Multicenter Study of Dynamic High-Density Functional Substrate Mapping Improves Identification of Substrate Targets for Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease: What Is Known and New Perspectives

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease and explore novel approaches currently developing to improve procedural and long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently published trials (PARTITA, PAUSE-SCD, and SURVIVE-VT) have demonstrated the prognostic benefit of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to current clinical practice. Advanced cardiac imaging provides a valuable pre-procedural evaluation of the arrhythmogenic substrate, identifying ablation targets non-invasively. Advanced cardiac mapping techniques allow to better characterize arrhythmogenic substrate during ablation procedure. Emerging technologies like pulsed field ablation and ultra-low temperature cryoablation show promise in ventricular tachycardia ablation. Advancements in mapping techniques, ablation technologies, and pre-procedural cardiac imaging offer promise for improving ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes in ischemic heart disease.

Ablation targets of scar-related ventricular tachycardia identified by dynamic functional substrate mapping

BACKGROUND

Dynamic functional substrate mapping of scar-related ventricular tachycardia offers better identification of ablation targets with limited ablation lesions. Several functional substrate mapping approaches have been proposed, including decrement-evoked potential (DEEP) mapping. The aim of our study was to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of a DEEP-guided versus a fixed-substrate-guided strategy for the ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT).

RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients presenting for ablation of scar-related VT were randomized to either DEEP-guided or substrate-guided ablation. Late potentials were tagged and ablated in the non-DEEP group, while those in the DEEP group were subjected to RV extrastimulation after a drive train. Only potentials showing significant delay were ablated. Patients were followed for a median duration of 12 months. Twenty patients were allocated to the DEEP group, while the other 20 were allocated to the non-DEEP group. Twelve patients (60%) in the DEEP group had ischemic cardiomyopathy versus 10 patients (50%) in the non-DEEP group (P-value 0.525). Intraoperatively, the median percentage of points with LPs was 19% in the DEEP group and 20.6% in the non-DEEP group. The procedural time was longer in the DEEP group, approaching but missing statistical significance (P-value 0.059). VT non-inducibility was successfully accomplished in 16 patients (80%) in the DEEP group versus 17 patients (85%) in the non-DEEP group (P value 0.597). After a median follow-up duration of 12 months, the VT recurrence rate was 65% in both groups (P value 0.311), with a dropout rate of 10% in the DEEP group. As for the secondary endpoints, all-cause mortality rates were 20% and 25% in the DEEP and non-DEEP groups, respectively (P-value 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS

DEEP-assisted ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia is a feasible strategy with comparable short- and long-term outcomes to a fixed-substrate-based strategy with more specific ablation targets, albeit relatively longer but non-significant procedural times and higher procedural deaths. The imbalance between the study groups in terms of epicardial versus endocardial mapping, although non-significant, warrants the prudent interpretation of our results. Further large-scale randomized trials are recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05086510, registered on 28th September 2021, record https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05086510.

Utility of Substrate Mapping Using Extrasystole to Localise Comprehensive Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits: Results From Intra-operative Mapping Studies

BACKGROUND

Substrate mapping-based identification of all ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits (diastolic activation), including partial and complete diastolic circuits in clinical and nonclinical VT, could be beneficial in guiding VT ablation to prevent VT recurrence. The utility of extrasystole induced late potentials has not been compared with late potentials in sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular pacing (RVp).

METHODS

Intraoperative simultaneous panoramic endocardial mapping of 21 VTs in 16 ischemic heart disease patients was performed with the use of a 112-bipole endocardial balloon. The decrement of near-field electrogram later than surface QRS during extrasystole (eLP) was studied.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 52 ± 9 years and were predominantly (75%) male. The mean sensitivity of eLP (0.75 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.78]) to detect VT circuits was better than SR (0.33 [0.30-0.36]; P < 0.001) and RVp (0.36 [0.33-0.39]; P < 0.001) without significant differences in specificity, eLP (0.77 [0.74-0.81], SR (0.82 [0.80-0.84]; P = 0.23), and RVp (0.81 [0.78-0.83]; P = 0.11). Both negative (NPV) and positivie (PPV) predictive values were significantly better for eLP mapping. The mean NPV was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81), 0.57 (0.55-0.59), and 0.58 (0.55-0.61) for eLP, SR, and RVp, respectively (P < 0.0001). PPV was 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78), 0.63 (0.59-0.67), and 0.63 (0.59-0.67) for eLP, SR, and RVp, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was significantly better for eLP (0.85 [95% CI 0.80-0.90] compared with SR (0.63 [0.56-0.72]; P < 0.001) or RVp (0.61 [0.52-0.74]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Evoked late potential mapping is a better tool to detect comprehensive diastolic circuits activated during VT, compared with eLP mapping in sinus rhythm or RV pacing.

Wavefront directionality and decremental stimuli synergistically improve identification of ventricular tachycardia substrate: insights from personalized computational heart models

AIMS

Multiple wavefront pacing (MWP) and decremental pacing (DP) are two electroanatomic mapping (EAM) strategies that have emerged to better characterize the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate. The aim of this study was to assess how well MWP, DP, and their combination improve identification of electrophysiological abnormalities on EAM that reflect infarct remodelling and critical VT sites.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-eight personalized computational heart models were reconstructed using images from post-infarct patients undergoing VT ablation. Paced rhythms were simulated by delivering an initial (S1) and an extra-stimulus (S2) from one of 100 locations throughout each heart model. For each pacing, unipolar signals were computed along the myocardial surface to simulate substrate EAM. Six EAM features were extracted and compared with the infarct remodelling and critical VT sites. Concordance of S1 EAM features between different maps was lower in hearts with smaller amounts of remodelling. Incorporating S1 EAM features from multiple maps greatly improved the detection of remodelling, especially in hearts with less remodelling. Adding S2 EAM features from multiple maps decreased the number of maps required to achieve the same detection accuracy. S1 EAM features from multiple maps poorly identified critical VT sites. However, combining S1 and S2 EAM features from multiple maps paced near VT circuits greatly improved identification of critical VT sites.

CONCLUSION

Electroanatomic mapping with MWP is more advantageous for characterization of substrate in hearts with less remodelling. During substrate EAM, MWP and DP should be combined and delivered from locations proximal to a suspected VT circuit to optimize identification of the critical VT site.

Significance of abnormal and late ventricular signals in ventricular tachycardia ablation of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies

BACKGROUND

Abnormal ventricular signals (AVS) are the cornerstone of substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in sinus rhythm. Signal characterization of AVS in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies has never been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe ventricular signal abnormalities in 3 different pathologies and examine their association with the diastolic component of VT circuits.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients (15 ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM], 15 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [ACM], 15 dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) who had undergone VT ablation with >50% of the diastolic pathway of the VT circuit recorded were studied. AVS were classified into late potentials (LPs) and continuous fractionated ventricular signals (CFVS), and their characteristics and correlation with the diastolic pathway of VT circuits were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five VT circuits were analyzed. Bipolar scars were greatest in ICM endocardially (53 cm² ICM vs 36 cm² ACM vs 25 cm² DCM; P = .010) and in ACM epicardially (98 cm² ACM vs 25 cm² ICM vs 24 cm² DCM; P = .005). Location of the VT diastolic interval coincided with AVS location in 54% of VTs in ICM, 89% in ACM, and 72% in DCM (P = .036). There was a trend toward a greater association of diastolic intervals coinciding with LPs than with CFVS (78% vs 57%; P = .052) (69% diastolic intervals in ICM coincided with LPs, 33% with CFVS; P = .063). All patients (100%) with CFVS in ACM had VT diastolic components arising from CFVS (33% ICM, 64% DCM; P = .049). Positive predictive value for LPs vs CFVS was 77.8% vs 56.7%, and sensitivity was 67.3% vs 32.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nature of abnormal signals in different cardiomyopathies reflects underlying pathology. LPs rather than CFVS seem to be more linked to diastolic components of VT circuits, especially in ICM. LPs have greater sensitivity and specificity for VT; however, CFVS may be of more relevance in ACM.

Best Practices for the Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Techniques for catheter ablation have evolved to effectively treat a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Pre-operative electrocardiographic and cardiac imaging data are very useful in understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate and can guide mapping and ablation. In this review, we focus on best practices for catheter ablation, with emphasis on tailoring ablation strategies, based on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, underlying clinical status, and hemodynamic stability of the ventricular arrhythmia. We discuss steps to make ablation safe and prevent complications, and techniques to improve the efficacy of ablation, including optimal use of electroanatomical mapping algorithms, energy delivery, intracardiac echocardiography, and selective use of mechanical circulatory support.

Intracardiac Electrogram Targets for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

The pathogenesis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in most patients with a prior myocardial scarring is reentry involving compartmentalized muscle fibers protected within the scar. Often the 12-lead ECG morphology of the VT itself is not available when treated with a defibrillator. Consequently, VT ablation takes on an interesting challenge of finding critical targets in sinus rhythm. High-density recordings are essential to evaluate a substrate based on whole electrogram voltage and activation delay, supplemented with substrate perturbation through alternate site pacing or introducing an extra stimulation. In this article, we discuss contemporary intracardiac electrogram targets for VT ablation, with explanation on each of their specific fundamental physiology.

Distribution of evoked delayed potential and delayed potential in a patient with subendocardial inferior infarction and transmural postero-lateral infarction: A case report

A 47-year-old man with transmural posterolateral myocardial infarction (MI) and subendocardial inferior MI underwent catheter ablation for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Right ventricular extra stimulation could unmask evoked delayed potentials in the subendocardial infarction area without delayed potentials in the sinus rhythm. Extra stimulation mapping for VT is useful for hidden VT substrates, particularly in the subendocardial infarction area.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Functional Substrate Mapping: Practices and Outcomes

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia has demonstrated its important role in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural cardiomyopathy. Conventional mapping techniques used to define the critical isthmus, such as activation mapping and entrainment, are limited by the non-inducibility of the clinical tachycardia or its poor hemodynamic tolerance. To overcome these limitations, a voltage mapping strategy based on bipolar electrograms peak to peak analysis was developed, but a low specificity (30%) for VT isthmus has been described with this approach. Functional mapping strategy relies on the analysis of the characteristics of the electrograms but also their propagation patterns and their response to extra-stimulus or alternative pacing wavefronts to define the targets for ablation. With this review, we aim to summarize the different functional mapping strategies described to date to identify ventricular arrhythmic substrate in patients with structural heart disease.

Substrate-based approaches in ventricular tachycardia ablation

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease is now part of standard care. Mapping and ablation of the clinical VT is often limited when the VT is noninducible, nonsustained or not haemodynamically tolerated. Substrate-based ablation strategies have been developed in an aim to treat VT in this setting and, subsequently, have been shown to improve outcomes in VT ablation when compared to focused ablation of mapped VTs. Since the initial description of linear ablation lines targeting ventricular scar, many different approaches to substrate-based VT ablation have been developed. Strategies can broadly be divided into three categories: 1) targeting abnormal electrograms, 2) anatomical targeting of conduction channels between areas of myocardial scar, and 3) targeting areas of slow and/or decremental conduction, identified with “functional” substrate mapping techniques. This review summarises contemporary substrate-based ablation strategies, along with their strengths and weaknesses.

Contemporary Management of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias

Percutaneous catheter ablation is an effective and safe therapy that can eliminate ventricular tachycardia, reducing the risks of both recurrent arrhythmia and shock therapies from a defibrillator. Successful ablation requires accurate identification of arrhythmic substrate and the effective delivery of energy to the targeted tissue. A thorough pre-procedural assessment is needed before considered 3D electroanatomical mapping can be performed. In contemporary practice, this must combine traditional electrophysiological techniques, such as activation and entrainment mapping, with more novel physiological mapping techniques for which there is an ever-increasing evidence base. Novel techniques to maximise energy delivery to the tissue must also be considered and balanced against their associated risks of complication. This review provides a comprehensive appraisal of contemporary practice and the evidence base that supports recent developments in mapping and ablation, while also considering potential future developments in the field.

Dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization is present in regions critical for ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation

BACKGROUND

The presence of dynamic substrate changes may facilitate functional block and reentry in ventricular tachycardia (VT).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study dynamic ventricular repolarization changes in critical regions of the VT circuit during sensed single extrastimulus pacing known as the Sense Protocol (SP).

METHODS

Twenty patients (aged 67 ± 9 years, 17 male) underwent VT ablation. A bipolar voltage map was obtained during sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular SP pacing at 20 ms above ventricular effective refractory period. Ventricular repolarization maps were constructed. Ventricular repolarization time (RT) was calculated from unipolar electrogram T waves, using the Wyatt method, as the dV/dtmax of the unipolar T wave. Entrainment or pace mapping confirmed critical sites for ablation.

RESULTS

The median global repolarization range (max-min RT per patient) was 166 ms (interquartile range [IQR] 143-181 ms) during SR mapping vs 208 ms (IQR 182-234) during SP mapping (P = .0003 vs intrinsic rhythm). Regions of late potentials (LP) had a longer RT during SP mapping compared to regions without LP (mean 394 ± 40 ms vs 342 ± 25 ms, P < .001). In paired regions of normal myocardium there was no significant spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR)/10 mm2 during SP mapping vs SR mapping (SDR 11 ± 6 ms vs 10 ± 6 ms, P = .54). SDR/10 mm2 was greater in critical areas of the VT circuit during SP mapping 63 ± 29 ms vs SR mapping 16 ± 9 ms (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ventricular repolarization is prolonged in regions of LP and increases dynamically, resulting in dynamic SDR in critical areas of the VT circuit. These dynamic substrate changes may be an important factor that facilitates VT circuits.

Dynamic High-density Functional Substrate Mapping Improves Outcomes in Ischaemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Sense Protocol Functional Substrate Mapping and Other Functional Mapping Techniques

Post-infarct-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurs due to reentry over surviving fibres within ventricular scar tissue. The mapping and ablation of patients in VT remains a challenge when VT is poorly tolerated and in cases in which VT is non-sustained or not inducible. Conventional substrate mapping techniques are limited by the ambiguity of substrate characterisation methods and the variety of mapping tools, which may record signals differently based on their bipolar spacing and electrode size. Real world data suggest that outcomes from VT ablation remain poor in terms of freedom from recurrent therapy using conventional techniques. Functional substrate mapping techniques, such as single extrastimulus protocol mapping, identify regions of unmasked delayed potentials, which, by nature of their dynamic and functional components, may play a critical role in sustaining VT. These methods may improve substrate mapping of VT, potentially making ablation safer and more reproducible, and thereby improving the outcomes. Further large-scale studies are needed.

Close-coupled pacing to identify the "functional" substrate of ventricular tachycardia: Long-term outcomes of the paced electrogram feature analysis technique

BACKGROUND

The conduction delay and block that compose the critical isthmus of macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is partly "functional" in that they only occur at faster cycle lengths. Close-coupled pacing stresses the myocardium's conduction capacity and may reveal late potentials (LPs) and fractionation. Interest has emerged in targeting this functional substrate.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a functional substrate VT ablation strategy.

METHODS

Patients with scar-related VT undergoing their first ablation were recruited. A closely coupled extrastimulus (ventricular effective refractory period + 30 ms) was delivered at the right ventricular apex while mapping with a high-density catheter. Sites of functional impaired conduction exhibited increased electrogram duration due to LPs/fractionation. The time to last deflection was annotated on an electroanatomic map, readily identifying ablation targets.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were recruited (34 [85%] ischemic). Median procedure duration was 330 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 300-369), and ablation time was 49.4 minutes (IQR 33.8-48.3). Median functional substrate area was 41.9 cm² (IQR 22.1-73.9). It was similarly distributed across bipolar voltage zones. Noninducibility was achieved in 34 of 40 patients (85%). Median follow-up was 711 days (IQR 255.5-972.8), during which 35 of 39 patients (89.7%) did not have VT recurrence, and 3 of 39 (7.5%) died. Antiarrhythmic drugs were continued in 53.8% (21/39).

CONCLUSION

Functional substrate ablation resulted in high rates of noninducibility and freedom from VT. Mapping times were increased considerably. Our findings add to the encouraging trend reported by related techniques. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to assess this next phase of VT ablation.