Apolipoprotein B Synthesis Inhibition by Mipomersen Reduces LDL-C When Added to Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Medication in Patients with Severe Heterozygous Hypercholesterolemia †

The Effect of Mipomersen in the Management of Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) lead to significant adverse effects in coronary arteries. Mipomersen is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits the synthesis of apolipoprotein B-100, an essential component of low density lipoprotein (LDL), and thus decreases the production of LDL. We aimed to determine the effect of mipomersen in patients with FH. Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, WHO ICTRP search portal, ISI database, the reference lists of relevant articles, and also Google Scholar to retrieve articles. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patients with FH receiving mipomersen as an add-on and a parallel group receiving a placebo or no intervention were selected. Results: Five studies with more than 500 patients were included. All had low risk of bias. Pooling data showed that mipomersen probably reduces LDL compared with placebo [mean difference: −24.79, 95% CI (−30.15, −19.43)] but with a moderate level of certainty. There was a high level of evidence for injection site reactions [RR = 2.56, CI (1.47–4.44)] and a low level for increased serum alanine transaminase (ALT) > 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) [RR = 5.19, CI (1.01–26.69)]. Conclusion: A moderate level of evidence in decreasing serum LDL indicates that we are uncertain if this drug provides benefit in any outcome important to patients. Although a low level of evidence for an increase in serum ALT leaves uncertainty about this adverse effect, injection site reactions in 10% or more of patients can be an important concern.

Effectiveness and Safety of Inclisiran, A Novel Long-Acting RNA Therapeutic Inhibitor of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9

Low-density cholesterol (LDL-C) has a causal association with coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Statins have been found to reduce LDL-C, and many randomized trials have documented the significant role of statins in prevention and treatment of ACS. Treatment with statin therapy is associated with few shortcomings. A healthy percentage of patients initiated on statin, discontinue it within a year of initiation predominantly because of its daily dosing schedule. There is considerable variability in treatment response to statins and in some percentage of patients with high risk for ACS, satins are not enough to help reach the LDL-C goal necessitating the development of alternate LDL-C lowering therapies. Inclisiran a small interfering ribonucleic acid molecule inhibitor is helpful in sustained reduction of LDL-C. A single dose can decrease LDL-C for around 6 months, showed promising results in the phase II trials. In conclusion, here we reviewed the possibilities of Inclisiran as LDL-C reducing therapy and compared with currently available newer nonstatin LDL-C lowering therapies.

Injection site reactions after subcutaneous oligonucleotide therapy

Oligonucleotides (ONs) are short fragments of nucleic acids, currently being investigated as therapeutic agents. When administered subcutaneously (sc), ONs cause a specific local reaction originating around the injection site, such as erythema, itching, discomfort and pain, including more severe manifestations such as ulceration or necrosis. These injection site reactions (ISRs) are common, but rather poorly described in the literature. With this review, we aim to provide an overview on the extent of the problem of ISRs, based on reported incidence. A structured literature search was performed to identify reported incidence and clinical features of ISRs which yielded 70 manuscripts that contained information regarding ISRs. The data from literature was combined with data on file available at our institution. All sc administered ONs described in the literature lead to the occurrence of ISRs. The percentage of trial subjects that developed ISRs ranged from 22 to 100% depending on ON. The majority of ONs caused ISRs in more than 70% of the trial subjects. The severity of the observed reactions varied between different ONs. Occurrence rate as well as severity of ISRs increases with higher doses. For chemistry and target of the compounds, no clear association regarding ISR incidence or severity was identified. All ONs developed to date are associated with ISRs. Overcoming the problem of ISRs might add greatly to the potential success of sc-administered ONs. Knowledge of these skin reactions and their specific immunostimulatory properties should be increased in order to obtain ONs that are more suitable for long-term use and clinically applicable in a broader patient population.