Utility of metabolic syndrome as a risk enhancing factor in decision of statin use

There is urgent need to treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk earlier, more intensively, and with greater precision: A review of current practice and recommendations for improved effectiveness

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is epidemic throughout the world and is etiologic for such acute cardiovascular events as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, unstable angina, and death. ASCVD also impacts risk for dementia, chronic kidney disease peripheral arterial disease and mobility, impaired sexual response, and a host of other visceral impairments that adversely impact the quality and rate of progression of aging. The relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and risk for ASCVD is one of the most highly established and investigated issues in the entirety of modern medicine. Elevated LDL-C is a necessary condition for atherogenesis induction. Basic scientific investigation, prospective longitudinal cohorts, and randomized clinical trials have all validated this association. Yet despite the enormous number of clinical trials which support the need for reducing the burden of atherogenic lipoprotein in blood, the percentage of high and very high-risk patients who achieve risk stratified LDL-C target reductions is low and has remained low for the last thirty years. Atherosclerosis is a preventable disease. As clinicians, the time has come for us to take primordial and primary prevention more serously. Despite a plethora of therapeutic approaches, the large majority of patients at risk for ASCVD are poorly or inadequately treated, leaving them vulnerable to disease progression, acute cardiovascular events, and poor aging due to loss of function in multiple visceral organs. Herein we discuss the need to greatly intensify efforts to reduce risk, decrease disease burden, and provide more comprehensive and earlier risk assessment to optimally prevent ASCVD and its complications. Evidence is presented to support that treatment should aim for far lower goals in cholesterol management, should take into account many more factors than commonly employed today and should begin significantly earlier in life.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate: metabolism, transport, atheroprotection and effect of statin treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To better define the metabolism of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), its transport in plasma and its interactions with S1P receptors on vascular cells, and to evaluate the effect of statin treatment on the subnormal plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-bound S1P characteristic of the atherogenic dyslipidemia of metabolic syndrome (MetS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Neither clinical intervention trials targeted to raising high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels nor human genome-wide association studies (GWAS) studies have provided evidence to support an atheroprotective role of HDL. Recently however a large monogenic univariable Mendelian randomization on the N396S mutation in the gene encoding endothelial lipase revealed a causal protective effect of elevated HDL-C on coronary artery disease conferred by reduced enzyme activity. Given the complexity of the HDL lipidome and proteome, components of HDL other than cholesterol may in all likelihood contribute to such a protective effect. Among HDL lipids, S1P is a bioactive sphingolipid present in a small proportion of HDL particles (about 5%); indeed, S1P is preferentially enriched in small dense HDL3. As S1P is bound to apolipoprotein (apo) M in HDL, such enrichment is consistent with the elevated apoM concentration in HDL3. When HDL/apoM-bound S1P acts on S1P1 or S1P3 receptors in endothelial cells, potent antiatherogenic and vasculoprotective effects are exerted; those exerted by albumin-bound S1P at these receptors are typically weaker. When HDL/apoM-bound S1P binds to S1P2 receptors, proatherogenic effects may potentially be induced. Subnormal plasma levels of HDL-associated S1P are typical of dyslipidemic individuals at high cardiovascular risk and in patients with coronary heart disease. International Guidelines recommend statin treatment as first-line lipid lowering therapy in these groups. The cardiovascular benefits of statin therapy are derived primarily from reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, although minor contributions from pleiotropic actions cannot be excluded. Might statin treatment therefore normalize, directly or indirectly, the subnormal levels of S1P in dyslipidemic subjects at high cardiovascular risk? Our unpublished findings in the CAPITAIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01595828), involving a cohort of obese, hypertriglyceridemic subjects (n = 12) exhibiting the MetS, showed that pitavastatin calcium (4 mg/day) treatment for 180days was without effect on either total plasma or HDL-associated S1P levels, suggesting that statin-mediated improvement of endothelial function is not due to normalization of HDL-bound S1P. Statins may however induce the expression of S1P1 receptors in endothelial cells, thereby potentiating increase in endothelial nitric oxide synthase response to HDL-bound S1P, with beneficial downstream vasculoprotective effects.

SUMMARY

Current evidence indicates that S1P in small dense HDL3 containing apoM exerts antiatherogenic effects and that statins exert vasculoprotective effects through activation of endothelial cell S1P1 receptors in response to HDL/apoM-bound S1P.

Prevalence and significance of risk enhancing biomarkers in the United States population at intermediate risk for atherosclerotic disease: Risk Enhancing Factors in Intermediate Risk for ASCVD

BACKGROUND

Pooled cohort equations (PCEs) estimate 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in US adults. One use is to guide statin eligibility. However, PCEs risk estimate is inaccurate in some US subpopulations.

OBJECTIVE

Recent cholesterol guidelines proposed addition of risk enhancing factors to improve risk assessment for selection of statin therapy. This study examines frequencies of several risk enhancing biomarkers in NHANES subjects at intermediate risk (7.5 -<20% 10-year risk for ASCVD) and considers how they may be used to better assess risk for individuals.

METHODS

Prevalence of the following biomarkers were determined; elevations in apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, i.e., LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (160-189 mg/dL), non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (190-219 mg/dL), or total apolipoprotein B (apoB) (≥ 130 mg/dL), serum triglyceride (≥175 mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (5.7-6.4%), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (2-10 mg/L), and waist circumference ≥ 102 cm, and abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (15 - ≤ 60 mg/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

25% of NHANES population had intermediate risk. In this subpopulation, 85% had ≥ 1 biomarkers-similarly in women and men-with a third having ≥3 abnormal markers. Frequencies were not age-related, except in those 40-49 years, in whom > 40% had ≥3 abnormal biomarkers. It made little difference whether LDL-C, non-HDL-C or apoB was used as the atherogenic lipoprotein.

CONCLUSION

Three or more enhancing risk factors in intermediate risk subjects can complement PCE-estimated 10-year risk and guide the patient-provider discussion toward use of lipid-lowering medication. Future research is needed to integrate risk estimates by PCE and multiple risk enhancers.