Initial combination therapy with metformin plus colesevelam improves lipoprotein particles in patients with early type 2 diabetes mellitus

Modulation of Bile Acid Metabolism to Improve Plasma Lipid and Lipoprotein Profiles

New drugs targeting bile acid metabolism are currently being evaluated in clinical studies for their potential to treat cholestatic liver diseases, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Changes in bile acid metabolism, however, translate into an alteration of plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, which may also affect cardiovascular outcomes in such patients. This review attempts to gain insight into this matter and improve our understanding of the interactions between bile acid and lipid metabolism. Bile acid sequestrants (BAS), which bind bile acids in the intestine and promote their faecal excretion, have long been used in the clinic to reduce LDL cholesterol and, thereby, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, BAS modestly but consistently increase plasma triglycerides, which is considered a causal risk factor for ASCVD. Like BAS, inhibitors of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBTi’s) reduce intestinal bile acid absorption. ASBTi’s show effects that are quite similar to those obtained with BAS, which is anticipated when considering that accelerated faecal loss of bile acids is compensated by an increased hepatic synthesis of bile acids from cholesterol. Oppositely, treatment with farnesoid X receptor agonists, resulting in inhibition of bile acid synthesis, appears to be associated with increased LDL cholesterol. In conclusion, the increasing efforts to employ drugs that intervene in bile acid metabolism and signalling pathways for the treatment of metabolic diseases such as NAFLD warrants reinforcing interactions between the bile acid and lipid and lipoprotein research fields. This review may be considered as the first step in this process.

Effectiveness and safety of combinational therapy compared with intensified statin monotherapy in patients with coronary heart disease

Reducing the plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is critical for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Conventional treatment with statins alone may not achieve the goal of lowering LDL-C due to drug intolerance or resistance. The present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of combining statin with another lipid-lowering agent in the management of dyslipidemia in CHD patients. A total of 180 patients with CHD were divided into three therapeutic groups (n=60 in each): Statin/colesevelam group (20 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg colesevelam daily), statin/ezetimibe group (20 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg ezetimibe daily) and high-intensity statin monotherapy group (30 mg atorvastatin daily). The baseline plasma lipid levels were measured. The duration of the treatment was eight weeks and the side effects were noted at one year's follow-up. After eight weeks' treatment, the mean plasma level of LDL-C was reduced by 45.2, 44.8 and 30.0% in the statin/colesevelam, statin/ezetimibe and statin monotherapy group, respectively. The reduction of LDL-C in the combinational therapy groups was greater than that in the statin monotherapy group (P<0.05). The proportion of patients achieving the goal of lowering LDL-C in the combinational therapy groups was higher than that in the statin monotherapy group. The effectiveness of reducing lipids was similar in the two combinational statin/colesevelam and statin/ezetimibe groups. Rates of adverse events were not significantly different among the three groups. In conclusion, statins combined with colesevelam or ezetimibe were more effective in reducing plasma LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy. This combinational therapeutic strategy may be an alternative for patients that are resistant or intolerant to statins.

Clinical relevance of epigenetics in the onset and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Epigenetics is involved in the altered expression of gene networks that underlie insulin resistance and insufficiency. Major genes controlling β-cell differentiation and function, such as PAX4, PDX1, and GLP1 receptor, are epigenetically controlled. Epigenetics can cause insulin resistance through immunomediated pro-inflammatory actions related to several factors, such as NF-kB, osteopontin, and Toll-like receptors. Hereafter, we provide a critical and comprehensive summary on this topic with a particular emphasis on translational and clinical aspects. We discuss the effect of epigenetics on β-cell regeneration for cell replacement therapy, the emerging bioinformatics approaches for analyzing the epigenetic contribution to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the epigenetic core of the transgenerational inheritance hypothesis in T2DM, and the epigenetic clinical trials on T2DM. Therefore, prevention or reversion of the epigenetic changes occurring during T2DM development may reduce the individual and societal burden of the disease.

Alpha-Glucosidase Enzyme Biosensor for the Electrochemical Measurement of Antidiabetic Potential of Medicinal Plants

A biosensor for measuring the antidiabetic potential of medicinal plants was developed by covalent immobilization of α-glucosidase (AG) enzyme onto amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs-NH2). The immobilized enzyme was entrapped in freeze-thawed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) together with p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG) on the screen-printed carbon electrode at low pH to prevent the premature reaction between PNPG and AG enzyme. The enzymatic reaction within the biosensor is inhibited by bioactive compounds in the medicinal plant extracts. The capability of medicinal plants to inhibit the AG enzyme on the electrode correlates to the potential of the medicinal plants to inhibit the production of glucose from the carbohydrate in the human body. Thus, the inhibition indicates the antidiabetic potential of the medicinal plants. The performance of the biosensor was evaluated to measure the antidiabetic potential of three medicinal plants such as Tebengau (Ehretis laevis), Cemumar (Micromelum pubescens), and Kedondong (Spondias dulcis) and acarbose (commercial antidiabetic drug) via cyclic voltammetry, amperometry, and spectrophotometry. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) response for the inhibition of the AG enzyme activity by Tebengau plant extracts showed a linear relation in the range from 0.423-8.29 μA, and the inhibition detection limit was 0.253 μA. The biosensor exhibited good sensitivity (0.422 μA/mg Tebengau plant extracts) and rapid response (22 s). The biosensor retains approximately 82.16 % of its initial activity even after 30 days of storage at 4 °C.

Effect of colesevelam HCl monotherapy on lipid particles in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Purpose

In addition to lowering hemoglobin A1C, colesevelam has been shown to improve the atherogenic lipoprotein profile of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when used in combination with metformin and/or sulfonylureas. A recent study evaluated the effects of colesevelam as antidiabetes monotherapy in adults with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control (hemoglobin A1C ≥7.5 to ≤9.5 %) with diet and exercise alone; we report here the effects on lipoprotein particle subclasses.

Methods

Subjects were randomized to receive oral colesevelam 3.75 g/day (n = 176) or placebo (n = 181) for 24 weeks. Changes in lipoprotein particle subclasses were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Results

At Week 24 with last observation carried forward, colesevelam produced a reduction in total low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle concentration (baseline: 1,611 nmol/L; least-squares [LS] mean treatment difference: −143 nmol/L, p < 0.0001) versus placebo; reductions were also seen in large, small, and very small LDL particle concentrations (all p < 0.05). There was also a reduction in total very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicron particle concentration (baseline: 88 nmol/L; LS mean treatment difference: −1 nmol/L, p = 0.82) that resulted from a lowering in small VLDL particle concentration (baseline: 45 nmol/L; LS mean treatment difference: −5 nmol/L, p = 0.03). In addition, with colesevelam there was an increase in total high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particle concentration versus placebo (baseline: 31 μmol/L; LS mean treatment difference: +0.6 μmol/L, p = 0.20), due to increases in the large (baseline: 5 μmol/L; LS mean treatment difference: +0.5 μmol/L, p = 0.007) and medium (baseline: 3 μmol/L; LS mean treatment difference: +0.8 μmol/L, p = 0.02) HDL subclasses.

Conclusions

Colesevelam monotherapy in subjects with T2DM resulted in generally favorable changes in certain lipoprotein subclass profiles compared with placebo.

Systematic review: Evaluating the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on lipoprotein and lipid values

PURPOSE

This systematic review was performed to summarize published experience using low density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P) to monitor the efficacy of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies.

METHODS

Studies were identified from a literature search of MEDLINE (January 1, 2000 - June 30, 2012); and abstract searches of select conferences. All accepted studies reported mean (or median) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based LDL-P values for at least 10 subjects receiving lipid lowering pharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Searches revealed 36 studies (with 61 treatment arms) in which LDL-P measurements were reported pre- and post-treatment. Most studies also reported changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but fewer studies reported changes in apolipoprotein B (apoB)(n = 20) and non-HDL-C (n = 28). Treatments included statins (22 arms/15 studies), fibrates (7 arms/7 studies), niacin (7 arms/6 studies), bile acid sequestrants (5 arms/2 studies), an anti-apoB oligonucleotide (2 arms/2 studies), combination therapies (8 arms/6 studies), anti-diabetics (5 arms/4 studies), and, other treatments (5 arms/2 studies). Lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy resulted in reductions in mean LDL-P in all but two studies. In several statin studies, the percent reductions in LDL-P were smaller than reductions in LDL-C, comparable changes were reported when LDL-P and apoB, were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Study-level data from this systemic review establish that different lipid lowering agents can lead to discordance between LDL-P and LDL-C, therefore, basing LDL-lowering therapy only on the achievement of cholesterol goals may result in a treatment gap. Therefore, the use of LDL-P for monitoring lipid-lowering therapy, particularly for statins, can provide a more accurate assessment of residual cardiovascular risk.

Ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants: impact on lipoprotein metabolism and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several lines of evidence indicate that the enterocyte plays a pivotal role in cholesterol homeostasis. The development of the selective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants (BAS) interrupting the enterohepatic circulation of bile salts has expanded the options for preventing and treating cardiovascular disease. We discuss here a selection of recently published studies that evaluated the effects of ezetimibe and BAS on lipoprotein metabolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although significant progress has been made in recent years in elucidating the impacts of ezetimibe and BAS on lipoprotein metabolism, underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Important new insights have been provided by using in-vivo kinetic studies of apolipoproteins labelled with a stable isotope. Other reports indicated that ezetimibe and BAS modulate the expression of several key genes involved in intestinal lipoprotein metabolism. Many of these effects have been related to the local effects of ezetimibe and BAS on intestinal cholesterol homeostasis.

SUMMARY

A substantial effort is being made by researchers to fully understand the mechanisms by which ezetimibe and BAS improve lipid profile. The efficacy of combination therapy of statins with ezetimibe or BAS for the prevention of cardiovascular disease remains to be confirmed in clinical endpoint studies.