Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava-Related Atrial Tachycardia: A Variant of Ridge-Related Re-Entry

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava: Case series and systematic review

Introduction

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common form of thoracic venous abnormality. Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be complicated by the existence of PLSVC, which could act as an important arrhythmogenic mechanism in AF.

Methods and results

We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent CA for AF at our center between 2018 and 2021. A systematic search was also performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for research reporting CA for AF in patients with PLSVC. Sixteen patients with PLSVC were identified at our center. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 5 patients in the index procedures and in four patients receiving redo procedures. One patient experienced acute procedure failure. After a median follow-up period of 15 months, only 6 (37.5%) patients remained free from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a single procedure. In the systematic review, 11 studies with 167 patients were identified. Based on the included studies, the estimated prevalence of PLSVC in patients undergoing CA for AF was 0.7%. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 121 (74.7%) patients. Major complications in patients with PLSVC receiving AF ablation procedure included four cases of cardiac tamponades (2%), three cases of cardiac effusion (1.5%), one case of ischemic stroke, and three cases of phrenic nerve injury (1.5%) (one left phrenic nerve and two right phrenic nerve). Pooled analysis revealed that after a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (IQR 12.0–74.0 months), the long-term AF/AT-free rate was 70.6% (95% CI 62.8–78.4%, I² = 0.0%) (Central illustration). Different ablation strategies for PLSVC were summarized and discussed in the systematic review.

Conclusion

In patients with PLSVC, recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after CA for AF is relatively common. Ablation aiming for PLSVC isolation is necessitated in most patients. The overall risk of procedural complications was within an acceptable range.

High-Resolution Mapping and Ablation of Atrial Tachycardias Involving the Lateral Left Atrium

Background

The lateral left atrium (LA) is often associated with atrial tachycardia (AT) because of its complex anatomy. We sought to characterize ATs associated with the lateral LA, including the posterolateral mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial ridge.

Methods and Results

Twenty‐eight lateral LA‐associated ATs were mapped with high‐resolution mapping systems and entrainment pacing. The vein of Marshall was mapped with a 1.8‐Fr mapping catheter when possible. ATs were associated with the posterolateral MI in 18 ATs (14 perimitral, 3 small reentry, and 1 focal AT). All patients had undergone MI area ablation, and all ATs were successfully eliminated. During 27.0 (interquartile range, 10.5–40.0) months of follow‐up, all were free from any atrial tachyarrhythmias, with 3 patients on antiarrhythmics. Of 10 ATs involving the ridge or Marshall bundle, 3 were ridge related, 3 were Marshall bundle related based on vein of Marshall mapping, and 1 was a persistent left superior vena cava related AT. All 7 patients had undergone MI linear ablation. The critical isthmus was in the LA‐ridge junction or the LA‐Marshall bundle junction. Bidirectional conduction block between the LA and ridge or Marshall bundle was created. Two patients had the critical isthmus in the other area. The remaining patient had micro‐reentry in the ridge. All 10 ATs were terminated during ablation at the critical isthmus. During 12.0 (5.2–31.7) months of follow‐up, all were free from any atrial tachyarrhythmias, with 7 patients on antiarrhythmics.

Conclusions

Most ATs occurred after MI area ablation. An high resolution mapping‐guided approach is highly effective for identifying the mechanism.