A meta-analysis of adjuvant group-interventions in psychiatric care for patients with bipolar disorders

Group therapy for mood disorders: A meta-analysis

The addition of group psychotherapy as a specialty by the APA in 2018 creates a need for rigorous empirical reviews of group treatments for specific disorders. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that tested the effect of group psychotherapy for mood disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder, at posttreatment and follow-up time-points, as well as rates of recovery and attrition. Major databases were searched for RCTs of group treatment for depression and bipolar disorder published from 1990 to 2018, which identified 42 studies across both disorders. Random effects meta-analyses indicated that group therapy for depression produced superior outcomes compared to waitlist control (WLC) and treatment as usual (TAU) and equivalent outcomes to medication. Similarly, group therapy for bipolar disorder produced superior outcomes to TAU. Analyses of recovery rates were conducted for depression, producing similar results to the main outcome analyses. Rates of attrition did not differ between group and comparison conditions for either disorder. These findings support group therapy for treating depression and bipolar disorder, although further research is needed comparing group treatment for bipolar disorder to medication.

Short group psychoeducation followed by daily electronic self-monitoring in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorders: a multicenter, rater-blind, randomized controlled trial

Background

Despite various pharmacological and psychological treatment interventions, bipolar disorders rank among the leading causes of global disease burden. Group psychoeducation has been demonstrated an effective add-on to pharmacotherapy, but it may be difficult to implement in practice depending on the clinical setting and available human resources.

Methods

Multicenter, rater-blind, randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of a new intervention program consisting of an initial 6-week psychoeducation protocol plus a subsequent structured daily computer-based self-charting program (ChronoRecord) over 54 weeks in remitted patients with bipolar disorders. The control condition included non-structured group sessions followed by daily computer-based self-reports (unstructured like a diary). Both groups received treatment-as-usual.

Results

Over 2 years, 41 mood episodes occurred in the experimental group (n = 39) compared to 27 in the control group (n = 34), without reaching statistical significance. Time to recurrence did not significantly differ between the experimental and control group (25% relapsed after 112 and 273 days, respectively). There were no significant group-by-time interactions in mood symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy expectations or perceived involvement in care.

Conclusions

Six weekly psychoeducational group sessions followed by daily self-monitoring via ChronoRecord for 54 weeks may not be superior to non-structured group meetings followed by unstructured self-reporting. Other psychotherapeutic interventions may be needed to optimize the treatment of patients with bipolar disorders, especially for those at later disease stages.

Trial registration Retrospectively registered at German Clinical Trials Register on May 24, 2019; DRKS00017319