Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings

Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) may uncover incidental findings (IFs) unrelated to lung cancer. There may be potential benefits from identifying clinically significant IFs that warrant intervention and potential harms related to identifying IFs that are not clinically significant but may result in additional evaluation, clinician effort, patient anxiety, complications, and excess cost. Objectives: To identify knowledge and research gaps and develop and prioritize research questions to address the approach to and management of IFs. Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary panel to review the available literature on IFs detected in lung cancer screening LDCT examinations, focusing on variability and standardizing reporting, management of IFs, and evaluation of the benefits and harms of IFs, particularly cardiovascular-related IFs. We used a three-round modified Delphi process to prioritize research questions. Results: This statement identifies knowledge gaps in 1) reporting of IFs, 2) management of IFs, and 3) identifying and reporting coronary artery calcification found on lung cancer screening LDCT. Finally, we present the panel's initial 36 research questions and the final 20 prioritized questions. Conclusions: This statement provides a prioritized research agenda to further efforts focused on evaluating, managing, and increasing awareness of IFs in lung cancer screening.

Evaluating Adherence to Canadian Radiology Guidelines for Incidental Hepatobiliary Findings Using RAG-Enabled LLMs

Purpose: Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to support clinical decision-making but often lack training on the latest clinical guidelines. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) may enhance guideline adherence by dynamically integrating external information. This study evaluates the performance of two LLMs, GPT-4o and o1-mini, with and without RAG, in adhering to Canadian radiology guidelines for incidental hepatobiliary findings. Methods: A customized RAG architecture was developed to integrate guideline-based recommendations into LLM prompts. Clinical cases were curated and used to prompt models with and without RAG. Primary analyses assessed the rate of guideline adherence with comparisons made between LLMs with and without RAG. Secondary analyses evaluated reading ease, grade level, and response times for generated outputs. Results: A total of 319 clinical cases were evaluated. Adherence rates were 81.7% for GPT-4o without RAG, 97.2% for GPT-4o with RAG, 79.3% for o1-mini without RAG, and 95.1% for o1-mini with RAG. Model performance differed significantly across groups, with RAG-enabled configurations outperforming their non-RAG counterparts (P < .05). RAG-enabled models demonstrated improved reading ease and lower grade level scores; however, all model outputs remained at advanced comprehension levels. Response times for RAG-enabled models increased slightly due to additional retrieval processing but remained clinically acceptable. Conclusions: RAG-enabled LLMs significantly improved adherence to Canadian radiology guidelines for incidental hepatobiliary findings without compromising readability or response times. This approach holds promise for advancing evidence-based care and warrants further validation across broader clinical settings.

Follow-up Imaging and Surgical Costs Associated with Different Guidelines for Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare follow-up imaging and surgical cost implications of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) guidelines, 2017 and 2022 European (EUR) guidelines, 2020 Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) recommendations, and 2013 American College of Radiology (ACR) White Paper for managing incidentally detected gallbladder polyps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

253 consecutive patients with gallbladder polyps identified on ultrasound were independently reviewed by three radiologists for polyp size and morphology. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, cholecystectomy (if performed) pathological findings, or any subsequent diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. For each patient, the following were calculated for each of the 5 guidelines studied: 1) number of recommended follow-up ultrasounds based on initial presentation, 2) number of surgical consultations recommended based on initial presentation, 3) number of surgical consultations recommended based on growth, and 4) associated imaging and surgical costs. Interrater agreement was calculated.

RESULTS

The SRU 2022 guidelines suggested significantly fewer follow-up ultrasounds and surgical consultations, leading to a cost reduction of 96.5 % and 96.7 % compared to European 2022 and 2017, respectively; 86.5 % compared to CAR; and 86.2 % compared to ACR guidelines. With SRU Recommendations, the majority of gallbladder polyps would be classified as extremely low risk (68.4 %), 30.8 % low risk, and 0.8 % indeterminate risk. In our cohort, a single case of gallbladder cancer was identified (26 mm) which would be recommended for surgical consult by all guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The SRU 2022 guidelines can lead to significant savings for patients, health systems, and society, while reducing unnecessary medical interventions for managing incidentally detected gallbladder polyps.

Challenges in Ultrasound of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts: A Focused Review and Update

Although ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice in patients with right upper quadrant pain or suspected biliary obstruction, a number of challenges in clinical practice limit its utility as a stand-alone imaging modality. This article presents a focused review of gallbladder and biliary ultrasound, highlighting current knowledge gaps, emerging applications, and directions for further study. The authors cover selected topics including acute cholecystitis, cystic artery velocity, gallbladder polyps, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and incidental biliary duct dilatation.

Incidental findings on MRI for the evaluation of endometriosis: prevalence and clinical significance

Objectives

This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on MRI for endometriosis. Differences between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were to be examined.

Methods

This was a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional single-center study. All patients who received a pelvic MRI for endometriosis between April 2021 and February 2023 were included. The presence and frequency of incidental findings were noted after review of all MR images and radiology reports. The potential clinical significance of the findings was analyzed. Differences in the frequency of incidental findings between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were evaluated, utilizing the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

303 consecutive patients (mean age, 33.4 years ± 8.3) were evaluated. Incidental findings were noted in 299/303 (98.7%) patients. Most frequently, ossification of the hip acetabular rim and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine were noted. In 25/303 (8.3%) patients, incidental findings had high clinical significance. For specific incidental findings, significantly higher prevalences were found in patients with than in patients without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI (hip acetabular rim ossification, p = 0.041; annulus fibrosus fissures, p = 0.006; gallstones, p = 0.042).

Conclusions

Incidental findings are very common on pelvic MRI for endometriosis. The detection of incidental findings can lead to the diagnosis of relevant diseases and thus enable early treatment. On the other hand, many incidental findings have no, only minor, or uncertain consequences.

Clinical predictors of significant findings on EUS for the evaluation of incidental common bile duct dilation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although EUS is highly accurate for the evaluation of common bile duct (CBD) dilation, the yield of EUS in patients with incidental CBD dilation is unclear.

METHODS

Serial patients undergoing EUS for incidental, dilated CBD (per radiologist, minimum of >6 mm objectively) from 2 academic medical centers without active pancreaticobiliary disease or significantly elevated liver function test results were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of EUS with significant findings and a novel prediction model was derived from one center, internally validated with bootstrapping, and externally validated at the second center.

RESULTS

Of 375 patients evaluated, 31 (8.3%) had significant findings, including 26 choledocholithiasis, 1 ampullary adenoma, and 1 pancreatic mass. Predictors of significant findings with EUS included age of ≥70 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-10.0), non-biliary-type abdominal pain without chronic pain (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.3-17.3), CBD diameter of ≥15 mm or ≥17 mm with cholecystectomy (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.7-18.7), and prior ERCP (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.1-22.5). A point-based novel clinical prediction model was created: age of ≥70 years = 1, non-biliary-type abdominal pain without chronic pain = 2, prior ERCP = 2, and CBD dilation = 2. A score of <1 had 93% (development) and 100% (validation) sensitivity and predicted a <2% chance of having a significant finding in both cohorts while excluding the need for EUS in ∼30% of both cohorts. Conversely, a score of ≥4 was >90% specific for the presence of significant pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 10% of patients undergoing EUS for incidental CBD dilation had pathologic findings. This novel, externally validated, clinical prediction model may reduce low-yield, invasive evaluation in nearly one-third of patients.

Management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: a review of clinical scenarios using the 2022 SRU gallbladder polyp consensus guidelines

Gallbladder (GB) polyps are a common incidental finding on sonography, but only a small fraction of polyps become GB cancer. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus committee recently performed an extensive literature review and published guidelines for GB polyp follow-up/management to provide clarity among the many heterogeneous recommendations that are available to clinicians. As these guidelines have become adopted into clinical practice, challenging clinical scenarios have arisen including GB polyps in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), high risk geographic/genetic patient populations, shrinking polyps, pedunculated vs sessile polyps, thin vs thick stalked polyps, vascular polyps and multiple polyps. According to the SRU guidelines, clinicians should refer to gastroenterology guidelines when managing GB polyps in patients with known PSC. If patients at high geographic/genetic risk develop GB polyps, 'extremely low risk' polyps may be managed as 'low risk' and 10-14 mm 'extremely low risk' or '7-14 mm' low risk polyps that decrease in size by ≥ 4 mm require no follow-up. Thin-stalked or pedunculated polyps are 'extremely low risk' and thick-stalked pedunculated polyps are 'low risk'. Sessile polyps are 'low risk' but should receive immediate specialist referral if features suggestive of GB cancer are present. Neither polyp multiplicity nor vascularity impact risk of GB cancer and follow up should be based on morphology alone.

Biliary Duct Dilatation: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Biliary duct dilatation is a common incidental finding in practice, but it is unlikely to indicate biliary obstruction in the absence of clinical symptoms or elevated levels on liver function tests (LFTs). However, the clinical presentation may be nonspecific, and LFTs may either be unavailable or difficult to interpret. The goal of this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review is to highlight a series of topics fundamental to the management of biliary duct dilatation, providing consensus recommendations in a question-and-answer format. We start by covering a basic approach to interpreting LFT results, the strengths and weaknesses of the biliary imaging modalities, and how and where to measure the extrahepatic bile duct. Next, we define the criteria for biliary duct dilatation, including patients with prior cholecystectomy and advanced age, and discuss when and whether biliary duct dilatation can be attributed to papillary stenosis or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Subsequently, we discuss two conditions in which the duct is pathologically dilated but not obstructed: congenital cystic dilatation (i.e., choledochal cyst) and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Finally, we provide guidance regarding when to recommend obtaining additional imaging or testing, such as endoscopic ultrasound or ERCP, and include a discussion of future directions in biliary imaging.

Gallbladder Cancer

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common biliary epithelial malignancy, with an estimated incidence of 1.13 cases per 100,000 in the United States (Hundal and Shaffer in Clin Epidemiol 6:99-109, 2014 1; Henley et al. in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:1319-1326, 2015 2). The insidious nature and late presentation of this disease place it among the most lethal invasive neoplasms. Gallbladder cancer spreads early by lymphatic or hematogenous metastasis, as well as by direct invasion into the liver. While surgery may be curative at early stages, both surgical and nonsurgical treatments remain largely unsuccessful in patients with more advanced diseases (Rahman et al. in Cancer Med 6:874-880, 2017 3).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidental findings in computed tomography scans for pediatric trauma patients

PURPOSE

To quantitatively synthesize and report the frequency and category of incidental findings on Computed Tomography (CT) scans in pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 6, 2023, in adherence to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies describing incidental findings on CT scans in trauma patients ≤21 years were included. Incidental findings were grouped into three categories: Category 1 (requiring immediate or urgent evaluation or treatment), Category 2 (likely benign but which may require outpatient follow-up), and Category 3 (benign anatomic variants or pathologic findings that do not require follow-up or intervention).

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this study, which revealed a combined rate of 27.10 % of incidental findings with notable heterogeneity among the studies. Aggregated frequencies were 10.15 % for Category 1, 32.18 % for Category 2 and 51.44 % for Category 3. Subgroup meta-analysis on abdominal CT scans showed a higher pooled incidence of incidental findings at 47.17 %, but with lower heterogeneity than the general meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the prevalence of incidental findings in pediatric trauma patients undergoing CT scans. The categorization of these findings provides useful information for clinicians in determining appropriate follow-up and management strategies.

Ultrasound Surveillance of Small, Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Projected Benefits by Sex, Age, and Comorbidity Level

OBJECTIVE

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps are commonly encountered when performing upper abdominal ultrasound. Our purpose was to estimate the life expectancy (LE) benefit of ultrasound-based gallbladder surveillance in patients with small (6-7 to <10 mm), incidentally detected gallbladder polyps, accounting for patient sex, age, and comorbidity level.

METHODS

We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate hypothetical cohorts of women and men with small gallbladder polyps, with varying age (66-80 years) and comorbidity level (none, mild, moderate, severe). Drawing from current evidence, in the base case, we assumed no increased risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with small gallbladder polyps. To estimate maximal possible LE gains from surveillance, we assumed perfect cancer control consequent to 5 years of surveillance. We varied key assumptions including cancer risk and test performance characteristics in sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Projected LE gains from surveillance were <3 days across most cohorts and scenarios evaluated. For 66- and 80-year-olds with no comorbidities, LE gains were 1.46 and 1.45 days, respectively, for women, and 0.67 and 0.75 days for men. With 10 years of surveillance, LE gains increased to 2.94 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 1.35 days). If we assumed a 10% increase in gallbladder cancer risk among individuals with polyps, LE gains increased slightly to 1.60 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 0.74 days). Results were sensitive to test performance and surgical mortality.

DISCUSSION

Even under unrealistic, optimistic assumptions of cancer control, ultrasound surveillance of incidentally detected small gallbladder polyps provided limited benefit.

[Patient-centered, value-based management of incidental findings in radiology]

As a byproduct of the increased use of high-resolution radiological imaging, the prevalence of incidental findings (IFs) has been increasing for years. The discovery of an incidental finding can allow early treatment of a potentially health-threatening disease and thus decisively change the course of the disease. However, many incidental findings are of low risk with little or no health impact, and yet their discovery often leads to a cascade of additional investigations. It is undisputed that incidental findings can have a direct impact on the life of the person and that not only psychosocial aspects such as worries and anxiety due to false-positive findings play a role, but that insurance, legal or professional problems can also occur under certain circumstances, which is why the correct handling of incidental findings and the accompanying ethical challenges that apply to them regularly give rise to discussions. General principles to consider when managing incidental findings are responsibility for the well-being of the patient/study participant and of society. In order to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment and to achieve high patient benefit, radiologists and clinicians must know how to properly deal with IFs. In recent years, various national and international societies have published important guidelines ("white papers") on how to deal with the management of IFs. It is important that radiologists are fully aware of and follow these guidelines and are also available to referring physicians for further discussions and advice. The most important fact is that the well-being of the patient must always be at the center of all decisions.

Applying Implementation Science Principles to Systematize High-Quality Care for Potentially Significant Imaging Findings

OBJECTIVE

Use principles of implementation science to improve the diagnosis and management of potentially significant imaging findings.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary stakeholders codified the diagnosis and management of potentially significant imaging findings in eight organs and created a finding tracking management system that was embedded in radiologist workflows and IT systems. Radiologists were trained to use this system. An automated finding tracking management system was created to support consistent high-quality care through care pathway visualizations, increased awareness of specific findings in the electronic medical record, templated notifications, and creation of an electronic safety net. Primary outcome was the rate of quality reviews related to eight targeted imaging findings. Secondary outcome was radiologist use of the finding tracking management tool.

RESULTS

In the 4 years after implementation, the tool was used to track findings in 7,843 patients who received 10,015 ultrasound, CT, MRI, x-ray, and nuclear medicine examinations that were interpreted by all 34 radiologists. Use of the tool lead to a decrease in related quality reviews (from 8.0% to 0.0%, P < .007). Use of the system increased from 1.7% of examinations in the early implementation phase to 3.1% (+82%, P < .00001) in the postimplementation phase. Each radiologist used the tool on an average of 294.6 unique examinations (SD 404.8). Overall, radiologists currently use the tool approximately 4,000 times per year.

DISCUSSION

Radiologists frequently used a finding tracking management system to ensure effective communication and raise awareness of the importance of recommended future follow-up studies. Use of this system was associated with a decrease in the rate of quality review requests in this domain.

A Quick Reference Guide for Incidental Findings on Lung Cancer Screening CT Examinations

PURPOSE

The US Preventive Services Task Force has recommended lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) in high-risk individuals since 2013. Because LDCT encompasses the lower neck, chest, and upper abdomen, many incidental findings (IFs) are detected. The authors created a quick reference guide to describe common IFs in LCS to assist LCS program navigators and ordering providers in managing the care continuum in LCS.

METHODS

The ACR IF white papers were reviewed for findings on LDCT that were age appropriate for LCS. A draft guide was created on the basis of recommendations in the IF white papers, the medical literature, and input from subspecialty content experts. The draft was piloted with LCS program navigators recruited through contacts by the ACR LCS Steering Committee. The navigators completed a survey on overall usefulness, clarity, adequacy of content, and user experience with the guide.

RESULTS

Seven anatomic regions including 15 discrete organs with 45 management recommendations were identified as relevant to the age of individuals eligible for LCS. The draft was piloted by 49 LCS program navigators from 32 facilities. The guide was rated as useful and clear by 95% of users. No unexpected or adverse experiences were reported in using the guide. On the basis of feedback, relevant sections were reviewed and edited.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACR Lung Cancer Screening CT Incidental Findings Quick Reference Guide outlines the common IFs in LCS and can serve as an easy-to-use resource for ordering providers and LCS program navigators to help guide management.

Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis

Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.

What's new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common condition and its incidence is rising. New technologies have advanced the imaging diagnosis of AC, providing more structural and functional information as well as allowing the radiologist to distinguish AC from mimics and identify complications from both the disease and its management. Dual energy CT aids in detecting gallstones and gallbladder wall enhancement, which helps to diagnose AC and identify its complications. Similarly, contrast-enhanced and non-contrast perfusion ultrasound techniques improve detection of abnormal gallbladder wall enhancement. Advances in MR imaging including hepatobiliary contrast agents aid in characterizing post-cholecystectomy complications such as bile leaks. Newer interventional techniques have also expanded the suite of options for minimally invasive management. Lumen apposing metal stents provide more options for conservative treatment in non-surgical candidates and are compared to a standard percutaneous cholecystostomy. Radiologists should be familiar with these advanced imaging methods and intervention techniques and the value they can bring to the diagnosis and management of AC.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: review for radiologists

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a rare chronic inflammatory disease affecting the bile ducts, which can eventually result in bile duct strictures, cholestasis and cirrhosis. Patients are often asymptomatic but may present with clinical features of cholestasis. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management. This review covers the pathophysiology, clinical features, imaging findings as well as methods of surveillance and post-transplant appearance.

The gallbladder: what's new in 2022?

This review focuses mainly on the imaging diagnosis, treatment, and complications of acute cholecystitis which is the most common benign disease of the gallbladder. The American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria for the imaging evaluation of patients with right upper quadrant pain and the Tokyo Guidelines for evaluating patients with acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis are presented. The recent articles for using US, CT, MR, and HIDA in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute cholecystitis are reviewed in detail. The clinical management and postoperative complications are described. Because gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis can mimic gallbladder malignancies and acute cholecystitis, their imaging findings and management are presented. Finally, due the recent literature reporting better results with CT than US in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, a suggested approach for imaging patients with right upper quadrant pain and possible acute cholecystitis is presented in an addendum.

Incidental Findings of Gallbladder and Bile Ducts-Management Strategies: General Aspects, Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening-A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Position Paper

The World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings with a series of position papers to give advice on characterization and management. The biliary system (gallbladder and biliary tree) is the third most frequent site for incidental findings. This first part of the position paper on incidental findings of the biliary system is related to general aspects, gallbladder polyps and other incidental findings of the gallbladder wall. Available evidence on prevalence, diagnostic work-up, malignancy risk, follow-up and treatment is summarized with a special focus on ultrasound techniques. Multiparametric ultrasound features of gallbladder polyps and other incidentally detected gallbladder wall pathologies are described, and their inclusion in assessment of malignancy risk and decision- making on further management is suggested.

Risk of developing gallbladder cancer in patients with gallbladder polyps detected on transabdominal ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of malignancy in gallbladder polyps of incremental sizes detected during transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS).

METHODS

We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies recording the polyp size from which gallbladder malignancy developed, confirmed following cholecystectomy, or by subsequent follow-up. Primary outcome was the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with polyps. Secondary outcome was the effect of polyp size as a prognostic factor for cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool. Bayesian meta-analysis estimated the median cancer risk according to polyp size. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020223629).

RESULTS

82 studies published since 1990 reported primary data for 67,837 patients. 67,774 gallbladder polyps and 889 cancers were reported. The cumulative median cancer risk of a polyp measuring 10 mm or less was 0.60% (99% credible range 0.30-1.16%). Substantial heterogeneity existed between studies (I2 = 99.95%, 95% credible interval 99.86-99.98%). Risk of bias was generally high and overall confidence in evidence was low. 13 studies (15.6%) were graded with very low certainty, 56 studies (68.3%) with low certainty, and 13 studies (15.6%) with moderate certainty. In studies considered moderate quality, TAUS monitoring detected 4.6 cancers per 10,000 patients with polyps less than 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

Malignant risk in gallbladder polyps is low, particularly in polyps less than 10 mm, however the data are heterogenous and generally low quality. International guidelines, which have not previously modelled size data, should be informed by these findings.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This large systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the mean cumulative risk of small gallbladder polyps is low, but heterogeneity and missing data in larger polyp sizes (>10 mm) means the risk is uncertain and may be higher than estimated.Studies considered to have better methodological quality suggest that previous estimates of risk are likely to be inflated.

Survey Study on the Experience, Practice Patterns, and Preferences of the Fellows of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound for Evaluation and Management of Gallbladder Polyps Detected With Ultrasound

ABSTRACT

Gallbladder polyps (GPs) are a common incidental finding on ultrasound; however, important differences in recommended management exist among professional society guidelines.An electronic survey was sent to 189 fellows of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Main outcomes included preferences and current practice patterns for evaluation, management, and surveillance of GPs as well as personal lifetime experience with gallbladder sonography and GPs.A total of 64 subjects (34%) with experience in gallbladder sonography completed the study. The estimated combined total number of gallbladder scans seen by the responders was 3,071,880. None of fellows had ever seen a pedunculated GP <1 cm detected on ultrasound that was proven to be malignant at the time of detection or during subsequent follow-up. All of the fellows used size as a feature to stratify recommendations. The median size threshold currently used by Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound fellows for recommending ultrasound follow-up was 6 mm, and their preferred threshold was 7 mm. The median size threshold for recommending surgical consultation was 10 mm, and the preferred threshold was 10 mm. Wall thickening and shape were considered important factors by 76% and 67% of respondents, respectively.Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound fellows tend to provide recommendations most similar to the American College of Radiology and Canadian Association of Radiology guidelines for management of GPs. Many would prefer guidelines that result in fewer recommendations for follow-up and surgical consultation. Despite a substantial combined experience, this survey did not uncover any case of a small GP that was malignant.

Focal incidental upper abdominal findings on unenhanced chest computed tomography that do not require further imaging: a roadmap for the thoracic radiologist

Abstract Chest scans usually include the upper abdomen, leading radiologists to evaluate the upper abdominal structures. The aim of this article is to summarize the most common incidental upper abdominal findings that do not require further imaging or management in patients undergoing unenhanced computed tomography of the chest for the investigation of thoracic symptoms or diseases. We review common incidental findings of the liver, gallbladder, spleen, adrenal glands, kidney, and retroperitoneum, as well as findings that mimic other lesions. Thoracic radiologists should be aware of such typical findings and report when no further investigation is needed, thus avoiding unnecessary imaging examinations, protecting patients from additional medical interventions, and allaying patient concerns.

[Incidental and "leave me alone" findings of abdominal organs-part 1 : Liver, gall ducts and pancreas]

Incidentalomas of the parenchymal organs of the abdomen, i.e. radiological findings in these organs that are not the primary focus of the clinical question, are frequent in this region of the body. In particular, findings presumed to be unimportant, such as cystic masses in the liver, the bile duct system or the pancreas, initially appear to be irrelevant in the diagnosis. For the liver we define the mostly clearly diagnosable simple cysts and hemangiomas as leave me alone lesions. Otherwise, we recommend a classification of incidentalomas into the three major categories (<0.5 cm, 0.5-1.5 cm and >1.5 cm) as well as an assessment with respect to clearly benign and suspect imaging characteristics in the context of a classification of patients into three different risk groups.

Longitudinal Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Size and Number of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps

BACKGROUND. Previous European multisociety guidelines recommend routine follow-up imaging of gallbladder polyps (including polyps < 6 mm in patients without risk factors) and cholecystectomy for polyp size changes of 2 mm or more. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal changes in the number and size of gallbladder polyps on serial ultrasound examinations. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent at least one ultrasound examination between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 (as part of a hepatocellular carcinoma screening and surveillance program) that showed a gallbladder polyp. Number of polyps and size of largest polyp were recorded based primarily on review of examination reports. Longitudinal changes on serial examinations were summarized. Pathologic findings from cholecystectomy were reviewed. RESULTS. Among 9683 patients, 759 (8%) had at least one ultrasound examination showing a polyp. Of these, 434 patients (248 men, 186 women; mean age, 50.6 years) had multiple examinations (range, 2-19 examinations; mean, 4.8 examinations per patient; mean interval between first and last examinations, 3.6 ± 3.1 [SD] years; maximum interval, 11.0 years). Among these 434 patients, 257 had one polyp, 40 had two polyps, and 137 had more than two polyps. Polyp size was 6 mm or less in 368 patients, 7-9 mm in 52 patients, and 10 mm or more in 14 patients. Number of polyps increased in 9% of patients, decreased in 14%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 22%, and showed no change in 55%. Polyp size increased in 10% of patients, decreased in 16%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 18%, and showed no change in 56%. In 9% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on follow-up imaging; in 6% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on a follow-up examination but were then detected on later studies. No gallbladder carcinoma was identified in 19 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION. Gallbladder polyps fluctuate in size, number, and visibility over serial examinations. Using a 2-mm threshold for growth, 10% increased in size. No carcinoma was identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. European multisociety guidelines that propose surveillance of essentially all polyps and a 2-mm size change as the basis for cholecystectomy are likely too conservative for clinical application.

Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE

Abstract

Main recommendations

Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence.

Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence.

Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence.

If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence.

If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

Source and scope

These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

Key Point

• These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.

Is there a role for growth status in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps? - A retrospective study based on 520 cholecystectomy patients

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder adenomas have cancerous potential and occur in 4-8.9% of gallbladder polyps. The growth status (size progression and growth rate during follow-up) of polyps and their effectiveness for predicting adenomas are poorly defined. Herein, we compared adenomas and cholesterol polyps based on the growth status and evaluated the reported risk factors in predicting neoplasm.

METHODS

We enrolled 520 patients who underwent preoperative ultrasonic follow-up more than 6 months with post-cholecystectomy pathologically confirmed gallbladder polyps. The patients were classified into adenoma and cholesterol polyp groups. Growth status, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, ultrasonic findings were reviewed and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine adenomas and 441 cholesterol polyps were analyzed. The mean diameter of adenomas (cholesterol polyps) was 7.24 ± 4.36 mm (6.23 ± 2.88 mm) in the initial and 12.06 ± 4.61 mm (10.05 ± 2.95 mm) in the preoperative examination. The median size progression (range) of polyps in the cholesterol polyps [3 (0, 22)] mm was smaller than that in adenomas [4 (0, 21)] mm (p = .075). The mean growth rate of adenomas (1.07 ± 1.33 mm/6 months) was slightly faster than in cholesterol polyps (0.83 ± 1.04 mm/6 months) (p = .338). The indicators significantly associated with adenomas were age >49.5 years, lack of gallbladder polyps/cholelithiasis family history, polyp size >11.5 mm and solitary polyp (p = .005, p = .027, p = .001, and p = .021, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Growth status was not a valuable modality to distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps. Risk factors such as age, polyp size, and solitary polyp were effective in predicting adenomas.

Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

Low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer has become a standard of care in the United States, in large part because of the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Additional evidence supporting the net benefit of low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer, and increased experience in minimizing the potential harms, has accumulated since the prior iteration of these guidelines. Here, we update the evidence base for the benefit, harms, and implementation of low-dose chest CT screening. We use the updated evidence base to provide recommendations where the evidence allows, and statements based on experience and expert consensus where it does not.

METHODS

Approved panelists reviewed previously developed key questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format to address the benefit and harms of low-dose CT screening, and key areas of program implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on a quarterly basis since the time of the previous guideline publication. Reference lists from relevant retrievals were searched, and additional papers were added. Retrieved references were reviewed for relevance by two panel members. The quality of the evidence was assessed for each critical or important outcome of interest using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses were performed when enough evidence was available. Important clinical questions were addressed based on the evidence developed from the systematic literature review. Graded recommendations and ungraded statements were drafted, voted on, and revised until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review identified 75 additional studies that informed the response to the 12 key questions that were developed. Additional clinical questions were addressed resulting in seven graded recommendations and nine ungraded consensus statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that low-dose CT screening for lung cancer can result in a favorable balance of benefit and harms. The selection of screen-eligible individuals, the quality of imaging and image interpretation, the management of screen-detected findings, and the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions can impact this balance.

Computer-Assisted Reporting and Decision Support in Standardized Radiology Reporting for Cancer Imaging

PURPOSE

Recent advances in structured reporting are providing an opportunity to enhance cancer imaging assessment to drive value-based care and improve patient safety.

METHODS

The computer-assisted reporting and decision support (CAR/DS) framework has been developed to enable systematic ingestion of guidelines as clinical decision structured reporting tools embedded within the radiologist's workflow.

RESULTS

CAR/DS tools can reduce the radiology reporting variability and increase compliance with clinical guidelines. The lung cancer use-case is used to describe various scenarios of a cancer imaging structured reporting pathway, including incidental findings, screening, staging, and restaging or continued care. Various aspects of these tools are also described using cancer-related examples for different imaging modalities and applications such as calculators. Such systems can leverage artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to assist with the generation of structured reports and there are opportunities for new AI applications to be created using the structured data associated with CAR/DS tools.

CONCLUSION

These AI-enabled systems are starting to allow information from multiple sources to be integrated and inserted into structured reports to drive improvements in clinical decision support and patient care.

Radiologists' Increasing Role in Population Health Management: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Population health management (PHM) is the holistic process of improving health outcomes of groups of individuals through the support of appropriate financial and care models. Radiologists' presence at the intersection of many aspects of healthcare, including screening, diagnostic imaging, and image-guided therapies, provides significant opportunity for increased radiologist engagement in PHM. Further, innovations in artificial intelligence and imaging informatics will serve as critical tools to improve value in healthcare through evidence-based and equitable approaches. Given radiologists' limited engagement in PHM to date, it is imperative to define the specialty's PHM priorities so that the radiologists' full value in improving population health is realized. In this expert review, we explore programs and future directions for radiology in PHM.

Incidence, Impact, and Management of Incidentalomas on Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiograms for Breast Cancer Patients with and without Genetic Mutations

BACKGROUND

Preoperative abdominal computed tomographic angiograms for free flap breast reconstruction improve operative safety and efficiency, but incidental findings are common and potentially affect management. In addition, the authors hypothesized that patients with genetic mutations might have a higher rate of significant findings. The authors present the largest series of computed tomographic angiogram "incidentalomas" in these two populations and an evidence-based algorithm for managing common findings.

METHODS

All patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction at Northwell Health between 2009 and 2017 were eligible. Medical history, perioperative details, and radiology reports were examined with abnormal findings recorded. Published literature was reviewed with radiologists to develop standardized guidelines for incidentaloma management.

RESULTS

Of 805 patients included, 733 patients had abdominal imaging. One hundred ninety-five (27 percent) had a completely negative examination. In the remaining 538 patients, benign hepatic (22 percent) and renal (17 percent) findings were most common. Sixteen patients (2.2 percent) required additional imaging (n = 15) or procedures (n = 5). One finding was concerning for malignancy-renal cell carcinoma-which interventional radiology ablated postoperatively. Seventy-nine patients (10.8 percent) had a genetic mutation but were not found to have a statistically significant higher rate of incidentalomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' rate of computed tomographic angiography incidental findings (73 percent) is consistent with previous studies, but the rate requiring further intervention (2.2 percent) is lower. Incidental findings were no more common or pathologic among genetic mutation carriers. The authors also introduce an evidence-based algorithm for the management of common incidentalomas. Using these guidelines, plastic surgeons can reassure patients, regardless of mutation status, that incidentalomas are most commonly benign and have minimal impact on their surgical plan.

Maternal and fetal incidental findings on antenatal magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations are increasingly used in antenatal clinical practice. Incidental findings are a recognized association with imaging and although in some circumstances their identification can alter management, they are often associated with increased anxiety, for both patient and clinician, as well as increased health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of unexpected findings in both the mother and fetus during antenatal MRI examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken over a five-year period at St.. Thomas' Hospital in London. Maternal incidental findings were recorded from all clinical reports of all fetal MRIs performed (for clinical reasons and in healthy volunteers) during this period. Fetal incidental findings were recorded only in cases where women with uncomplicated pregnancies were participating as healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

A total of 2,569 MRIs were included; 17% of women had maternal incidental findings. Of these, 1,099 were women with uncomplicated pregnancies who undertook research MRIs as healthy volunteers; fetal incidental findings were identified in 12.3%.

CONCLUSION

Incidental findings are a common occurrence in antenatal MRI. Consideration should be given to counseling women appropriately before imaging and ensuring that robust local protocols are in place for follow-up and further management of such cases.

Gallbladder Cancer: Imaging Appearance and Pitfalls in Diagnosis

Gallbladder cancer is an uncommon malignancy with an overall poor prognosis. The clinical and imaging presentation of gallbladder cancer often overlaps with benign disease, making diagnosis difficult. Gallbladder cancer is most easily diagnosed on imaging when it presents as a mass replacing the gallbladder. At this stage, the prognosis is usually poor. Recognizing the features of gallbladder cancer early in the disease can enable complete resection and improve prognosis. Recognition of the patterns of wall enhancement on computed tomography can help differentiate gallbladder cancer from benign disease. Gallbladder wall thickening without pericholecystic fluid presenting in an older patient with raised alkaline phosphatase should raise concern regarding gallbladder cancer. Gallbladder polyps in high-risk individuals need close surveillance or surgery as per guidelines. Small gallbladder cancers in the neck can present as biliary dilatation or cholecystitis, and careful examination of this area is needed to assess for lesion. The imaging appearance of gallbladder cancer is reviewed and supported by local institutional data. Features that differentiate it from its common mimics enabling earlier diagnosis are described.

Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps is considered a standard of care in the treatment after mastectomy, yet vascular anatomy is highly variable and perforator selection remains challenging. The use of preoperative imaging can influence surgical planning and assist intraoperative decision-making. However, this imaging can inevitably uncover incidental findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidental findings, evaluate correlation with patient factors, and examine effects on overall care.

Management of gallbladder polyps

A gallbladder polyp (GP) is defined as an elevation of the gallbladder mucosa that protrudes into the gallbladder lumen. Gallbladder polyps (GPs) have an estimated prevalence in adults of 0.3–12.3%. However, only 5% of polyps are considered “true” GPs that have malignant potential or are even already cancerous. The most important imaging method for diagnosis and follow-up of GPs is transabdominal ultrasound, but it fails to discriminate between true and pseudo polyps at a clinically relevant level. Although gallbladder cancer (GBC) arising from polyps is a rare event, malignancy is significantly more common among polyps from a size of 10 mm. In light of this, the consensus, which is reflected in current guidelines, is that surgery should be considered for polyps of 10 mm or greater. However, 10 mm is an arbitrary cutoff, and high-quality evidence to support this is lacking. Lowering the threshold for cholecystectomy when patients have additional risk factors for gallbladder malignancy may improve the cancer detection rate in polyps smaller than 10 mm. Nevertheless, the evidence behind this is also weak. This review shows the shortcomings in the available evidence and underlines the decision-making process regarding the surgical indication, surveillance, or both.

Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Hepatobiliary Findings in Adults: Endorsement and Adaptation of the 2017 and 2013 ACR Incidental Findings Committee White Papers by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspecialty and general radiologists and is tasked with adapting and expanding upon the American College of Radiology incidental findings white papers to more closely apply to Canadian practice patterns, particularly more comprehensively dealing with the role of ultrasound and pursuing more cost-effective approaches to the workup of incidental findings without compromising patient care. Presented here are the 2020 Canadian guidelines for the management of hepatobiliary incidental findings. Topics covered include initial assessment of hepatic steatosis and cirrhosis, the workup of incidental liver masses identified on ultrasound and computed tomography (with algorithms presented), incidental gallbladder findings (wall thickening, calcification, and polyps), and management of incidental biliary dilatation.

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental extra-intestinal findings in MR enterography: experience of a single University Centre

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and clinical relevance of extra-intestinal incidental findings (IF) in a cohort of patients with proven or suspected Crohn disease (CD) examined with magnetic resonance enterography (MR-E) in a single University Centre.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and June 2019, 182 patients with proven or suspected CD with a planned first MR-E examination, were retrospectively included in this study. Incidental findings were considered as any abnormality identified in the absence of previous clinically suspected or known disease. IF were categorized as unremarkable, benign or potentially relevant findings requiring further imaging or specific treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 182 revised MR-E, extra-intestinal IF were recorded in 70 cases (38.5%); 35 (50%) incidental lesions were recognized as non-significant, 24 (34%) as benign and 11 (16%) as clinically relevant. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between IF and patients' age (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, a high number of IF (38.5%) was found, with a prevalence that increases with patients' age. Clinically relevant findings were found in 16% of MR-E. This means that MR-E is a useful tool to detect IF, therefore, the presence of a radiologist during the image acquisition is crucial in adding sequences to the examination.

Outcomes of Gallbladder Polyps and Their Association With Gallbladder Cancer in a 20-Year Cohort

IMPORTANCE

Gallbladder polyps (GP) are found in more than 4% of adult abdominal ultrasonographs. Their growth pattern and association with gallbladder cancer (GBC) are poorly defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the growth pattern of GPs and their association with GBC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included 622 227 adult members (ie, aged 18 years or older) of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system, enrolled between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014. The GBC cohort comprised a total of 365 adults with GBC and prior ultrasonography, and the GP cohort comprised 35 970 adults with GPs present on ultrasonography. Data analysis was performed from March 2016 to November 2019.

EXPOSURES

Gallbladder polyps (quantitative size, <6 mm, 6 to <10 mm, and ≥10 mm or qualitative size [ie, tiny, small, moderate, and large]).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For the GBC cohort, proportion of patients with GBC with polyps identified on preceding ultrasonograph. For the GP cohort, rates of GBC among those with polyps according to size and rate of GP growth of at least 2 mm over time.

RESULTS

The GBC cohort comprised 365 individuals (267 [73.1%] women; 173 [47.4%] white patients; median [interquartile range] age, 71 [61-79] years). After excluding 14 patients who did not have evaluation of polyp size, the final GP cohort comprised 35 856 adults, with 18 645 (52.0%) women, a median (interquartile range) age 50 (40-60) years, and 15 573 (43.3%) white patients. Gallbladder polyps were found in 22 patients (6.0%) in the GBC cohort and in 35 870 of 622 227 adults (5.8%) who underwent abdominal ultrasonography. Of these, 19 (0.053%) were diagnosed with GBC, similar to those without GP (316 of 586 357 [0.054%]). The unadjusted GBC rate per 100 000 person-years was 11.3 (95% CI, 6.2-16.3) overall and increased with polyp size, from 1.3 (95% CI, 0-4.0) with initial size of less than 6 mm (n = 17 531) to 128.2 (95% CI, 39.4-217.0) with initial size of 10 mm or larger (n = 2055). In those observed for at least 1 year, the rate was 3.6 (95% CI, 0.7-6.5) per 100 000 person-years. In 6359 patients with evaluable follow-up, unadjusted cumulative probabilities of polyp growth of at least 2 mm at 10 years were 66.2% (95% CI, 62.3%-70.0%) in polyps initially less than 6 mm and 52.9% (95% CI, 47.1%-59.0%) in polyps initially 6 mm to less than 10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, GBC rates were low and similar among patients with and without GPs. Growth of 2 mm or more appeared to be part of GP natural history. The results call into question the strategy of proactively following GP to detect GBC.

Incidentally detected biliary ductal dilatation on contrast-enhanced CT: what is the incidence of occult obstructing malignancy?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of occult obstructing malignancy in the setting of asymptomatic biliary ductal dilatation incidentally detected and without identifiable cause on contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

A retrospective search identified patients with biliary ductal dilatation on contrast-enhanced CT from March 30, 2007 to November 1, 2017. Patients with biliary symptomatology or clinical concern for an obstructing process, an explanation for biliary ductal dilatation on index CT, intrahepatic without extrahepatic biliary ductal dilatation, concurrent pancreatic ductal dilatation, and inadequate follow-up were excluded. A reference standard of at least 1 year of imaging follow-up or 2 years of clinical follow-up was used to exclude occult obstructing malignancy.

RESULTS

156 patients were included; 120 patients met imaging follow-up criteria and 36 patients met clinical follow-up criteria. No cases of occult malignancy were identified as the source of biliary ductal dilatation (95% CI 0.0-1.9%). LFTs were available for 131 patients, of which 36 were elevated (27%). One case demonstrated a 1.2-cm ampullary adenoma on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (occult on follow-up MRI, normal LFTs at the time of the index CT).

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic biliary ductal dilatation incidentally detected and without identifiable cause on contrast-enhanced CT is likely benign in patients with normal LFTs, and further workup may not be warranted.

Incidentally Detected Focal Fundal Gallbladder Wall Thickening at Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: Prevalence and Computed Tomography Features of Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and computed tomography (CT) features of malignancy in incidental focal fundal gallbladder wall thickening.

METHODS

Patients with incidental focal fundal gallbladder wall thickening on CT were included if they had an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic of the etiology (n = 19), stability on CT for 1 year (n = 84), or pathological correlation (n = 13). Morphologies were classified as type 1 (nodular/pinched intramural low attenuation), type 2 (intramural low attenuation), type 3 (homogeneous enhancement), type 4 (nodular/pinched homogeneous enhancement), type 5 (intramural cystic spaces), or type 6 (hyperenhancing/heterogeneous enhancement).

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients had the following morphologies: type 1 (n = 57), type 2 (n = 10), type 3 (n = 6), type 4 (n = 19), type 5 (n = 14), and type 6 (n = 10). Four cases (3.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.9%-8.6%) of malignancy were identified (type 6 in 3 and type 3 in 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental focal fundal gallbladder wall thickening is usually benign. Computed tomography features help distinguish benign from malignant etiologies.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography in Autologous Breast Reconstruction-Incidence and Impact of Incidentalomas

Background

Incidentalomas are lesions found coincidentally during examination, imaging, or surgical procedures. Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) before abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction can lead to identification of incidentalomas leading to the need for further investigations. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of incidental findings on preoperative CTA and to determine their impact on management.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed at a single tertiary institution. CTA reports were analyzed for the presence of incidental findings and details of follow-up were studied. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with incidental findings.

Results

One hundred eighteen patients with a mean age of 49 years were included in the study. The majority of patients underwent bilateral reconstruction (65%, n = 77) in the immediate setting (70%, n = 83). Fifty-six percentage had an incidental finding on CTA, with hepatic (20%), renal (14%), and osseous (11%) abnormalities being most common. Additional imaging including ultrasound, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging were recommended in 19 cases (16%). Additional consultations were sought for 3 patients before reconstruction (with suspicion of bone metastases, an intraabdominal mass, and suspicion of colonic malignancy, respectively). No significant surgical delay secondary to CT findings was noted.

Conclusions

Incidentalomas following preoperative CTA of the abdomen/pelvis are common (56%). However, unlike previous reports, we did not observe a change in reconstructive plan following incidentaloma discovery. We recommend that all patients are counseled pre-CTA regarding the possibilities of incidentaloma detection and need for additional imaging.

Beyond the Spinal Canal

Cross-sectional spinal imaging is common, and extraspinal findings are often incidentally identified during interpretation. Although some of these findings may cause symptoms that mimic a spinal disorder, the majority are entirely asymptomatic and incidental. It is essential that the radiologist not only identify those abnormalities that may have clinical significance but also recognize those that are clinically irrelevant and thereby prevent patients from being subjected to further unnecessary, expensive and potentially harmful interventions. This article focuses on those abnormalities that are commonly encountered and provides practical guidance for follow-up and management based on current recommendations.

Improving diagnosis in health care: perspectives from the American College of Radiology

In September of 2014, the American College of Radiology joined a number of other organizations in sponsoring the 2015 National Academy of Medicine report, Improving Diagnosis In Health Care. Our presentation to the Academy emphasized that although diagnostic errors in imaging are commonly considered to result only from failures in disease detection or misinterpretation of a perceived abnormality, most errors in diagnosis result from failures in information gathering, aggregation, dissemination and ultimately integration of that information into our patients' clinical problems. Diagnostic errors can occur at any point on the continuum of imaging care from when imaging is first considered until results and recommendations are fully understood by our referring physicians and patients. We used the concept of the Imaging Value Chain and the ACR's Imaging 3.0 initiative to illustrate how better information gathering and integration at each step in imaging care can mitigate many of the causes of diagnostic errors. Radiologists are in a unique position to be the aggregators, brokers and disseminators of information critical to making an informed diagnosis, and if radiologists were empowered to use our expertise and informatics tools to manage the entire imaging chain, diagnostic errors would be reduced and patient outcomes improved. Heath care teams should take advantage of radiologists' ability to fully manage information related to medical imaging, and simultaneously, radiologists must be ready to meet these new challenges as health care evolves. The radiology community stands ready work with all stakeholders to design and implement solutions that minimize diagnostic errors.

Adding value to myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT studies that include coronary calcium CT: Detection of incidental pulmonary arterial dilatation

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of undiagnosed pulmonary arterial dilatation using the gated computed tomography (CT) images acquired in patients with an otherwise normal Tc-sestamibi single-photon-emission CT (SPECT)/CT myocardial perfusion study.This was a retrospective review of 200 consecutive patients (100 men, mean age 58.7 years) who underwent a myocardial perfusion Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT study with normal perfusion and with gated CT images acquired for coronary calcium scoring. The CT images were reviewed using a previously validated mean main pulmonary artery diameter (mPAD) measurement method which has been correlated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Clinical information on multiple comorbidities was also retrieved. Previously reported mPAD cutoffs (>29.5 and >31.5 mm) were used to stratify patients.Indications for the study included dyspnea on exertion (58.9%), preoperative workup (22.3%), and chest pain (13.9%). The mean mPAD measurement was 26.3 mm (±0.5). There was a significant correlation between body mass index and mPAD (correlation coefficient [ρ]: 0.28; P < .001). About 23% (46/200) of patients had mPAD > 29.5 mm and 15.0% (30/200) of patients had mPAD > 31.5 mm. From previous work, these cutoffs have a sensitivity and specificity for PAH of 70.8%, 79.4% and 52.0%, 90.2%, respectively. Among patients undergoing a preoperative myocardial perfusion study, 35.6% (16/45) patients had mPAD > 29.5 mm and 26.7% (12/45) patients had mPAD > 31.5 mm. There was a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (62.5% vs 19.6%; P < .001) and hypertension (78.3% vs 21.7%; P < .02) in patients with mPAD > 29.5 mm. Similarly, there was a high prevalence of congestive heart failure (P < .001), hyperlipidemia (P < .04), and hypertension (P < .04) in patients with mPAD > 31.5 mm.Incidental pulmonary arterial dilatation (mPAD ≥ 29.5 mm) can be detected in a large number of patients with normal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and correlates with multiple different comorbidities. The mPAD can be measured in all patients undergoing gated imaging as part of a myocardial perfusion study, and PAH may be considered as an alternative explanation for symptoms in some patients without perfusion deficits. The data to make this potential diagnosis is already being acquired and represents an opportunity to add value to the interpretations of otherwise negative myocardial perfusion studies.