A distinct biomolecular profile identifies monoclonal mast cell disorders in patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis

Pearls for practice from the 2023 joint task force anaphylaxis practice parameter

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To share important highlights on the management of anaphylaxis from the latest 2023 practice parameter.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2023 Allergy Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters (JTFPP) anaphylaxis practice parameter provides updated anaphylaxis guidance. Criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis are reviewed. The parameter highlights that while anaphylaxis is not more severe in younger children, age-specific symptoms can vary. Activation of emergency medical services may not be required in patients who experience prompt resolution of symptoms following epinephrine use and caregivers are comfortable with observation. For children weighing <15 kg, the anaphylaxis parameter suggests the clinician may prescribe either the 0.1 mg or the 0.15 mg epinephrine autoinjector, with the 0.3 mg autoinjector prescribed for those weighing 25 kg or greater. In patients with heart disease, discontinuing or changing beta blockers and/or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may pose a larger risk for worsened cardiovascular disease compared with risk for severe anaphylaxis with medication continuation. Furthermore, in patients with a history of perioperative anaphylaxis, shared decision-making based on diagnostic testing and clinical history is recommended prior to repeat anesthesia use. Beyond the recent parameter update, novel contemporary therapies can decrease risk of community anaphylaxis.

SUMMARY

The 2023 JTFPP Anaphylaxis Guidelines offer up-to-date guidance for the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in infants, children, and adults.

Anaphylaxis in Practice: A Guide to the 2023 Practice Parameter Update

This review summarizes new research developments and clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis presented in the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters 2023 Anaphylaxis practice parameter Update. It is intended to serve as a high-level summary of the 2023 practice parameter, which makes clinically impactful recommendations based on evidence that has emerged since the 2015 practice parameter. We invite clinicians to explore the full 2023 practice parameter to understand the research methods and underlying evidence that have informed the recommendations summarized here. There are new and evolving diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis, rules for defining elevated tryptase levels, and recognition of signs and symptoms particular to infants and toddlers. The administration of epinephrine should not be used as a surrogate to diagnose anaphylaxis. Risk factors for anaphylaxis should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Patient counseling and shared decision-making are essential to support patients' treatment decisions and capacity to manage the risk of anaphylaxis at home and in other community settings. Activation of emergency medical services after home epinephrine administration may not be required in all cases, and patients should be engaged in shared decision-making to determine when home management may be appropriate.

Test Panel of Hidden Allergens for "Idiopathic Anaphylaxis" Reveals Wheat Allergy Dependent on Augmentation Factors as Common Final Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is an unresolved concern. Hidden allergens may be relevant in IA and in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity (NSAID-HS).

OBJECTIVE

To identify hidden elicitors for IA and NSAID-HS by a skin prick test (SPT) (13 allergens) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) panel (12 allergens) and to determine the value of each tested allergen.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients from 2018 to 2021 referred with a suspicion of IA or NSAID-HS by history in whom SPT and/or sIgE to allergens of the IA panel were performed. Patient characteristics from patients' records included comorbidities, history and symptoms of anaphylaxis, serum baseline tryptase level, total IgE level, SPT, sIgE, challenge results, and final diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients (77 female, mean age 39.7 ± 14.6 years) were included. Median serum baseline tryptase and total IgE levels were 4.23 μg/L and 133.5 kU/L, respectively. Allergologic workup with the IA panel resulted in positive SPT and sIgE in 61 (47%) and 66 (60%) patients, respectively. In those, confirmation or exclusion of allergy, mostly by challenge, led to a definitive diagnosis in 61 of 134 patients (46%). Skin prick test was most frequently positive to gluten (22.4%) and sIgE to ω5-gliadin (21.6%), which correlated with the history (r = 0.310, P < .001; and r = 0.407, P < .001, respectively). In 28 of 134 patients (21%) with initially suspected IA or NSAID-HS, challenges confirmed occult food allergy in which wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors should be considered in all patients with anaphylaxis of unknown cause or after NSAID intake.

Pediatric idiopathic anaphylaxis: practical management from infants to adolescents

Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) remains a frustrating challenge for both patients and physicians. The aim of this paper is to focus on IA in pediatric ages and suggest possible diagnostic algorithms according to specific age ranges (infants, children, and adolescents). In fact, in a variable percentage of patients, despite extensive diagnostic tests, the cause of anaphylactic episodes cannot be identified. Moreover, the lack of a unanimous IA definition requires a careful and detailed diagnostic workup. Prompt recognition of signs and symptoms, especially in younger children, and an accurate clinical history often allow a choice of the most appropriate diagnostic tests and a correct differential diagnosis.

Standardized indolent systemic mastocytosis evaluations across a health care system: implications for screening accuracy

ABSTRACT

Timely diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM) remains challenging because of care heterogeneity. We implemented a standardized approach for SM screening and diagnosis using a novel health care system-wide international screening registry. A retrospective analysis assessed rates of SM, cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), and molecular diagnoses before and 2 years after care standardization. The accuracy of individual and combined SM screening tests, basal serum tryptase (BST) ≥11.5 and ≥20.0 ng/mL, REMA ≥2, monomorphic maculopapular CM (MPCM), and elevated BST based upon tryptase genotype, was analyzed. Tryptase genotyping and high-sensitivity KIT p.D816V testing increased substantially 2 years after care standardization. SM diagnoses doubled from 47 to 94, and KIT p.D816V molecular diagnoses increased from 24 to 79. Mean BST and KIT p.D816V variant allele frequency values were significantly lower in patients diagnosed after standardization. Hereditary-alpha tryptasemia prevalence was increased in SM before care standardization (4/30 [13.3%]) but reflected the general population prevalence 2 years later at (5/76 [6.6%]). Elevated BST based upon genotype and BST ≥11.5 ng/mL had the highest sensitivities at 84.2% and 88.3%, respectively. The presence of monomorphic MPCM, elevated BST based upon tryptase genotype, and the combination of REMA ≥2 with elevated BST based upon tryptase genotype had specificities >90%. BST >20.0 ng/mL had low sensitivity and specificity and was not required to establish any indolent SM (ISM) diagnosis. Care standardization increased SM diagnosis rates, particularly in patients with low BSTs. Stratifying BST based upon genotype had the best overall sensitivity and specificity of any ISM screening test and improved the REMA score specificity.

Alpha-Tryptase as a Risk-Modifying Factor for Mast Cell-Mediated Reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview on the current understanding of genetic variability in human tryptases and summarize the literature demonstrating the differential impact of mature tryptases on mast cell-mediated reactions and associated clinical phenotypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is becoming increasingly recognized that tryptase gene composition, and in particular the common genetic trait hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT), impacts clinical allergy. HαT has consistently been associated with clonal mast cell disorders (MCD) and has also been associated with more frequent anaphylaxis among these patients, and patients in whom no allergic trigger can be found, specifically idiopathic anaphylaxis. Additionally, more severe anaphylaxis among Hymenoptera venom allergy patients has been linked to HαT in both retrospective and prospective studies. An increased relative number of α-tryptase-encoding gene copies, even in the absence of HαT, has also been associated with systemic mastocytosis and has been shown to positively correlate with the severity of mast cell-mediated reactions to vibration and food. These findings may be due to increased generation of α/β-tryptase heterotetramers and differences in their enzymatic activity relative to β-tryptase homotetramers. HαT is a naturally occurring overexpression model of α-tryptase in humans. Increased relative α-tryptase expression modifies immediate hypersensitivity symptoms and is associated with more frequent and severe mast cell-mediated reactions, ostensibly due to increased α/β-tryptase heterotetramer production.

Low Prevalence of Idiopathic Mast Cell Activation Syndrome Among 703 Patients With Suspected Mast Cell Disorders

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (iMCAS) is characterized by severe, episodic systemic mast cell (MC) activation and mediator-related symptoms, an event-related increase in serum tryptase levels, and response to MC-targeted therapies in the absence of underlying IgE-mediated allergy or clonal MC disorder. Studies indicating its prevalence using evidence-based diagnostic criteria are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of patients with iMCAS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of data from 703 consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) referred to our center based on suspicion of having MC disorders. Patients underwent a thorough clinical workup including patient history, allergy tests, KIT D816V mutation analysis, and/or bone marrow investigation. Disease activity was prospectively assessed during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

We identified 31 patients with confirmed iMCAS. Furthermore, hereditary α-tryptasemia was detected in three patients with baseline tryptase levels greater than 8 ng/mL. The most common clinical presentation during MCAS episodes was mucocutaneous symptoms in patients with iMCAS, especially urticaria or angioedema. However, these symptoms were less prevalent in patients with clonal MCAS (P = .015). The duration of diagnostic delay was significantly longer in patients with iMCAS compared to those with clonal MCAS (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of iMCAS was 4.4% in the entire cohort, which indicates that iMCAS is an uncommon condition. To accurately diagnose iMCAS, it is crucial to evaluate suspected patients using the three diagnostic MCAS criteria. This involves performing a comprehensive allergy work-up including laboratory tests and ultrasensitive mutation analysis of KIT D816V. Subsequently, recommended diagnostic algorithms should be applied.

Using the Right Criteria for MCAS

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article aims to provide a comprehensive update on diagnostic criteria for mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), addressing challenges in diagnosing and classifying MCAS and its variants.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in our knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms responsible for the activation of mast cells (MCs) in various pathological conditions. Furthermore, a set of criteria and a classification for MCASs have been established. MCAS is characterized by the presence of typical clinical symptoms, a substantial elevation in serum tryptase levels during an attack compared to the patient's baseline tryptase levels, and a response to MC mediator-targeting therapy. In this report, a thorough examination was conducted on the contemporary literature relating to MCAS, with a focus on comparing the specificity, sensitivity, and robustness of MCAS-related parameters within proposals for diagnosing and classifying MCAS and its variants. Moreover, the significance of employing specific consensus criteria in the assessment and categorization of MCAS in individual patients was underscored, due to the escalating occurrence of patients receiving a misdiagnosis of MCAS based on nonspecific criteria.

Predictors of Clonality and Underlying Mastocytosis in Mast Cell Activation Syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mast cell (MC) activation can present with a wide range of symptoms. The mechanisms that cause such activation are varied. One of them is the presence of clonal MCs which is defined, within other possible changes, by the presence of a somatic, activating mutation in the KIT gene. The clinical course and prognosis of patients with this underlying disease may be different from other causes of MC activation (MCA). For this reason, it is important to early diagnose, or at least suspect, which patients with MCA are due to clonal MCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of clonality must be made in a comprehensive manner. However, this paper reviews chronologically each of the stages from the patient's first visit to the doctor's office which can be indicative of clonality: clinical presentation of MCA, physical examination, analytical determinations of tryptase, and/or KIT mutational analysis and bone involvement, among others. The different clonality predictive scores proposed are also reviewed and compared. Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of certainty of MC clonality is the performance of a bone marrow (BM) biopsy, there are clinical symptoms, signs, and biological parameters suggestive of clonality, as well as predictive scores, which can guide (or rule out) an early diagnosis and avoid unnecessary BM biopsies.

Anaphylaxis: A 2023 practice parameter update

This practice parameter update focuses on 7 areas in which there are new evidence and new recommendations. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis have been revised, and patterns of anaphylaxis are defined. Measurement of serum tryptase is important for diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify underlying mast cell disorders. In infants and toddlers, age-specific symptoms may differ from older children and adults, patient age is not correlated with reaction severity, and anaphylaxis is unlikely to be the initial reaction to an allergen on first exposure. Different community settings for anaphylaxis require specific measures for prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis. Optimal prescribing and use of epinephrine autoinjector devices require specific counseling and training of patients and caregivers, including when and how to administer the epinephrine autoinjector and whether and when to call 911. If epinephrine is used promptly, immediate activation of emergency medical services may not be required if the patient experiences a prompt, complete, and durable response. For most medical indications, the risk of stopping or changing beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication may exceed the risk of more severe anaphylaxis if the medication is continued, especially in patients with insect sting anaphylaxis. Evaluation for mastocytosis, including a bone marrow biopsy, should be considered for adult patients with severe insect sting anaphylaxis or recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis. After perioperative anaphylaxis, repeat anesthesia may proceed in the context of shared decision-making and based on the history and results of diagnostic evaluation with skin tests or in vitro tests when available, and supervised challenge when necessary.

Diagnostic Significance of Tryptase for Suspected Mast Cell Disorders

Tryptase has proven to be a very useful and specific marker to demonstrate mast cell activation and degranulation when an acute (i.e., within 4 h after the event) and baseline value (i.e., at least 24 h after the event) are compared and meet the consensus formula (i.e., an increase of 20% + 2). The upper limit of normal determined by the manufacturer is 11.4 ng/mL; however, this boundary has been the subject of debate. According to ECNM and AIM experts, the normal range of baseline tryptase should be 1 to 15 ng/mL. A genetic trait, hereditary alpha tryptasemia, characterized by an increased alpha coding TPSAB1 copy number is associated with a baseline value above 8 ng/mL. Elevated tryptase can also be found in chronic kidney disease, obesity, and hematological neoplasms. A tryptase > 20 ng/mL serves as a minor criterion to diagnose systemic mastocytosis and an increase in tryptase > 20% + 2 during an acute event is a required criterion in the diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome. The goal of this review is to demonstrate the (in)significance of tryptase using some clinical vignettes and to provide a practical guide on how to manage and interpret an elevated tryptase level.

Management of Mediator Symptoms, Allergy, and Anaphylaxis in Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is characterized by expansion and activation of clonally aberrant mast cells (MCs) in one or more organ systems. Inappropriate MC activation is a key finding in both allergy and mastocytosis; therefore, symptoms in both conditions show some degree of overlap. When mediator release is excessive and involves multiple systems, anaphylaxis may occur. In mastocytosis, the prevalence of atopy is similar to those of the general population, whereas the incidence of anaphylaxis is significantly higher. The purpose of this review is to discuss features of allergy and anaphylaxis as well as the principles of managing MC mediator release symptoms in mastocytosis.

A Puzzling Mast Cell Trilogy: Anaphylaxis, MCAS, and Mastocytosis

Our knowledge of biology and mast cell (MC) function, as well as disorders associated with the pathologic activation of MCs, has evolved over the last few decades. Anaphylaxis, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and mastocytosis are interrelated yet distinct conditions within the spectrum of mast cell activation disorders. Nevertheless, all three conditions can co-exist in one and the same patient, as pathologic MC activation is the key finding in all three. When mediator release is excessive and involves multiple systems, anaphylaxis and MCAS may occur. Furthermore, mastocytosis is a clonal disorder of MCs and often presents with anaphylaxis and MCAS. Nevertheless, in some cases, even the proliferative and accumulative features of MCs in mastocytosis can account for symptoms and disease progression. In each case, diagnosis can be only made when the diagnostic consensus criteria are fulfilled. The current article aims to provide a concise clinical update and pinpoint the main difficulties in diagnosing these puzzling disorders of MCs in medical practice.

Mastocytosis and related entities: a practical roadmap

Mastocytosis is a complex heterogenous multisystem disorder that is characterized by pathologic activation or accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MCs) in one or more organs. This clonal MC expansion is often associated with a somatic gain-of-function mutation (D816V in most of the cases) in the KIT gene, encoding for the MC surface receptor KIT (CD117), a stem cell growth factor receptor. Based on clinical and biochemical criteria, the World Health Organization (WHO) divided mastocytosis into different subclasses. The exact prevalence of mastocytosis remains elusive, but it is estimated that the disease affects approximately 1 in 10,000 persons. The clinical presentation of mastocytosis varies significantly, ranging from asymptomatic patients to a life-threatening disease with multiple organ involvement, potentially leading to cytopenia, malabsorption, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, ascites or osteolytic bone lesions with pathological fractures. Patients with mastocytosis may experience symptoms related to release of MC mediators, such as flushing or diarrhea or even more severe symptoms such as anaphylaxis. Recently, a new genetic trait, hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HaT), was described which involves a copy number variation in the TPSAB1-gene. Its role as standalone multisystem syndrome is heavily debated. There is emerging evidence suggesting there might be a link between HaT and due to the increased prevalence of HaT in patients with SM. The aim of this review is to provide a practical roadmap for diagnosis and management of mastocytosis and its associated entities, since there are still many misconceptions about these topics.Abbreviations: AdvSM: Advanced systemic mastocytosis; ASM: Aggressive systemic mastocytosis; aST: acute serum tryptase; BM: Bone marrow; BMM: Bone marrow mastocytosis; bST: baseline serum tryptase; CM: Cutaneous mastocytosis; DCM: Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis; HVA: Hymenoptera venom allergy; HaT: Hereditary alpha tryptasemia; ISM: Indolent systemic mastocytosis; MC: Mast cell; MCA: Mast cell activation; MCAS: Mast cell activation syndrome; MCL: Mast cell leukemia; MIS: Mastocytosis in the skin; MMAS: Monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome; MPCM: Maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis; SM: Systemic mastocytosis; SM-AHN: Systemic mastocytosis with associated hematological neoplasm; SSM: Smouldering systemic mastocytosis; VIT: Venom immunotherapy.

Disease Spectrum of Anaphylaxis Disorders

Anaphylaxis results from massive mast cell activation. Mechanisms of mast cell activation may involve IgE- and non-IgE-mediated triggers, clonal mast cell disease, or be idiopathic and may be modified by several factors including but not restricted to hormonal status, stress, heritable factors, mast cell burden, and simultaneous exposure to more than 1 factor. Patients with recurrent anaphylaxis with a nonidentifiable trigger present a particular challenge in diagnosis and management. Presence of clonal disease may be suggested by hypotensive episodes with urticaria and angioedema, and high baseline tryptase levels. A number of scoring systems have been developed to identify patients who are at high risk to have underlying mastocytosis. This review provides an overview of anaphylaxis disorders and our current understanding of their mechanisms of action, evaluation, and management.

Extrinsic and Intrinsic Modulators of Anaphylaxis

The severity of anaphylaxis is determined by many factors. The allergenic source as well as the age of the affected individual and the route of allergen exposure encompass the major contributors of the clinical outcome. Moreover, the severity can be modulated further by intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Among these, the genetic predisposition, certain comorbidities such as uncontrolled asthma, and hormonal fluctuations have been proposed as intrinsic and antihypertensive medications or physical activity as extrinsic factors. Recent advances have highlighted immunologic pathways that may exacerbate the response to allergens through receptors on mast cells, basophils, platelets, and other granulocytes. Atopy, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase deficiency, hereditary alpha tryptasemia, and clonal mast cell disorders are examples associated with genetic alterations that may predispose to severe anaphylaxis. Identifying risk factors that lower the threshold of reactivity or increase the severity of multisystem reactions is important in the management of this patient population.

Recent advances in diagnosis and therapy in systemic mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous neoplasm characterized by accumulation of neoplastic mast cells in various organs. There are three main types: cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), systemic mastocytosis (SM), and mast cell sarcoma. CM mainly affects children and is confined to the skin, whereas SM affects adults and is characterized by extracutaneous involvement, with or without cutaneous involvement. Most cases of SM have an indolent clinical course; however, some types of SM have aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular changes in SM have changed the diagnosis and treatment of aggressive and advanced SM subtypes. The International Consensus Classification and World Health Organization refined the diagnostic criteria and classification of SM as a result of accumulation of clinical experience and advances in molecular diagnostics. Somatic mutations in the KIT gene, most frequently KIT D816V, are detected in 90% of patients with SM. Expression of CD30 and any KIT mutation were introduced as minor diagnostic criteria after the introduction of highly sensitive screening methods. SM has a wide spectrum of clinical features, and only a few drugs are effective at treating advanced SM. Currently, the mainstay of SM treatment is limited to the management of chronic symptoms related to release of mast cell mediators. Small-molecule kinase inhibitors targeting the KIT-downstream and KIT-independent pathways were recently approved for treating advanced SM. I describe recent advances in diagnosis of SM, and review the currently available and emerging therapeutic options for SM management.

Hidden and Rare Food Allergens in Pediatric Age

In food allergy management, the avoidance of the allergen that caused the reaction plays a fundamental role. Nevertheless, that can be thwarted in case of accidental exposure to a rare or hidden allergen, causing the adoption of a monotonous diet and a consequent reduction in the quality of life of the patient and their family. The identification of a rare and hidden allergen is an important diagnostic challenge, taking into account that a significant proportion of all food reactions is in reality due to them. The aim of the present review is to provide the pediatric allergist an overview of the possible sources of rare and hidden food allergens, taking into consideration the routes of exposure to these potential allergens with the main examples published in the scientific literature and the distinction between types of direct or cross-contamination. The identification of the allergen responsible for the reaction and the provision of a dietary advice customized for the specific individual’s dietary habits is essential to improve quality of life of the familiar nucleus and to reduce the risk of further allergic reactions.

Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: Comparison Between Two Scoring Models to Predict for Mast Cell Clonality

BACKGROUND

The Red Española de Mastocitosis (Spanish Network on Mastocytosis) score (REMAs) and the National Institutes of Health idiopathic clonal anaphylaxis score (NICAS) were developed for more efficient screening of mast cell (MC) clonality in MC activation syndromes. In a limited idiopathic anaphylaxis case series, the NICAS showed higher accuracy compared with the REMAs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of the REMAs against the NICAS in the diagnosis of MC clonality.

METHODS

We compared the diagnostic value of the REMAs against the NICAS in 182 patients (63% men, median age 56 years) who presented with anaphylaxis triggered by Hymenoptera venom allergy (45%), drugs (15%), food (11%), idiopathic anaphylaxis (20%), and mixed causes (10%). KIT mutation was assessed in parallel in whole blood and bone marrow (BM) and, when negative, in highly purified BM MC. TPSAB1 was genotyped in a subset of 71 patients.

RESULTS

We found higher accuracy and rates of correctly classified patients for the REMAs (82% and 84%) compared with the NICAS (75% and 75%; P = .02 and P = .03, respectively), particularly among men (P = .05), patients with systemic mastocytosis (P = .05), those presenting anaphylaxis owing to any cause featuring urticaria (P = .04), cardiovascular symptoms (P = .02), and/or presyncope (P = .02) and those with a blood-negative/BM-positive KIT mutational profile (P = .002), but not hereditary α-tryptasemia-associated genotypes. Combined assessment of the REMAs and KIT^D816V in blood yielded an overall improved classification efficiency of 86% versus 84% for REMAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of the REMAs and blood detection of KIT^D816V is recommended, but more sensitive blood-based molecular assays to detect KIT^D816V are needed.

Anaphylaxis: Advances in the Past 10 Years

In the past 10 years, anaphylaxis has grown into its own special area of study within Allergy-Immunology, both at the bench and at the bedside. This review focuses on some of the most clinically relevant advances over the past decade. These include simplified and more inclusive diagnostic criteria for adults and children, uniform definition of biphasic anaphylaxis, and improved systems for objective severity grading. Studies reported in the past decade have led to improved understanding of normal and abnormal regulation of mast cell function, translating into better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with anaphylaxis. Research has provided improved recognition and treatment of mast cell disorders and has identified a new condition, hereditary α-tryptasemia, that may impact anaphylactic syndromes. We have learned to recognize new causes (α-gal), new pathways (Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2), and many risk factors for severe anaphylaxis. The stability of epinephrine in autoinjectors was reported to be very good for several years after the labeled expiry date, and it can tolerate freezing and thawing. Repeated and prolonged exposure to excessive heat leads to degradation of epinephrine activity. New treatments to prevent severe anaphylaxis have been described, using new ways to block the IgE receptor or modulate intracellular signaling pathways.

Detection of clonal mast cell disease in wasp venom allergic patients with normal tryptase

Background

Clonal mast cell disease (CMD) is an underlying aggravating condition in wasp venom allergy (WVA) which requires a different treatment strategy. CMD is increasingly recognized in patients with normal basal serum tryptase (bsT). However, methods to identify at risk patients have not yet been assessed in large cohorts of WVA patients with normal bsT.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated the reliability of the REMA score in detecting CMD in a cohort of grade IV WVA patients with normal bsT and assessed the added value of other clinical parameters, KIT D816V mutation analysis in peripheral blood (PB) and the diagnosis of hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). All patients had a conclusive bone marrow evaluation that demonstrated or excluded underlying CMD.

Results

In total 35 CMD and 96 non-CMD patients were included. REMA score had a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI 56%-88%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI 70%-87%) in this cohort. Loss of consciousness during systemic reaction and bsT between 6.3 and 11.4 ng/ml were additional parameters independently associated with CMD. Sensitivity of KIT in PB was relatively low, 56% (95% CI 36%-75%), but had added value as screening method in patients with a low REMA score due to 100% specificity.

Conclusion

The REMA score is a relatively reliable method to detect patients at risk of CMD among WVA patients with normal bsT. KIT mutation analysis in PB could serve as additional screening method in patients with low REMA scores.

Nontryptase Urinary and Hematologic Biomarkers of Mast Cell Expansion and Mast Cell Activation: Status 2022

Quantitation of urinary metabolites of histamine, prostaglandin D₂, and leukotriene E₄ can fill the gap in our current efforts to improve diagnosis and management of symptomatic patients with systemic mastocytosis, and/or mast cell activation syndrome, In addition, patients symptomatic due to mast cell activation but who do not meet all the criteria for mast cell activation syndrome can have elevated baseline mediator metabolites. Serum tryptase levels have been the workhorse in diagnosing these disorders, but it has several drawbacks including the need to obtain acute and baseline samples, which require 2 visits to health care facilities and 2 venipunctures. Recently, increased baseline tryptase level has been reported in hereditary alpha tryptasemia, complicating diagnostic possibilities of an increased baseline tryptase level. Furthermore, no treatment can specifically be targeted at tryptase itself. In contrast, the finding of 1 or more elevated urinary levels of histamine, prostaglandin D₂, and/or leukotriene E₄ metabolites (1) greatly narrows diagnostic possibilities for causes of symptoms; (2) informs the practitioner what specific metabolic pathways are involved; and (3) targets the treatment in a specific, direct fashion. As a bonus, baseline spot/random urine samples can be obtained by the patients themselves and repeated at exactly the correct time when symptoms occur.

Refined Treatment Response Criteria for Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis Proposed by the ECNM-AIM Consortium

Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) has a favorable prognosis and normal life expectancy. However, many patients suffer from mast cell (MC) mediator-related symptoms, which significantly affect quality of life (QoL). Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and neurological complaints, musculoskeletal pain, and the presence of skin lesions, anaphylaxis, and osteoporosis are the main symptoms and signs in ISM and must be assessed in all patients before and during treatment. Validated mastocytosis-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should be used for this purpose. Serum tryptase and KIT D816V allele burden are recommended as secondary outcome parameters, noting that they do not reflect the severity of signs, symptoms, and related QoL impairment, but indirectly express MC burden. Changes from baseline of 90%, 60%, and 30% indicate complete response >90%, major response 60% to 90%, partial response 30% to 60%, and no response <30% to treatment. To conclude, we recommend the use of PROMs as primary outcome parameters to define treatment response in patients with ISM in clinical trials and in everyday clinical practice.

Overexpression of FcεRI on Bone Marrow Mast Cells, but Not MRGPRX2, in Clonal Mast Cell Disorders With Wasp Venom Anaphylaxis

Background

Uncertainties remain about the molecular mechanisms governing clonal mast cell disorders (CMCD) and anaphylaxis.

Objective

This study aims at comparing the burden, phenotype and behavior of mast cells (MCs) and basophils in patients with CMCD with wasp venom anaphylaxis (CMCD/WVA⁺), CMCD patients without anaphylaxis (CMCD/ANA^-), patients with an elevated baseline serum tryptase (EBST), patients with wasp venom anaphylaxis without CMCD (WVA⁺) and patients with a non-mast cell haematological pathology (NMHP).

Methods

This study included 20 patients with CMCD/WVA⁺, 24 with CMCD/ANA^-, 19 with WVA⁺, 6 with EBST and 5 with NMHP. We immunophenotyped MCs and basophils and compared baseline serum tryptase (bST) and both total and venom specific IgE in the different groups. For basophil studies, 13 healthy controls were also included.

Results

Higher levels of bST were found in CMCD patients with wasp venom anaphylaxis, CMCD patients without anaphylaxis and EBST patients. Total IgE levels were highest in patients with wasp venom anaphylaxis with and without CMCD. Bone marrow MCs of patients with CMCD showed lower CD117 expression and higher expression of CD45, CD203c, CD63, CD300a and FcεRI. Within the CMCD population, patients with wasp venom anaphylaxis showed a higher expression of FcεRI as compared to patients without anaphylaxis. Expression of MRGPRX2 on MCs did not differ between the study populations. Basophils are phenotypically and functionally comparable between the different patient populations.

Conclusion

Patients with CMCD show an elevated burden of aberrant activated MCs with a significant overexpression of FcεRI in patients with a wasp venom anaphylaxis.

Defining baseline variability of serum tryptase levels improves accuracy in identifying anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Acute increases of ≥20% + 2 ng/mL (20 + 2 rule) over basal serum tryptase (BST) is the recommended threshold supporting a clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Prospective studies have demonstrated high sensitivity for this algorithm after parenteral exposure, but specificity has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define a serum tryptase change that distinguishes baseline variability from anaphylaxis on the basis of intraindividual variation in BST.

METHODS

Ninety-three total subjects with atopy (n = 62) or hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) (n = 31) and ≥2 BST measurements were identified. Sequential BST variability measurements were modeled and threshold ratios that optimized sensitivity and/or specificity determined. Models were tested in 22 individuals with physician-diagnosed anaphylaxis and validated in independent cohorts of individuals with HαT (n = 33), indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) (n = 52), and ISM + HαT (n = 12). Mature tryptase levels were measured in HαT (n = 19) and ISM (n = 20). An online application was developed for clinical use.

RESULTS

As a result of BST variability, 9.7% (9/93) of primary cohort patients, and 18% (6/33) of HαT, 30% (16/53) of ISM, and 25% (3/12) of ISM + HαT patients from validation cohorts met the 20 + 2 rule despite absent immediate hypersensitivity symptoms; mature tryptase was noncontributory among individuals with HαT or ISM at baseline. A ratio of acute tryptase/BST exceeding 1.685 provided the optimized diagnostic rule for jointly maximizing sensitivity and specificity. Statistically significant improvement in specificity relative to the 20 + 2 rule was observed among individuals with elevated BST caused by HαT and ISM.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an acute tryptase/BST ratio of 1.685 improves specificity of measured changes among individuals with HαT and ISM while maintaining high sensitivity for confirmation of anaphylaxis.

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Cutaneous Mastocytosis in Childhood: Single-center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Mastocytosis is a rare and heterogenous disease, and in children it is generally limited to the skin and tends to regress spontaneously in adolescence.

AIM

In this study, demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of pediatric patients with mastocytosis, and also coexisting diseases were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 61 pediatric patients were included in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 2.2, the median age was 2 years (range, 0.25 to 19 y), and the median follow-up period was 2.0 years (range, 0.25 to 19 y). Types of clinical presentation at diagnosis consisted of mainly urticaria pigmentosa (45.9%). Seven patients were further investigated with suspicion of systemic mastocytosis, they were followed up, median of 9 years (range, 2.5 to 16 y), and none of them developed systemic disease. Coexisting allergic diseases were recorded in total 5 patients (8.2%). Three patients had immunoglobulin A deficiency, 1 patient had elevated immunoglobulin E level. A patient developed mature B-cell lymphoma with a heterozygous mutation in c-KIT exon 11.

DISCUSSION

Cutaneous mastocytosis in children may present as a complex disease with different clinical signs and symptoms. Standardized clinical criteria and guidelines for the follow-up of children with mastocytosis are required.

Anaphylaxis and Mast Cell Disorders

There is strong evidence of an association between severe anaphylaxis, especially hymenoptera venom induced, and mast cell (MC) disorders. It has been thought that intrinsic abnormalities in MCs, including the presence of the activating KIT D816V mutation in mastocytosis or of genetic trait, hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, may influence susceptibility to severe anaphylaxis. This article evaluates the potential mechanisms leading to severe MC activation, as well as the differential diagnosis of and range of symptoms attributable to MC mediator release. Also, we offer a global classification for disorders related to MC activation.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis: Diagnosis and management

Introduction: Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on the inability to identify a causal relationship between a trigger and an anaphylactic event, despite a detailed patient history and careful diagnostic assessment. The prevalence of IA among the subset of people who experienced anaphylaxis is challenging to estimate and varies widely, from 10 to 60%; most commonly noted is ∼20% in the adult anaphylactic population. Comorbid atopic conditions, such as food allergy, allergic rhinitis, and asthma, are present in up to 48% of patients with IA. Improved diagnostic technologies and an increased understanding of conditions that manifest with symptoms associated with anaphylaxis have improved the ability to determine a more accurate diagnosis for patients who may have been initially diagnosed with IA. Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Results: Galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) allergy, mast cell disorders, and hereditary a-tryptasemia are a few differential diagnoses that should be considered in patients with IA. Unlike food allergy, when anaphylaxis occurs within minutes to 2 hours after allergen consumption, α-gal allergy is a 3-6-hour delayed immunoglobulin E-mediated anaphylactic reaction to a carbohydrate epitope found in red meat (e.g., beef, lamb, pork). The more recently described hereditary α-tryptasemia is an inherited autosomal dominant genetic trait caused by increased germline copies of tryptase human gene alpha-beta 1 (TPSAB1), which encodes α tryptase and is associated with elevated baseline serum tryptase. Acute management of IA consists of carrying an epinephrine autoinjector to be administered immediately at the first signs of anaphylaxis. Long-term management for IA with antihistamines and other agents aims to potentially reduce the frequency and severity of the anaphylactic reactions, although the evidence is limited. Biologics are potentially steroid-sparing for patients with IA; however, more research on IA therapies is needed. Conclusion: The lack of diagnostic criteria, finite treatment options, and intricacies of making a differential diagnosis make IA challenging for patients and clinicians to manage.

Mast cell activation syndrome: is anaphylaxis part of the phenotype? A systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) and anaphylaxis are the result of a spontaneous or triggered pathological degranulation of mast cells (MCs) and might have as substrate normal or pathological MCs (increased burden, aberrant MCs or both).

RECENT FINDINGS

This review summarizes the most recent evidence on immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated and non IgE-mediated mechanisms underlying MC activation and degranulation and highlights the importance of standardized diagnostic criteria for MCAS. Application of these criteria implies that in most cases the clinical presentation of MCAS meets the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.

SUMMARY

Integrating clinical parameters and diagnostic test recognition and underlying clonal MC disease are of utmost importance for a patient-tailored approach. Hereditary alpha-tryptasemia can be encountered in context of anaphylaxis, MCAS and primary MC disorders.

Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis and hereditary alpha-tryptasemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the association between the common dominantly inherited genetic trait hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT) and hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis (HVA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Elevated BST has been correlated with more severe systemic anaphylaxis in humans in a number of settings - most notably in HVA. Clonal mast cell disease, in particular, systemic mastocytosis, is frequently associated with elevated BST, and is a major risk factor for severe HVA. However, clonal mast cell diseases are believed to be rare, whereas HVA is relatively more common. HαT affects an estimated 3-5% of Western populations and is the common cause for elevated BST in these individuals. An association between HαT and severe HVA, as well as clonal mast cell disease has recently been demonstrated wherein this trait modifies reaction severity in venom allergic individuals. A mechanism underlying this association has been proposed through the identification of naturally occurring heterotetrameric tryptases and characterization of their unique physical attributes.

SUMMARY

Here we discuss the long-standing association between elevated BST and HVA severity, how HαT fits into this landscape, and review the clinical and mechanistic evidence that supports HαT as a modifier of HVA.

Clinical relevance of inherited genetic differences in human tryptases: Hereditary alpha-tryptasemia and beyond

OBJECTIVE

To describe our current understanding of hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT), how HαT fits into the evolutionary context of tryptases and contemporary framework of mast cell-associated disorders, and to discuss the future clinical and therapeutic landscape for symptomatic individuals with HαT.

DATA SOURCES

Primary peer-reviewed literature.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Basic, clinical, and translational studies describing tryptase gene composition, generation, secretion, and elevation and the associated clinical impacts of HαT and treatment of such individuals were reviewed.

RESULTS

HαT is a common autosomal dominant genetic trait caused by increased TPSAB1 copy number encoding α-tryptase. Approximately 1 in 20 White individuals have HαT, making it by far the most common cause for elevated basal serum tryptase levels. Although many individuals with HαT may not manifest associated symptoms, the prevalence of HαT is increased in patients with clonal and nonclonal mast cell-associated disorders wherein it is linked to more prevalent and/or severe anaphylaxis and increased mast cell mediator-associated symptoms. Increased generation of mature α/β-tryptase heterotetramers, and their unique physiochemical properties, may be responsible for some of these clinical findings.

CONCLUSION

HαT is a common modifier of mast cell-associated disorders and reactions. Nevertheless, whether HαT may be an independent cause of clinical phenotypes with which it has been associated remains unproven. Correct identification of HαT is critical to accurate interpretation of serum tryptase levels in the clinical evaluation of patients. Beyond HαT, we foresee tryptase genotyping as an important parameter in the standard workup of patients with mast cell-associated disorders and development of therapeutic modalities targeting these patients and associated clinical phenotypes.

Decoding the intricacies of the mast cell compartment

Historically, understanding of the human mast cell (MC) compartment has lagged behind the appreciation of other cell lineages. MCs exist in vascularised tissues but do not under normal circumstances circulate in blood, and there has been no pharmacological agent identified that totally and selectively inhibits human MC function. There are no substantiated accounts of an apparently healthy individual who is severely lacking in MCs. Thus, some of the approaches employed to understand the function of a specific immune cell are not available to the MC biologist. The disease categories that have provided the greatest insight into MC biology have been monoclonal and IgE-mediated MC disorders. This has led to the categorisation of MC diseases as intrinsic or extrinsic to the MC compartment and to the recognition of the role of mediators in MC activation disorders. Mastocytosis as a clonal disorder not only impacts the MC compartment through changes intrinsic to the MC, but also by the effects of episodes of significant release of MC mediators. The availability of newer therapeutic approaches developed to treat monoclonal MC disorders offer insights into how to more selectively approach management of MC centric diseases.

PATHOGENIC AND DIAGNOSTIC RELEVANCE OF KIT IN PRIMARY MAST CELL ACTIVATION DISORDERS

OBJECTIVE

Mast cell (MC) activation (MCA) defines the mechanism by which certain patients suffer from symptoms due to the effect of a wide range of mediators released from MC upon their activation triggered by different stimuli. When these symptoms are severe and recurrent, the diagnosis of MCA syndrome (MCAS) might be considered. Here we review the relevant aspects related to the pathogenesis of MCAS, with special emphasis on the prevalence and diagnostic relevance of KIT mutations.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched between 1980 and 2021 using the following terms: Mast cell activation syndromes, mast cell activation, anaphylaxis, KIT mutations, KIT D816V, indolent systemic mastocytosis, bone marrow mastocytosis, cutaneous mastocytosis, IgE anaphylaxis and idiopathic anaphylaxis.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Only articles published in English were selected based on their relevance to MCAS and/or severe and recurrent anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

MCAS can be classified in clonal MCAS and non-clonal MCAS depending on the presence vs. absence of an underlying KIT mutation (mostly KIT D816V), respectively. In contrast to clonal MCAS in which MCA is associated with a primary MC disorder (i.e. primary MCAS) such as mastocytosis or monoclonal MCAS, non-clonal MCAS can be secondary to known or unidentified triggers (i.e. secondary and idiopathic MCAS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The clinical heterogeneity and complexity of the molecular assays needed for the study of MCAS patients might lead to misdiagnosis, particularly when patients are evaluated at non-specialized centers. Thus, referral of patients suffering from clinical manifestations suggestive of MCAS to Reference Centers on mastocytosis and MC diseases is strongly recommended.

Use of omalizumab for management of idiopathic anaphylaxis: A systematic review and retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) may fail to respond to a combination of high-dose H₁ and H₂ antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers. Treatment options for these patients are currently limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical experience of omalizumab use for the treatment of patients with IA with no evidence of underlying clonal mast cell disorders.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review at 2 separate institutions of medical records of patients with a diagnosis of IA without evidence of mast cell clonality who had received treatment with omalizumab. We searched PubMed for studies describing omalizumab use in similar patients. Information on symptoms and omalizumab therapy was compiled, and response pattern of anaphylaxis was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with IA and no evidence of mast cell clonality who received omalizumab were identified. The median age was 36 years at the start of omalizumab (range, 11-54 years; n = 29). The frequency of anaphylaxis episodes before omalizumab treatment varied from 2 total episodes to several episodes per month. The most often used initial omalizumab dose was 300 mg every 4 weeks (n = 16). Most patients ultimately achieved clinical response after starting omalizumab: complete response (63%, n = 22), partial response (28.5%, n = 10), with 3 nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab may be an effective treatment option for patients with IA who do not have evidence of mast cell clonality and fail to respond to antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers.

Inherited and acquired determinants of serum tryptase levels in humans

OBJECTIVE

To aid the clinician in correctly interpreting serum tryptase levels.

DATA SOURCES

Primary peer-reviewed literature.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Clinical and basic science peer-reviewed studies characterizing the genetic and physiological bases for tryptase generation, secretion, and elevation, including those describing serum tryptase levels in population-based cohort studies.

RESULTS

Clinically measured basal serum tryptase (BST) consists of ostensibly inactive alpha- and beta-tryptase precursors. The autosomal dominant genetic trait hereditary alpha-tryptasemia is the most often cause for elevated BST levels, with other acquired causes, such as renal failure and clonal myeloid diseases being far less common. Acute increases in serum tryptase levels resulting from release of mature tryptase from secretory granules is specific to mast cell degranulation but is not detected in all cases of systemic anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the differences and distinguishing between acute increases in serum tryptase and chronic elevations in BST owing to inherited or acquired conditions is critical in the correct interpretation of this useful clinical biomarker.

Selecting the Right Criteria and Proper Classification to Diagnose Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: A Critical Review

In recent years, knowledge about mechanisms underlying mast cell activation (MCA) and accumulation in various pathologic conditions increased substantially. In addition, criteria and a classification of MCA syndromes (MCASs) have been set forth. MCAS is defined by typical clinical symptoms, a substantial increase in serum tryptase level during an attack over the patient's baseline tryptase, and a response of the symptoms to drugs targeting mast cells, mediator production, and/or mediator effects. Alternative diagnostic criteria of MCAS have also been suggested, but these alternative criteria often lack specificity and validation. In this report, we critically review the contemporary literature relating to MCAS and compare the specificity, sensitivity, and strength of MCAS-related parameters within proposals to diagnose and classify MCAS and its variants. Furthermore, we highlight the need to apply specific consensus criteria in the evaluation and classification of MCAS in individual patients. This is an urgent and important medical necessity because as an increasing number of patients are being given a misdiagnosis of MCAS based on nonspecific criteria, which contributes to confusion and frustration by patients and caregivers and sometimes may delay recognition and treatment of correct medical conditions that often turn out to be unrelated to MCA.

Idiopathic Anaphylaxis: A Form of Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Idiopathic anaphylaxis is a condition caused by paroxysmal episodes of sudden-onset multiorgan involvement variably including laryngeal edema, urticaria, bronchoconstriction, dyspnea, hypoxia, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and hypotension. Rarely, the episodes can lead to cardiovascular collapse and death in the absence of a clear trigger, especially in the presence of other cardiovascular comorbidities. Elevated mast cell mediators such as tryptase and histamine have been reported during episodes, and mast cells are considered the primary cells responsible for driving anaphylaxis in humans. Basophils also secrete histamine and LTC4 when activated and theoretically can contribute to symptoms. As our understanding of mast cell disorders continue to grow, the classification for these disorders evolves. The purpose of this article was 2-fold: to review the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis and to discuss the classification of idiopathic anaphylaxis within the broader context of mast cell activation disorders.

Hereditary Alpha-Tryptasemia: a Commonly Inherited Modifier of Anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT) is an autosomal dominant genetic trait and a common cause of elevated basal serum tryptase in Western populations. It is a risk factor for severe anaphylaxis among individuals with venom allergy and an established modifier of anaphylaxis and mast cell mediator-associated symptoms among patients with systemic mastocytosis. Understanding the physiology of tryptases and how this may relate to the clinical features associated with HαT is the first step in identifying optimal medical management and targets for novel therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

HαT prevalence is increased in both clonal and non-clonal mast cell-associated disorders where it augments symptoms of immediate hypersensitivity, including anaphylaxis. The unique properties of naturally occurring α/β-tryptase heterotetramers may explain certain elements of phenotypes associated with HαT, though additional mechanisms are being evaluated. This review provides an overview of the clinical and translational studies that have identified HαT as a modifier of mast cell-associated disorders and anaphylaxis and discusses mechanisms that may potentially explain some of these clinical findings.

Diagnosis of Primary Mast Cell Disorders in Anaphylaxis: Value of KIT D816V in Peripheral Blood

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is frequent in patients suffering from primary mast cell disorders (PMCDs). In patients without mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) and a baseline serum tryptase (bST) less than 30 ng/mL, the diagnosis of PMCD is challenging. In these patients, detection of the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood (PB) has been suggested as screening tool for a PMCD.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated whether KIT D816V in PB can contribute to the decision to perform a bone marrow (BM) biopsy in patients with anaphylaxis without MIS and a bST less than 30 ng/mL.

METHODS

We selected 74 patients with severe anaphylaxis without MIS and a bST less than 30 ng/mL. All underwent a BM biopsy. KIT D816V mutation was quantified in both PB and BM using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR).

RESULTS

Diagnosis of a PMCD was established in 40 patients (54%). Median bST for patients with and without PMCD was, respectively, 9.5 ng/mL (range 4.2-27 ng/mL) and 4.9 ng/mL (range 2.2-20.3 ng/mL) (P <.001). KIT D816V in PB was detected in 16 out of 40 (40%) patients with PMCD. KIT D816V in BM was detected in 22 out of 40 (55%) patients with PMCD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without MIS and a bST less than < 30 ng/mL who experience anaphylaxis, determination of KIT D816V mutation in PB is of limited help in deciding when to proceed to a BM biopsy. Therefore, KIT D816V in PB mutation analysis should be interpreted together with scoring tools to make a better assessment in identifying patients who should undergo BM biopsy.

Culturing cells with mast cell phenotype and function: Comparison of peripheral blood and bone marrow as a source

BACKGROUND

Studies on the mechanisms that govern mast cell (MC) functions are hindered by the difficulties in isolating sufficient numbers of these tissue-resident cells. Therefore, many research groups use cultured human MCs obtained out of progenitor cells. However, these culture methods significantly differ regarding primary source material, culture durations and conditions. Consequently, the finally obtained cells are likely to exhibit morphological, phenotypical and/or functional heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the phenotype and functionality of cells cultured from peripheral blood and bone marrow progenitor cells from patients with suspected clonal MC disease. These cells are designated as PBCMCs and BMCMCs, respectively.

METHODS

Twenty paired PBCMCs and BMCMCs cultures starting from CD34⁺ progenitor cells were compared. Cells were cultured for 4 weeks. Phenotyping included Giemsa and CD117 staining and flow cytometric staining for CD117, CD203c, FcεRI, MRGPRX2, CD300a, CD32, CD63 and CD25. Functional assessment included measurement of the up-regulation of CD63 after cross-linking of the high affinity receptor for IgE (FcεRI) with anti-FcεRI and ligation of MRGPRX2 with substance P.

RESULTS

PBCMCs and BMCMCs are phenotypically comparable. Functionally, after activation with anti-FcεRI and substance P, PBCMCs and BMCMCs show similar up-regulation of the lysosomal degranulation marker CD63. However, the yield of PBCMCs is higher than BMCMs and peripheral blood cultures are purer than bone marrow cultures.

CONCLUSION

PBCMCs are an attractive alternative to the more difficult to obtain BMCMCs for the exploration of the complex mechanisms that govern IgE- and MRGPRX2-dependent MC activation and degranulation. Unlike BMCMCs, PBCMCs are easily accessible and enable repetitive analyses.

Mast cell tryptases in allergic inflammation and immediate hypersensitivity

Dysregulated mast cell-mediated inflammation and/or activation have been linked to a number of human diseases, including asthma, anaphylaxis, chronic spontaneous urticaria, and mast cell activation syndromes. As a major mast cell granule protein, tryptase is a biomarker commonly used in clinical practice to diagnose mast cell-associated disorders and -mediated reactions, but its mechanistic roles in disease pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Here, we summarize recent advances in the understanding of human tryptase genetics and the effects that different genetic composition may have on the quaternary structure of tetrameric mature tryptases. We also discuss how these differences may impact clinical phenotypes including allergic inflammation, immediate hypersensitivity, and others seen in patients with mast cell-associated disorders. With the increased application of next-generation sequencing, we foresee that human genetic approaches will be a major focus of understanding human tryptase functions in various human mast cell disorders and in new therapeutic development.

Idiopathic Anaphylaxis: a Perplexing Diagnostic Challenge for Allergists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this systematic review is to present the proposed theories of pathogenesis for idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA), to discuss its classification, its diagnostic approach, and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

IA represents a major diagnostic challenge and is diagnosed when excluding the possible identifiable triggers of anaphylaxis. The current research, however, revealed that certain conditions including mastocytosis, mast cell activation syndromes, and hereditary alpha tryptasemia can masquerade and overlap with its symptomatology. Also, newly identified galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose mammalian red meat allergy has recently been recognized as underlying cause of anaphylaxis in some cases that were previously considered as IA. IA comprises a heterogenous group of conditions where, in some cases, inherently dysfunctional mast cells play a role in pathogenesis. The standard trigger avoidance strategies are ineffective, and episodes are unpredictable. Therefore, prompt recognition and treatment as well as prophylaxis are critical. The patients should always carry an epinephrine autoinjector.

Scoring the Risk of Having Systemic Mastocytosis in Adult Patients with Mastocytosis in the Skin

BACKGROUND

Mastocytosis in adults often presents with skin lesions. A bone marrow biopsy is necessary to confirm or exclude the presence of systemic mastocytosis (SM) in these cases. When a bone marrow biopsy is not performed, the provisional diagnosis is mastocytosis in the skin (MIS). No generally accepted scoring system has been established to estimate the risk of SM in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a risk score to predict SM in adults with MIS.

METHODS

We examined 1145 patients with MIS from the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis Registry who underwent a bone marrow biopsy. A total of 944 patients had SM and 201 patients had cutaneous mastocytosis; 63.7% were female, and 36.3% were male. Median age was 44 ± 13.3 years. The median serum tryptase level amounted to 29.3 ± 81.9 ng/mL. We established a multivariate regression model using the whole population of patients as a training and validation set (bootstrapping). A risk score was developed and validated with receiver-operating curves.

RESULTS

In the multivariate model, the tryptase level (P < .001), constitutional/cardiovascular symptoms (P = .014), and bone symptoms/osteoporosis (P < .001) were independent predictors of SM (P < .001; sensitivity, 90.7%; specificity, 69.1%). A 6-point risk score was established (risk, 10.7%-98.0%) and validated.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large data set of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis Registry, we created a risk score to predict the presence of SM in patients with MIS. Although the score will need further validation in independent cohorts, our score seems to discriminate safely between patients with SM and with pure cutaneous mastocytosis.

The Role of Bone Marrow Evaluation in Clinical Allergy and Immunology Practice: When and Why

Allergists and immunologists rely on other specialists for higher risk procedures such as biopsies of the lung or gastrointestinal tract. However, we perform and interpret a handful of procedures ourselves. Training programs have historically required competency for prescribing immunoglobulin infusions, patch testing, rhino laryngoscopy, lung function testing, and provocation testing for airway hyperreactivity even though other specialists often perform them. Bone marrow aspirations and biopsies are not included in fellowship training assessments despite a significant number of marrow evaluations being requested by allergists and immunologists. For example, nearly 1 marrow assessment per month has been requested over 2 years for patients in the Allergy Immunology Clinic at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Marrow assessments are often required for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment-related toxicities. Interpretive and procedural competency would benefit the field given the range of diseases in clinical immunology practice that require marrow assessment. We have generated a comprehensive list of the major conditions that might require bone marrow assessments in any Allergy and Immunology practice. We then summarize the specific tests that must be ordered and show how to determine sample quality. Finally, some providers may desire procedural competency and for those individuals we discuss tips for the procedure.

Doctor, I Think I Am Suffering from MCAS: Differential Diagnosis and Separating Facts from Fiction

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a rare condition defined by a severe systemic reaction to mast cell (MC)-derived mediators. Most cases present with clinical signs of anaphylaxis, and some have an underlying IgE-dependent allergy. A primary MC disease (mastocytosis) may also be detected. Severe recurrent MCAS episodes requiring intensive care or even resuscitation are typically found in patients who suffer from both mastocytosis and allergy against certain triggers, such as hymenoptera venom components. A less severe form and a local form of MC activation (MCA) also exist. For these patients, diagnostic criteria are lacking. Moreover, a number of different, unrelated, conditions with overlapping symptoms may be confused with MCAS. As a result, many patients believe that they are suffering from MCAS but have in fact a less severe form of MCA or another underlying disease. In the current article, we review the potential differential diagnoses of MCA and MCAS and discuss available diagnostic criteria and diagnostic tools. These criteria and assays may be useful in daily practice and help avoid unnecessary referrals and unjustified fears in patients.