Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion as First Step for Mitral Isthmus Linear Ablation

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for AF Ablation; A Review

The outcomes of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are modest with various adjunctive strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) yielding largely disappointing results in randomised controlled trials. Linear ablation is a commonly employed adjunct strategy but is limited by difficulty in achieving durable bidirectional block, particularly at the mitral isthmus. Epicardial connections play a role in AF initiation and perpetuation. The ligament of Marshall has been implicated as a source of AF triggers and is known to harbour sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibres that contribute to AF perpetuation. Ethanol infusion into the Vein of Marshall, a remnant of the superior vena cava and key component of the ligament of Marshall, may eliminate these AF triggers and can facilitate the ease of obtaining durable mitral isthmus block. While early trials have demonstrated the potential of Vein of Marshall 'ethanolisation' to reduce arrhythmia recurrence after persistent AF ablation, further randomised trials are needed to fully determine the potential long-term outcome benefits afforded by this technique.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

The effect of an initial catheter ablation with an adjunctive ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall on persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Some previous studies have reported that a first-step ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) with touch-up radiofrequency (RF) ablation can facilitate mitral isthmus (MI) block and improves the ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) patients. However, the effect of an initial RF ablation with an adjunctive EIVOM has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

This study enrolled 233 PeAF patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation including an MI, roof line, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. An EIVOM was performed when endocardial ablation with or without coronary sinus ablation failed to create MI block.

RESULTS

Bidirectional MI block was achieved in 224 patients (96.1%). Among them, MI block was obtained by only RF ablation in 174/224 patients (77.7%) (RF group) and an adjunctive EIVOM was needed in 50/224 (22.3%) (EIVOM group). During the follow-up, 113 (64.9%) RF group patients were free from AF/atrial tachycardia compared to 41 (82.0%) EIVOM group patients (log-rank p = .045). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, an adjunctive EIVOM was associated with a lower recurrence rate (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.78, p = .006).

CONCLUSION

An initial RF ablation with an adjunctive EIVOM strategy improved MI ablation's acute success rate and was associated with better clinical outcomes.

The autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation-pathophysiology and non-invasive assessment

The autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology. Parasympathetic hyperactivity result in a shortening of the action potential duration, a reduction of the conduction wavelength, and as such facilitates reentry in the presence of triggers. Further, autonomic remodeling of atrial myocytes in AF includes progressive sympathetic hyperinnervation by increased atrial sympathetic nerve density and sympathetic atrial nerve sprouting. Knowledge on the pathophysiological process in AF, including the contribution of the autonomic nervous system, may in the near future guide personalized AF management. This review focuses on the role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and non-invasive assessment of the autonomic nervous system.

Impact of Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion Combined with Anatomical Ablation for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Long-Term Follow-Up Based on Implantable Loop Recorders

BACKGROUND

The best ablation treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) patients is still debated. The vein of Marshall (VOM) seems to be a promising target for ablation and could be combined with a linear set of ablation lesions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the incidence of AF recurrences in a PeAF population treated with a comprehensive ablation approach consisting of VOM ethanol infusion (EI), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), a left atrial (LA) roofline, a mitral line (guided by the newly formed lesion after alcohol infusion into the VOM and validated by pacing), and a cavotricuspid isthmus line.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing the first ablation procedure of catheter ablation (CA) for PeAF were enrolled. All patients underwent VOM-EI, PVI, and ablation lines along the roof of the LA, mitral, and cavotricuspid isthmus. LA voltage mapping before and after VOM-EI was also performed. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) was implanted at the end of the ablation in each patient.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive patients (66 ± 8 years and 71% male) affected by PeAF were included in this study. The VOM-EI procedural phase lasted 21.4 ± 10.1 min. PV isolation and lines were validated in all subjects. The ML block was achieved within 10.8 ± 8.7 min. At a mean follow-up of 12 ± 7 months, 27 out of 31 (87%) patients remained free from AT/AF recurrences. Among the patients with recurrences, two (50%) had incomplete ablation lesions and three (75%) had "suboptimal" VOM-EI. In 23/31 patients (74%), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) were discontinued after 1 month of follow-up. No significant complications were reported during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

this single-center experience demonstrates that VOM-EI systematically combined with an anatomical ablation set in patients with PeAF resulted in feasible, safe, and effective freedom from AF/AT recurrences in 87% of the population after a 1-year follow-up period according to an ILR.

The impact of empirical Marshall vein ethanol infusion as a first-choice intraoperative strategy on the long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing mitral isthmus ablation

Background

Marshall vein ethanol infusion (MVEI) as an additional therapy to conventional catheter ablation (CA) has been proved to be efficacious in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, whether empirical MVEI could be the first-line strategy in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation has seldom been investigated. Here, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes between provisional and empirical MVEI in PeAF patients undergoing the index MI ablation procedure.

Methods

We enrolled 133 patients with PeAF either in the provisional group (n = 38, MVEI was performed when conventional endocardial and/or epicardial ablation procedures were inadequate to achieve bidirectional MI block) or in the empirical group (n = 95, MVEI was performed empirically before MI CA).

Results

All of the baseline characteristics were comparable. Less spontaneous or inducible atrial tachycardias (ATs) were encountered in the empirical group of patients (P < 0.001). More epicardial ablations were applied (26.3% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.016) and a higher incidence of CA-facilitated restoration of sinus rhythm was recorded (86.8% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) in the provisional group of patients. Although more fluoroscopy time (6.4[4.2, 9.3] vs. 9.5[5.9, 11.6] min, P = 0.019) and radiation exposure (69.0[25.3, 160.2] vs. 122.0[62.5, 234.1] mGy, P = 0.010) were documented in the empirical group with comparable procedure time, less time (455.9 ± 192.2 vs. 366.5 ± 161.3 s, P = 0.038) was consumed to achieve bidirectional MI block during endocardial ablation in the provisional group. Incidences of procedure-related complications were similar between the two groups. During a 16.5 ± 4.4-month follow-up, the empirical group of patients showed a significantly higher rate of freedom from AT recurrence (95.8% vs. 81.6%, log-rank P = 0.003), while the rate of freedom from AF or atrial tachyarrhythmias (combining AF and AT) was similar. Both univariate (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.64, P = 0.008) and multivariate (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, P = 0.037) Cox regression analyses indicated that empirical MVEI was independently associated with lower long-term AT recurrence.

Conclusion

Among patients with PeAF who underwent the index MI ablation procedure, empirical MVEI could reduce endocardial MI ablation time and provide greater long-term freedom from AT recurrence.

Epicardial connections and bi-atrial tachycardias: From anatomy to clinical practice

Bi-atrial tachycardia (BiAT) is not rare after extensive atrial ablation or cardiac surgery. The complexity of bi-atrial reentrant circuits poses a great challenge for clinical practice. With recent advances in mapping technologies, we are now able to characterize atrial activation in detail. However, given the involvement of both atria and multiple epicardial conductions, endocardial mapping for BiATs is not easy to understand. Knowledge of the atrial myocardial architecture is the foundation for the clinical management of BiATs; as it is required to understand the possible mechanism of the tachycardia and identify the optimal target of ablation. In this review we summarize current knowledge about the anatomy of interatrial connections as well as other epicardial fibers and discuss the interpretation of electrophysiological findings and ablation strategies for BiATs.

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion: First-step or adjunctive choice for perimitral atrial tachycardia?

BACKGROUND

Perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) is the most frequent type of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia (AT) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (EIVOM) is a promising technique in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation.

METHODS

A total of 165 patients with PMAT were divided into three groups according to ablation strategies, including RF only group (n = 89), RF-EIVOM group (initial RF ablation with adjunctive EIVOM, n = 28), and EIVOM-RF group (first-step EIVOM with touch-up RF ablation, n = 48). Acute and follow-up procedure outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

PMAT terminated in 89.9%, 89.3%, and 93.7% of patients in RF only, RF-EIVOM and EIVOM-RF groups, respectively (p = .715), with complete MI block achieved in 80.9%, 89.3%, and 95.8% of patients (EIVOM-RF vs. RF only, p = .012). First-step utilization of EIVOM was associated with a significant shortening of RF ablation time at MI (EIVOM-RF 2.1 ± 1.3 min, RF only 7.9 ± 5.9 min, RF-EIVOM 6.8 ± 5.8 min; p < .001) and a decrease in the proportion of patients need ablation within coronary sinus (CS, EIVOM-RF 14.6%, RF only 61.8%, RF-EIVOM 64.3%; p < .001). After a mean follow-up of 12.1 ± 6.2 months, AF/AT recurred in 39 (43.8%), 6 (21.4%), and 12 (25.0%) patients in RF only, RF-EIVOM, and EIVOM-RF group (RF-EIVOM vs. RF only, p = .026; EIVOM-RF vs. RF only, p = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

EIVOM was associated with an enhanced acute MI block rate as well as reduced AF/AT recurrence. First-step utilization of EIVOM promises to significantly simplify the RF ablation process.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

PMAT is the most common type of iatrogenic AT after AF ablation procedures. EIVOM contributed to a higher acute MI block rate and lower arrhythmia recurrence risk during follow-up. First-step utilization of EIVOM significantly reduced the need for radiofrequency ablation at MI and inside CS with the advantage of creating a homogenous, transmural lesion and eliminating epicardial connections.

The adjunctive effect for left pulmonary vein isolation of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the effect of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) on the acute success of left pulmonary vein (LPV) isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 313 patients with drug-resistant PeAF were enrolled (135 in Group 1 and 178 in Group 2). In Group 1, EIVOM was firstly performed, followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) including bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation at roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and mitral isthmus (MI). In Group 2, PVI and linear ablations were completed with RFA. First-pass isolation of the LPV was achieved in 119 (88.1%) and 132 (74.2%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) was significantly lower in Group 1 (9.6% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.003). About half of acute PVR occurred in the carina with or without EIVOM.

CONCLUSION

EIVOM is effective in achieving a higher first-pass isolation and a lower acute PVR of LPV in PeAF.

Atrial tachycardia occurring after a prior atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: Does non-inducibility matter?

Recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) is a common phenomenon after catheter ablation for AF, particularly in the setting of additional substrate ablation, with many studies demonstrating gap-related macro re-entrant AT (predominantly mitral and roof dependent) to be the dominant mechanism. Although multiple inducible ATs after ablation of the clinical AT are commonly described at repeat procedures, the optimal ablation strategy, and procedural endpoints are unclear in this setting. A recent randomized study addressing the question of non-inducibility as a procedural endpoint demonstrated no additional benefits to the ablation of all induced, non-clinical ATs, but it was limited by small numbers and high rates of non-inducibility. Nevertheless, once ablation of the clinical AT has been successfully performed, ensuring durable linear block and PV isolation may be sufficient for the prevention of further AT. Durable linear block, particularly at the mitral isthmus, is difficult to achieve but may be facilitated by the real-time evaluation of lesion quality and contiguity and the novel technique of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion. Large-scale, randomized trials are needed, nonetheless, to fully assess the optimal ablation strategy in the setting of recurrent AT post-AF ablation.

Impact of technical aspects of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion on mitral isthmus block for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Aims

Ethanol infusion into the VOM (EIVOM) adjunctive to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was a novel approach facilitating mitral isthmus (MIth) block for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF); However, there were remarkable disparities in its technical aspects. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of EIVOM technical aspects on acute MIth block.

Methods

Eighty consecutive patients (63 males, average age 66.4 ± 8.6 years) undergoing de novo PeAF ablation were assigned to different groups. The procedural parameters in “EIVOM first” (n = 13) or “RFCA first” (n = 13) as well as small dose ([SD], ≤4 ml, n = 26) or big dose ([BD], >4 ml, n = 54) approaches were analyzed to identify the predictors for acute MIth block.

Results

Compared with the “EIVOM first” approach, the “RFCA first” approach was associated with longer procedural and MIth ablation time (134 ± 27 min vs. 112 ± 17 min; 14.9 ± 5.5 min vs. 9.3 ± 5.1 min, both P < 0.05, respectively), but with comparable success of MIth block. The ethanol dose was 6.3 ± 1.5 ml in BD group vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 ml in SD group (P < 0.001) and was correlated significantly with the size of Δlow voltage area (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). The success of MIth block was 92.6% in BD group vs. 73.1% in SD group, P = 0.03. The ethanol dose >5.75 ml independently predicted successful MIth block (OR: 0.428, 95% CI: 0.219–0.839, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Despite the comparable effectiveness on MIth block, the “EIVOM first” approach was associated with shorter procedural and MIth ablation time than the “RFCA first” approach. The ethanol dose in EIVOM was an independent predictor for MIth block.

The Maine vein of Marshall ethanol experience: learning curve and safety

BACKGROUND

The marginal benefit of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation has shown promise in a single randomized study and case series from very experienced centers. However, adoption has not been widespread and the impact on real-world outcomes outside of leading centers is not established. The objective in this study is to understand the learning curve, and explore procedural outcomes and safety with VOM ethanol infusion from a large single medical center.

METHODS

One hundred twenty nine atrial ablation cases wherein VOM ethanol infusion was attempted were identified from the time of the program's inception in 2019 at Maine Medical Center (Portland, ME). Our technical approach, procedural success, and complications were adjudicated from the medical record.

RESULTS

The overall VOM ethanol infusion success was 90%. Infusion success rates improved and fluoroscopy utilization decreased with experience. Arrhythmia recurrence was 14% after a mean follow-up of 9.5 months. Complications occurred in 5.4% of patients, including a 3.1% risk of delayed tamponade.

CONCLUSION

In our single center experience, VOM ethanol infusion was feasible with a high technical success rate. These positive results are balanced against a concerning rate of delayed tamponade.

Angiographic Characteristics of the Vein of Marshall in Patients with and without Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (Et-VOM) is a novel therapeutic treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, few studies have focused on the difference between AF and non-AF patients (presented other types of arrhythmias) regarding the characteristics of the vein of Marshall (VOM). Objective: This study sought to investigate the incidence, morphology, and angiographic characteristics of the VOM. Methods: Coronary sinus (CS) angiography was performed in all patients. The baseline, angiographic characteristics and measurements of VOM dimensions were compared between the AF and non-AF group. Results: CS angiography was performed in 290 patients. The VOM detection rate was higher in the AF group than in the non-AF group (91.8% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.044). In the right anterior oblique (RAO) projection, AF patients had significant larger VOM ostium, CS ostium, and CS diameter at VOM ostium than non-AF patients (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.015; 12.8 ± 4.1 vs. 11.4 ± 3.7 mm, p = 0.016; 9.1 ± 3.1 vs. 8.2 ± 2.9 mm, p = 0.028, respectively). There was a slight linear correlation between the VOM ostium and the CS ostium diameter as well as left atrial volume (LAV). Conclusion: AF patients seem to have a higher incidence of the VOM, larger VOM ostium, CS ostium, and CS lumen in RAO view. Meanwhile, the VOM ostium may correlate with the CS ostium and LAV.