Significant Benefit of Uninterrupted DOACs Versus VKA During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation associated silent cerebral emboli: A narrative review

The incidence of silent cerebral emboli (SCE) associated with atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) is much higher than that of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Interventional electrophysiologists have been increasingly alerted to asymptomatic cerebral infarction over the years. Plentiful studies revealed that diagnostic definitions, detection modalities, energy sources, ablation strategies, perioperative anticoagulation regimens, and patient-related factors were associated with the risk of AFCA-associated SCE. Studies related to non-interventional procedures found that SCE may prompt stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia later in life, suggesting a possible role of AFCA-associated SCE in the cognitive function of patients with AF. However, there is no consistent evidence for this view to date. Given that the majority of patients with AF being elderly and the increased risk of cognitive impairment in AF itself, efforts should be made to minimize the occurrence of AFCA-associated SCE.

Reducing bleeding risk in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) significantly mitigates thromboembolism risks in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients yet concern about major bleeding events persist. In fact, clinically relevant hemorrhages can be life-threatening. Bleeding risk is dynamic and influenced by factors such as age, new comorbidities, and drug therapies, and should not be assessed solely based on static baseline factors.

AREAS COVERED

We comprehensively review the bleeding risk associated with OAC therapy. Emphasizing the importance of assessing both thromboembolic and bleeding risks, we present clinical tools for estimating stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and bleeding risk in AF and VTE patients. We also address overlapping risk factors and the dynamic nature of bleeding risk.

EXPERT OPINION

The OAC management is undergoing constant transformation, motivated by the primary objective of mitigating thromboembolism and bleeding hazards, thereby amplifying patient safety throughout the course of treatment. The future of OAC embraces personalized approaches and innovative therapies, driven by advanced pathophysiological insights and technological progress. This holds promise for improving patient outcomes and revolutionizing anticoagulation practices.

Real-world comparison of in-hospital complications after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between non-antivitamin K anticoagulants and warfarin: A propensity-matched analysis using nation-wide database

Background

Few large-scale, real-world studies have compared the efficacy and safety of non-antivitamin K anticoagulants (NOACs) with that of warfarin in catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study used a nationwide administrative claims database, to compare complication-incidence rates following CA for AF between NOAC-treated patients and warfarin-treated matched cohorts in the real-world. Among the 32,797,540 records between June 2011 and August 2020 from 426 hospitals, 41,347 patients (38,065 on NOACs and 3,282 on Warfarin) were considered eligible. After performing propensity matching, 6,564 patients (3,282 per group) were analyzed.

Results

The overall complication incidence was significantly lower in the NOACs group than in the warfarin group (2.3 % vs. 4.0 %; P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.74). Although no significant differences in the incidence of cardiac tamponade (1.0 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.90, OR: 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.56) and major bleeding (0.6 % vs. 0.7 %; P = 0.54, OR: 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.44-1.52) were noted, blood transfusion requirements (0.6 % vs. 1.2 %; P = 0.02, OR: 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.30-0.88) and vascular complications (0.2 % vs. 0.5 %; P = 0.02, OR: 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.79) were significantly lower in the NOACs group than in the warfarin group. Furthermore, the thromboembolic event incidence was significantly lower in the NOACs group than in the warfarin group (0.5 % vs. 1.2 %; P < 0.001, OR: 0.36, 95 % CI: 0.19-0.64).

Conclusions

NOACs should be considered as a first-line therapy for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing CA for AF.

Assessment and Mitigation of Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: Executive Summary of a European and Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Paper

While there is a clear clinical benefit of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in reducing the risks of thromboembolism, major bleeding events (especially intracranial bleeds) may still occur and be devastating. The decision for initiating and continuing anticoagulation is often based on a careful assessment of both thromboembolism and bleeding risk. The more common and validated bleeding risk factors have been used to formulate bleeding risk stratification scores, but thromboembolism and bleeding risk factors often overlap. Also, many factors that increase bleeding risk are transient and modifiable, such as variable international normalized ratio values, surgical procedures, vascular procedures, or drug-drug and food-drug interactions. Bleeding risk is also not a static "one-off" assessment based on baseline factors but is dynamic, being influenced by aging, incident comorbidities, and drug therapies. In this executive summary of a European and Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Paper, we comprehensively review the published evidence and propose a consensus on bleeding risk assessments in patients with AF and VTE, with a view to summarizing "best practice" when approaching antithrombotic therapy in these patients. We address the epidemiology and size of the problem of bleeding risk in AF and VTE, and review established bleeding risk factors and summarize definitions of bleeding. Patient values and preferences, balancing the risk of bleeding against thromboembolism, are reviewed, and the prognostic implications of bleeding are discussed. We propose consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist in everyday clinical practice.

Comparison of major bleeding events of uninterrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses comparing major bleeding of uninterrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) had no consensus. This meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the risk of major bleeding events of these two anticoagulant strategies.

METHODS

We searched online databases for randomised controlled trials that compared major bleeding events of uninterrupted NOACs and VKA during CA of AF. A fixed-effect model was used if P-value was > 0.10 and I² was < 50%, otherwise a random- effect model was used.

RESULTS

Six studies including 2392 patients were included in the analysis. The incidence of major bleeding was lower in the NOACs group than in the VKA group (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.34 - 0.93, I² = 38%, p = 0.15). Subgroup analyses showed that the incidence of severe puncture site complications was lower in the NOACs group than in the VKA group (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.30 - 0.96, I² = 16%, p = 0.32). But the incidence of cardiac tamponade (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.23 - 1.26, I² = 0%, p = 0.46), intracranial (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.03 - 2.23, I² = 0%, p = 0.82) and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.18 - 5.39, I² = 0%, p = 0.43) had no statistically differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that compared to uninterrupted VKA, uninterrupted NOACs are superior in major bleeding during CA of AF, but this superiority existed only in the aspect of severe puncture site complications.

Assessment and mitigation of bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: A Position Paper from the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care and the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society

Whilst there is a clear clinical benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in reducing the risks of thromboembolism, major bleeding events (especially intracranial bleeds) may still occur and be devastating. The decision to initiate and continue anticoagulation is often based on a careful assessment of both the thromboembolism and bleeding risk. The more common and validated bleeding risk factors have been used to formulate bleeding risk stratification scores, but thromboembolism and bleeding risk factors often overlap. Also, many factors that increase bleeding risk are transient and modifiable, such as variable international normalized ratio values, surgical procedures, vascular procedures, or drug-drug and food-drug interactions. Bleeding risk is also not a static 'one off' assessment based on baseline factors but is dynamic, being influenced by ageing, incident comorbidities, and drug therapies. In this Consensus Document, we comprehensively review the published evidence and propose a consensus on bleeding risk assessments in patients with AF and VTE, with the view to summarizing 'best practice' when approaching antithrombotic therapy in these patients. We address the epidemiology and size of the problem of bleeding risk in AF and VTE, review established bleeding risk factors, and summarize definitions of bleeding. Patient values and preferences, balancing the risk of bleeding against thromboembolism are reviewed, and the prognostic implications of bleeding are discussed. We propose consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist in everyday clinical practice.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: what is known and what needs to be explored?

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most effective rhythm control strategy and its role in the treatment of AF patients has been strengthened by recent guidelines. An increasing AF prevalence and the resulting demands on interventional electrophysiology call for improved resource allocation through both technical innovations and streamlined workflows and patient pathways. Same-day discharge is already established in the context of other electrophysiological interventions; however, its broad implementation in the practice of AF ablation is pending for several reasons, despite the fact that the body of evidence is growing and the majority of reports propagate early discharge to be feasible and safe under certain conditions. This review article is intended to provide an overview of the existing data, classify these into the specific study context, and to show limitations and open questions.

Perioperative consultative hematology: can you clear my patient for a procedure?

Periprocedural management of antithrombotics is a common but challenging clinical scenario that renders patients vulnerable to potential adverse events such as bleeding and thrombosis. Over the past decade, periprocedural antithrombotic approaches have changed considerably with the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), as well as a paradigm shift away from bridging in many warfarin patients. Successfully navigating this high-risk period relies on a number of individualized patient assessments conducted within a framework of standardized, systematic approaches. It also requires a thorough understanding of antithrombotic pharmacokinetics, multidisciplinary coordination of care, and comprehensive patient education and empowerment. In this article, we provide clinicians with a practical, stepwise approach to periprocedural management of antithrombotic agents through case-based examples of relevant clinical scenarios.

Use of NOACs Versus Vitamin K Antagonist in Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: An Updated Meta-analysis With Subgroup Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines give class I recommendations for uninterrupted use of dabigatran rivaroxaban as an alternative to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients of atrial fibrillation (AF) who are undergoing catheter ablation. The recent randomized controlled trials have shown similar efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants when compared to VKA in these patients. We sought to perform a meta-analysis with a focus on subgroup analysis of novel oral anticoagulants.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Clinical trials registry and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched through August 2020. Six RCTs studies (n = 2260) comparing the use of NOACs versus VKA in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were included. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval was computed and P < 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were considered as a primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Our results showed a significant difference in MACE between NOACs and VKA [OR 0.57 (0.37-0.88); P = 0.01] and in major bleeding events [OR 0.55 (0.35-0.86); P = 0.009], which is mainly derived from the use of dabigatran. No significant difference in MACE or major bleeding events was found on the subgroup analysis of rivaroxaban and apixaban over VKA therapy.

CONCLUSION

Uninterrupted use of NOACs are safe and effective alternative for the prevention of cerebral thromboembolism and reducing the risk of major bleeding in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. However, the individual subgroup analysis showed only dabigatran is superior to VKA in terms of reducing MACE through a reduction in major bleeding. The rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are non-inferior to VKA therapy based on these results. Further studies are needed to generalize these recommendations in morbidly obese patients.

Utilization and perception of same-day discharge in electrophysiological procedures and device implantations: an EHRA survey

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the utilization of same-day discharge (SDD) in electrophysiology (EP). An online-based questionnaire was shared with the EHRA community between 12 and 30 June 2020 and recorded institutional information, complication assessment, recent experiences, and opinions regarding possible advantages or concerns with SDD. In total, 218 responses from 49 countries provided information on current SDD management. Overall, SDD was implemented in 77.5%, whereas this proportion was significantly higher in tertiary and high-volume centres (83.8% and 85.3%, both P < 0.01). The concept of SDD was most commonly used following implantations of cardiac event recorders (97%), diagnostic EP procedures (72.2%), and implantations of pacemakers with one or two intracardiac leads (50%), while the lowest SDD utilization was observed after catheter ablations of left atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Within SDD-experienced centres, ∼90% respondents stated that this discharge concept is recommendable or highly recommendable and reported that rates of increased rehospitalization and complication rates were low. Most respondents assumed a better utilization of hospital resources (78.2%), better cost effectiveness (77.3%), and an improved patients' comfort but were concerned about possible impairment of detection (72.5%) and management (78.7%) of late complications. In conclusion, >75% of respondents already implement SDD following EP interventions with a large heterogeneity with regard to specific procedures. Further research is needed to confirm or disprove existing and expected benefits and obstacles.

Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus, A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

AIMS

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist to treat left ventricular (LV) thrombus post myocardial infarction (MI). Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) in this setting is limited. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in treating LV thrombus after MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective, randomized, multi-center open label clinical trial including patients with LV thrombus detected by 2D-transthoracic-echocardiography 1-14 days after acute MI. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in 3 medical centers, 17 patients were randomized to warfarin and 18 patients to apixaban. The primary outcome was the presence and size of LV thrombus 3 months after initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, stroke or systemic embolism, re-hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Mean LV thrombus size at enrollment was 18.5 × 12.3 mm in the warfarin group and 19.9 × 12.4 mm in the apixaban group (P = NS). Thirty-two patients completed 3 months follow-up. In the warfarin group two patients withdrew and in the apixaban group one patient died. Thrombus completely resolved in 14 of 15 patients in the warfarin group and in 16 of 17 in the apixaban group ((P = NS, P = 0.026 for non-inferiority). Two patients had major bleeding in the warfarin group while no major bleeding events were recorded in the apixaban group. There was one stroke in the warfarin group and one death in the apixaban group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that apixaban is non-inferior to warfarin for treatment of patients with LV thrombus after acute MI with a 20% non-inferiority margin.

Uninterrupted versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the safety of uninterrupted versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) for patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing uninterrupted versus interrupted DOAC for patients undergoing CA of AF. Primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or thromboembolism (TE), silent cerebral ischemic events, and cardiac tamponade. Meta-analysis was stratified by study design. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects model and Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool RR.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies (7 randomized, 6 observational) comprising 3595 patients were included. The RCT restricted analysis did not show any difference in terms of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR] = 0.79; [0.35-1.79]), minor bleeding (RR = 0.99 [0.68-1.43]), stroke or TIA or TE (RR = 0.80 [0.19-3.32]), silent cerebral ischemic events (RR = 0.64 [0.32-1.28]), and cardiac tamponade (RR = 0.61 [0.20-1.92]). Observational study restricted analysis showed a protective effect of uninterrupted DOAC on silent cerebral ischemic events (RR = 0.45 [0.31-0.67]) and no difference in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes with uninterrupted versus interrupted DOAC for CA of AF and observational data suggests that uninterrupted DOACs are protective against silent cerebral ischemic lesions.

Direct oral anticoagulants: evidence and unresolved issues

Currently licenced direct oral anticoagulants selectively target thrombin (eg, dabigatran) or coagulation factor Xa (eg, apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Designed to be given in fixed doses without routine monitoring, direct oral anticoagulants have a lower propensity for food and drug interactions than do vitamin K antagonists, and in randomised controlled trials involving around 250 000 patients, they were at least as effective for prevention and treatment of thrombosis and were associated with a lower risk of life-threatening bleeding. The absolute benefits of direct oral anticoagulants over vitamin K antagonists are modest; however, guidelines recommend them in preference to vitamin K antagonists for most indications because of their ease of use and superior safety. The greatest benefits of direct oral anticoagulants are likely to be in patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. The emergence of generic preparations is expected to further increase the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants, particularly in countries where they are currently not widely used because of cost. Direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated in patients with mechanical heart valves and should be used with caution or avoided in patients with advanced kidney or liver disease. In this Therapeutics paper, we review the pharmacology of direct oral anticoagulants, summarise the evidence that led to their approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, and explore key unresolved issues. We also briefly discuss future perspectives for the development of oral anticoagulants.

Effects of Carbamazepine and Phenytoin on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban (RIV) is commonly prescribed with carbamazepine or phenytoin (CBZ/PHT) in post-stroke seizure or post-stroke epilepsy patients. Although adverse events have been reported in several previous studies when they are coadministered, there are no studies of the interactions between these drugs. Therefore, our study was conducted to solve this lack of information. The potential effects of CBZ/PHT were investigated by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of RIV between the control group (RIV alone) and the test groups (RIV administered with CBZ/PHT) in rats using the noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and the compartmental model approach. The NCA results indicate that AUC_t of RIV decreased by 57.9% or 89.7% and C_max of RIV decreased by 43.3% or 70.0% after administration of CBZ/PHT, respectively. In addition, both CBZ and PHT generally reduced the effects of RIV on the prothrombin times of the blood samples. PK profiles of RIV were most properly described by a two-compartment disposition model with a mixed first- and zero-order absorption kinetics and a first-order elimination kinetics. The compartmental model approach showed that a 211% or 1030% increase in CL/F of RIV and a 33.9% or 43.4% increase in D2 of RIV were observed in the test groups by the effects of CBZ/PHT, respectively. In conclusion, CBZ and PHT significantly reduced RIV exposure and therefore reduced the therapeutic effects of RIV. Consequently, this might result in adverse events due to insufficient RIV concentration to attain its therapeutic effects. Further studies are needed to validate this finding.

Peri-procedural novel oral anticoagulants dosing strategy during atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at determining whether uninterrupted novel oral anticoagulant (UI-NOAC) would have similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events as minimally interrupted NOAC (MI-NOAC) at the time of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) as relevant studies are scarce.

METHODS

We searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective observational studies (POSs) or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing UI-NOAC versus MI-NOAC from their establishment to January 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the pooled treatment effect.

RESULTS

Nine studies (three POSs and six RCTs) with 2578 patients were included in the final analysis (55% patients received MI-NOAC). No significant difference was found regarding the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-2.00, P = .84, I²   = 0%). Both groups were comparable in all subgroups ([Asians: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43-2.36, P = .99, I²   = 0%], [non-Asians: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11-3.88, P = .63, I²   = 0%], [RCTs: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.37-1.97, P = .71, I²   = 0%], and [POSs: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-12.01, P = .69, I²   = 0%]). The risk of minor bleeding (P = .88) or stroke (P = .69) was comparable between the groups. UI-NOAC resulted in a significant reduction in silent stroke (SS) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = .01, I²   = 72%). No significant difference was found in SS between once-daily and twice-daily NOACs (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.33, P = .64, I²   = 0%) in the MI-NOAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

UI-NOAC, as a peri-procedural anticoagulation strategy for catheter ablation in AF, had similar safety compared with MI-NOAC, but was advantageous in terms of SS.

Factors associated with silent cerebral events during atrial fibrillation ablation in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

Silent cerebral events (SCEs) are related to the potential thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Periprocedural uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) reportedly reduced the risk of SCEs, but the incidence still remains.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were eligible. All patients took non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs; n = 248) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA; n = 37) for periprocedural OAC (>4 weeks) without interruption during the procedure. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to detect SCEs. Clinical characteristics and procedure-related parameters were compared between patients with and without SCEs. SCEs were detected in 66 patients (23.1%; SCE[+]) but were not detected in 219 patients (SCE[-]). Age was higher in SCE[+] than in SCE[-] (66 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 12 years; p < .05). Persistent AF prevalence, CHADS₂ /CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc scores, serum NT-ProBNP levels, left atrial dimension (LAD), and spontaneous echo contrast prevalence in transesophageal echocardiography significantly increased in SCE[+] versus SCE[-]. SCE[+] had lower baseline activated clotting time (ACT) before heparin injection and longer time to reach optimal ACT (>300 s) than SCE[-] (146 ± 27 vs. 156 ± 29 s and 44 ± 30 vs. 35 ± 25 min; p < .05, respectively). In multivariate analysis, age, LAD, baseline ACT, and time to reach the optimal ACT were predictors for SCEs. The average values of the ACT parameters were significantly different among NOACs/VKA.

CONCLUSION

Age, LAD, and intraprocedural ACT kinetics significantly affect SCEs during AF ablation. Different anticoagulants have different impacts on ACT during the procedure, which should be considered when estimating the risk of SCEs.

Updates in periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the prevalence of patients on antithrombotics is increasing, anesthesiologists must have a firm understanding of these medications and considerations for their periprocedural management. This review details up-to-date periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

RECENT FINDINGS

DOACs have favorable pharmacokinetics including quick onset of action and short half-lives. Periprocedural management of DOACs relies heavily on drug half-life as well as procedural risk of bleeding. Other than a few exceptions, the American College of Cardiologists generally recommends complete clearance of oral anticoagulants prior to high-risk bleeding procedures and partial clearance prior to low-risk bleeding procedures. Procedures with little to no clinical risk of bleeding can be performed without any drug interruption or during trough levels. Exceptions to periprocedural DOAC management pertain to electrophysiology procedures.

SUMMARY

With the exception of no clinically relevant bleeding risk or certain electrophysiology procedures, DOACs should be discontinued periprocedurally in accordance with bleeding risks and drug's half-life. Bridging is generally not recommended for DOACs.

Meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of using minimally interrupted novel oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The ideal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy for patients being treated with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of using a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy versus an uninterrupted NOAC or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) strategy during AF ablation.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized controlled or prospective observational studies that compared a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy with an uninterrupted NOAC or VKA strategy from the time of database establishment up to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major bleeding, minor bleeding, and symptomatic thromboembolism. The secondary endpoint was silent cerebral infarction (SCI) as detected by post-ablation brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A measurement of treatment effect for the endpoint was reported as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies (6 randomized, 11 observational, and 1 randomized registry) with 6203 patients were included in the final analysis (47% of the patients received minimally interrupted NOAC). There was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding the risk for major bleeding (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.57, P = 0.86, I² = 27%). Different stratification methods did not yield significant difference regarding the risk for major bleeding. There was no difference between groups regarding the risk for minor bleeding (P = 1.00) or symptomatic thromboembolism (P = 0.26). Brain MRI results showed that both uninterrupted NOAC (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = 0.01, I² = 72%) and uninterrupted VKA (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97, P = 0.04, I² = 36%) produced a significant reduction in the rate of SCI when compared with minimally interrupted NOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

A periprocedural anticoagulation strategy of minimally interrupted NOAC is not superior to uninterrupted NOAC or VKA when used during AF ablation. There is evidence favoring the use of uninterrupted NOAC or VKA in terms of the risk for SCI.