Intraoperative radiography for evaluation of surgical miscounts

Clinical Issues-March 2022

Nursing scope of practice Key words: state nurse practice act (NPA), state board of nursing, decision-making framework, standards, guidance. Practice of unlicensed perioperative personnel Key words: job description, task delegation, unlicensed personnel, allied health care provider, scope of practice. Definition of a cavity for counting procedures Key words: anatomical hollow space, counting, cavity, retained surgical item (RSI), retained foreign object (RFO). Identifying retained suture needles on radiographic images Key words: suture needle size, suture needle length, radiographic imaging, counting procedures, count discrepancy.

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management.

METHODS

Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical "sharps," a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of "sharps". Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview.

RESULTS

Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery.

CONCLUSION

The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.

No stone left unturned and nothing left behind - A pictorial guide for retained surgical items

Retained surgical instruments (RSI) remain an unsolved problem with serious implications for patients and healthcare providers. Although radiographs are commonly obtained whenever a surgical count is incorrect or incomplete, they have a very low prevalence of positive findings. With the majority of these studies being negative, it is difficult for radiologists and trainees to develop expertise in the detection of RSI, and comfort with reporting and documenting their findings. It is also important for the radiologist to be familiar with the documentation and communication requirements of their own institution in regards to intraoperative radiographs and their interpretation. This pictorial essay is intended to provide guidance to these "best practices" for the management of these cases. A series of case examples is also provided. In this manuscript we illustrate potential pitfalls and avoidable sources of error in the interpretation of these challenging cases.

The Impact of Surgical Count Technology on Retained Surgical Items Rates in the Veterans Health Administration

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare retained surgical item (RSI) rates for 137 Veterans Health Administration Surgery Programs with and without surgical count technology and the root cause analysis (RCA) for soft good RSI events between October 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. A 2017 survey identified 46 programs to have independently acquired surgical count technology.

METHODS

Retained surgical item rates were calculated by the sum of events (sharp, soft good, instrument) divided by the total procedures performed. The RCAs for RSI events were analyzed using codebooks for procedure type/location and root cause characterization.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four RSI events occurred in 2,964,472 procedures for an overall RSI rate of 1/23,908 procedures. The RSI rates for 46 programs with surgical count technology were significantly higher in comparison with 91 programs without a surgical count technology system (1/18,221 versus 1/30,593, P = 0.0026). The RSI rates before and after acquiring the surgical count technology were not significantly different (1/17,508 versus 1/18,673, P = 0.8015). Root cause analyses for 42 soft good RSI events identified multiple associated disciplines (general surgery 26, urology 5, cardiac 4, neurosurgery 3, vascular 2, thoracic 1, gynecology 1) and locations (abdomen 26, thorax 7, retroperitoneal 4, paraspinal 2, extremity 1, pelvis 1, and head/neck 1). Human factors (n = 24), failure of policy/procedure (n = 21), and communication (n = 19) accounted for 64 (65%) of the 98 root causes identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Acquisition of surgical count technology did not significantly improve RSI rates. Soft good RSI events are associated with multiple disciplines and locations and the following dominant root causes: human factors, failure to follow policy/procedure, and communication.