Successful rapid desensitization to imiglucerase in an adult patient with Gaucher disease and documented IgE-mediated hypersensitivity

Desensitization of olipudase alfa-induced anaphylaxis in a child with chronic neurovisceral acid sphingomyelinase deficiency

Olipudase alfa is indicated for the non-central nervous system manifestations of Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD). Anaphylaxis is a very rare and life-threatening adverse reaction described for this drug. Here, we report the case of a 2-year-old boy affected by chronic neurovisceral ASMD who experienced signs of hypersensitivity reactions to olipudase alfa since the administered dose of 1 mg/kg during dose escalation and a proper anaphylactic reaction during the second administration of the target therapeutic dose of 3 mg/kg. The treatment was stopped for 15 weeks and then a 7-step desensitization protocol with the infused dose of 0.03 mg/kg was applied. Subsequent gradual dose escalation was resumed, successfully reaching the dose of 0.3 mg/kg. Moreover, biochemical, and radiological disease indexes, which were increased during treatment discontinuation, have gradually improved since the restart of treatment. However, at the second administration of the dose of 0.6 mg/kg, the patient experienced another adverse drug reaction with facial urticarial rash and bronchospasm, requiring the administration of adrenaline, methylprednisolone, and inhaled salbutamol. This case report highlights the need to customize the olipudase alfa desensitization protocol according to individual tolerance and raises the issue of achieving the established therapeutic target in the most sensitive children.

Synopsis

We report a case of anaphylaxis to olipudase alfa in a child affected by chronic neurovisceral Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) and describe a 7-step desensitization procedure. This procedure, with the total administered dose of 0.03 mg/kg, followed by gradual dose escalation, allowed to reach the dose of 0.3 mg/kg without adverse reactions; however, at the second administration of the dose of 0.6 mg/kg our patient presented another adverse reaction suggesting the need of a different desensitization strategy.

Hypersensitivity infusion-associated reactions induced by enzyme replacement therapy in a cohort of patients with late-onset Pompe disease: An experience from the French Pompe Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pompe disease is a rare hereditary glycogen storage disorder due to lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase deficiency. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is the only available treatment. Infusion-associated reactions (IAR) are challenging since there are no guidelines for ERT rechallenge after a drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) in Pompe disease. The objective of the present study was to describe IAR and their management in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) patients in France, and to discuss the various possibilities of ERT rechallenge.

METHODS

An exhaustive screening of LOPD patients receiving ERT between 2006 and 2020 from the 31-participating hospital-based or reference centers was performed. The patients who had presented at least one hypersensitivity IAR (=DHR) episode were included. Demographic characteristics of the patients, IAR onset and timing, were retrospectively collected from the French Pompe Registry.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients among 115 treated LOPD patients in France presented at least 1 IAR; 80.0% were women. Twenty-nine IAR were reported; 18 (62.1%) IAR were Grade I reactions, 10 (34.5%) IAR were Grade II, and 1 (3.4%) IAR was Grade III. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was found in 2/15 patients (13.3%). The median [IQR] time from ERT introduction to the first IAR was 15.0 months [11.0-24.0]. ERT was safely and effectively re-introduced either with premedication alone, or in combination with either modified regimen or desensitization protocol, in all 9 rechallenged patients; including in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, in the patient with the Grade III reaction, as well as in patients with very high anti-GAA titer.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results herein and previous reports, we discuss premedication and modified regimen for Grade I reactions, and desensitization in Grade II and III reactions. In conclusion, ERT-induced IAR can be safely and effectively managed with a modified regimen or desensitization protocol in LOPD patients.

Hypersensitivity reaction during enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage disorders. A systematic review of desensitization strategies

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are rare genetic metabolic disorders that cause the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in lysosomes due to enzyme deficiency or reduced function. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) represents the gold standard treatment, but hypersensitivity reaction can occur resulting in treatment discontinuation. Thus, desensitization procedures for different culprit recombinant enzymes can be performed to restore ERT. We searched desensitization procedures performed in LSDs and focused on skin test results, protocols and premedication performed, and breakthrough reactions occurred during infusions. Fifty-two patients have been subjected to desensitization procedures successfully. Skin tests, with the culprit recombinant enzyme, deemed positive in 29 cases, doubtful in two cases, and not performed in four patients. Moreover, 29 of the 52 desensitization protocols used at the first infusion were breakthrough reaction free. Different desensitization strategies have proved safe and effective in restoring ERT in patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions. Most of these events seem to be Type I hypersensitivity reactions (IgE-mediated). Standardized in vivo and in vitro testing is necessary to better estimate the risk of the procedure and find the safest individualized desensitization protocol.

Management of hypersensitivity reactions to enzyme replacement therapy in children with lysosomal storage diseases

BACKGROUND

Intravenous recombinant enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is currently available for 8 lysosomal diseases. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) may be observed during this long-term treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency and clinical treatment features of ERT HSRs and the management of desensitizations in children.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for patients who received ERT. Those who had experienced HSRs to ERT were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, culprit enzyme, signs and symptoms, diagnostic tests, management of the reaction, and the protocol employed for the maintenance of ERT were recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 54 patients received ERT in our institution. A total of 11 patients (20.4%) experienced HSR to ERT. All reactions were of immediate type. The most common symptoms were cutaneous manifestations. A total of 9 patients experienced urticaria, and 2 had anaphylaxis as initial reaction. Patients who had isolated cutaneous symptoms continued their treatments with antihistamines, corticosteroid premedication, slower infusion rate or both. Patients who had recurrent urticaria with these modalities or those who had anaphylaxis continued their ERT with desensitization (n = 8). A total of 3 patients required revisions in desensitization protocols because of recurrent anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

The reactions that develop during this long-term treatment may be treated by premedication-prolonged infusion, but in some patients, desensitization protocols are necessary for the continuation of therapy. Revisions in desensitization protocols may be required.