ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction

Accurately evaluating for a small bowel obstruction using an abdominal radiograph, by a new method: The Bowel-Spine Ratio

INTRODUCTION

A well-established method does not exist to rule out a small bowel obstruction using an abdominal xray series with significant accuracy. The hypothesis of the study is that the ratio of an average small bowel diameter to lumbar spine diameter over 0.5 is most likely a small bowel obstruction.

METHODS

An x-ray abdominal series measurement technique was applied to 41 subjects with a chief complaint of "abdominal pain" as part of a randomized retrospective case review to predict an obstruction v. non obstruction. A total number of 81 abdominal pain subjects with a mean age of 46.7 years were selected with 40 excluded due to normal small bowel gas pattern. The subject's medical information was unknown to the authors when reading their images. The measurement technique involved averaging the largest and smallest small bowel short axis diameters with comparison to the lowest clearly visible lumbar body width. The subjects' medical course as described in the medical chart or subsequent computed tomography scans were used as the referencing standard to determine presence of obstruction vs non-obstruction.

RESULTS

This method, called the Bowel-Spine Ratio (BSR), resulted in a sensitivity of 0.882 (0.622-0.979; 95% CI), specificity of 0.957 (0.760-0.998; 95% CI), accuracy of 94.7% (80.9%-99.1%; 95% CI) and a positive likelihood ratio of 21 for predicting a small bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSION

The abdominal series Bowel-Spine Ratio is a simple yet effective technique to screen for a small bowel obstruction using limited resources and to avoid unnecessary computed tomography scans with the potential to reduce health care costs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians could have increased confidence in utilizing abdominal radiographs to evaluate for small bowel obstruction.

Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy-a rare presentation of uterine perforation

BACKGROUND

Intestinal obstruction is an uncommon non-obstetric condition during pregnancy which may cause maternal and fetal mortality. Clinicians are confronted with challenges in diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction due to the overlapping symptoms, concerns over radiological evaluation, and surgical risks.

CASE PRESENTATION

We reported a 39-year old, gravida 7, para 2, woman who suffered from acute intestinal obstruction at 34 weeks of gestation. Ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography were applied for intestinal obstruction diagnose. Conservative treatment was initially attempted. But following ultrasound found the absence of fluid in the amniotic sac and the patient showed no improvement in clinical symptoms. An emergency caesarean section was then performed. Intra-operative assessment showed dense adhesion between the left wall of uterus and omentum, descending colon, and sigmoid colon. After adhesion dialysis, uterine rupture with complete opening of the uterine wall at the site of left uterine cornua was found without active bleeding. The uterine rupture was then repaired.

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon during pregnancy, clinical suspicion of bowel obstruction is necessary especially in women with a history of abdominal surgery. Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative therapy fails and when there are signs of abnormal fetal conditions and worsened symptoms.

Small bowel obstruction due to encircling of fallopian tube: A curious case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Intestinal obstruction is a common surgical emergency encountered almost in every casualty. Though adhesions, hernias and malignancies are the common causes of obstruction, various articles describe unusual causes of intestinal obstruction which needs timely surgical interventions to prevent morbidity and mortality.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case report we present the history of a 50 year old sub-fertile woman who presented with features of intestinal obstruction and confirmed radiologically with both plain x-ray and computed tomography. After conservative management and as the imaging didn't show the cause of obstruction, exploratory laparotomy was performed. There we found have encircling of left fallopian tube around mid-ileum with gangrenous part. Left salphingectomy and bowel resection with side-to-side anastomosis resulted in a favorable outcome.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Intestinal obstruction can compromise blood flow to bowel loops leading to gangrene, perforation and death.

CONCLUSION

Awareness, early recognition and timely intervention in intestinal obstruction is mandatory to prevent poor outcomes, especially in cases of unknown cause and not responding to conservative management. The real surgical challenge is not the decision whether to perform surgery, but the decision when and how to perform it.

Small bowel obstruction and intestinal ischemia: emphasizing the role of MDCT in the management decision process

The objective of this article is to assess the computed tomography (CT) findings of small bowel obstruction (SBO) complicated by ischemia. SBO is a frequent clinical entity characterized by high morbidity and mortality. The radiologic aim is not just to diagnose the obstruction itself but to rule out the presence of complications related to SBO. This is crucial for differentiating which patients can be safely treated non-operatively from the ones who may need an urgent surgical approach. The main complication of SBO is intestinal ischemia. In the emergency setting, CT imaging is the modality of choice for SBO because of its ability to assess the bowel wall, the supporting mesentery and peritoneal cavity all in one. On the other hand, the radiologist who documents an intestinal ischemia should think about SBO as possible cause. In this case, the main finding which helps the radiologist in the identification of SBO is the presence of multiple and packed valvulae conniventes in the dilated bowel wall and the "transition zone" that indicates the passage between compressed and decompressed small bowel, otherwise the localization of the obstruction cause. Once the site of obstruction has been recognized, the other issue is to assess the cause of obstruction, considering that the most common cause of SBO remains "unidentified" and related to intra-abdominal adhesions. After that, the following most important point is to rule out the presence of an ischemic bowel and mesenteric changes associated to SBO. CT signs of bowel ischemia include reduced or increased bowel wall enhancement, mesenteric edema or engorgement, fluid or free air in the peritoneal cavity. This condition usually leads to an urgent laparotomy and, in some cases, to a surgical resection.

Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Intestinal Obstruction

It is essential for the colon and rectal surgeon to understand the evaluation and management of patients with both small and large bowel obstructions. Computed tomography is usually the most appropriate and accurate diagnostic imaging modality for most suspected bowel obstructions. Additional commonly used imaging modalities include plain radiographs and contrast imaging/fluoroscopy, while less commonly utilized imaging modalities include ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Regardless of the imaging modality used, interpretation of imaging should involve a systematic, methodological approach to ensure diagnostic accuracy.

Diagnostic utility of CT for small bowel obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) for small bowel obstruction (SBO), including diagnostic accuracy, ischemia, predicting surgical intervention, etiology and transition point.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE and related databases were searched for research articles published from their inception through August 2018. Findings were pooled using bivariate random-effects and summary receiver operating characteristic curve models. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate whether publication year, patient age, enhanced CT, slice thickness and pathogenesis affected classification accuracy.

RESULTS

In total, 45 studies with a total of 4004 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT for SBO were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84%, 95%) and 89% (95% CI: 81%, 94%), respectively, and there were no differences in the subgroup analyses of age, publication year, enhanced CT and slice thickness. For ischemia, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 82% (95% CI: 67%, 91%) and 92% (95% CI: 86%, 95%), respectively. No difference was found between enhanced and unenhanced CT based on subgroup analysis; however, high sensitivity was found in adhesive SBO compared with routine causes (96% vs. 78%, P = 0.03). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting surgical intervention were 87% and 73%, respectively. The accuracy for etiology of adhesions, hernia and tumor was 95%, 70% and 82%, respectively. In addition, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for transition point was 92% and 77%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CT has considerable accuracy in diagnosis of SBO, ischemia, predicting surgical intervention, etiology and transition point.

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery guideline summaries 2018: acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, acute diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and small bowel obstruction

In April 2017, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) asked the AAST Patient Assessment Committee to undertake a gap analysis for published clinical practice guidelines in emergency general surgery (EGS). Committee members performed literature searches to catalogue published guidelines for common EGS diseases and also to identify gaps in the literature where guidelines could be created. For five of the most common EGS conditions, acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, acute diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and small bowel obstruction, we found multiple well-referenced guidelines published by leading professional organizations. We have summarized guideline recommendations for each of these disease states stratified by the AAST EGS anatomic severity score based on these published consensus guidelines. These summaries could be used to help inform evidence-based clinical decision-making, but are intended to be flexible and updatable in real time as further research emerges. Comprehensive guidelines were available for all of the diseases queried and identified gaps most commonly represented areas lacking a solid evidence base. These are therefore areas where further research is needed.

Emergency Medicine Evaluation and Management of Small Bowel Obstruction: Evidence-Based Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a commonly diagnosed disease in the emergency department (ED). Recent literature has evaluated the ED investigation and management of SBO.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the ED investigation and management of adult SBO based on the current literature.

DISCUSSION

SBO is most commonly due to occlusion of the small intestine, resulting in fluid and gas accumulation. This may progress to mucosal ischemia, necrosis, and perforation. A variety of etiologies are present, but in adults, adhesions are the most common cause. Several classification systems are present. However, the most important distinction is complete vs. partial and complicated vs. simple obstruction, as complete complicated SBO more commonly requires surgical intervention. History and physical examination can vary, but the most reliable findings include prior abdominal surgery, history of constipation, abdominal distension, and abnormal bowel sounds. Signs of strangulation include fever, hypotension, diffuse abdominal pain, peritonitis, and several others. Diagnosis typically requires imaging, and though plain radiographs are often ordered, they cannot exclude the diagnosis. Computed tomography and ultrasound are reliable diagnostic methods. Management includes intravenous fluid resuscitation, analgesia, and determining need for operative vs. nonoperative therapy. Nasogastric tube is useful for patients with significant distension and vomiting by removing contents proximal to the site of obstruction. Surgery is needed for strangulation and those that fail nonoperative therapy. Surgical service evaluation and admission are recommended.

CONCLUSION

SBO is a common reason for admission from the ED. Knowledge of recent literature can optimize diagnosis and management.

MRI of the Nontraumatic Acute Abdomen: Description of Findings and Multimodality Correlation

Obtaining a specific diagnosis in the nontraumatic acute abdomen can be clinically challenging, because a wide range of disease processes affecting a number of different organ systems may have very similar presentations. Although computed tomography and ultrasound examination are the imaging tests most commonly used to evaluate the acute abdomen, MRI can often offer comparable diagnostic performance, and may be considered when other modalities are equivocal, suboptimal, or contraindicated. In some circumstances, MRI is emerging as an appropriate first-line imaging test.

Assessment of Strangulation in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction on the Basis of Combined CT Findings: Implications for Clinical Care

Purpose To determine which computed tomography (CT) findings or combinations of findings can help to accurately identify strangulation in adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO). Materials and Methods Contrast agent-enhanced CT findings in a cohort of 256 patients consecutively admitted for adhesive SBO, with a delay of less than 24 hours between CT and surgery for the operated patients, were reviewed independently by two radiologists, with consensus by a third, to assess CT findings commonly associated with strangulation. The reference standard for strangulation was surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of strangulation in the entire cohort and to identify predictors of the need for surgical resection in the subgroup of patients with strangulation. A CT score was obtained and diagnostic performances of different combined CT findings were calculated. Results In this study, 105 patients (41.0%; 105 of 256) underwent a surgical procedure, 62 of whom were found to have strangulation (59.0%; 62 of 105), whereas 151 patients (59.0%; 151 of 256) improved with medical care. Three CT findings were significantly associated with strangulation in the multivariate analysis: reduced bowel wall enhancement (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6, 23.5), diffuse mesenteric haziness (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% CI: 2.5, 15.2), and a closed-loop mechanism (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI: 2.8, 15.5). The model combining these three features had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) and a high negative predictive value (97%; 95% CI: 93%, 99%). Positive likelihood ratios were high when two or three of these CT findings were combined (positive likelihood ratios, 14.7 [95% CI: 7.1, 30.4] and 43.8 (95% CI: 14.2, 135.2], respectively). Among the strangulated cases, reduced bowel wall enhancement (odds ratio, 3.9; 95% CI: 1.3, 12) and mesenteric fluid (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.0, 12.8) were predictive of resection. Conclusion A score that combines three CT findings (reduced bowel wall enhancement, a closed-loop mechanism, and diffuse mesenteric haziness) can accurately predict strangulation in adhesive SBO. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Evolving Practice Patterns in Imaging Pregnant Patients With Acute Abdominal and Pelvic Conditions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine the current practice patterns of U.S. radiologists in imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtaining an Institutional Review Board waiver, all members of the Association of University Radiologists, the Association of Program Directors in Radiology, and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound were invited via e-mail to take a 23-question online survey on radiology practices and clinical scenarios about acute abdominal and pelvic imaging of pregnant patients.

RESULTS

Comparisons were made with previously published surveys. A total of 225 responses were received. Areas of high consensus included pregnancy assessment (97%) and obtaining informed consent (87%) before imaging, having a written policy on imaging pregnant patients (79%), modification of computed tomography (CT) protocols (74%), avoiding gadolinium contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (74%), using ultrasound for initial imaging in some scenarios, and using CT in trauma cases after inconclusive ultrasound. Areas of emerging consensus compared to 2007 included the use of serum or urine testing to confirm pregnancy status (59.4%; previously 14%) and the use of MRI in suspected appendicitis after an inconclusive ultrasound (73% in first trimester and 67% in third trimester; previously 46% and 29%, respectively). Areas without clear consensus included policy development, additional modifications to MRI protocols, choice of imaging modality, radiation dose, and the use of contrast agents in some scenarios.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, high or increasing consensus exists in some areas of imaging pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic conditions, but has yet to emerge in other areas.

Bowel Obstruction

Small bowel obstruction and large bowel obstruction account for approximately 20% of cases of acute abdominal surgical conditions. The role of the radiologist is to answer several key questions: Is obstruction present? What is the level of the obstruction? What is the cause of the obstruction? What is the severity of the obstruction? Is the obstruction simple or closed loop? Is strangulation, ischemia, or perforation present? In this presentation, the radiologic approach to and imaging findings of patients with known or suspected bowel obstruction are presented.

Colon cancer presented with sigmoid volvulus: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Sigmoid volvulus is the most prevalent type of colonic volvulus. Colon cancer is seen less where sigmoid volvulus is common, so it is rare to see that colon cancer is synchronous with sigmoid volvulus.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We would like to present a case of sigmoid volvulus caused by colon cancer in a male patient aged 80 who was referred to the hospital with toxaemic shock presentation.

DISCUSSION

Sigmoid cancer can be presented as sigmoid volvulus to the emergency department. In intestinal obstruction early diagnosis is of crucial importance. Computarized tomography is a diagnosis tool that should be preferred both in the diagnosis of obstruction and in detecting its cause, localisation, degree and complications.

CONCLUSION

When surgery is performed due to the urgent colonic obstruction in colonic volvulus diagnosed patients, a colon tumour should be considered in the same column loops or in the distal colon. We believe that CT is the method that should be preferred in large-bowel obstruction suspected patients.

MDCT of Small Bowel Obstruction: How Reliable Are Oblique Reformatted Images in Localizing Point of Transition?

The goal of this study is to prospectively assess the additional value of oblique reformatted images for localizing POT, having surgery as a reference standard. Materials and Methods. 102 consecutive patients with suspected small bowel obstruction (SBO) underwent 64-slice multidetector row CT (MDCT) using surgical findings as reference standard. Two independent GI radiologists reviewed the CT scans to localize the exact POT by evaluating axial images (data set A) followed by axial, coronal, and oblique MPR images. CT findings were compared to surgical findings in terms of diagnostic performance. McNemar's test was used to detect any statistical difference in POT evaluation between datasets A and B. Kappa statistics were applied for measuring agreement between two readers. Results. There was a diagnostic improvement of 9.9% in the case of the less experienced radiologist in localizing POT by using oblique reformatted images. The more experienced radiologist showed diagnostic improvement by 12.9%.

Acute GI obstruction

Acute gastrointestinal obstruction occurs when the normal flow of intestinal contents is interrupted. The blockage can occur at any level throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The clinical symptoms depend on the level and extent of obstruction. Various benign and malignant processes can produce acute gastrointestinal obstruction, which often represents a medical emergency because of the potential for bowel ischemia leading to perforation and peritonitis. Early recognition and appropriate treatment are thus essential. The typical clinical symptoms associated with obstruction include nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, abdominal pain and failure to pass bowel movements. Abdominal distention, tympany due to an air-filled stomach and high-pitched bowel sounds suggest the diagnosis. The diagnostic process involves imaging including radiography, ultrasonography, contrast fluoroscopy and computer tomography in less certain cases. In patients with uncomplicated obstruction, management is conservative, including fluid resuscitation, electrolyte replacement, intestinal decompression and bowel rest. In many cases, endoscopy may aid in both the diagnostic process and in therapy. Endoscopy can be used for bowel decompression, dilation of strictures or placement of self-expandable metal stents to restore the luminal flow either as a final treatment or to allow for a delay until elective surgical therapy. When gastrointestinal obstruction results in ischemia, perforation or peritonitis, emergency surgery is required.

Bowel obstruction and hernia

Bowel obstruction and abdominal hernia are commonly observed in patients seeking emergency care for abdominal pain. This article discusses bowel obstruction, adynamic ileus, acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, and abdominal hernias, with particular emphasis on the management of patients in the emergency department (ED). Although the diagnostic approach to bowel obstruction often requires imaging, abdominal hernia may be identified in most circumstances by history and physical examination alone. Urgent surgical consultation is indicated when there is a concern for bowel ischemia, strangulation, or complete obstruction. This article reviews an ED-based approach to the patient presenting with symptoms of bowel obstruction or hernia.

The relevance of transition zones on computed tomography in the management of small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

Frequently, radiologists emphasize radiographic transition zones (RTZs) on computed tomography (CT), which are areas of abrupt change from dilated to collapsed bowel, as pathognomonic for small-bowel obstruction (SBO) diagnosis and location. The relevance of RTZs to patient management remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical predictive value and intraoperative accuracy of RTZ.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 200 patients with SBO who underwent abdominal CT at a single institution from 2002 to 2007 was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired t test, a Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients with SBO, 150 (75%) had an RTZ. Seventy-five (38%) patients required operative intervention; 58 (39%) patients had RTZ and 17 (34%) patients did not have RTZ (P=NS). The presence of RTZ was not associated with increased probability of operative versus nonoperative management (odds ratio=1.19; 95% confidence interval [0.61-2.32]). The mean time to operative intervention was 3.6 days. Immediate operative intervention (<24 h) was equivalent in patients with versus without RTZ (57% vs 53%; P=NS) as was intervention for failed nonoperative management (43% vs 47%; P=NS). For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ correlated with intraoperative site of obstruction in only 31 (63%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The presence of RTZs does not increase the likelihood of operative intervention or identify patients who will fail nonoperative management. RTZ should, therefore, not be used as a major criterion influencing operative versus nonoperative management decisions in patients with SBO. For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ had a 63% correlation with intra-operative findings, which makes it a useful adjunct to pre-operative planning.

Multiphasic MDCT in small bowel volvulus

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the use of MDCT with 3D CT angiography (CTA) and CT portal venography (CTPV) reconstruction for the diagnosis of small bowel volvulus (SBV).

METHODS

Multiphasic MDCT findings in nine patients (seven males and two females, age range 2-70) with surgically proven SBV were retrospectively reviewed. Non-contrast and double phase contrast enhanced MDCT including 3D CTA and CTPV reconstruction were performed in all the patients. Two experienced abdominal radiologists evaluated the images and defined the location, direction and degree of SBV.

RESULTS

On axial MDCT images, all cases show segmental or global dilatation of small intestine. Other findings include circumferential bowel wall thickening in eight cases, halo appearance and hyperemia in seven cases, whirl sign in six cases, beak-like appearance in six cases, closed loops in six cases and ascites in one case. CTA/CTPV showed abnormal courses involving main trunks of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in seven cases, with or without distortion of their tributaries. Normal course of SMA but abnormal course of SMV was seen in the other two cases. Of all the nine cases, whirl sign was seen in six cases and barber's pole sign in five cases. Dilated SMV was observed in eight cases and abrupt termination of SMA was found in one case. Compared with surgical findings, the location, direction and degree of SBV were correctly estimated in all cases based on CTA/CTPV.

CONCLUSION

Multiphasic MDCT with CTA/CTPV reconstruction can play an important role in the diagnosis of SBV. The location, direction and degree of SBV can all be defined preoperatively using this method.

Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain

Acute abdominal pain may be caused by a myriad of diagnoses, including acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, and cholecystitis. Imaging plays an important role in the treatment management of patients because clinical evaluation results can be inaccurate. Performing computed tomography (CT) is most important because it facilitates an accurate and reproducible diagnosis in urgent conditions. Also, CT findings have been demonstrated to have a marked effect on the management of acute abdominal pain. The cost-effectiveness of CT in the setting of acute appendicitis was studied, and CT proved to be cost-effective. CT can therefore be considered the primary technique for the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, except in patients clinically suspected of having acute cholecystitis. In these patients, ultrasonography (US) is the primary imaging technique of choice. When costs and ionizing radiation exposure are primary concerns, a possible strategy is to perform US as the initial technique in all patients with acute abdominal pain, with CT performed in all cases of nondiagnostic US. The use of conventional radiography has been surpassed; this examination has only a possible role in the setting of bowel obstruction. However, CT is more accurate and more informative in this setting as well. In cases of bowel perforation, CT is the most sensitive technique for depicting free intraperitoneal air and is valuable for determining the cause of the perforation. Imaging is less useful in cases of bowel ischemia, although some CT signs are highly specific. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a promising alternative to CT in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain and does not involve the use of ionizing radiation exposure. However, data on the use of MR imaging for this indication are still sparse.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

http://radiology.rsna.org/content/253/1/31/suppl/DC1.

Small bowel obstruction: what to look for

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common clinical syndrome for which effective treatment depends on a rapid and accurate diagnosis. Despite advances in imaging and a better understanding of small bowel pathophysiology, SBO is often diagnosed late or misdiagnosed, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. A comprehensive approach that includes clinical findings, patient history, and triage examinations such as plain abdominal radiography will help the clinician develop an individualized treatment plan. When an SBO is accompanied by signs of strangulation, emergent surgical treatment is advised. If surgery cannot be performed immediately or if a partial obstruction is suspected, then a more detailed radiologic work-up is needed. The imaging techniques used subsequently vary according to the initial findings. If a low-grade partial obstruction is suspected, volume-challenge enteral examinations such as enteroclysis and computed tomographic (CT) enteroclysis are preferred. If a complete or high-grade obstruction is suspected, cross-sectional studies such as ultrasonography or multidetector CT are used to exclude strangulation. An algorithmic approach to imaging is proposed for the management of SBO to achieve accurate diagnosis of the obstruction; determine its severity, site, and cause; and assess the presence of strangulation. Radiologists have a pivotal role in clinical decision making in cases of SBO by providing answers to specific questions that significantly affect management.

Ischemia and infarction of the intestine related to obstruction

In the acute obstructive syndrome, beyond the evaluation of the morphologic findings of the intestine (e.g. dilation, air-fluid level, whirl sign, transition point), it is important to consider the pathophysiology of the bowel wall in order to better estimate the status of viability, the degree of the obstruction and the presence of the intestinal ischemic complications or infarction: the intestine is a dynamic system and the same pathological condition can appear in different forms, depending on the stage of disease. MDCT examination could be of help in differentiating various type and degree of disease of the intestinal ischemia correlated to obstruction.

Intestinal obstruction: trends in imaging utilization and their influence in its rising hospital bill

The purpose of the study was to evaluate trends in the utilization of different imaging modalities and review how imaging utilization practices affect hospital charges for patients with intestinal obstruction. All patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of intestinal obstruction during 6 fiscal years (1999-2004) were retrospectively studied. We obtained data on patients' demographics, procedures, outcomes, imaging services utilization, and hospital and imaging charges from our institution's transition system (a clinical and financial decision support software system). The institutional review board approved this study. Surgery was performed in 26% of patients in 1999 and in 40% in 2004 (p = 0.01) with the mortality rate significantly (p < 0.01) dropping from 3.8% to 0.4%. A total of 5,292 abdominal imaging studies were obtained; 93% of those were either abdominal radiographs or abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans. CT studies per patient increased from 0.5 in 1999 to 1 in 2004 (p < 0.01), while abdominal radiographs (mean = 2.4) did not significantly change over the entire study period (p = 0.6). Average imaging charges doubled during the study period ($1,572 to $3,012, p < 0.01). Average hospital charges increased from $18,138 in 1999 to $32,808 in 2004 (p < 0.01). The fraction of hospital charges attributed to imaging varied between 8.7% and 9.2%. CT utilization for intestinal obstruction increased from 1999 to 2004 without modality substitution. While hospital and imaging charges have significantly increased, the fraction represented by imaging has remained constant, suggesting that imaging is an unlikely cause for the increase in hospital charges.