Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Chemo-Radiotherapy Require Individualized Oncology Nutrition

The efficacy of immunonutrition in improving tolerance to chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, receiving nutritional counseling: study protocol of a randomized, open-label, parallel group, bicentric pilot study

Background:

Nutritional support, including nutritional counseling and oral nutritional supplements (ONSs), has been recommended at the earliest opportunity in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. The limited available evidence on the efficacy of immunonutrition during chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in H&N cancer patients is positive with regard to some secondary endpoints, but is still scanty, particularly with regard to toxicity and treatment tolerance. We hypothesize that early systematic provision of ONSs with a high-protein–high-calorie mixture containing immunonutrients (Impact) compared to standard high-calorie–high-protein nutritional blends, in addition to nutritional counseling, may be beneficial to patients with H&N cancer during CT-RT. Hence, we designed the present study to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of treatment tolerance, toxicity and response, body weight, body composition, protein-calorie intake, quality of life (QoL), fatigue, muscle strength and immunological profile of the early systematic provision of ONSs enriched in immunonutrients compared to isonitrogenous standard blends, in H&N cancer patients undergoing CT-RT.

Methods:

This is a pragmatic, bicentric, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open label, controlled, pilot clinical trial.

Discussion:

Many efforts are still to be taken to improve the efficacy of nutritional support in oncology. Immunonutrition represents a promising approach also in H&N cancer patients, but the evidence on its efficacy in improving clinical outcomes during CT-RT is still inconclusive. The present pilot study, which guarantees the early provision of nutritional assessment and support to all the enrolled patients in accordance with the recent guidelines and recommendations, could represent one of the first proofs of the clinical effectiveness of early oral immunonutrition in cancer patients undergoing CT-RT and could stimulate further large randomized trials, potentially resulting in the improvement of supportive care quality.

Trial registration:

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04611113.

Influence of pretreatment ideal body weight percentile and albumin on prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long-term outcomes of 512 patients from a single institution

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between pretreatment nutritional status and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Pretreatment nutritional status was evaluated by ideal body weight percentile (IBW%) and serum albumin for 512 patients with NPC who underwent radical radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank test, and a Cox model were applied for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Before radiotherapy, IBW% <90% was related to poorer overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; p = .031 and p = .012, respectively); albumin ≤43.0 g/L was related to poorer OS and DMFS (p < .001 and p = .042, respectively); both IBW% and albumin were independent prognostic factors for OS; those patients with IBW% <90% and albumin ≤43.0 g/L simultaneously had the worst OS and DMFS.

CONCLUSION

Decrease of pretreatment IBW% and albumin was related to poorer survival of NPC.

The effect of an intensive nutritional program on daily set-up variations and radiotherapy planning margins of head and neck cancer patients

This is a prospective case-control study to assess nutritional supplementation in limiting weight loss and its impact on daily set-up variations and planning target volume (PTV) margins in head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT). Twenty sequential H&N patients were recruited for this study. Ten patients had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube inserted prior to RT and 10 did not. PEG use was determined by departmental guidelines for patients considered at high risk for weight loss. Daily 2D electronic portal images were taken for orthogonal verification. Set-up variations were determined for both PEG and non-PEG patients by calculating systematic (Sigma) and random (sigma) errors, and PTV margins were derived. PEG patients lost less weight (P = 0.04) over the course of RT and had a reduction in set-up variation in the superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes compared to those without. Mean correctional shifts in mm (range) for PEG patients were: Right-Left (RL) 0.1 (-1.9-2.1), SI -1.7 (-2.9-0.0), AP -0.4 (-2.0-0.8), and for non-PEG patients were: RL -0.2 (-2.7-1.3), SI -1.3 (-3.1-1.0), AP 0.4 (-1.5-2.8). The adapted PTV margins (mm) in the RL, SI and AP planes, respectively, for PEG patients were 4.1, 3.3 and 3.6, and for non-PEG were 3.9, 4.9 and 4.8. Intensive enteral support maintained weight stability in H&N patients considered at risk of weight loss during RT and this was associated with reduced set-up variation.