1
|
Tan JJ, Zhou PY, Chua NGS, Hung KC, Lee HLW, Lee LW, Lim JL, Lim YCS, Liew Y, Loo LW, Koomanan N, Teoh BS, Yii YCD, Thien SY, Cherng PZB, Piotr CM, Kwa LHA, Chung SJ. The Safety of Aztreonam Versus Ceftazidime in Patients Labeled With Penicillin Allergy: A Cohort Study. Clin Ther 2024:S0149-2918(24)00114-0. [PMID: 38942719 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA. METHODS This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity. FINDINGS There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events. IMPLICATIONS Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Jie Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Peijun Yvonne Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Kai Chee Hung
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Lai Wei Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Le Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Chun Shena Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yixin Liew
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Wen Loo
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Narendran Koomanan
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Boon San Teoh
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Siew Yee Thien
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Lay Hoon Andrea Kwa
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; SingHealth Duke-NUS Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore; Emerging Infectious Diseases Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shimin Jasmine Chung
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hogan AM, Rahman ASMZ, Motnenko A, Natarajan A, Maydaniuk DT, León B, Batun Z, Palacios A, Bosch A, Cardona ST. Profiling cell envelope-antibiotic interactions reveals vulnerabilities to β-lactams in a multidrug-resistant bacterium. Nat Commun 2023; 14:4815. [PMID: 37558695 PMCID: PMC10412643 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40494-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) presents unique restrictions to antibiotic penetration. As a consequence, Bcc species are notorious for causing recalcitrant multidrug-resistant infections in immunocompromised individuals. Here, we present the results of a genome-wide screen for cell envelope-associated resistance and susceptibility determinants in a Burkholderia cenocepacia clinical isolate. For this purpose, we construct a high-density, randomly-barcoded transposon mutant library and expose it to 19 cell envelope-targeting antibiotics. By quantifying relative mutant fitness with BarSeq, followed by validation with CRISPR-interference, we profile over a hundred functional associations and identify mediators of antibiotic susceptibility in the Bcc cell envelope. We reveal connections between β-lactam susceptibility, peptidoglycan synthesis, and blockages in undecaprenyl phosphate metabolism. The synergy of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is primarily mediated by inhibition of the PenB carbapenemase. In comparison with ceftazidime, avibactam more strongly potentiates the activity of aztreonam and meropenem in a panel of Bcc clinical isolates. Finally, we characterize in Bcc the iron and receptor-dependent activity of the siderophore-cephalosporin antibiotic, cefiderocol. Our work has implications for antibiotic target prioritization, and for using additional combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors that can extend the utility of current antibacterial therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Hogan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Anna Motnenko
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Aakash Natarajan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Dustin T Maydaniuk
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Beltina León
- CINDEFI, CONICET-CCT La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Zayra Batun
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Armando Palacios
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Alejandra Bosch
- CINDEFI, CONICET-CCT La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Silvia T Cardona
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Via GG, Brueggeman DA, Murray VA, Froehle AW, Burdette SD, Prayson MJ. Use of single agent Cefotetan for Gustilo-Anderson type III open fracture prophylaxis. Injury 2023; 54:110914. [PMID: 37441857 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prophylactic intravenous antibiotic regimen for Gustilo-Anderson Type III open fractures traditionally consists of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside plus penicillin for gross contamination. Cefotetan, a second-generation cephalosporin, offers a wide spectrum of activity against both aerobes and anaerobes as well as against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Cefotetan has not been previously established within orthopedic surgery as a prophylactic intravenous agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS Cefotetan monotherapeutic prophylaxis versus any other antibiotic regimen (standard/literature-supported and otherwise) was studied for patient encounters between September 2010 and December 2019 within a single Level 1 regional trauma center. Patient comorbidities, preoperative fracture characteristics, and in-hospital/operative metrics (including length of stay [LOS], number of antibiotic doses, and antibiotic costs [US$]) were included for analysis. Postoperative outcomes up to 1 year included rates of surgical site infection (SSI), deep infection necessitating return to the operating room (OR), non-union, prescribed outpatient antibiotics, hospital readmissions, and related returns to the emergency department (ED). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to include standard/literature-supported antibiotic regimens as a nested random factor within the non-cefotetan cohort. RESULTS The nested variable accounting for standard/literature-supported antibiotic regimens had no significant effect in any model for any outcome (for each, P ≥ 0.302). Thus, 1-year data for 138 Type III open fractures were included, accounting for only the binary effect of cefotetan (n = 42) versus non-cefotetan cohorts. The cohorts did not differ significantly at baseline. The cefotetan cohort received fewer in-house dose/day antibiotics (P < 0.001), was less likely to receive outpatient antibiotics in the following year (P = 0.023), had decreased return to the OR (35.7% versus 54.2%, P = 0.045), and demonstrated non-union rates of 16.7% versus 28.1% (P = 0.151). When adjusted for length of stay (LOS), the dose/day total costs for antibiotics were $8.71/day more expensive for the cefotetan cohort (P = 0.002). Type III open fractures incurred overall rates of SSI reaching 16.7% in the cefotetan cohort and 14.7% for non-cefotetan (P = 0.773). Deep infections necessitating return to the OR were 9.5% and 11.6%, respectively (P = 0.719). CONCLUSION Cefotetan alone may provide superior antibiotic stewardship with similar infectious sequalae compared to more traditional antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for Gustilo-Anderson Type III open long bone fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrhett G Via
- Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America.
| | - David A Brueggeman
- Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America
| | - Victoria A Murray
- Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America
| | - Andrew W Froehle
- Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America
| | - Steven D Burdette
- Wright State University Department of Infectious Disease, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 6258, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America
| | - Michael J Prayson
- Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Norvell MR, Porter M, Ricco MH, Koonce RC, Hogan CA, Basler E, Wong M, Jeffres MN. Cefazolin vs Second-line Antibiotics for Surgical Site Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Patients With a Beta-lactam Allergy. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad224. [PMID: 37363051 PMCID: PMC10289809 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cefazolin is a first-line agent for prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) after total joint arthroplasty. Patients labeled allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics frequently receive clindamycin or vancomycin perioperatively due to the perceived risk of a hypersensitivity reaction after exposure to cefazolin. Methods This single-system retrospective review included patients labeled allergic to penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotics who underwent a primary total hip and/or knee arthroplasty between January 2020 and July 2021. A detailed chart review was performed to compare the frequency of SSI within 90 days of surgery and interoperative hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) between patients receiving cefazolin and patients receiving clindamycin and/or vancomycin. Results A total of 1128 hip and/or knee arthroplasties from 1047 patients were included in the analysis (cefazolin n = 809, clindamycin/vancomycin n = 319). More patients in the clindamycin and/or vancomycin group had a history of cephalosporin allergy and allergic reactions with immediate symptoms. There were fewer SSIs in the cefazolin group compared with the clindamycin and/or vancomycin group (0.9% vs 3.8%; P < .001) including fewer prosthetic joint infections (0.1% vs 1.9%). The frequency of interoperative HSRs was not different between groups (cefazolin = 0.2% vs clindamycin/vancomycin = 1.3%; P = .06). Conclusions The use of cefazolin as a perioperative antibiotic for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty in patients labeled beta-lactam allergic is associated with decreased postoperative SSI without an increase in interoperative HSR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda R Norvell
- Correspondence: Meghan N. Jeffres, PharmD, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mail Stop C 238, 12850 E. Montview Blvd, V20-1212, Aurora, CO 80045 (); or Miranda R. Norvell, PharmD, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Mailstop 90-52-411, St Louis, MO 63110-1026 ()
| | - Melissa Porter
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Madison H Ricco
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ryan C Koonce
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Craig A Hogan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Eric Basler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Megan Wong
- UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Meghan N Jeffres
- Correspondence: Meghan N. Jeffres, PharmD, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mail Stop C 238, 12850 E. Montview Blvd, V20-1212, Aurora, CO 80045 (); or Miranda R. Norvell, PharmD, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Mailstop 90-52-411, St Louis, MO 63110-1026 ()
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nelson G, Fotopoulou C, Taylor J, Glaser G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Meyer LA, Stone R, Mena G, Elias KM, Altman AD, Bisch SP, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:58-67. [PMID: 37086524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges. METHODS Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Bakkum-Gamez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - L A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R Stone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - G Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K M Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A D Altman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - S P Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roux C, Ben Said B, Milpied B, Bernier C, Staumont-Sallé D, Dezoteux F, Soria A, Barbaud A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Tétart F, Bellon N, Lebrun-Vignes B, Gener G, Paul M, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Assier H. Skin Testing and Drug Provocation Tests in Epidermal Necrolysis: A French Experience. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:3252-3261.e2. [PMID: 35870724 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on the use of skin testing, other than patch testing, and challenges in the evaluation of epidermal necrolysis (EN), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. OBJECTIVE To report a French multicenter experience in skin testing and challenges in EN, and investigate the factors associated with tests' positivity. METHODS All patients who were evaluated by patch tests (PTs), skin prick tests, intradermal tests (IDTs), or drug provocation tests (DPTs) for EN between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included through 2 French drug reaction networks. RESULTS In total, 113 patients were included from 8 centers. Median (interquartile range) time from EN to hypersensitivity workup was 7.9 months (5.1-15 months). All patients had PTs, 17 (15%) had skin prick tests or IDTs with delayed readings and 32 (28.3%) had DPTs. One mild reaction occurred after a DPT. Overall, 22 patients (19.5%) had positive PTs, and the only factors associated with positivity were Algorithm of Drug Causality for Epidermal Necrolysis (ALDEN) score and drug class. Only 1 IDT was positive but considered irrelevant. The DPTs were never performed to prove responsibility of a highly suspected drug but were used to confirm current tolerance of needed medications. CONCLUSIONS Allergological workup in EN, performed by specialists involved in EN, seems safe. Skin tests, although of limited sensitivity, can be helpful for considering the reintroduction of essential drugs according to a benefit-to-risk decision. We propose an algorithm for approaching hypersensitivity testing in patients with EN, to be adapted to each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Roux
- Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Benoit Ben Said
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, HCL, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France
| | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, HCL, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; Department of Dermatology, National Reference Center for Rare Skin Diseases, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Claire Bernier
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Delphine Staumont-Sallé
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Frédéric Dezoteux
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Angèle Soria
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Annick Barbaud
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Private Practice, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Florence Tétart
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Nathalia Bellon
- Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Dermatology, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
- French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Paris Est Créteil University, EpiDermE, Créteil, France
| | - Gwendeline Gener
- Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Muriel Paul
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro
- Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France; French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) Group, Paris, France; Paris Est Créteil University, EpiDermE, Créteil, France
| | - Haudrey Assier
- Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, HCL, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Dermatoses and Severe Drug Reactions (TOXIBUL), Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J, Khan DA, Golden DBK, Shaker M, Stukus DR, Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:1333-1393. [PMID: 36122788 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
| | - Aleena Banerji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Roland Solensky
- Corvallis Clinic, Oregon State University/Oregon Health Science University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Ore
| | - Andrew A White
- Department of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, Calif
| | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The Research Institute of St Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne K Ellis
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - David B K Golden
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Matthew J Greenhawt
- Food Challenge and Research Unit Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Caroline C Horner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy Pulmonary Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
| | - Dennis Ledford
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Fla; James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital, Tampa, Fla
| | - Jay A Lieberman
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tenn
| | - John Oppenheimer
- Division of Allergy, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, NJ
| | - Matthew A Rank
- Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz
| | - Marcus S Shaker
- Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - David R Stukus
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern Allopathic Medical School, Fort Lauderdale, Fla
| | - Julie Wang
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, The Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Copaescu AM, Ben-Shoshan M, Trubiano JA. Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:923991. [PMID: 36313986 PMCID: PMC9606226 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed drug T-cell immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions have a large clinical heterogeneity varying from mild maculopapular exanthema (MPE) to severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and severe skin necrosis and blistering as seen in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Given the knowledge gaps related to the immunopathogenesis of these conditions, the absence of validated diagnostic tools and the significant associated morbidity and mortality, patients with SCARs often have limited drug choices. We performed a comprehensive review aiming to evaluate in vivo diagnostic tools such as delayed intradermal skin and patch testing and ex vivo/in vitro research assays such as the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and the enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay. We searched through PubMed using the terms “drug allergy,” “in vivo” and “ex vivo” for original papers in the last 10 years. A detailed meticulous approach adapted to the various clinical phenotypes is recommended for the diagnostic and management of delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. This review highlights the current diagnostic tools for the delayed drug hypersensitivity phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Maria Copaescu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada,The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada,*Correspondence: Ana Maria Copaescu,
| | - Moshe Ben-Shoshan
- The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Allergy, Immunology and Dermatology, Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jason A. Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Romano A, Oussalah A, Chery C, Guéant‐Rodriguez R, Gaeta F, Cornejo‐Garcia J, Rouyer P, Josse T, Mayorga C, Torres M, Guéant J. Next-generation sequencing and genotype association studies reveal the association of HLA-DRB3*02:02 with delayed hypersensitivity to penicillins. Allergy 2022; 77:1827-1834. [PMID: 34687232 DOI: 10.1111/all.15147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonimmediate (delayed)-allergic reactions to penicillins are common and some of them can be life-threatening. The genetic factors influencing these reactions are unknown/poorly known/poorly understood. We assessed the genetic predictors of a delayed penicillin allergy that cover the HLA loci. METHODS Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we genotyped the MHC region in 24 patients with delayed hypersensitivity compared with 20 patients with documented immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins recruited in Italy. Subsequently, we analyzed in silico Illumina Immunochip genotyping data that covered the HLA loci in 98 Spanish patients with delayed hypersensitivity and 315 with immediate hypersensitivity compared to 1,308 controls. RESULTS The two alleles DRB3*02:02:01:02 and DRB3*02:02:01:01 were reported in twenty cases with delayed reactions (83%) and ten cases with immediate reactions (50%), but not in the Allele Frequency Net Database. Bearing at least one of the two alleles increased the risk of delayed reactions compared to immediate reactions, with an OR of 8.88 (95% CI, 3.37-23.32; p < .0001). The haplotype (ACAA) from rs9268835, rs6923504, rs6903608, and rs9268838 genetic variants of the HLA-DRB3 genomic region was significantly associated with an increased risk of delayed hypersensitivity to penicillins (OR, 1.7; 95% CI: 1.06-1.92; p = .001), but not immediate hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION We showed that the HLA-DRB3 locus is strongly associated with an increased risk of delayed penicillin hypersensitivity, at least in Southwestern Europe. The determination of HLA-DRB3*02:02 alleles in the risk management of severe delayed hypersensitivity to penicillins should be evaluated further in larger population samples of different origins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Romano
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
- Oasi Research Institute‐IRCCS Troina Italy
| | - Abderrahim Oussalah
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
- Department of Molecular Medicine Division of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition University Hospital of Nancy Nancy France
| | - Celine Chery
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
- Department of Molecular Medicine Division of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition University Hospital of Nancy Nancy France
| | - Rosa‐Maria Guéant‐Rodriguez
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
- Department of Molecular Medicine Division of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition University Hospital of Nancy Nancy France
| | - Francesco Gaeta
- Allergy Unit Columbus Hospital Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
| | | | - Pierre Rouyer
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
| | - Thomas Josse
- Department of Molecular Medicine Division of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition University Hospital of Nancy Nancy France
| | | | - Maria‐Jose Torres
- Allergy Unit Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐UMA‐ARADyAL Malaga Spain
| | - Jean‐Louis Guéant
- INSERM UMR_S 1256 Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE) Faculty of Medicine of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France
- Department of Molecular Medicine Division of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition University Hospital of Nancy Nancy France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Iuliano S, Senn L, Moi L, Muller YD, Ribi C, Buss G, Comte D. Management of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Allergy: A Real-Life Study. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:853587. [PMID: 35769578 PMCID: PMC9234877 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.853587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Beta-lactam allergy is a common problem in everyday medical practice and is recognized as a major public health issue. Carrying this label frequently leads to the avoidance of all beta-lactam antibiotics, favoring the use of other less preferred classes of antibiotics, that are more expensive and associated with more side effects and increased antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, delabeling a beta-lactam allergy is part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Herein, we retrospectively examined the clinical records of 576 patients who were referred to our center for a label of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics and were systematically investigated following a standardized algorithm. Our main aim was to evaluate the frequency of confirmed immediate- and delayed-type allergy to commonly prescribed subclasses of beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin and cephalosporin), as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) and the sensitivity of skin tests. Our secondary aims were to examine the safety of beta-lactam skin testing and drug challenge. We identified that 260 patients reported a history of immediate reactions, 131 of delayed reactions, and 114 of unknown timing or mechanism of reactions. Following assessment and testing, 86 (18.3%) patients had a confirmed allergy to any beta-lactam antibiotics; 63 (13.4%) with an immediate- and 23 (4.9%) with a delayed-type reaction. Most frequently identified confirmed allergy was to penicillins (65 patients), followed by cephalosporins (21 patients). When immediate-type reactions were examined, NPV of skin tests were 96.3% and 100% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. When delayed reactions were considered, NPV were 91.9 and 87.5% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. Evaluation of the safety of skin tests according to the standardized procedure showed that systemic allergic reactions occurred in only 0.7% of skin tests and in 3.1% of drug challenges. Overall, our data indicate that only 18.3% of patients with a beta-lactam allergy label have a confirmed allergy and non-allergic patients can be safely delabeled through allergic workup based on skin tests and drug challenge. This approach supports the policy of saving second-line antibiotics through a standardized allergy workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Iuliano
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurence Senn
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laura Moi
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yannick D. Muller
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Camillo Ribi
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Buss
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Denis Comte
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Denis Comte
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barbaud A, Romano A. Skin Testing Approaches for Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2022; 42:307-322. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
12
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Approximately 1 in 5 adults in the US had a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in 2018. This review provides an update on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, Mycoplasma genitalium, trichomoniasis, and genital herpes. OBSERVATIONS From 2015 to 2019, the rates of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis increased in the US; from 1999 to 2016, while the rates of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 declined. Populations with higher rates of STIs include people younger than 25 years, sexual and gender minorities such as men and transgender women who have sex with men, and racial and ethnic minorities such as Black and Latinx people. Approximately 70% of infections with HSV and trichomoniasis and 53% to 100% of extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia infections are asymptomatic or associated with few symptoms. STIs are associated with HIV acquisition and transmission and are the leading cause of tubal factor infertility in women. Nucleic acid amplification tests have high sensitivities (86.1%-100%) and specificities (97.1%-100%) for the diagnosis of gonorrhea, chlamydia, M genitalium, trichomoniasis, and symptomatic HSV-1 and HSV-2. Serology remains the recommended method to diagnose syphilis, typically using sequential testing to detect treponemal and nontreponemal (antiphospholipid) antibodies. Ceftriaxone, doxycycline, penicillin, moxifloxacin, and the nitroimidazoles, such as metronidazole, are effective treatments for gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, M genitalium, and trichomoniasis, respectively, but antimicrobial resistance limits oral treatment options for gonorrhea and M genitalium. No cure is available for genital herpes. Effective STI prevention interventions include screening, contact tracing of sexual partners, and promoting effective barrier contraception. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately 1 in 5 adults in the US had an STI in 2018. Rates of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis in the US have increased, while rates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 have declined. Ceftriaxone, doxycycline, penicillin, moxifloxacin, and the nitroimidazoles are effective treatments for gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and trichomoniasis, respectively, but antimicrobial resistance limits oral therapies for gonorrhea and Mycoplasma genitalium, and no cure is available for genital herpes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Tuddenham
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew M Hamill
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Khalil G Ghanem
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin in children by skin test and drug provocation tests: A retrospective case-series study. Allergol Int 2022; 71:131-136. [PMID: 34384710 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin rash often occurs upon oral administration of amoxicillin in children, due to non-immediate hypersensitivity. However, information on delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin is scarce. Moreover, the appropriate diagnostic method and actual diagnostic rate of delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin among Japanese children are unclear. We conducted intradermal tests (IDTs) and drug provocation tests (DPTs) and retrospectively investigated the proportion of children with a definitive diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. We then evaluated the characteristics of patients with a positive allergic workup. METHODS We enrolled children referred for suspected findings of mild or moderate non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin between August 2018 and March 2020. If the IDT in the delayed phase was negative, DPT with amoxicillin (60-90 mg/kg/day) was performed for 7 days. Non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin was defined when IDT or DPT was positive. We evaluated the potential of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) to reveal hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. RESULTS This study enrolled 27 children. Fourteen children (52%) had hypersensitivity to amoxicillin, of whom 12 had positive IDTs and two had positive DPTs. No differences in age, sex, history of allergic disease, days from oral use to symptom onset, type of rash at symptom onset, generalized rash, and DLST results were observed between the hypersensitivity and non-hypersensitivity groups. CONCLUSIONS Examination should be performed for children with mild or moderate reactions because positive cases have no significant features and half of the suspected cases are negative.
Collapse
|
14
|
Fernandez J, Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Blanca-Lopez N. Classifying cephalosporins: from generation to cross-reactivity. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 21:346-354. [PMID: 34074874 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the most recent literature studying the classifications, immunochemistry, and crossreactivity of allergy reactions to cephalosporins. RECENT FINDINGS Over the last five years, research interest has focused on three areas related to cephalosporin allergy: cross-reactivity among cephalosporins and with other beta-lactams; the incidence of adverse reactions in penicillin allergy patients or in reported penicillin allergy labels; and new cephalosporins structures involved in the immunological recognition. SUMMARY Meta-analysis of a substantial number of studies shows that cephalosporins are safer than previously thought. Evidence supports two main conclusions in that regard. First, there is a relatively low percentage of cross-reactivity between cephalosporins and other beta-lactams with penicillins in penicillin allergy patients. Second, there is a very low incidence of allergy reactions in nonselected as well as in selected penicillin allergy patients when cephalosporins are used prior to surgical intervention.On the other hand, few structures have been discovered related to the immune mechanism of cephalosporin allergy reactions, and these are far from being ready to use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Fernandez
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital, ISABIAL-UMH, Alicante
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Establishing Amoxicillin Allergy in Children Through Direct Graded Oral Challenge (GOC): Evaluating Risk Factors for Positive Challenges, Safety, and Risk of Cross-Reactivity to Cephalosporines. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4060-4066. [PMID: 34293504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the diagnostic properties of direct oral challenges without the use of skin tests in children with suspected amoxicillin allergy are sparse. OBJECTIVE Assess the use of direct oral challenges. METHODS A cohort study was conducted between March 2013 and March 2020, in Montreal and Winnipeg. All children referred with reported history of benign reactions (ie, limited to the skin with no mucosal lesions and no vesicles) to amoxicillin were recruited and a 2-step graded oral challenge (GOC) was conducted. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. Eligible children were followed to assess reactions to subsequent use of amoxicillin and to assess the safety of cephalexin use in children with a positive GOC. RESULTS Among 1914 children recruited, 1811 (94.6%) tolerated the GOC, 42 (2.2%) developed mild immediate reactions, and 61 (3.2%) developed mild nonimmediate reactions. Among 265 participants who had a negative GOC and reused amoxicillin, 226 (85.3%) reported tolerance and 39 (14.7%) had mild cutaneous reactions. Chronic urticaria (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23) and an index reaction occurring within 5 minutes of exposure (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14) were associated with immediate reactions during the GOC. Symptoms lasting longer than 7 days (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) and parental drug hypersensitivity (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06) were associated with nonimmediate reactions. Among those reacting to the GOC, 12.5% reacted with mild cutaneous reactions to cephalexin challenge. CONCLUSIONS Direct GOCs are an accurate and safe confirmatory to establish true hypersensitivity among children reporting benign reactions to amoxicillin.
Collapse
|
16
|
Delabeling Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: How Far Can You Safely Go? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 8:2878-2895.e6. [PMID: 33039012 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Delayed immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) are defined as reactions occurring more than 6 hours after dosing. They include heterogeneous clinical phenotypes that are typically T-cell-mediated reactions with distinct mechanisms across a wide spectrum of severity from benign exanthems through to life-threatening cutaneous or organ-specific diseases. For mild reactions such as benign exanthem, considerations for delabeling are similar to immediate reactions and may include a graded or single-dose drug challenge with or without preceding skin or patch testing. Evaluation of challenging cases such as the patient who is on multiple drugs at the time a severe delayed IM-ADR occurs should prioritize clinical ascertainment of the most likely phenotype and implicated drug(s). Although not widely available and validated, procedures such as patch testing, delayed intradermal skin testing, and laboratory-based functional drug assays or genetic (human leukocyte antigen) testing may provide valuable information to further help risk stratify patients and identify the likely implicated and/or cross-reactive drug(s). The decision to use a drug challenge as a diagnostic or delabeling tool in a patient with a severe delayed IM-ADR should weigh the risk-benefit ratio, balancing the severity and priority for the treatment of the underlying, and the availability of alternative efficacious and safe treatments.
Collapse
|
17
|
Touati N, Cardoso B, Delpuech M, Bazire R, El Kara N, Ouali D, Demoly P, Chiriac AM. Cephalosporin Hypersensitivity: Descriptive Analysis, Cross-Reactivity, and Risk Factors. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:1994-2000.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Fosnot S, Currier K, Pendell J, Jeffres MN. Comparison of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to preoperative antibiotics in patients labeled as penicillin allergic. Surgery 2021; 170:777-782. [PMID: 33838879 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cefazolin is routinely recommended as the first-line agent for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis because it prevents more surgical site infections than second-line antibiotics. Clinicians often avoid administering cefazolin to patients who are labeled as penicillin allergic due to concerns of cross-reactivity. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions between cefazolin and the second-line antibiotics vancomycin and clindamycin. METHODS This retrospective study included patients who were labeled as penicillin allergic and received either cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin as preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions. RESULTS A total of 734 surgical procedures in 690 patients were included. Fifteen immediate hypersensitivity reactions were identified. Probable hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients in the cefazolin group, 4 (1.4%) in the clindamycin group, and 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group. Seven of 8 patients reported allergies to additional medications beyond penicillin. There were seven cases of possible hypersensitivity reactions, 3 (0.9%) in the cefazolin group, 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group, and 3 (1.0%) in the clindamycin group. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are uncommon in patients labeled as penicillin allergic. The frequency of immediate hypersensitivity reactions was not different between patients receiving cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin. Avoiding cefazolin in patients labeled as penicillin allergic may not be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer Fosnot
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO
| | - Katelyn Currier
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO
| | - Jay Pendell
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO
| | - Meghan N Jeffres
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Blumenthal KG, Courtney L, Mancini CM, Jeffres MN. Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e210021. [PMID: 33729459 PMCID: PMC7970387 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cefazolin is the preoperative antibiotic of choice because it is safer and more efficacious than second-line alternatives. Surgical patients labeled as having penicillin allergy are less likely to prophylactically receive cefazolin and more likely to receive clindamycin or vancomycin, which results in higher rates of surgical site infections. Objective To examine the incidence of dual allergy to cefazolin and natural penicillins. Data Sources MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without language restrictions for relevant articles published from database inception until July 31, 2020. Study Selection In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was performed for articles published from database inception to July 31, 2020, for studies that included patients who had index allergies to a natural penicillin and were tested for tolerability to cefazolin or that included patients who had index allergies to cefazolin and were tested for tolerability to a natural penicillin. A total of 3228 studies were identified and 2911 were screened for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were independently extracted by 2 authors. Bayesian meta-analysis was used to estimate the frequency of allergic reactions. Main Outcomes and Measures Dual allergy to cefazolin and a natural penicillin. Results Seventy-seven unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding 6147 patients. Cefazolin allergy was identified in 44 participants with a history of penicillin allergy, resulting in a dual allergy meta-analytical frequency of 0.7% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.1%-1.7%; I2 = 74.9%). Such frequency was lower for participants with unconfirmed (0.6%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-1.3%; I2 = 54.3%) than for those with confirmed penicillin allergy (3.0%; 95% CrI, 0.01%-17.0%; I2 = 88.2%). Thirteen studies exclusively assessed surgical patients (n = 3884), among whom 0.7% (95% CrI, 0%-3.3%; I2 = 85.5%) had confirmed allergy to cefazolin. Low heterogeneity was observed for studies of patients with unconfirmed penicillin allergy who had been exposed to perioperative cefazolin (0.1%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-0.3%; I2 = 13.1%). Penicillin allergy was confirmed in 16 participants with a history of cefazolin allergy, resulting in a meta-analytical frequency of 3.7% (95% CrI, 0.03%-13.3%; I2 = 64.4%). The frequency of penicillin allergy was 4.4% (95% CrI, 0%-23.0%; I2 = 75%) for the 8 studies that exclusively assessed surgical patients allergic to cefazolin. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that most patients with a penicillin allergy history may safely receive cefazolin. The exception is patients with confirmed penicillin allergy in whom additional care is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kimberly G. Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Lindsay Courtney
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Christian M. Mancini
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Meghan N. Jeffres
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluating Immediate Reactions to Cephalosporins: Time Is of the Essence. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:1648-1657.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
21
|
Thompson G, McLean-Tooke A, Lucas M. Cross With Caution: Antibiotic Cross-Reactivity and Co-Reactivity Patterns in Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions. Front Immunol 2021; 12:601954. [PMID: 33717082 PMCID: PMC7947317 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.601954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Current understanding of cross-reactivity in severe cutaneous adverse reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics is limited, thereby making recommendations for future prescribing difficult. The underlying immunopathogenesis of these reactions is not completely understood but involves interactions between small molecule drugs, T cells and HLA molecules. Historically, these reactions were considered to be specific to the inciting antibiotic and therefore likely to have minimal cross-reactivity. We assessed patients presenting with non-SJS/TEN severe cutaneous adverse reactions to a tertiary hospital drug allergy clinic. In our case series cross-reactivity or co-reactivity commonly occurred among the beta-lactam antibiotic class, however further research is required to investigate and understand patterns of cross-reactivity. Based on our experience we provide clinicians with a practical algorithm for testing for cross-reactivity in non-SJS/TEN severe cutaneous adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Thompson
- Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Immunology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Pathwest, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Andrew McLean-Tooke
- Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Immunology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Pathwest, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Michaela Lucas
- Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Immunology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Pathwest, Nedlands, WA, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Caruso C, Valluzzi RL, Colantuono S, Gaeta F, Romano A. β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-Reactivity: A Clinician's Guide to Selecting an Alternative Antibiotic. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:31-46. [PMID: 33500632 PMCID: PMC7822086 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s242061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
β-Lactams which include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams are the most common antibiotic classes reported to cause allergic reactions to drugs. This review is mainly about published studies assessing the cross-reactivity among β-lactams in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic subjects by carrying out diagnostic tests with alternative β-lactams and, if appropriate, graded challenges. Several studies demonstrated that cross-reactivity connected with the β-lactam ring, causing positive responses to allergy tests with all β-lactams, is infrequent in subjects with an IgE-mediated allergy and anecdotal in those with a T-cell-mediated allergy. Identities or similarities of β-lactam side-chain structures are mainly responsible for cross-reactivity among these antibiotics. For example, in aminopenicillin-allergic subjects, cross-reactivity with aminocephalosporins could possibly be over 30%. On the other hand, in a few prospective studies of penicillin-allergic individuals, less than 1% of cases show a cross-reactivity between penicillins and both aztreonam and carbapenems. Particular patterns of allergy-test positivity observed in some studies that assessed cross-reactivity among β-lactams seem to indicate that prior exposures may be responsible for coexisting sensitivities. Therefore, pre-treatment skin tests with the related β-lactams are suggested before administering them via graded challenges to β-lactam-allergic patients who need alternative β-lactams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Caruso
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Luigi Valluzzi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Vatican City, Italy
| | - Stefania Colantuono
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Gaeta
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Romano
- Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
- Fondazione Mediterranea G.B. Morgagni, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Copaescu A, Gibson A, Li Y, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. An Updated Review of the Diagnostic Methods in Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:573573. [PMID: 33597867 PMCID: PMC7883592 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.573573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions are clinically diverse reactions that vary from isolated benign skin conditions that remit quickly with no or symptomatic treatment, drug discontinuation or even continued drug treatment, to the other extreme of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) that are associated with presumed life-long memory T-cell responses, significant acute and long-term morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic "in clinic" approaches to delayed hypersensitivity reactions have included patch testing (PT), delayed intradermal testing (IDT) and drug challenges for milder reactions. Patch and IDT are, in general, performed no sooner than 4-6 weeks after resolution of the acute reaction at the maximum non-irritating concentrations. Functional in vitro and ex vivo assays have largely remained the province of research laboratories and include lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and cytokine release enzyme linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay, an emerging diagnostic tool which uses cytokine release, typically IFN-γ, after the patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells are stimulated with the suspected drug(s). Genetic markers such as human leukocyte antigen have shown recent promise for both pre-prescription screening as well as pre-emptive and diagnostic testing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Copaescu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Center for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Gibson
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.,Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Yueran Li
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Center for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,The National Center for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patch Testing in Adverse Drug Reactions. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Neo-antigens for the serological diagnosis of IgE-mediated drug allergic reactions to antibiotics cephalosporin, carbapenem and monobactam. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16037. [PMID: 32994501 PMCID: PMC7525514 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73109-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
New antigens deriving from -lloyl and -llanyl, major and minor determinants, respectively, were produced for β-lactam antibiotics cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem and aztreonam. Twenty β-lactam antigens were produced using human serum albumin and histone H1 as carrier proteins. Antigens were tested by multiplex in vitro immunoassays and evaluated based on the detection of specific IgG and IgE in the serum samples. Both major and minor determinants were appropriate antigens for detecting specific anti-β-lactam IgG in immunised rabbit sera. In a cohort of 37 allergic patients, we observed that only the minor determinants (-llanyl antigens) were suitable for determining specific anti-β-lactam IgE antibodies with high sensitivity (< 0.01 IU/mL; 24 ng/L) and specificity (100%). These findings reveal that not only the haptenisation of β-lactam antibiotics renders improved molecular recognition events when the 4-member β-lactam ring remains unmodified, but also may contribute to develop promising minor antigens suitable for detecting specific IgE-mediated allergic reactions. This will facilitate the development of sensitive and selective multiplexed in vitro tests for drug-allergy diagnoses to antibiotics cephalosporin, carbapenem and monobactam.
Collapse
|
26
|
Yu RJ, Krantz MS, Phillips EJ, Stone CA. Emerging Causes of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: A Review of Anaphylaxis-Associated Reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:819-829.e2. [PMID: 32992044 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-induced anaphylaxis is a well-known adverse drug reaction for some drug classes, but emerging drug causes of anaphylaxis and novel mechanisms may contribute in unrecognized ways. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the top drugs reported in association with anaphylaxis and anaphylaxis followed by death in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS We reviewed the publicly available FAERS database from 1999 to 2019. Using search terms "anaphylactic shock" or "anaphylactic reaction" and sorting cases by generic drug names, we counted and trended reports to FAERS in which a drug was associated with anaphylaxis or anaphylaxis followed by death. RESULTS From 1999 to 2019, there were 17,506,002 adverse drug events reported in FAERS, of which 47,496 (0.27%) were reported as anaphylaxis. Excluding patients without age, sex, or country data, respectively, the median age of patients in reports of anaphylaxis was 52 (interquartile range: 28), 62.71% were female, and 13,899 of 34,381 (40.43%) reports were from the United States. There were 2984 of 47,496 (6.28%) reports of anaphylaxis followed by death. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis in FAERS were antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis deaths were antibiotics, radiocontrast agents, and intraoperative agents. Linear regression demonstrated reports of anaphylaxis to mAbs increasing at an average rate of 0.77% of total anaphylaxis reports per year (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.88) from 2.00% in 1999 to 17.37% in 2019, faster than any other drug class. CONCLUSION Antibiotics were highly reported for anaphylaxis overall and anaphylaxis followed by death. Increasing reports were noted for anaphylaxis to mAb therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger J Yu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Matthew S Krantz
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Cosby A Stone
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stone CA, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Testing Strategies and Predictors for Evaluating Immediate and Delayed Reactions to Cephalosporins. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:435-444.e13. [PMID: 32822918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although 1% to 2% of the general population carries a cephalosporin allergy label (CAL), we lack validated testing strategies and predictors of true allergy. OBJECTIVE To identify cross-reactivity patterns and predictors of skin test positive (STP) in geographically disparate patients with a CAL. METHODS A total of 780 adult patients labeled with a CAL or penicillin allergy label (PAL) with unknown tolerance of cephalosporins identified from the Austin Hospital (Melbourne, Australia) (n = 410) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) (n = 370) between 2014 and 2018 underwent a standardized skin testing. RESULTS Of 328 patients with a CAL, 29 (8.8%) tested STP to ≥1 cephalosporin(s). There were no cefazolin or ceftriaxone STP, 0 of 452 (0%), in patients with a PAL only. Of 328 patients with a CAL, 16 (4.8%) were ampicillin STP. Eleven of 16 of these patients had an initial allergy label to cephalexin. Twenty of 29 cephalosporin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to a cephalosporin with a different R1 side chain, and 8 of 14 ampicillin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to ≥1 non-amino R1 group cephalosporin. Eleven of 13 patients STP to cefazolin were skin and ingestion challenge negative to all other penicillins and cephalosporins predicted by its distinct R1/R2 groups. Seven of 15 ceftriaxone STP patients demonstrated cross-reactivity with R1-similar cephalosporins. Time since the original reaction predicted STP testing to both penicillins, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per year 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90, 0.97), and cephalosporins, aOR per year 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Cephalosporin cross-reactivity is based on shared R1 groupings. Increasing time since the original reaction and the presence of a PAL with unknown cephalosporin tolerance predict a lower likelihood of cephalosporin STP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosby A Stone
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; National Centre for Infections in Cancer and Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn; Institute for Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Romano A, Atanaskovic‐Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bircher AJ, Brockow K, Caubet J, Celik G, Cernadas J, Chiriac A, Demoly P, Garvey LH, Mayorga C, Nakonechna A, Whitaker P, Torres MJ. Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper. Allergy 2020; 75:1300-1315. [PMID: 31749148 DOI: 10.1111/all.14122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A recent survey of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) on how European allergy specialists deal with beta-lactam (BL) hypersensitivity demonstrated a significant heterogeneity in current practice, suggesting the need to review and update existing EAACI guidelines in order to make the diagnostic procedures as safe and accurate, but also as cost-effective, as possible. For this purpose, a bibliographic search on large studies regarding BL hypersensitivity diagnosis was performed by an EAACI task force, which reviewed and evaluated the literature data using the GRADE system for quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. The updated guidelines provide a risk stratification in BL hypersensitivity according to index reaction(s), as well as an algorithmic approach, based on cross-reactivity studies, in patients with a suspicion of BL hypersensitivity and an immediate need for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible. Furthermore, the update addresses availability and concentrations of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, and diagnostic algorithms and administration of alternative BL in allergic subjects. Specifically, distinct diagnostic algorithms are suggested depending on risk stratification of the patient into high and low risk based on the morphology and chronology of the reaction, immediate (ie, occurring within 1-6 hours after the last administered dose) or nonimmediate (ie, occurring more than 1 hour after the initial drug administration), and the reaction severity. Regarding the allergy workup, the main novelty of this document is the fact that in some low-risk nonimmediate reactions ST are not mandatory, especially in children. For DPT, further studies are necessary to provide data supporting the standardization of protocols, especially of those regarding nonimmediate reactions, for which there is currently no consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Romano
- Casa di Cura Quisisana Rome & Fondazione Mediterranea G.B. Catania Italy
| | | | - Annick Barbaud
- Departement of Dermatology and Allergology Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique INSERM Tenon Hospital Sorbonne Université Paris France
| | | | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| | | | - Gulfem Celik
- Department of Immunology and Allergy Ankara University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
| | - Josefina Cernadas
- Department of Allergy and Immunology Centro Hospitalar Universitário de S João Porto Portugal
| | - Anca‐Mirela Chiriac
- Division of Allergy Department of Pulmonology Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve University Hospital of Montpellier Montpellier France
- UMRS 1136 Equipe ‐ EPAR ‐ IPLESP UPMC Univ Sorbonne Universités Paris France
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Division of Allergy Department of Pulmonology Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve University Hospital of Montpellier Montpellier France
- UMRS 1136 Equipe ‐ EPAR ‐ IPLESP UPMC Univ Sorbonne Universités Paris France
| | - Lene H. Garvey
- Allergy Clinic Department of Dermatology and Allergy Herlev and Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Cristobalina Mayorga
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA Malaga Spain
- Allergy Unit Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga-UMA-ARADyAL Malaga Spain
| | - Alla Nakonechna
- Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit Sheffield Teaching Hospital Sheffield UK
- University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
| | - Paul Whitaker
- Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit St James's Hospital Leeds UK
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Unit Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga-UMA-ARADyAL Malaga Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patil SS, Sun L, Fox CJ, Anthony KE, Anzalone FA, Fisher PM, Girma B, Huang GJ, Barsley EL, Cornett EM, Urman RD, Kaye AD. Multiple drug allergies: Recommendations for perioperative management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2020; 34:325-344. [PMID: 32711838 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions are more likely to occur in patients with a history of allergy, atopy, or asthma. Hence, in a patient who presented with a history of multiple drug allergies (MDA), an allergological assessment should be performed prior to surgical procedure. Drug allergies, being one of the causes of catastrophic events occurring in the perioperative period, are of major concern to anesthesiologists. Neuromuscular blocking agents are regularly used during anesthesia and are one of the most common causes of perioperative anaphylaxis. They are estimated to be responsible for 50%-70% of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. Antibiotics and latex represent the next two groups of drug allergy. Allergic reactions to propofol are rare with an incidence of 1:60,000 exposures. Although intraoperative drug anaphylaxis is rare, it contributes to 4.3% of deaths occurring during general anesthesia. These recommendations discuss pathophysiology of MDA, preoperative evaluation, and anesthesia considerations as well as the prevention and management of allergic reactions in anesthetized patients with a history of MDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpadevi S Patil
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Lu Sun
- School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, 2020 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
| | - Charles J Fox
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | | | - Fallon A Anzalone
- LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, 433 Bolivar Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
| | - Paul M Fisher
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Brook Girma
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Genkai J Huang
- Division of Family Medicine, HCA Houston Healthcare West, 12141 Richmond Ave. Houston, TX, 77082, USA.
| | - Emily L Barsley
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Elyse M Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H, Brehler R, Jakob T, Kreft B, Mahler V, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Ott H, Pfützner W, Röseler S, Ruëff F, Sitter H, Sunderkötter C, Trautmann A, Treudler R, Wedi B, Worm M, Brockow K. Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG). Allergol Select 2020; 4:11-43. [PMID: 32568254 PMCID: PMC7304290 DOI: 10.5414/alx02104e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) hypersensitivity was written by the German and Austrian professional associations for allergology, and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy in a consensus procedure according to the criteria of the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. BLA such as penicillins and cephalosporins represent the drug group that most frequently triggers drug allergies. However, the frequency of reports of suspected allergy in patient histories clearly exceeds the number of confirmed cases. The large number of suspected BLA allergies has a significant impact on, e.g., the quality of treatment received by the individual patient and the costs to society as a whole. Allergies to BLA are based on different immunological mechanisms and often manifest as maculopapular exanthema, as well as anaphylaxis; and there are also a number of less frequent special clinical manifestations of drug allergic reactions. All BLA have a beta-lactam ring. BLA are categorized into different classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, and beta-lactamase inhibitors with different chemical structures. Knowledge of possible cross-reactivity is of considerable clinical significance. Whereas allergy to the common beta-lactam ring occurs in only a small percentage of all BLA allergic patients, cross-reactivity due to side chain similarities, such as aminopenicillins and aminocephalosporins, and even methoxyimino cephalosporins, are more common. However, the overall picture is complex and its elucidation may require further research. Diagnostic procedures used in BLA allergy are usually made up of four components: patient history, laboratory diagnostics, skin testing (which is particularly important), and drug provocation testing. The diagnostic approach - even in cases where the need to administer a BLA is acute - is guided by patient history and risk - benefit ratio in the individual case. Here again, further studies are required to extend the present state of knowledge. Performing allergy testing for suspected BLA hypersensitivity is urgently recommended not only in the interests of providing the patient with good medical care, but also due to the immense impact of putative BLA allergies on society as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerda Wurpts
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria,
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum,
| | - Randolf Brehler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster,
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Gießen Site, Gießen,
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Vera Mahler
- Paul-Ehrlich Institute, Langen,
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen,
| | - Hans F. Merk
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Auf der Bult Children’s Hospital, Hannover,
| | - Wolfgang Pfützner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg Site, Marburg,
| | - Stefani Röseler
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich,
| | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute of Surgical Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg,
| | - Cord Sunderkötter
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Axel Trautmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg,
| | - Regina Treudler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology and Leipzig Interdisciplinary Center for Allergology – LICA-CAC, University of Leipzig, Leipzig,
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover,
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Allergy Center Charité (ACC), Berlin, and
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology am Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cortellini G, Carli G, Franceschini L, Lippolis D, Farsi A, Romano A. Evaluating nonimmediate cutaneous reactions to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants via patch testing. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:3190-3193. [PMID: 32376484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Carli
- Allergy Unit, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonino Romano
- Allergy Unit, IRCCS Oasi Maria S.S., Troina, Italy; Allergy Unit, Fondazione Mediterranea G.B. Morgagni, Catania, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
A Practical Guide for Managing Antibiotic Allergies in the Emergency Department. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2020; 41:306-315. [PMID: 31687994 DOI: 10.1097/tme.0000000000000264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Up to 30% of patients report at least one antibiotic allergy, but oftentimes these antibiotic allergies are misdiagnosed. In fact, of the 10% of patients reporting penicillin allergies, 90%-98% are not truly allergic. In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance coupled with a limited number of new antibiotics, evaluating antibiotic allergies is critical in providing optimal patient care. Differentiating adverse drug reactions from antibiotic allergies may seem like a daunting task for clinicians and providers, especially in the emergency department, where decisions are made quickly. However, a systemic approach, including medical record review coupled with patient and/or family interview, is vital in managing patients with antibiotic allergies. Inappropriate, alternative antibiotics are frequently chosen due to patient allergies, and data suggest higher rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and poor outcomes as a result. Herein, we review antibiotic selection in patients reporting antibiotic allergies in the emergency department.
Collapse
|
33
|
A Streamlined Approach to Optimize Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Setting of Penicillin Allergy Labels. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:1316-1322. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
34
|
Sakoulas G, Geriak M, Nizet V. Is a Reported Penicillin Allergy Sufficient Grounds to Forgo the Multidimensional Antimicrobial Benefits of β-Lactam Antibiotics? Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:157-164. [PMID: 29986019 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of patients with reported penicillin allergy are not allergic when tested or challenged. Penicillin allergy testing has been shown to significantly reduce annual healthcare expenditures. Data have emerged showing β-lactams have multidimensional antibacterial effects in vivo, far beyond what is appreciated in standard bacteriological susceptibility testing media. These include enhancing bacterial killing by the innate immune system. Supporting the clinical relevance of these secondary underappreciated effects are recent clinical and pharmacoeconomic analyses that show worse outcomes in patients with reported penicillin allergies who receive non-β-lactam antibiotics when compared to their non-penicillin-allergic counterparts. This is particularly relevant in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. This article reviews the tremendous advantages offered by β-lactam therapy and makes a strong case that the debunking of false penicillin allergies through a detailed allergy history and penicillin allergy testing should be a vital component of antimicrobial stewardship practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Sakoulas
- Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, La Jolla.,School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Victor Nizet
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.,Skaggs School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Gelincik A, Cavkaytar O, Kuyucu S. An Update on the Management of Severe Cutaneous Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Curr Pharm Des 2019; 25:3881-3901. [DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666191106115556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Severe cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reactions involve of different mechanisms , some of which are
life-threatening, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia
and systemic symptoms, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, generalized bullous fixed drug eruptions,
serum sickness and serum sickness-like reaction and drug-induced vasculitis. These reactions may have substantial
morbidity and mortality. In the past years, successive studies have provided new evidence regarding the
pathogenesis of some of these severe reactions and revealed that underlying mechanisms are highly variable.
Since these reactions have unique presentations and distinct pathomechanisms, the treatment methods and response
rates might be different among various entities. Although supportive and local therapies are sufficient in
some of these reactions, targeted immunosuppressive treatments and even mechanistic therapies such as plasmapheresis
may be required in severe ones. However, there is still insufficient evidence to support the best treatment
options for these patients since number of patients and large-scale studies are limited. In this review, conventional
and new treatment options for severe cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reactions are presented in detail in
order to provide the contemporary approaches to lessen the morbidity and mortality relevant to these severe iatrogenic
diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aslı Gelincik
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Cavkaytar
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Semanur Kuyucu
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Mersin University, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Penicillin allergies are not always lifelong. Approximately 50% are lost over five years A reaction to penicillin during a childhood infection is unlikely to be a true allergy Only 1–2% of patients with a confirmed penicillin allergy have an allergy to cephalosporins. In patients with a low risk of severe allergic reactions, cephalosporins are a relatively safe treatment option Patients with a history of delayed non-severe reactions, such as mild childhood rashes that occurred over 10 years ago, may be suitable for an oral rechallenge with low-dose penicillin. This should be done in a supervised hospital environment In many cases, with appropriate assessment and allergy testing, it may be possible to remove the penicillin allergy label
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Devchand
- Antimicrobial Stewardship, Drug and Antibiotic Allergy Service and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Melbourne.,Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Melbourne.,The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne.,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Antimicrobial Stewardship, Drug and Antibiotic Allergy Service and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Melbourne.,Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Melbourne.,The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne.,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Krispinsky AJ, Shedlofsky LB, Kaffenberger BH. The frequency of low‐risk morbilliform drug eruptions observed in patients treated with different classes of antibiotics. Int J Dermatol 2019; 59:647-655. [DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Krispinsky
- Division of Dermatology Department of Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
| | | | - Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
- Division of Dermatology Department of Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Trubiano JA, Chua KYL, Holmes NE, Douglas AP, Mouhtouris E, Goh M, Phillips EJ. Safety of cephalosporins in penicillin class severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 8:1142-1146.e4. [PMID: 31678298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Trubiano
- Infectious Diseases Department and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Kyra Y L Chua
- Infectious Diseases Department and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Natasha E Holmes
- Infectious Diseases Department and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Abby P Douglas
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Effie Mouhtouris
- Infectious Diseases Department and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle Goh
- Department of Dermatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bérot V, Gener G, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Gaudin O, Paul M, Chosidow O, Wolkenstein P, Assier H. Cross-reactivity in beta-lactams after a non-immediate cutaneous adverse reaction: experience of a reference centre for toxic bullous diseases and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 34:787-794. [PMID: 31571276 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cross-reactivity among beta-lactam antibiotics (BL) is essentially reported in immediate hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVES To evaluate cross-reactivity beyond BLs in patients with non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reaction (non-immediate CADR) managed in a dermatology reference centre of toxic bullous and severe CADRs. PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-centre study in consecutive patients consulting between 2010 and 2018 with an active BL-suspected non-immediate CADR and explored by cutaneous tests [patch tests (PT) and intradermal tests (P-IDR)] for at least three penicillin's subclasses and amino- and non-amino-cephalosporins (at least one aminocephalosporin). Cross-reactivity among subclasses was investigated for patients with positive tests. RESULTS We included 56 patients, among whom 46 amoxicillin-suspected were and seven cephalosporin-suspected. Twenty-nine had severe CADR, and 27 had non-immediate maculopapular exanthema (MPE). Twenty-two had positive tests (18 for AS and four for CS). Among the 18 positive amoxicillin-suspected, 10 (55.6%) showed cross-reactivity with one or more other BL: 9 (50%) with another penicillin and 3 (16.5%) with a non-aminocephalosporin. No amoxicillin- or cephalosporin-suspected patient showed cross-reactivity with aztreonam or carbapenems. P-IDR showed cross-reactivity only once. CONCLUSION After a suspected BL-induced non-immediate CADR, a large allergologic exploration is needed to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate cross-reactivity. In our population including cases of severe CADRs and MPE with late delay of onset, cross-reactivity was frequent and PT was sufficient to this purpose. The frequent cross-reactivity among penicillins encourages stopping this whole family and to test cephalosporins, aztreonam and carbapenems for which cross-allergies are rarer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Bérot
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - G Gener
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France
| | - S Ingen-Housz-Oro
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France.,EA7379 EpidermE, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - O Gaudin
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France
| | - M Paul
- EA7379 EpidermE, UPEC, Créteil, France.,Department of Pharmacy, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - O Chosidow
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil Val de Marne UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - P Wolkenstein
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil Val de Marne UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - H Assier
- Dermatology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.,Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H, Brehler R, Jakob T, Kreft B, Mahler V, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Ott H, Pfützner W, Röseler S, Ruëff F, Sitter H, Sunderkötter C, Trautmann A, Treudler R, Wedi B, Worm M, Brockow K. S2k-Leitlinie: Diagnostik bei Verdacht auf eine Betalaktamantibiotika-Überempfindlichkeit. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-019-1876-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
42
|
Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-019-0100-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
43
|
Blanca-Lopez N, Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Somoza ML, Gomez E, Al-Ahmad M, Perez-Sala D, Blanca M. Allergic reactions to penicillins and cephalosporins: diagnosis, assessment of cross-reactivity and management. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:707-721. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2019.1619548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria L. Somoza
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Gomez
- Roche Innovation Center Basel, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Dolores Perez-Sala
- Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Blanca
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cross-Reactivity to Cephalosporins and Carbapenems in Penicillin-Allergic Patients: Two Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2722-2738.e5. [PMID: 31170539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no recent systematic review on the risk of cross-reactivity to cephalosporins and carbapenems in penicillin-allergic patients despite many new studies on the subject. All past reviews have several limitations such as not including any patient with a T-cell-mediated penicillin allergy. OBJECTIVES To determine the risk of cross-reactivity to cephalosporins and carbapenems in patients with a proven IgE- or T-cell-mediated penicillin allergy. To measure the association between R1 side chain similarity on cephalosporins and penicillins and the risk of cross-reactivity. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 to March 2019. Studies had to include at least 10 penicillin-allergic subjects whose allergy had been confirmed by a positive skin test (ST) or drug provocation test (DPT) result. Cross-reactivity had to be assessed to at least 1 cephalosporin or carbapenem through ST or DPT. Both random-effects and fixed-effect models were used to combine data. A bioinformatic model was used to quantify the similarity between R1 side chains. RESULTS Twenty-one observational studies on cephalosporin cross-reactivity involving 1269 penicillin-allergic patients showed that the risk of cross-reactivity varied with the degree of similarity between R1 side chains: 16.45% (95% CI, 11.07-23.75) for aminocephalosporins, which share an identical side chain with a penicillin (similarity score = 1), 5.60% (95% CI, 3.46-8.95) for a few cephalosporins with an intermediate similarity score (range, 0.563-0.714), and 2.11% (95% CI, 0.98-4.46) for all those with low similarity scores (below 0.4), irrespective of cephalosporin generation. The higher risk associated with aminocephalosporins was observed whether penicillin allergy was IgE- or T-cell-mediated. Eleven observational studies on carbapenem cross-reactivity involving 1127 penicillin-allergic patients showed that the risk of cross-reactivity to any carbapenem was 0.87% (95% CI, 0.32-2.32). CONCLUSIONS Although it remains possible that these meta-analyses overestimated the risk of cross-reactivity, clinicians should consider the increased risk of cross-reactivity associated with aminocephalosporins, and to a lesser extent with intermediate-similarity-score cephalosporins, compared with the very low risk associated with low-similarity-score cephalosporins and all carbapenems when using beta-lactams in patients with a suspected or proven penicillin allergy.
Collapse
|
45
|
New Insights of Biomarkers in IgE and Non-IgE-Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-019-0201-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
46
|
Caffarelli C, Franceschini F, Caimmi D, Mori F, Diaferio L, Di Mauro D, Mastrorilli C, Arasi S, Barni S, Bottau P, Caimmi S, Cardinale F, Comberiati P, Crisafulli G, Liotti L, Pelosi U, Saretta F, Marseglia G, Duse M, Paravati F. SIAIP position paper: provocation challenge to antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Ital J Pediatr 2018; 44:147. [PMID: 30526636 PMCID: PMC6286516 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-018-0589-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) in childhood are mainly caused by betalactam or non-betalactam antibiotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Laboratory tests for identifying children who are allergic to drugs have low diagnostic accuracy and predictive value. The gold standard to diagnose DHR is represented by the drug provocation test (DPT), that aims of ascertaining the causative role of an allergen and evaluating the tolerance to the suspected drug. Different protocols through the administration of divided increasing doses have been postulated according to the type of drug and the onset of the reaction (immediate or non immediate reactions). DPT protocols differ in doses and time interval between doses. In this position paper, the Italian Pediatric Society for Allergy and Immunology provides a practical guide for provocation test to antibiotics and NSAIDs in children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Caffarelli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43122 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Davide Caimmi
- Allergy Unit, Departement de Pneumologie et Addictologie, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHRU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Diaferio
- Department of Paediatrics, Aldo Moro University of Bari-Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Dora Di Mauro
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43122 Parma, Italy
| | - Carla Mastrorilli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43122 Parma, Italy
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Bambino Gesù Academic Hospital, Rome, Vatican State Italy
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Bottau
- Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Ospedale di Imola, Azienda USL, Imola, Italy
| | - Silvia Caimmi
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabio Cardinale
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hospital “Giovanni XXIII”, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Comberiati
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Life and Reproduction Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Crisafulli
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Lucia Liotti
- Pediatric Unit, Civic Hospital, Senigallia, Italy
| | | | | | - Gianluigi Marseglia
- Pediatric Clinic, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico “S. Matteo” Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marzia Duse
- Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Paravati
- Pediatric Unit, Infant Maternal Department, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Crotone, Crotone, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Trautmann A, Wurpts G. Allergien gegen Penizilline und andere β-Laktamantibiotika — Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Patientenmanagement. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-018-1614-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
48
|
Norton AE, Konvinse K, Phillips EJ, Broyles AD. Antibiotic Allergy in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2018; 141:peds.2017-2497. [PMID: 29700201 PMCID: PMC5914499 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The overlabeling of pediatric antibiotic allergy represents a huge burden in society. Given that up to 10% of the US population is labeled as penicillin allergic, it can be estimated that at least 5 million children in this country are labeled with penicillin allergy. We now understand that most of the cutaneous symptoms that are interpreted as drug allergy are likely viral induced or due to a drug-virus interaction, and they usually do not represent a long-lasting, drug-specific, adaptive immune response to the antibiotic that a child received. Because most antibiotic allergy labels acquired in childhood are carried into adulthood, the overlabeling of antibiotic allergy is a liability that leads to unnecessary long-term health care risks, costs, and antibiotic resistance. Fortunately, awareness of this growing burden is increasing and leading to more emphasis on antibiotic allergy delabeling strategies in the adult population. There is growing literature that is used to support the safe and efficacious use of tools such as skin testing and drug challenge to evaluate and manage children with antibiotic allergy labels. In addition, there is an increasing understanding of antibiotic reactivity within classes and side-chain reactions. In summary, a better overall understanding of the current tools available for the diagnosis and management of adverse drug reactions is likely to change how pediatric primary care providers evaluate and treat patients with such diagnoses and prevent the unnecessary avoidance of antibiotics, particularly penicillins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Eaddy Norton
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Pulmonology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, and
| | - Katherine Konvinse
- Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth J. Phillips
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Pulmonology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, and,John A. Oates Institute for Experimental Therapeutics and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee;,Division of Infectious Disease, Departments of Medicine and,Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee;,Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia; and
| | - Ana Dioun Broyles
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
How to Manage Antibiotic Allergy in Cystic Fibrosis? Epidemiologic, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Aspects. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-018-0152-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
Pinheiro V, Pestana C, Pinho A, Antunes I, Gonçalo M. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by antibiotics in healthcare workers - relationship with non-immediate drug eruptions. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78:281-286. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vítor Pinheiro
- Occupational Health Department; Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC); Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
| | - Catarina Pestana
- Occupational Health Department; Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC); Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
| | - André Pinho
- Dermatology Department; Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC); Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
| | - Isabel Antunes
- Occupational Health Department; Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC); Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Dermatology Department; Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC); Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
- Dermatology Clinic, Medicine Faculty; Coimbra University; Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra Portugal
| |
Collapse
|