ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Trauma to the Foot

Evaluation of treatment planning discrepancies: CT versus plain radiographic findings in patients with foot and ankle trauma

This study aimed to compare the findings of plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) of foot and ankle in patients submitted to the emergency department with high-energy foot and ankle trauma, to demonstrate if missing fractures on plain radiographs will significantly alter the treatment plan considered for each patient based on the findings of each imaging modality. We retrospectively observed standard radiological foot and ankle x-rays and CT scans in patients who presented to our center from April 2019 to June 2020 with a history of foot and ankle trauma with either loss of consciousness, a history of high-energy trauma, or clinical presentation disproportionate to plain radiographic findings. We investigated the number of fractures of each bone detected on plain radiographs and CT scans and the treatments based on each modality's findings in patients admitted to our center. Sixty-five out of 163 (39.87%) included in our study had at least one missed fracture on plain radiography that was detected on CT. Thirty-one (19%) patients had normal radiography despite actually having fractures. In 38 (23.31%) patients CT changed the treatment plan decided by our surgeons (P < 0.001). The two imaging modalities had a moderate agreement for detecting foot and ankle fractures overall (κ = 0.432). The failure to detect fractures in patients with high-energy trauma can significantly impact treatment effectiveness. Integrating CT scans into the diagnostic process can lead to changes in treatment planning and ultimately improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: IV.

Navicular and Cuboid Fractures

Navicular and cuboid fractures can be complex and difficult to treat. Depending on the mechanism of injury, diagnosis of such fractures is not always possible with conventional radiographs due to the irregularity and overlap of the midfoot bones. Advanced imaging is indicated if a fracture is of high suspicion or to further characterize a displaced fracture. Cuboid and navicular fractures can occur in isolation but are often associated with other midfoot injuries due to their anatomic relationships. Typically, nondisplaced fractures can be treated conservatively, whereas displaced fractures require surgical intervention to prevent future complications.

Comparison of epidemiologic features between upper and lower limb injuries and risk factors for intensive care unit admission in a university hospital affiliated with the National Trauma Registry of Iran

PURPOSE

Upper extremity injuries (UEIs) and lower extremity injuries (LEIs) constitute a considerable component of traumas. However, their epidemiologic differences and short-term in-hospital outcomes are not fully elucidated. This study aims to compare such discrepancies in a large-scale study.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients with UEIs and/or LEIs hospitalized from 24th July 2016 to 16th May 2020 in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, and registered at the National Trauma Registry of Iran were enrolled in the study. Relevant demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the National Trauma Registry of Iran database. Patients were grouped into either UEI or LEI. For those with concomitant UEIs and LEIs, the more severe one based on the abbreviated injury scale was defined as the principal diagnosis. In addition, cases with the abbreviated injury scale > 3 for both UEI and LEI or concomitant injuries to body areas other than the limbs were excluded. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, quintile regression models, and logistic regression models with "margins" command were used for statistical analyses, as indicated.

RESULTS

In this research, 3170 eligible cases were identified. For the LEI group, there was a much higher proportion of male patients (86.7% vs. 82.0%) and higher mean age (years, 42.9 vs. 35.3) compared to the UEI group (both p < 0.001). Patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 - 15 were outnumbered in the LEI group (22.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of those with an ISS < 9 was higher in the UEI group (98.1% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.001). The multiple logistic regression model showed a statistically significant association between intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ISS (odds ratio (OR) = 4.01 for ISS 9 - 15 vs. ISS <9, 95% confidence interval (CI)|: 3.01 - 5.35; OR = 17.65 for ISS ≥16 vs. ISS < 9, 95% CI: 4.03 - 77.27), age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.03), cause of injury (OR = 0.27 for blunt trauma vs. road traffic crash, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.90; OR = 0.49 for cut/stab injuries vs. road traffic crash, 95% CI: 0.28 - 0.84) and body region (OR = 1.65 for lower extremity, 95% CI: 1.19 - 2.29). Having adjusted for other covariates, the odds of ICU admission in patients with LEIs was 1.65 times the odds in patients with UEIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LEIs were older and suffered from more severe injuries. In addition, the age- and ISS-adjusted ICU admission and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in LEI patients. The chance of ICU admission was associated with age, cause of injury, ISS, and body region. The findings of this study can aid in the meticulous selection of ICU-candidate patients. In addition, the role of factors other than ISS and age in ICU admission and prolongation of hospitalization should be addressed by prospective studies.

Isolated Medial Cuneiform Fractures: A Systematic Search and Qualitative Analysis of Case Studies

BACKGROUND

Isolated medial cuneiform fracture is a rare but diagnostically challenging condition. Diagnostic delay in these cases may lead to delays in ideal treatment approaches and prolonged symptoms. An understanding of clinical presentation is needed to expedite diagnosis, facilitate decision making, and guide treatment approach.

METHODS

Case studies/series were searched in four databases until September 2019. Included studies had participants with a history of traumatic closed medial cuneiform fracture. Studies were excluded if the medial cuneiform fractures were open fractures, associated with multitrauma, or associated with dislocation/Lisfranc injury. Three blinded reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the studies, and a qualitative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 15 patients were identified. Mean ± SD patient age was 38.0 ± 12.8 years, with 86.7% of reported participants being men. The overall methodological quality was moderate to high, and reporting of the patient selection criteria was poor overall. The most commonly reported clinical symptoms were localized tenderness (60.0%) and edema (53.3%). Direct blow was the most common inciting trauma (46.2%), followed by axial load (30.8%) and avulsion injuries (23.1%). Baseline radiographs were occult in 72.7% of patients; magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were the most common diagnostic modalities. Mean ± SD diagnostic delay was 64.7 ± 89.6 days. Conservative management was pursued in 54.5% of patients, with reported resolution of symptoms in 3 to 6 months. Surgical intervention occurred in 45.5% of patients and resulted in functional restoration in 3 to 6 months in all but one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial radiographs for isolated medial cuneiform fractures are frequently occult. Due to expedience and relatively low cost, radiographs are still a viable first-line imaging modality. If clinical concern remains, magnetic resonance imaging may be pursued to minimize diagnostic delay. Conservative management is a viable treatment method, with expected return to full function in 3 to 6 months.

Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions

Objectives

Trauma evaluation of extremities can be challenging in conventional radiography. A multi-use x-ray system with cone-beam CT (CBCT) option facilitates ancillary 3-D imaging without repositioning. We assessed the clinical value of CBCT scans by analyzing the influence of additional findings on therapy.

Methods

Ninety-two patients underwent radiography and subsequent CBCT imaging with the twin robotic scanner (76 wrist/hand/finger and 16 ankle/foot/toe trauma scans). Reports by on-call radiologists before and after CBCT were compared regarding fracture detection, joint affliction, comminuted injuries, and diagnostic confidence. An orthopedic surgeon recommended therapy based on reported findings. Surgical reports (N = 52) and clinical follow-up (N = 85) were used as reference standard.

Results

CBCT detected more fractures (83/64 of 85), joint involvements (69/53 of 71), and multi-fragment situations (68/50 of 70) than radiography (all p < 0.001). Six fractures suspected in radiographs were ruled out by CBCT. Treatment changes based on additional information from CBCT were recommended in 29 patients (31.5%). While agreement between advised therapy before CBCT and actual treatment was moderate (κ = 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.35–0.47]; p < 0.001), agreement after CBCT was almost perfect (κ = 0.88 [0.83–0.93]; p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased considerably for CBCT studies (p < 0.001). Median effective dose for CBCT was 4.3 μSv [3.3–5.3 μSv] compared to 0.2 μSv [0.1–0.2 μSv] for radiography.

Conclusions

CBCT provides advantages for the evaluation of acute small bone and joint trauma by detecting and excluding extremity fractures and fracture-related findings more reliably than radiographs. Additional findings induced therapy change in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact.

Key Points

• With cone-beam CT, extremity fractures and fracture-related findings can be detected and ruled out more reliably than with conventional radiography.

• Additional diagnostic information provided by cone-beam CT scans has substantial impact on therapy in small bone and joint trauma.

• For distal extremity injury assessment, one-stop-shop imaging without repositioning is feasible with the twin robotic x-ray system.

Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model

BACKGROUND

Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose. Although of questionable accuracy, the current gold standard to assess these injuries is through bilateral weight-bearing radiography. However, weight-bearing cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT), providing clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be utilized for evaluation. This study aims to establish the hypothesis that a specific weight-bearing CBCT finding (asymmetric lambda sign) can serve as an independent indicator of a subtle Lisfranc injury.

METHODS

Weight-bearing CBCT images of 24 match-paired cadaveric legs were acquired, initially intact, and then following sequential dissection of each aspect (dorsal, interosseous, and plantar ligaments, respectively) of the Lisfranc ligamentous complex (LLC). All scans were taken in non- (NWB, 0 kg), partial- (PWB, 40 kg), and full-weight-bearing (FWB, 80 kg) manners. The lambda sign was then inspected axially for asymmetry (positive sign) by identifying three symmetrical joint spaces created between the medial cuneiform and the second metatarsal base (C1-M2), the medial and middle cuneiform (C1-C2), and the second metatarsal base and middle cuneiform (M2-C2).

RESULTS

A positive sign was observed in 25.6% (221/864) of all studies. Most notably, the fully dissected specimens demonstrated an asymmetric lambda sign in 33.3%, 72.2%, and 83.3% in NWB, PWB, and FWB conditions, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability kappa value was calculated to be 0.843 and 0.912.

CONCLUSION

An asymmetric lambda sign is a simple and useful indicator for a complete LLC injury in PWB and FWB conditions using a cadaver model.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Trauma to the Foot

Acute injuries to the foot are frequently encountered in the emergency room and in general practice settings. This publication defines best practices for imaging evaluations for several variants of patients presenting with acute foot trauma. The variants include scenarios when the Ottawa rules can be evaluated, when there are exclusionary criteria, and when suspected pathology is in anatomic areas not addressed by the Ottawa rules. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Fractures of the Cuboid Bone: A Critical Analysis Review

Cuboid fractures rarely occur in isolation, and a high index of suspicion for the presence of Chopart, Lisfranc, or complex midfoot injuries should be raised. The cuboid is the cornerstone of the lateral column and acts as a bridge between the lateral column and the transverse plantar arch. Its most important role is maintenance of lateral column length and associated motion in the midtarsal and tarsometatarsal joints. To date, a classification system that is validated for clinical practice (i.e., guidance for management and prediction of outcome and prognosis) is lacking. The principles of operative treatment are restoration of articular congruity, lateral column length, and stability of the Chopart and Lisfranc joints. Nonoperative management is reserved for nondisplaced articular fractures (<1 mm) or avulsion fractures that are caused by low-energy trauma.

Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the Lisfranc joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and ScienceDirect were systematically searched. Thirty articles were subdivided by imaging modality: conventional radiography (17 articles), ultrasonography (six articles), computed tomography (CT) (four articles), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (11 articles). Some articles discussed multiple modalities. The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement methods, participant number, sensitivity, specificity, and measurement technique accuracy. Methodological quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Conventional radiography commonly assesses Lisfranc injuries by evaluating the distance between either the first and second metatarsal base (M1-M2) or the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base (C1-M2) and the congruence between each metatarsal base and its connecting tarsal bone. For ultrasonography, C1-M2 distance and dorsal Lisfranc ligament (DLL) length and thickness are evaluated. CT clarifies tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint alignment and occult fractures obscured on radiographs. Most MRI studies assessed Lisfranc ligament integrity. Overall, included studies show low bias for all domains except patient selection and are applicable to daily practice.

CONCLUSIONS

While conventional radiography can demonstrate frank diastasis at the TMT joints; applying weightbearing can improve the viewer's capacity to detect subtle Lisfranc injury by radiography. Although ultrasonography can evaluate the DLL, its accuracy for diagnosing Lisfranc instability remains unproven. CT is more beneficial than radiography for detecting non-displaced fractures and minimal osseous subluxation. MRI is clearly the best for detecting ligament abnormalities; however, its utility for detecting subtle Lisfranc instability needs further investigation. Overall, the available studies' methodological quality was satisfactory.

Radiographic Anatomy of the Pediatric Lisfranc Joint

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the Lisfranc joint in children and adolescents are rare. The incomplete ossification of the bones of the foot makes it difficult to detect injuries.The aim of this study was to determine age-specific radiographic measurements of the Lisfranc joint to provide guidance to the radiologist, emergency physicians, and surgeons to decrease misdiagnosis of Lisfranc injuries and improve detection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all foot radiographs without traumatic injury made between August 2014 and February 2015 in all patients younger than 18. The attendance list of the Emergency Department and Outpatient Clinic of a level-1 trauma center were used. Using a non-weight-bearing anteroposterior-view of the foot the distance between the base of metatarsal 1 and metatarsal 2 (MT1-MT2) and the distance between the medial cuneiform (MC) and the base of metatarsal 2 (MC-MT2) were measured. Median normal values were calculated per age.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients between the age of 0 and 18 years were screened for eligibility. Excluded were 109 patients because of anatomic abnormality, a fracture, inadequate radiograph, pain at the base of the first metatarsal, second metatarsal or MC, persisting pain at the Outpatient Clinic checkup or no follow-up. Included in the analysis were 243 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The distance between the base of MT1-MT2 was constant below 3 mm. Measurements for both MT1-MT2 and MC-MT2 distance approached adult values at the age of 6.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture

PURPOSE

Radiography has a low sensitivity for the detection of fractures related to the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid articulations, also known as Chopart fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of radiographs for detecting additional foot and ankle fractures related to Chopart fracture using CT or MRI as the reference standard.

METHOD

We performed an IRB-approved, retrospective review of radiology reports between 2010 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were (1) diagnosis of a Chopart fracture and (2) at least one radiograph and subsequent cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR). CT or MRI was considered the diagnostic reference standard. Results were stratified by the energy of trauma and by type of radiograph performed (weight-bearing (WB) versus non-WB).

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The calcaneocuboid articulation was the most commonly involved type of Chopart fracture, seen in 75% of cases (81/108). Chopart fractures were detected on the initial radiographs in 67.6% of cases (73/108). Additional fractures of the ankle and midfoot were diagnosed in 34.2% of cases (37/108), with 56.7% (21/37) of these cases having at least one additional fracture seen on CT or MRI that was not seen on the initial radiographs, with fractures of the midfoot most often missed. In 56.7% (17/30) patients whose radiographs detected Chopart fractures, at least one additional fracture was missed; 30% of them demonstrated intra-articular extension and 56.7% were considered displaced. High-energy trauma was related to higher incidence of additional fractures. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of radiographs to detect additional fractures between high versus low-energy trauma (p = 0.3) and WB versus non-WB radiographs (p = 0.5). Most patients were treated nonoperatively (56.5%, 61/108), with surgical intervention more frequent in patients with a high energy of trauma (51.7% versus 33.3%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of a Chopart fracture, CT or MRI can add significant value in the detection of additional ankle or midfoot fractures, irrespective of the energy of trauma. Since additional fractures can have important management implications, CT or MRI should be considered as part of the standard workup for all midfoot fractures.

Advanced MRI Techniques for the Ankle

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this article are to present a state-of-the-art routine protocol for MRI of the ankle, to provide problem-solving tools based on specific clinical indications, and to introduce principles for the implementation of ultrashort echo time MRI of the ankle, including morphologic and quantitative assessment.

CONCLUSION

Ankle injury is common among both athletes and the general population, and MRI is the established noninvasive means of evaluation. The design of an ankle protocol depends on various factors. Higher magnetic field improves signal-to-noise ratio but increases metal artifact. Specialized imaging planes are useful but prolong acquisition times. MR neurography is useful, but metal reduction techniques are needed whenever a metal prosthesis is present. An ultrashort echo time sequence is a valuable tool for both structural and quantitative evaluation.

Is there an Added Value of T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Fat-suppressed Spin-Echo MR Sequences Compared to STIR Sequences in MRI of the Foot and Ankle?

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) sequences after gadolinium application (T1wGdFS) to STIR sequences in patients with acute and chronic foot pain.

METHODS

In 51 patients referred for MRI of the foot and ankle, additional transverse and sagittal T1wGdFS sequences were obtained. Two sets of MR images (standard protocol with STIR or T1wGdFS) were analysed. Diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and localization of the abnormality were noted. Standard of reference was established by an expert panel of two experienced MSK radiologists and one experienced foot surgeon based on MR images, clinical charts and surgical reports. Patients reported prospectively localization of pain. Descriptive statistics, McNemar test and Kappa test were used.

RESULTS

Diagnostic accuracy with STIR protocol was 80% for reader 1, 67% for reader 2, with contrast-protocol 84%, both readers. Significance was found for reader 2. Diagnostic confidence for reader 1 was 1.7 with STIR, 1.3 with contrast-protocol; reader 2: 2.1/1.7. Significance was found for reader 1. Pain location correlated with STIR sequences in 64% and 52%, with gadolinium sequences in 70% and 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

T1-weighted contrast material-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo magnetic resonance sequences improve diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence and correlation of MR abnormalities with pain location in MRI of the foot and ankle. However, the additional value is small.

KEY POINTS

• Additional value of contrast-enhanced MR over standard MR with STIR sequences exists. • There is slightly more added value for soft tissue than for bony lesions. • This added value is limited. • Therefore, application of contrast material cannot be generally recommended.

Functional Outcomes After Temporary Bridging With Locking Plates in Lisfranc Injuries

The standard operative treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations currently consists of open reduction and transarticular fixation. Recently, bridge plating has been used more often. Using joint spanning, the reduced fracture dislocation is temporary stabilized to minimize articular damage. The present study describes the outcomes of patients treated with bridge plating after tarsometatarsal fracture dislocations compared with transarticular screw fixation. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with an isolated tarsometatarsal injury who had been treated operatively from June 2000 to October 2013 were included. The primary functional outcome was measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score and the Foot Function Index. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction, which was measured using the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire and a visual analog scale. A total of 34 patients were included. Bridge plating was used in 21 patients. In 13 patients, Kirschner wires or transarticular screws or a combination were used. The median follow-up period was 49 (interquartile range 18 to 89) months. The implants were removed in 10 of 13 patients in the transarticular group and 17 of 21 patients in the bridge plating group. The incidence of wound complications was comparable in both groups. The median American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was lower in the transarticular group (77 versus 66). The Foot Function Index score was 18 in both groups. Patient satisfaction was 90% in the bridge plating group and 80% in the transarticular group. Bridge plating for Lisfranc injuries led to at least similar results compared with transarticular fixation in terms of functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether the prevention of secondary damage to the articular surface leads to less post-traumatic arthritis and better functional outcomes.