Performance of Prognostic Heart Failure Models in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT.

Mortality after catheter ablation of structural heart disease related ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data describing mortality after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT).

OBJECTIVES

We describe the causes and predictors of cardiac transplant and/or mortality following catheter ablation of structural heart disease (SHD) related VT.

METHODS

Over 10-years, 175 SHD patients underwent VT ablation. Clinical characteristics, and outcomes, were compared between patients undergoing transplant and/or dying and those surviving.

RESULTS

During 2.8 (IQR 1.9-5.0) years follow-up, 37/175 (21%) patients underwent transplant and/or died following VT ablation. Prior to ablation, these patients were older (70.3 ± 11.1 vs. 62.1 ± 13.9 years, P = 0.001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] 30 ± 12% vs. 44 ± 14%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have failed amiodarone (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.050), compared to those that survived. Predictors of transplant and/or mortality included LVEF≤35% (HR 4.71 [95% CI 2.18-10.18], P < 0.001), age ≥ 65 years (HR 2.18 [95% CI 1.01-4.73], P = 0.047), renal impairment (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.80-7.74], P < 0.001), amiodarone failure (HR 2.67 [95% CI 1.27-5.63], P = 0.010) and malignancy (HR 3.09 [95% CI 1.03-9.26], P = 0.043). Ventricular arrhythmia free survival at 6-months was lower in the transplant and/or deceased, compared to non-deceased group (62% vs. 78%, P = 0.010), but was not independently associated with transplant and/or mortality. The risk score, MORTALITIES-VA, accurately predicted transplant and/or mortality (AUC: 0.872 [95% CI 0.810-0.934]).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac transplant and/or mortality after VT ablation occurred in 21% of patients. Independent predictors included LVEF≤35%, age ≥ 65 years, renal impairment, malignancy, and amiodarone failure. The MORTALITIES-VA score may identify patients at high-risk of transplant and/or dying after VT ablation.

Noninvasive neurological monitoring to enhance pLVAD-assisted ventricular tachycardia ablation - a Mini review

For critically ill patients, hemodynamic fluctuations can be life-threatening; this is particularly true for patients experiencing cardiac comorbidities. Patients may suffer from problems with heart contractility and rate, vascular tone, and intravascular volume, resulting in hemodynamic instability. Unsurprisingly, hemodynamic support provides a crucial and specific benefit during percutaneous ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Mapping, understanding, and treating the arrhythmia during sustained VT without hemodynamic support is often infeasible due to patient hemodynamic collapse. Substrate mapping in sinus rhythm can be successful for VT ablation, but there are limitations to this approach. Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy may present for ablation without exhibiting useful endocardial and/or epicardial substrate-based ablation targets, either due to diffuse extent or a lack of identifiable substrate. This leaves activation mapping during ongoing VT as the only viable diagnostic strategy. By enhancing cardiac output, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) may facilitate conditions for mapping that would otherwise be incompatible with survival. However, the optimal mean arterial pressure to maintain end-organ perfusion in presence of nonpulsatile flow remains unknown. Near infrared oxygenation monitoring during pLVAD support provides assessment of critical end-organ perfusion during VT, enabling successful mapping and ablation with the continual assurance of adequate brain oxygenation. This focused review provides practical use case scenarios for such an approach, which aims to allow mapping and ablation of ongoing VT while drastically reducing the risk of ischemic brain injury.

Complications of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia

With the increasing literature demonstrating benefits of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), the number of patients undergoing VT ablation has increased dramatically. As VT ablation is being performed more routinely, operators must be aware of potential complications of VT ablation. This review delves deeper into the practice of VT ablation with a focus on periprocedural complications.

Sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: A real-world systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sex differences have diversely affected cardiac diseases. Little is known whether these differences impact outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Objectives

To assess the impact of sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of VT.

Methods

Databases were searched from inception through December 2021. Effect estimates from individual studies were extracted and combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The outcomes of interest included VT recurrence rates, all-cause mortality, and composite outcomes of mortality, left ventricular assistant device use, and heart transplantation following VT ablation.

Results

Our analysis included 22 observational studies. There were 10,206 patients, of which 12.8% were women. We found no statistical difference between sexes for VT recurrence rate (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, P = .57, I ² = 14.9%). Similarly, there was statistical difference in neither all-cause mortality nor composite outcomes (pooled HR 0.93, P = .75, I ² = 59.1% and pooled HR 0.9, P = .33, I ² = 0%, respectively). There was a trend toward an increase in women undergoing VT ablation in the recent registries (P = .071).

Conclusion

Our contemporary analysis suggests that sex may have no impact on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of VT in patients with structural heart disease, though women are the underrepresented. However, recent VT ablation registries have involved more women in their studies. Future studies with a higher proportion of women are encouraged to verify the current perception.

Gender differences in patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to examine gender differences in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) referred for ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT).

BACKGROUND

Female patients are often underrepresented in large studies. Significant differences in the clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of female patients have been described in previous studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 88 female patients with SHD undergoing VT ablation (mean age 59 years, 56% nonischemic cardiomyopathy, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 35%, 82% in electrical storm). A case-control study with 88 male patients was performed and the results regarding clinical and procedural characteristics, acute and long-term results of the two groups were compared. The female patients had more arrhythmogenic substrate, as they more commonly presented with electrical storm (p = .016) and had a higher number of inducible VT morphologies during the procedure (p = .018). Moreover, the female patients were less likely to have an optimized heart failure medical treatment at baseline (p = .030) and required more time from the first manifestation of the VT to ablation referral (p = .034). Although fewer epicardial ablations were performed in female patients (p = .019), the two groups showed similar results regarding VT noninducibility as ablation endpoint (p = .844), major procedure-related complications (p = .719) and freedom from VT during follow-up (p = .268). Moreover, the overall mortality in the two groups was similar (p = .176). Advanced NYHA class was associated with worse transplant and assist-device-free survival in the female group.

CONCLUSION

Female patients presenting for VT ablation had more arrhythmogenic substrate and were less likely to have an optimized heart failure medical treatment. Nevertheless, the procedural acute and long-term outcomes between the two genders were similar.

Role of assist device implantation and heart transplantation in the long-term outcome of patients with structural heart disease after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Introduction

Ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) has been associated with advanced heart failure and poor survival.

Methods and results

This matched case-control study sought to assess the difference in survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and/or heart transplantation (HTX) in SHD patients undergoing VT ablation. From the initial cohort of 309 SHD patients undergoing VT ablation (187 ischemic cardiomyopathy, mean age 64 ± 12 years, ejection fraction of 34 ± 13%), 15 patients received an LVAD and nine patients HTX after VT ablation during a follow-up period of 44 ± 33 months.

Long-term survival after LVAD did not differ from the matched control group (p = 0.761), although the cause of lethal events was different. All post-HTX patients survived during follow-up.

Conclusion

In this matched case-control study on patients with SHD undergoing VT ablation, patients that received LVAD implantation had similar survival compared to the control group after 4‑year follow-up, while the patients with HTX had a significantly better outcome.

Mortality risk in dilated cardiomyopathy: the accuracy of heart failure prognostic models and dilated cardiomyopathy-tailored prognostic model

Aims

The aims of this paper were to investigate the analytical performance of the nine prognostic scales commonly used in heart failure (HF), in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to develop a unique prognostic model tailored to DCM patients.

Methods and results

The hospital and outpatient records of 406 DCM patients were retrospectively analysed. The information on patient status was gathered after 48.2 ± 32.0 months. Tests were carried out to ascertain the prognostic accuracy in DCM using some of the most frequently applied HF prognostic scales (Barcelona Bio‐Heart Failure, Candesartan in Heart Failure‐Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity, Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico‐Heart Failure, Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure, Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure, MUerte Subita en Insuficiencia Cardiaca, Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure, Seattle Heart Failure Model) and one dedicated to DCM, that of Miura et al. At follow‐up, 70 DCM patients (17.2%) died. Most analysed scores substantially overestimated the mortality risk, especially in survivors. The prognostic accuracy of the scales were suboptimal, varying between 60% and 80%, with the best performance from Barcelona Bio‐Heart Failure and Seattle Heart Failure Model for 1–5 year mortality [areas under the receiver operating curve 0.792–0.890 (95% confidence interval 0.725–0.918) and 0.764–0.808 (95% confidence interval 0.682–0.934), respectively].Based on our accumulated data, a self‐developed DCM prognostic model was constructed. The model consists of age, gender, body mass index, symptoms duration, New York Heart Association class, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, abnormal liver function, dyslipidaemia, left bundle branch block, left ventricle end‐diastolic diameter, ejection fraction, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and pharmacological and resynchronisation therapy. This newly created prognostic model outperformed the analysed HF scales.

Conclusions

An analysis of various HF prognostic models found them to be suboptimal for DCM patients. A self‐developed DCM prognostic model showed improved performance over the nine other models studied. However, further validation of the prognostic model in different DCM populations is required.

Predictors of long-term mortality after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in a contemporary cohort of patients with structural heart disease

Aims

Ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease has been established in the past decades as an effective and safe treatment. However, the prognosis and long-term outcome remains poor.

Methods and results

We investigated 309 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (186 ICM, 123 NICM; 271 males; mean age 64.1 ± 12 years; ejection fraction 34 ± 13%) after ≥1 VT ablations over a mean follow-up period of 34 ± 28 months. Electrical storm was the indication for 224 patients (73%), whereas 86 patients (28%) underwent epicardial as well as endocardial ablation. During follow-up, 132 patients (43%) experienced VT recurrence and 97 (31%) died. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy and NICM patients showed comparable results, regarding procedural endpoints, complications, VT recurrence and survival. The Cox-regression analysis for all-cause mortality revealed that the presence of higher left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV; P &lt; 0.001), male gender (P = 0.018), atrial fibrillation (AF; P &lt; 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; P = 0.001), antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up (P &lt; 0.001), polymorphic VTs (P = 0.028), and periprocedural complications (P = 0.001) were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

Ischaemic cardiomyopathy and NICM patients undergoing VT ablation had comparable results regarding procedural endpoints, complications, VT recurrence and 3-year mortality. Higher LVEDV, male gender, COPD, AF, polymorphic VTs, use of antiarrhythmics, and periprocedural complications are strong and independent predictors for increased mortality. The PAINESD score accurately predicted the long-term outcome in our cohort.

Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic-Guided Epicardial Access for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Background

The usual approach to epicardial access in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and megacolon is surgical access to avoid bowel injury. However, there are concerns regarding its safety in cases of Chagas cardiomyopathy with reports of prolonged mechanical ventilation and high mortality in this clinical setting. The aim of this study was to examine feasibility and complication rates for ventricular tachycardia ablation performed with laparoscopic‐guided epicardial access.

Methods and Results

This single center study examined complication rates of the first 11 cases of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, using laparoscopic guidance to access epicardial space. All 11 patients underwent epicardial VT ablation using laparoscopic‐guided epicardial access, and the complication rates were compared with historical medical reports. The main demographic features of our population were age, 63±13 years; men, 82%; and median ejection fraction, 31% (Q1=30% and Q3=46%). All patients were sent for ventricular tachycardia ablation because of medical therapy failure. The reason for laparoscopy was megacolon in 10 patients and massive liver enlargement in 1 patient. Epicardial access was achieved in all patients. Complications included 1 severe cardiogenic shock and 1 phrenic nerve paralysis. No intra‐abdominal organ injury occurred; only 1 death, which was caused by progressive heart failure, was reported more than 1 month after the procedure.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic‐guided epicardial access in the setting of ventricular tachycardia ablation and enlarged intra‐abdominal organ is a simple alternative to more complex surgical access and can be performed with low complication rates.

Electrophysiology's Identity Crisis: What our Clinical Trials Do and Do Not Say About Us

Although it has not always been this way, the impact of large, randomised clinical trials in electrophysiology is limited, at least compared with other disciplines in cardiology. This has been particularly true regarding procedural aspects of our field: successful randomised trials are rare and observational trials are small and typically without a proper active control group. In this article, the authors examine the reasons behind this circumstance, which include underinvestment from funding sources; lack of consensus on procedural endpoints; lack of consensus on techniques; and a therapeutic bias in favour of procedural intervention that stands in the way of investigator equipoise. Together, these factors have created a scientific culture dominated by small-scale, siloed, observational research and unwillingness to collaboratively advance the field with consensus and prospective trials. The authors feel that it is increasingly urgent to improve the scientific basis for clinical practice and explore strategies to accomplish this goal.