = 83 of 386) studying procedural interventions and 11% of all Phase 3 studies (n = 18 of 168). Among the 238 studies with PROs, most described "quality of life" (n = 194 [82%]), and most (n = 198 [83%]) included only generic (not AF-specific) PROs. Only 17% of studies (n = 40) reporting PROs specified a previously published AF-specific tool, most commonly the AFEQT (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life) form (n = 20 [8.4%]). Among the available PubMed citations of 391 studies, 74 studies (19%) described collecting a specific PRO tool (n = 29 [7.4%]) for an AF-specific PRO. CONCLUSIONS Despite increased emphasis on the importance of PROs in AF, a minority of registered clinical trials reported collecting PROs, with very few using validated, AF-specific PROs. Improving outcomes that are most important to patients will necessitate increased emphasis on these PROs in pivotal clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Steinberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Paul Dorian
- Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Daniel B Mark
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter A Noseworthy
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John A Spertus
- Cardiovascular Research, Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | |
Collapse
|