Effectiveness and harms of mental health treatments in service members and veterans with deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury

The impact of prior head injury on outcomes following group and individual cognitive processing therapy among military personnel

This study examined the impact of a history of head injury (HHI) on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms in active duty military personnel following group and individual cognitive processing therapy (CPT). Data for these secondary analyses were drawn from a clinical trial comparing group and individual CPT. Service members (N = 268, 91.0% male) were randomized to 12 sessions of group (n = 133) or individual (n = 135) CPT. Most participants (57.1%) endorsed a deployment-related HHI, 92.8% of whom reported currently experiencing symptoms (CES) related to the head injury (i.e., HHI/CES). Patients classified as non-HHI/CES demonstrated large, significant improvements in PTSD symptom severity in both individual and group therapy, ds = 1.1, p < .001. Patients with HHI/CES status showed similar significant improvements when randomized to individual CPT, d = 1.4, p < .001, but did not demonstrate significant improvements when randomized to group CPT, d = 0.4, p = .060. For participants classified as HHI/CES, individual CPT was significantly superior to group CPT, d = 0.98, p = .003. Symptoms of depression improved following treatment, with no significant differences by treatment delivery format or HHI/CES status. The findings of this clinical trial subgroup study demonstrate evidence that group CPT is less effective than individual CPT for service members classified as HHI/CES. The results suggest that HHI/CES status may be important to consider in selecting patients for group or individual CPT; additional research is needed to confirm the clinical implications of these findings.

Mild traumatic brain injury characteristics do not negatively influence cognitive processing therapy attendance or outcomes

Some providers have expressed hesitation about the appropriateness of PTSD treatment for veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), given concerns that TBI-related sequelae may negatively affect PTSD treatment and/or should be the focus of treatment instead. However, research suggests that those with a history of mTBI can benefit from evidence-based PTSD treatment. To extend these findings, we examined whether specific mTBI injury markers were associated with PTSD treatment attendance and response. Iraq/Afghanistan-era veterans with PTSD and history of mTBI (N = 88) all received Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT; either standard CPT without the trauma account or SMART-CPT, a modified version of CPT that included cognitive rehabilitation strategies). Analyses examined whether time since injury, presence of loss of consciousness (LOC) or posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and number and mechanism of mTBIs were associated with treatment attendance or response. None of the five injury variables examined were associated with number of treatment sessions attended. Multilevel modeling indicated that injury variables did not moderate treatment response (across treatment conditions) in terms of change in PTSD and depression symptoms. There was a three-way interaction showing that individuals who denied ever experiencing LOC exhibited a greater decrease in PTSD and depression symptoms in standard CPT relative to those in the SMART-CPT. Thus, a history of mTBI should not preclude individuals from receiving standard CPT, regardless of injury characteristics. In fact, PTSD treatment should often be a first line of treatment for these veterans, given evidence of a mental health etiology to persistent post-concussive symptoms.