Prevalence of Parkinson disease and Parkinson disease dementia in community nursing homes

Using Telemedicine to Assess and Manage Psychosis in Neurodegenerative Diseases in Long-Term Care

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has forced a sudden global implementation of telemedicine strategies, including in long-term care (LTC) facilities where many people with dementia and Parkinson disease (PD) reside. Telemedicine offers a unique set of advantages for residents in LTC facilities if effectively supported and implemented, including expanded access to specialists in rural or underserved areas or for people with dementia who cannot travel for off-site visits. Many medical and psychiatric organizations have recently issued new or updated guidelines on the use of telemedicine. On October 22, 2020, a multidisciplinary consensus panel was convened to collate a list of best practices for LTC facilities and specialists when conducting telemedicine with residents with dementia-related psychosis or PD-related psychosis (PDP).

A collaborative effort between specialists, facility administrators, and facility staff is essential for the success of telemedicine in the LTC setting. Telemedicine in LTC facilities comes with increased administrative and technical challenges that fall heavily on the shoulders of the LTC facility administrators and staff. Specialists can ease this burden by maintaining flexibility and ensuring expression of empathy and thanks to the staff who are facilitating the visits. LTC staff can provide specialists with valuable information about their patients to aid in evaluation and diagnosis. Specialists can facilitate this exchange of information by speaking to staff who work closely with the resident about any signs of hallucinations or delusions they may have observed. Educational efforts can increase staff understanding of dementia and PDP and empower them to engage with, and facilitate the resident's treatment plan. Using these strategies to take advantage of the benefits of telemedicine, specialists and LTC staff can together expand and improve care for LTC facility residents with dementia-related psychosis or PDP.

[Residents with Parkinson's disease in the institutional care : A cross-sectional survey of nursing homes in Germany]

Hintergrund

Parkinson-Syndrome führen im Krankheitsverlauf zur Pflegebedürftigkeit bei den Betroffenen. Zur Prävalenz der Bewohner*innen mit einem Parkinson-Syndrom in Pflegeeinrichtungen, zu ihrer Versorgungssituation und zur vorhandenen Expertise der Pflegefachpersonen in den Einrichtungen ist wenig bekannt.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Prävalenzrate der Bewohner*innen mit einem Parkinson-Syndrom in stationären Pflegeeinrichtungen in Deutschland. Die Arbeit exploriert die Zusammenarbeit verschiedener Akteure, deren Koordination sowie Information und Wissen des Pflegepersonals. Ziel ist es, einen möglichen Bedarf an spezialisierter Pflege in Pflegeeinrichtungen aufzuzeigen.

Methode

Die schriftliche Querschnittsbefragung der Wohnbereichsleitungen von 500 zufällig ausgewählten Pflegeeinrichtungen in Deutschland erfolgte von Januar bis Juni 2020. Der eingesetzte Fragebogen wurde vorab literaturbasiert entwickelt. Die Daten wurden deskriptiv analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Aus 57 Einrichtungen wurden Fragebogen von 85 Wohnbereichen analysiert (Rücklaufquote 11,4 %). Die Prävalenzrate von Bewohner*innen mit einem Parkinson-Syndrom in der stationären Altenhilfe beträgt 13,9 %. Mehr als die Hälfte haben zusätzlich eine Demenzdiagnose (52,8 %). In 26 % der Fälle erfolgen Krankenhausaufenthalte infolge von Sturzereignissen. Eine eindeutige Koordination der Versorgung durch ärztliche oder pflegerische Spezialisten gibt es nicht.

Diskussion

Bewohner*innen mit einem Parkinson-Syndrom in der stationären Altenhilfe sind häufig, und sie zeigen komplexe motorische und nichtmotorische Symptome – auch durch die Komorbidität Demenz. Die Häufigkeit von Sturzereignissen mit Krankenhausaufenthalten und die geringe Anzahl Parkinson-Syndrom-spezifischer Hilfsmittel zeigen, dass das Wissen der Pflege vor Ort gesteigert werden kann. Eine zentrale Koordination und Unterstützung hierzu sollten in der stationären Langzeitpflege etabliert werden.

Zusatzmaterial online

Zusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00391-021-01874-y) enthalten.

Dyadic Decision-Making in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: A Mixed Methods Study

People with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) are living at home being cared for by a family member. Decisions about health care and living preferences are made in a family context. The aims of the study were to (a) examine the types and timing of the decisions being made by dyads (person with Parkinson’s [PWP] and caregiver) in advanced PD; and (b) explore perceived decision quality relative to specific decisions made. A mixed methods design of semi-structured dyad interviews followed by individual completion of decision measures twice at six months apart was utilized. Decisions involved obtaining more services in the home, moving into assisted living communities, maintaining as is, and initiating hospice. There was high decision quality as reflected by low decisional conflict and regret without statistical differences within the dyad. The findings provide insight into the nature of decisions dyads face and suggest ways that health care providers can support decision-making.

Prescription database analyses indicates that the asthma medicine montelukast might protect against dementia: a hypothesis to be verified

BACKGROUND

It has recently been shown that the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast rejuvenates aged brains in rats. The question is whether this commonly used, systemic, anti-asthmatic medicine has a similar effect in humans?

RESULTS

We approached this issue by doing statistical analyses based on the Norwegian Prescription Database. The Database lists all prescription-based medications in Norway, but not drugs given to people who are in hospitals or nursing homes. The question asked was whether users of montelukast, compared to users of inhalation asthma medicine, live longer, and are less likely to develop dementia. A small, non-significant protective effect on the use of dementia medicine became significant when adjusting for other prescriptions (based on the notion that montelukast users on average are less healthy). A possible protective effect was substantiated by looking at the lack of prescriptions as a proxy for dementia-related residency in nursing homes, and the risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that montelukast may alleviate the cognitive decline associated with human aging. However, further data, preferably based on controlled clinical trials, are required.

Memantine for Lewy body disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether memantine is more efficacious in several outcomes and safer than placebo in patients with Lewy body disorders, we performed a meta-analysis of memantine in patients with Lewy body disorders.

METHODS

The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials of memantine for Lewy body disorders in all patients with Lewy body disorders. Motor function, activities of daily living, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Mini-Mental State Exam, discontinuation rate, and individual side effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant effects of memantine on motor function scores, Mini-Mental State Exam scores, Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores, and activity of daily living scores were found. However, memantine was superior to placebo in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change scores (standardized mean difference: -0.26; 95% confidence interval: -0.51 to -0.02; z = 2.08; p = 0.04; two studies; N = 258). Dropout due to all causes, inefficacy, or adverse events were similar in both groups. Moreover, no significant differences in serious adverse events, somnolence/tiredness, stroke, dizziness/vertigo, and confusion were found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that memantine did not have a benefit for the treatment of Lewy body disorders in cognition and motor function. However, memantine may be superior to placebo for the overall impression of the disorders. Further, memantine is well tolerated.