1
|
Ziemer LS, De Haan CE, Cardwell AL, Gambino JM, McLear RC, Silverman S, Spattini G, Thompson M. ACVR and ECVDI consensus statement for teleradiology. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2024; 65:288-293. [PMID: 38507602 DOI: 10.1111/vru.13353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Increased demand for the interpretation of diagnostic images by board-certified radiologists and profound advancements in technology have led to extremely rapid growth in the field of veterinary teleradiology over the past decade. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a guideline for best practices for quality and safety in veterinary teleradiology. The statement addresses appropriate image acquisition and transmission, the creation of teleradiology submissions, quality control in teleradiology, and appropriate documentation of imaging reports, as deficiencies in any of these areas may directly affect the standard of patient care. The consensus statement may be used as a guide for radiologists, primary care veterinarians, technicians, and students for the use of teleradiology in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa S Ziemer
- Antech Imaging Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Amy L Cardwell
- Ocean State Veterinary Specialists, East Greenwich, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Margret Thompson
- Department of Clinical Science, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Panagides JC, Hancel K, Kalva S, Schenker M, Saini S, Glazer DI, Khorasani R, Daye D. Interventional Radiology Peer Learning Platform and Adverse Event Reporting (IR-PEER): Initial Experience Implementing a Team-based Novel Peer Learning System in Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:93-102. [PMID: 37659453 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
Although the transition from peer review to peer learning has had favorable outcomes in diagnostic radiology, experience with implementing a team-based peer review system in interventional radiology (IR) remains limited. Peer learning systems benefit diverse IR teams composed of multiple clinical roles and could contribute value in archiving events that have potential educational value. With multiple stakeholder input from clinical roles within the IR division at our institution (ie, radiologic technologists, nurses, advanced practice providers, residents, fellows, and attending physicians), we launched a HIPAA-compliant secure IR complication and learning opportunity reporting platform in April 2022. Case submissions were monitored over the subsequent 24 weeks, with monthly dashboard reports provided to departmental leadership. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess the impact of the peer learning platform and adverse event reporting in IR (IR-PEER) on perceptions of complication reporting in the IR division across clinical roles. Ninety-two peer learning submissions were collected for a weekly average ± standard error of 3.8 ± 0.6 submissions per week, and an additional 26 submissions were collected as part of the division's ongoing monthly complication review conference, for a total of 98 unique total case references. A total of 64.1% of submissions (59 of 92) involved a complication and/or adverse event, and 35.9% of submissions (33 of 92) identified a learning opportunity (no complication or adverse event). Nurses reported that IR-PEER made the complication-reporting process easier (P = .01), and all clinical roles reported that IR-PEER improved the overall process of complication reporting. Peer learning frameworks such as IR-PEER provide a more equitable communication platform for multidisciplinary teams to capture and archive learning opportunities that support quality and safety improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kayesha Hancel
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sanjeeva Kalva
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew Schenker
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sanjay Saini
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel I Glazer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ramin Khorasani
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dania Daye
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Felsen A, McClelland A, Kobi M, Bello JA, Burns J. Health Systems Science - A Primer for Radiologists. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:2079-2088. [PMID: 36966069 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
Health systems science (HSS) is an educational framework designed to promote improved care through enhanced citizenship and the training of systems-fluent individuals trained in the science of health care delivery. HSS education in residency builds upon foundations established during medical school, emphasizing practical skills development, and fostering a growth mindset among trainees. The HSS framework organizes elements of system-based practice for radiology trainees, promoting practice-readiness for providing safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient centered radiological care. This paper serves as a primer for radiologists to understand and apply the HSS framework. Additionally, we highlight radiology-specific curricular elements aligned with the HSS framework, and provide teaching resources both for classroom education and for resident self-study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Felsen
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital; Bronx, NY
| | - Andrew McClelland
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine; New York, NY
| | - Mariya Kobi
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center; New York, NY
| | | | - Judah Burns
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center; Bronx, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Bronx, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bloeser K, McAdams M, McCarron KK, Varon S, Pickett L, Johnson I. Institutional Courage in Healthcare: An Improvement Project Exploring the Perspectives of Veterans Exposed to Airborne Hazards. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 13:bs13050423. [PMID: 37232660 DOI: 10.3390/bs13050423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Military environmental exposures and care for subsequent health concerns have been associated with institutional betrayal, or a perception on the part of veterans that the US government has failed to adequately prevent, acknowledge, and treat these conditions and in doing so has betrayed its promise to veterans. Institutional courage is a term developed to describe organizations that proactively protect and care for their members. While institutional courage may be useful in mitigating institutional betrayal, there is a lack of definitions of institutional courage in healthcare from the patient perspective. METHODS Using qualitative methods, we sought to explore the notions of institutional betrayal and institutional courage among veterans exposed to airborne hazards (i.e., airborne particulate matter such as open burn pits; N = 13) to inform and improve clinical practice. We performed initial interviews and follow-up interviews with veterans. RESULTS Veterans' depictions of courageous institutions contained key themes of being accountable, proactive, and mindful of unique experiences, supporting advocacy, addressing stigma related to public benefits, and offering safety. Veterans described institutional courage as including both individual-level traits and systems or organizational-level characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Several existing VA initiatives already address many themes identified in describing courageous institutions (e.g., accountability and advocacy). Other themes, especially views of public benefits and being proactive, hold particular value for building trauma-informed healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Bloeser
- The War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, The VA New Jersey Health Care System, 285 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ 07019, USA
- Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10035, USA
| | | | - Kelly K McCarron
- The War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, The VA New Jersey Health Care System, 285 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ 07019, USA
| | - Samantha Varon
- The War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, The VA New Jersey Health Care System, 285 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ 07019, USA
| | - Lisa Pickett
- The War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, The VA New Jersey Health Care System, 285 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ 07019, USA
| | - Iman Johnson
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ryder KM, Carey MK, Walker YN, Shorr RI. Is There a Relationship Between Facility Peer Review Findings and Quality in the Veterans Health Administration? Fed Pract 2022; 39:208-211. [PMID: 35935928 PMCID: PMC9351737 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of clinical peer review (PR) is to improve facility health care quality. However, prior authors have shown that PR may be biased, have rater reliability concerns, or be used for punitive reasons. It is important to determine whether facility PR processes are related to objective facility quality of care. METHODS We collected proportion of PR findings that "most experienced and competent clinicians may have managed the case differently" or "most experienced and competent clinicians would have managed the case differently" as an objective measure of facility PR processes and outcomes. We correlated these with facility quality metrics for 2019. RESULTS PR findings were not associated with facility quality metrics but were strongly associated with previous year findings. CONCLUSIONS This study describes a potentially new source of bias in PR and demonstrates that objective facility outcomes are not related to individual PR findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Ryder
- Pacific Islands Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Megan K Carey
- Veterans Health Administration Clinical Risk Management
| | - Yuri N Walker
- Veterans Health Administration Clinical Risk Management
| | - Ronald I Shorr
- North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center
- University of Florida, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kunst M, Elentuck D, Broder J. Leveraging the Peer Learning Conference to Establish and Maintain a Peer Learning Program. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51:686-690. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
7
|
Phalak KA, Gerlach K, Parikh JR. Peer learning in breast imaging. Clin Imaging 2022; 85:60-63. [PMID: 35247790 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing focus on quality and safety in medicine, radiology practices are increasingly transitioning from traditional score-based peer review to peer learning. Participation in a peer learning program can increase learning, practice improvement, and cultivation of interpersonal relationships in a non-punitive environment. As breast imaging errors are the most cited in medical malpractice cases, learning and attention to and reduction of these errors in breast imaging are especially important. We describe the strengths of a peer learning program, implementation process in a breast imaging program, challenges to overcome, and strategies to support success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanchan A Phalak
- Department of Radiology, University MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Karen Gerlach
- Department of Radiology, University MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jay R Parikh
- Department of Radiology, University MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burns J, Ciccarelli S, Mardakhaev E, Erdfarb A, Goldberg-Stein S, Bello JA. Handoffs in Radiology: Minimizing Communication Errors and Improving Care Transitions. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:1297-1309. [PMID: 33989534 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Handoffs are essential to achieving safe care transitions. In radiology practice, frequent transitions of care responsibility among clinicians, radiologists, and patients occur between moments of care such as determining protocol, imaging, interpreting, and consulting. Continuity of care is maintained across these transitions with handoffs, which are the process of communicating patient information and transferring decision-making responsibility. As a leading cause of medical error, handoffs are a major communication challenge that is exceedingly common in both diagnostic and interventional radiology practice. The frequency of handoffs in radiology underscores the importance of using evidence-based strategies to improve patient safety in the radiology department. In this article, reliability science principles and handoff improvement tools are adapted to provide radiology-focused strategies at individual, team, and organizational levels with the goal of minimizing handoff errors and improving care transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judah Burns
- Chair, Montefiore Medical Center Peer Review Board; Program Director, Montefiore Medical Center Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
| | | | | | - Amichai Erdfarb
- Director of Quality and Safety, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Shlomit Goldberg-Stein
- Director of Operational Improvement, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Jacqueline A Bello
- Vice Chair, Board of Chancellors, American College of Radiology; Section Chief of Neuroradiology, Montefiore Medical Center; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Armstrong V, Tan N, Sekhar A, Richardson ML, Kanne JP, Sai V, Chernyak V, Godwin JD, Tammisetti VS, Eberhardt SC, Henry TS. Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences: Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:1641-1646. [PMID: 31848074 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants' experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. RESULTS From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35-74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5-5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: "great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), "zebras" 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. CONCLUSION Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nelly Tan
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California.
| | - Aarti Sekhar
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ganeshan D, Rosenkrantz AB, Bassett RL, Williams L, Lenchik L, Yang W. Burnout in Academic Radiologists in the United States. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:1274-1281. [PMID: 32037261 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among U.S. academic radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey was sent to the radiologists who were full members of the Association of University Radiologists in December 2018. Burnout was measured using the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. Survey respondents were also requested to complete questions on demographics, potential professional stressors, sense of calling, and career satisfaction. Associations between survey participants' characteristics and burnout were tested using logistic regression model. RESULTS The survey response rate was 27% (228/831). Twenty-nine percent met all three criteria for high burnout, including high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. Seventy-nine percent had one or more symptoms of burnout. Numerous factors including work overload, inability to balance personal and professional life, lack of autonomy, lack of appreciation from patients and other medical staff were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with high burnout. Older age (OR, 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.98; p < 0.05), higher number of years of experience practicing as radiologists (OR, 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.98; p < 0.05), and holding academic rank of professor (OR, 0.25; 95%CI 0.11-0.56; p < 0.05) were factors associated with lower odds of experiencing burnout. Radiologists with high burnout were more likely to be dissatisfied with their career (OR, 2.28; 95%CI 1.70-3.07; p < 0.0001) and less likely to identify medicine as a calling. CONCLUSION Multiple factors contribute to high burnout in academic radiologists. Familiarity with these factors may help academic radiology departments to develop strategies to promote health and wellness of their faculty.
Collapse
|
11
|
Moriarty AK, Cedeno-Kelly K, Hioe T. Private Practice Radiologists' Perceptions of Peer Learning. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:1509-1514. [PMID: 32771495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Moriarty
- Advanced Radiology Services, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Division of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
| | | | - Tanya Hioe
- Division of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Spectrum Health-Michigan State University Radiology, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brown SD, Bruno MA, Shyu JY, Eisenberg R, Abujudeh H, Norbash A, Gallagher TH. Error Disclosure and Apology in Radiology: The Case for Further Dialogue. Radiology 2019; 293:30-35. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|