1
|
Dols A, Sekhon H, Rej S, Klaus F, Bodenstein K, Sajatovic M. Bipolar Disorder Among Older Adults: Newer Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice. FOCUS (AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING) 2023; 21:370-379. [PMID: 38695001 PMCID: PMC11058954 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
The term older-age bipolar disorder (OABD) refers to patients with bipolar disorder who are ages 50 and older. Research findings suggest important differences, including the attenuation of manic symptoms with age and the occurrence of multiple somatic comorbid conditions. Although the pharmacological treatment of OABD is fairly similar, adverse effects, somatic comorbidity, and drug-drug interactions are more common. Lithium is effective in treating OABD and may have the potential to be neuroprotective. Anticonvulsants and second-generation antipsychotics have a growing evidence supporting their use in treating OABD. Behavioral intervention can be a helpful adjunct to pharmacological treatment. Clinicians and health care systems need to be prepared to provide care and services to individuals with bipolar disorder throughout the life span. Although older adults have typically been excluded from bipolar disorder RCTs, emerging efforts organized by global advocates and harnessing teams of clinicians and scientists have the potential to advance care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemiek Dols
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| | - Harmehr Sekhon
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| | - Soham Rej
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| | - Federica Klaus
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| | - Katie Bodenstein
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dols); Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Sekhon, Rej, Bodenstein); McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School Affiliate), Belmont, Massachusetts (Sekhon); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Klaus); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Sajatovic)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang H, Schmerold L, Dembek C, Fan Q, Dieyi C, Williams GR, Loebel A. Healthcare resource utilization, costs and treatment patterns in patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone or cariprazine. J Med Econ 2021; 24:352-362. [PMID: 33588674 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1890428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and treatment adherence and persistence for patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone or cariprazine. METHODS Adult patients with bipolar disorder who initiated lurasidone or cariprazine as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2019 were identified from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Database. The date of the first claim for lurasidone or cariprazine was defined as the index date. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis, which mitigated bias by using each cohort as its own control, compared the changes in HCRU and costs from 6-months pre-treatment (baseline) to 6-months post-treatment (follow-up) between the two cohorts. Treatment adherence (medication possession ratio and proportion of days covered) and persistence (time to discontinuation) were assessed during the 6-month post-treatment period. Adjusted analyses were conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting on HCRU, costs, and time to discontinuation. RESULTS A total of 16,683 patients treated with lurasidone and 4,128 patients treated with cariprazine were identified. Average age (39-40) and proportion female (68-71%) were similar between cohorts. Both cohorts had reductions in hospitalizations from baseline to follow-up, and the decrease was significantly greater for the lurasidone cohort compared to the cariprazine cohort (change in the proportions of patients with all-cause hospitalizations: -5.3% vs. -2.5%, DID = -2.8%, p<.001). The total healthcare costs increased from baseline to follow-up in both cohorts, and the increase was significantly lower for the lurasidone cohort (change in total all-cause healthcare cost per person: $3,413 vs. $4,642, DID=-$1,228, p = .022). The lurasidone cohort had significantly lower risk of discontinuing treatment (hazard ratio = 0.86, p<.001) than the cariprazine cohort. CONCLUSIONS Patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone had greater reductions in hospitalizations from 6-months pre-treatment to 6-months post-treatment and had a lower increase in total costs compared to patients treated with cariprazine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Huang
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Qi Fan
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Second Generation Antipsychotics Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: a Systematic Review of Long-Term Studies. Psychiatr Q 2020; 91:1047-1060. [PMID: 32651765 DOI: 10.1007/s11126-020-09753-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Atypical or so called second generation antipsychotics (SGA) are playing a role of increasing importance in treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). This study is aimed towards a systematic review of their efficacy when used as monotherapy in order to prevent relapses in the long term treatment. Publications about this subject were identified after a thorough bibliographic research in Medline, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science, employing the PICO method for the creation of a database search strategy and carrying out a critical read and analysis of the found evidence. 14 studies were found which informed about the results of randomized and controlled clinical trials (RCT) about the efficacy of these SGA in monotherapy for BD, when it comes to prevention of relapse, in adult patients diagnosed with either type I or II BD, with a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. Evidence of the use of SGAs for maintenance treatment in BD is limited. Amongst all antipsychotics assessed only aripiprazole, olanzapine, lurasidone, risperidone and quetiapine have been found to be competent for their use in monotherapy, according to RCT.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ali Z, Tegin C, El-Mallakh RS. Evaluating lurasidone as a treatment option for bipolar disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:253-260. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1695777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Ali
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Cunyet Tegin
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Rif S. El-Mallakh
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Newer Atypical Antipsychotics as Treatments for Bipolar Disorder: Considerations for Use in Older Patients. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:887-895. [PMID: 30187288 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0579-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Bipolar disorder prevalence rates vary in the older adult population (defined as age ≥ 65 years), ranging from 1% in community dwellers to as high as 8-10% in hospital inpatients. Although older agents, including lithium and valproic acid, offer significant antimanic efficacy, as supported by a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), there is growing interest in using atypical antipsychotics to treat bipolar disorder in older adults. Newer atypical antipsychotics are of interest based on their tolerability and efficacy in the general adult bipolar population. The aim of this review was to systematically examine efficacy and tolerability of newer atypical antipsychotics for older adult bipolar disorder (OABD). We conducted a systematic search utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library electronic databases, with the aim of identifying all RCTs comparing newer atypical antipsychotics approved by the US FDA since 2002 (including brexpiprazole, cariprazine, lurasidone, iloperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, and aripiprazole) with placebo or another comparator, in the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder (including mania, depression or mixed episodes while used as an acute or maintenance treatment) in older adults (> 65 years). We found no RCT data on any of the examined agents. Hence, we changed our search criteria to include studies with a lower age cut-off (≥ 55 years), as well as the inclusion of post hoc studies. Two post hoc studies on lurasidone suggest its reasonable safety and efficacy profile in the acute and maintenance treatment of OABD; however, there are no pharmacoeconomic data on the use of lurasidone in the treatment of OABD. Research data from open-label studies on oral asenapine and aripiprazole as add-on therapy suggest that these two agents are adequately tolerated and improved symptoms of depression and mania in OABD; hence, there is an urgent need to conduct RCTs on these two agents. Lastly, we found no studies for the treatment of OABD with brexpiprazole, cariprazine, iloperidone, or paliperidone.
Collapse
|