Atrial Tachycardia With Atrial Activation Duration Exceeding the Tachycardia Cycle Length: Mechanisms and Prevalence

Demonstration of the discrepancy between AT-wave morphology on 12-lead ECG and AT mechanism in scar-related AT

The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental modality to help determine the mechanism and the localization of atrial tachycardias (ATs). Although macroreentrant ATs and focal ATs typically show F-waves and discrete P-waves respectively on the 12-lead ECG, this is not universally the case in scar-related ATs.1, We present three cases clearly showing the discrepancy between the AT morphology on the 12-lead ECG and the AT-mechanism.

Mapping and ablation of post-AF atrial tachycardias

Atrial tachycardias are commonly encountered in patients undergoing catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Unlike typical atrial flutter that can be readily recognized and ablated, these post-AF tachycardias can arise from a wide variety of locations and involve a multiplicity of mechanisms. Apart from diagnostic challenges, radiofrequency ablation to eliminate the tachycardias may require multiple approaches. In addition, specialized techniques such as epicardial and chemical ablation may be required for definitive treatment. This review describes the various mechanisms and approaches to mapping and ablation of these challenging tachycardias.

Differentiating atrial tachycardias with centrifugal activation: Lessons from high-resolution mapping

BACKGROUND

Centrifugal activation is not always the origin of a focal atrial tachycardia (AT) ("true-focal"), but passive activation from the other structures ("pseudo-focal").

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to establish a method to differentiate true-focal from pseudo-focal.

METHODS

In 49 centrifugal activations in 35 patients with AT, 12-lead electrocardiogram, activation map, atrial global activation histogram (GAH), and local electrograms were analyzed. GAH demonstrates the relation between the activation area and timing through the cycle length, displayed with a normalized value, ranging from 0 (smallest activation area) to 1.0 (largest activation area).

RESULTS

Of 30 centrifugal activations observed in the septal region, 6/30 (20.0%) were true-focal. The remaining 24/60 (80.0%) were pseudo-focal, of which 23 (95.8%) were from the opposite chamber. P-wave/flutter-wave duration < 200 ms discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal (sensitivity 100%; specificity 54.5%; positive predictive value 33.3%; negative predictive value 100%). Multiple breakthrough ruled out the possibility of a true-focal AT. Other differentiating factors were an activation area within the initial 20 ms of <5 mm² and a typical QS pattern electrogram at the origin. Of 19 centrifugal activations observed outside the septal regions, 7 were true-focal and 12 were pseudo-focal exited from an epicardial structure: 10 of 12 (83.3%) were located around the left atrial appendage and ridge. Flutter wave, GAH score ≤ 0.05, and GAH score < 0.1 for >110 ms of cycle length differentiated true-focal from pseudo-focal with a sensitivity/negative predictive value of 100%. GAH score < 0.1 for >40% of the cycle length simply discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal with 100% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Centrifugal activation is not necessarily due to a focal AT but passive activation. The activation map with GAH in addition to the 12-lead electrocardiogram and local electrograms enables an accurate differentiation.

Catheter ablation for atrial tachycardias: How to interpret the unclear activation map?

BACKGROUND

Post-ablation atrial tachycardias (ATs) are characterized by low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods. In this study, we analyzed common mistakes during activation mapping and delineated a mapping strategy for correct interpretation of tachycardia mechanisms in patients with challenging underlying substrate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-one patients referred for AT ablation were selected for the study. Three types of incorrect activation patterns were identified, which were referred to as unrecognized block line (pseudo-macroreentry and pseudo-fig-8 reentry), incorrect activation timing window of interest (WOI) (chaotic activation), and mis-annotation of complex signals (multiple sites of "early meets late"). Pseudo-macroreentry and chaotic activation occur in focal or localized reentry AT with the error related to the WOI selection (four cases), incorrect annotation of local activation time (six cases), or a previous line of atrial block in (seven cases). Pseudo-fig-8 reentry (five cases) and multiple sites of "early meets late" (nine cases) occur in macroreentrant AT with blocked areas and low-voltage atrial substrate. All ATs were successfully eliminated at the origin site.

CONCLUSIONS

We delineated a series of ATs in the setting of a disordered pattern of activation mapping encountered in patients after previous extensive ablation or atriotomy. The algorithm proposed rapidly corrects the activation map and identifies the mechanism of the AT.

Basket catheter-guided ultra-high-density mapping of cardiac arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Ultra-high-density mapping (HDM) is increasingly used for guidance of catheter ablation in cardiac arrhythmias. While initial results are promising, a systematic evaluation of long-term outcome has not been performed so far. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on studies investigating long-term outcome after Rhythmia HDM-guided atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia catheter ablation. Results: Beyond multiple studies providing novel insights into arrhythmia mechanisms, follow-up data from 17 studies analyzing Rhythmia HDM-guided ablation (1768 patients, 49% with previous ablation) were investigated. Cumulative acute success was 100/90.2%, while 12 months long-term pooled success displayed at 71.6/71.2% (AF/atrial tachycardia). Prospective data are limited, showing similar outcome between HDM-guided and conventional AF ablation. Conclusion: Acute results of HDM-guided catheter ablation are promising, while long-term success is challenged by complex arrhythmogenic substrates. Prospective randomized trials investigating different HDM-guided ablation strategies are warranted and underway.