Revisiting autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome caused by Fas ligand mutations

Genetic Testing in Patients with Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome: Experience of 802 Patients at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is a rare genetic disorder featuring chronic lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, cytopenias, and increased lymphoma risk. Differentiating ALPS from immunodeficiencies with overlapping symptoms is challenging. This study evaluated the performance and the diagnostic yield of a 15-gene NGS panel for ALPS at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Samples from 802 patients submitted for ALPS NGS panel were studied between May 2014 and January 2023. A total of 62 patients (7.7%) had a definite diagnosis: 52/62 cases (84%) showed 37 unique pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline FAS variants supporting ALPS diagnosis (6.5%, 52/802). The ALPS diagnostic yield increased to 30% in patients who additionally fulfilled abnormal ALPS immunology findings criteria. 17/37 (46%) diagnostic FAS variants were novel variants reported for the first time in ALPS. 10/802 cases (1.2%) showed diagnostic findings in five genes (ADA2, CTLA4, KRAS, MAGT1, NRAS) which are related to autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiency (ALPID). Family studies enabled the reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) and also the identification of at-risk family members of FAS-positive patients, which helped in the follow-up diagnosis and treatment. Alongside family studies, complete clinical phenotypes and abnormal ALPS immunology and Fas-mediated apoptosis results helped clarify uncertain genetic findings. This study describes the largest cohort of genetic testing for suspected ALPS in North America and highlights the effectiveness of the ALPS NGS panel in distinguishing ALPS from non-ALPS immunodeficiencies. More comprehensive assessment from exome or genome sequencing could be considered for undefined ALPS-U patients or non-ALPS immunodeficiencies after weighing cost, completeness, and timeliness of different genetic testing options.

Looking for ALPS: The value of a combined assessment of biochemical markers

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is a rare primary immune disorder caused by defect of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. The current diagnostic criteria combine clinical features and typical biomarkers but have not been the object of clear international consensus.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on pediatric patients who were investigated for autoimmune cytopenia and/or lymphoproliferation at the CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital over 10 years. Patients were screened using the combination of TCRαβ+ CD4- CD8- "double negative" (DN) T cells and soluble plasmatic FAS ligand (sFASL).

RESULTS

Among the 398 tested patients, the median sFASL and DN T cells were 200 ng/mL and 1.8% of TCRαβ+ T cells, respectively. sFASL was highly correlated with vitamin B12 levels. We identified five patients diagnosed with ALPS for whose sFASL and vitamin B12 levels were the more discriminating biomarkers. While ALPS diagnostic criteria had high sensibility, their predictive value remained low.

CONCLUSION

sFASL level can efficiently discriminate patients with ALPS when using the appropriate thresholds. Our study highlights the need for an international consensus to redefine the place and threshold of biological biomarkers for ALPS diagnosis.

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies (ALPIDs): A proposed approach to redefining ALPS and other lymphoproliferative immune disorders

Chronic nonmalignant lymphoproliferation and autoimmune cytopenia are relevant manifestations of immunohematologic diseases of childhood. Their diagnostic classification is challenging but important for therapy. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is a genetically defined inborn error of immunity combining these manifestations, but it can explain only a small proportion of cases. Diagnostic categories such as ALPS-like disease, common variable immunodeficiency, or Evans syndrome have therefore been used. Advances in genetics and increasing availablity of targeted therapies call for more therapy-oriented disease classification. Moreover, recent discoveries in the (re)analysis of genetic conditions affecting FAS signaling ask for a more precise definition of ALPS. In this review, we propose the term autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies for a disease phenotype that is enriched for patients with genetic diseases for which targeted therapies are available. For patients without a current molecular diagnosis, this term defines a subgroup of immune dysregulatory disorders for further studies. Within the concept of autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies, we propose a revision of the ALPS classification, restricting use of this term to conditions with clear evidence of perturbation of FAS signaling and resulting specific biologic and clinical consequences. This proposed approach to redefining ALPS and other lymphoproliferative conditions provides a framework for disease classification and diagnosis that is relevant for the many specialists confronted with these diseases.

Characterizing the regulatory Fas (CD95) epitope critical for agonist antibody targeting and CAR-T bystander function in ovarian cancer

Receptor clustering is the most critical step to activate extrinsic apoptosis by death receptors belonging to the TNF superfamily. Although clinically unsuccessful, using agonist antibodies, the death receptors-5 remains extensively studied from a cancer therapeutics perspective. However, despite its regulatory role and elevated function in ovarian and other solid tumors, another tumor-enriched death receptor called Fas (CD95) remained undervalued in cancer immunotherapy until recently, when its role in off-target tumor killing by CAR-T therapies was imperative. By comprehensively analyzing structure studies in the context of the binding epitope of FasL and various preclinical Fas agonist antibodies, we characterize a highly significant patch of positively charged residue epitope (PPCR) in its cysteine-rich domain 2 of Fas. PPCR engagement is indispensable for superior Fas agonist signaling and CAR-T bystander function in ovarian tumor models. A single-point mutation in FasL or Fas that interferes with the PPCR engagement inhibited apoptotic signaling in tumor cells and T cells. Furthermore, considering that clinical and immunological features of the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) are directly attributed to homozygous mutations in FasL, we reveal differential mechanistic details of FasL/Fas clustering at the PPCR interface compared to described ALPS mutations. As Fas-mediated bystander killing remains vital to the success of CAR-T therapies in tumors, our findings highlight the therapeutic analytical design for potentially effective Fas-targeting strategies using death agonism to improve cancer immunotherapy in ovarian and other solid tumors.

CD95 (Fas) and CD95L (FasL)-mediated non-canonical signaling pathways

Although the interaction of CD95L (also known as FasL) with its so-called death receptor CD95 (Fas) induces an apoptotic signal responsible for the elimination of infected and cancer cells and maintenance of tissue homeostasis, this receptor can also implement non apoptotic signaling pathways. This latter signaling is involved in metastatic dissemination in certain cancers and the severity of auto-immune disorders. The signaling complexity of this pair is increased by the fact that CD95 expression itself seems to contribute to oncogenesis via a CD95L-independent manner and, that both ligand and receptor might interact with other partners modulating their pathophysiological functions. Finally, CD95L itself can trigger cell signaling in immune cells rendering complex the interpretation of mouse models in which CD95 or CD95L are knocked out. Herein, we discuss these non-canonical responses and their biological functions.

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies (ALPID) in childhood: breakdown of immune homeostasis and immune dysregulation

Many inborn errors of immunity (IEI) manifest with hallmarks of both immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation due to uncontrolled immune responses and impaired immune homeostasis. A subgroup of these disorders frequently presents with autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation (ALPID phenotype). After the initial description of the genetic basis of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) more than 20 years ago, progress in genetics has helped to identify many more genetic conditions underlying this ALPID phenotype. Among these, the majority is caused by a group of autosomal-dominant conditions including CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency, STAT3 gain-of-function disease, activated PI3 kinase syndrome, and NF-κB1 haploinsufficiency. Even within a defined genetic condition, ALPID patients may present with staggering clinical heterogeneity, which makes diagnosis and management a challenge. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, approaches to diagnosis, and conventional as well as targeted therapy of the most common ALPID conditions.

Type 1 diabetes and inborn errors of immunity: Complete strangers or 2 sides of the same coin?

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a polygenic disease and does not follow a mendelian pattern. Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs), on the other hand, are caused by damaging germline variants, suggesting that T1D and IEIs have nothing in common. Some IEIs, resulting from mutations in genes regulating regulatory T-cell homeostasis, are associated with elevated incidence of T1D. The genetic spectrum of IEIs is gradually being unraveled; consequently, molecular pathways underlying human monogenic autoimmunity are being identified. There is an appreciable overlap between some of these pathways and the genetic variants that determine T1D susceptibility, suggesting that after all, IEI and T1D are 2 sides of the same coin. The study of monogenic IEIs with a variable incidence of T1D has the potential to provide crucial insights into the mechanisms leading to T1D. These insights contribute to the definition of T1D endotypes and explain disease heterogeneity. In this review, we discuss the interconnected pathogenic pathways of autoimmunity, β-cell function, and primary immunodeficiency. We also examine the role of environmental factors in disease penetrance as well as the circumstantial evidence of IEI drugs in preventing and curing T1D in individuals with IEIs, suggesting the repositioning of these drugs also for T1D therapy.