A case of aquagenic urticaria successfully treated with omalizumab

New insights into chronic inducible urticaria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a group of long-persisting and challenging to manage diseases, characterized by recurrent wheals and angioedema induced by definite triggers. In this review, we address recent findings on CIndU pathogenesis, diagnosis as well as its treatment, and we discuss novel potential targets that may lead to the development of more effective therapies for CIndU patients.

RECENT ADVANCES

Meaningful advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have been reported in the last decades. Novel CIndU-specific patient-reported outcome measures enable a closer and better evaluation of patients. CIndU is a hard-to-treat disease that highly impairs quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Provocation tests allow to diagnose CIndU subtypes. The only licensed and recommended treatment for CIndU are second generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines, which lack efficacy in many cases. Omalizumab off-label use has been assessed in all types of CIndU with overall good outcomes. Promising emerging therapies currently assessed in chronic spontaneous urticaria are paving the path for novel treatments for CIndU.

A localized salt-dependent aquagenic urticaria successfully treated with omalizumab

We present the first case of a localized salt-dependent aquagenic urticaria confirmed by a challenge test. A good therapeutic response was achieved after only the first dose of omalizumab.

A Systematic Review of Aquagenic Urticaria-Subgroups and Treatment Options

BACKGROUND

Aquagenic urticaria (AquaU) is a rare variant of chronic inducible urticaria where wheals occur after skin contact with water. Information on clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes is limited, which makes the management of AquaU challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review disease features and relevant triggers of AquaU and patients' response to treatment.

METHODS

Related articles were searched by use of the terms "aquagenic urticaria" and "aquagenic angioedema" until June 2021 and reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients with AquaU were investigated in 59 studies including 47 case reports and 12 case series. AquaU predominantly presented in women (47 patients, 61%), and the mean age of onset of the disease was 19.6 ± 10.8 years (range: 0-54 years). Wheals commonly occurred in localized areas and regardless of the water temperature. Based on the reviewed evidence, AquaU can be classified as familial AquaU (FAquaU, 18.2%) and acquired AquaU (AAquaU, 81.8%). Although many treatments were used in both subtypes of AquaU, the use of second-generation H₁ antihistamines (2^ndAH₁) was reported most often to achieve marked improvement in both subtypes. The use of topical therapies in AquaU, which most commonly use hydrophobic vehicles, is poorly documented and of controversial efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

AquaU is proposed to be classified into 2 subtypes, FAquaU and the more common AAquaU. Treatment with a 2^ndAH₁ is recommended as the first-line treatment for both types of AquaU. Further studies are required to fill knowledge gaps.

Evidence for histamine release in chronic inducible urticaria – A systematic review

Background

Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) constitutes a group of nine different CIndUs in which pruritic wheals and/or angioedema occur after exposure to specific and definite triggers. Histamine released from activated and degranulating skin mast cells is held to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CIndU, but evidence to support this has, as of yet, not been reviewed systematically or in detail. We aim to characterize the role and relevance of histamine in CIndU.

Methods

We systematically searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) for studies that reported increased serum or skin histamine concentration (direct evidence) or in vitro or ex vivo histamine release (indirect evidence) following trigger exposure.

Results

An initial total of 3,882 articles was narrowed down to 107 relevant studies of which 52 were in cold urticaria, 19 in cholinergic urticaria, 14 in heat urticaria, 10 in contact urticaria, 7 each in solar urticaria and vibratory angioedema, 4 each in symptomatic dermographism and aquagenic urticaria, and 3 in delayed pressure urticaria. The results of our review support that histamine has a key pathogenic role in the pathogenesis of all CIndUs, but it is not the sole mediator as evidenced by the often poor relationship between the level of histamine and severity of symptoms and the variable clinical efficacy of H1-antihistamines.

Conclusions

Histamine released from skin mast cells is a key driver of the development of signs and symptoms and a promising therapeutic target in CIndU.

Omalizumab as a treatment option for antihistamine-refractory aquagenic urticaria

A teenage girl presented with symptoms of itching and hives on contact with water for 3 years. On specific provocative testing and ruling out underlying systemic conditions, she was diagnosed with aquagenic urticaria. Following failed attempts to control her symptoms with second-generation antihistamines, she was started on monthly subcutaneous injections of the monoclonal antibody, omalizumab. The patient demonstrated significant improvement, with symptoms being well-controlled for 2 years now. She enjoys a good quality of life and can take a shower without developing itching or hives.

Clinical impact of omalizumab in refractory chronic urticaria: One centre experience

Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a debilitating disorder, which has a major impact on the quality of life of affected individuals, and is a substantial global burden. Refractory, difficult to treat cases pose a difficult challenge to patients and clinicians alike. Advances in the field of immunotherapy have led to novel and effective therapeutic strategies. Omalizumab, an immunomodulatory anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, inaugurated a new era in the treatment of refractory chronic urticaria. Several multicenter clinical trials have proven omalizumab to be a safe and effective option for the treatment of refractory symptoms of chronic spontaneous urticaria, while some small studies have shown its efficacy in chronic inductible urticaria as well. In this study, we bring forth updates in chronic urticaria approach, with a focus on our experience with anti-IgE therapy in different forms of chronic urticaria treated at the Allergy Department of the Professor Doctor Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Cluj-Napoca, Romania).

Water-related dermatoses

Water-related dermatoses are a spectrum of diseases that are associated with water exposure. They result either from the direct influence of water or after injury from water inhabitants. In this review, clinical entities that manifest after water exposure (aquagenic pruritus, aquagenic urticaria, and aquagenic wrinkling of the palms) will be discussed with particular focus on the reported pathogenesis. Aquatic organisms and activities can be linked to cutaneous injuries that require identification and distinct management. Marine and freshwater dermatoses were summarized to provide physicians with easy access to the causative organism, method of injury, and appropriate management.

Omalizumab treatment in patients with chronic inducible urticaria: A systematic review of published evidence

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, a recombinant anti-IgE antibody, effectively treats chronic spontaneous urticaria. Evidence is lacking in patients with chronic inducible urticarias (CIndUs), which are frequently H₁-antihistamine resistant.

OBJECTIVE

From the current published literature, we aimed to determine the strength of evidence for omalizumab efficacy and safety in the treatment of CIndUs.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search to identify evidence on omalizumab use in the following 9 CIndU subtypes: symptomatic dermographism, cold urticaria, delayed-pressure urticaria, solar urticaria, heat urticaria, vibratory angioedema, cholinergic urticaria, contact urticaria, and aquagenic urticaria.

RESULTS

Forty-three trials, case studies, case reports, and analyses were identified. Our review indicates that omalizumab has substantial benefits in patients with various CIndUs. The evidence is strongest for symptomatic dermographism, cold urticaria, and solar urticaria. Little/no evidence was available on vibratory angioedema and aquagenic and contact urticaria. Our review supports rapid onset of action demonstrated through early symptom control in most cases, sometimes within 24 hours. Many patients gained complete/partial symptom relief and substantially improved quality of life. Adverse events were generally low, with omalizumab being well tolerated by most patients, including children.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong body of evidence supports the use of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with therapy-refractory CIndU. More data from randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Management of chronic inducible urticaria according to the guidelines: A prospective controlled study

BACKGROUND

The recommended treatment approach in chronic inducible urticarias (CIndU) is the same as that for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). But there is a lack of controlled trials assessing efficacy of available treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of treatment algorithm recommended by the guidelines and comparison of treatment responses in CIndU vs CSU.

METHODS

This prospective parallel group controlled study included 70 CIndU and 66 CSU patients. The same treatment algorithm recommended by the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/Global Allergy and Asthma European Network/European Dermatology Forum/World Allergy Organization (EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO) was implemented to both CSU and CIndU patients. Treatment responses of the groups were evaluated with urticaria control test (UCT) and dermatology life quality questionnaire (DLQI) scores at the 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24th weeks for CIndU and 0, 4, 12 and 24 weeks for CSU.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (20,9%) with CIndU and 25 (37,9%) with CSU responded to standard doses of H1-AHs which was significantly higher in the CSU group (p=0,031, p<0,05). Patients with CIndU and CSU showed statistically similar responses to 2nd line treatments (combining or updosing AHs) (p=0,979; p>0,05). Twenty-seven (40,3%) of CIndU patients and 21 (31,8%) of CSU patients were diagnosed as AH-resistant urticaria. Omalizumab was administered to 15 CSU patients and 17 CIndU patients. Response rates to omalizumab were similar in both groups. Total response rates increased from 37,9% (n:25) to 68,2% (n:45) with the 2nd line treatments in CSU group while it increased from 20,9% (n:14) to 59,7% (n:40) in CIndU group. When omalizumab was introduced to AH-refractory cases as a 3rd line treatment, total response rates evaluated at the 12th week were 76,1% (n:51) in patients with CIndU and 83,3% (n:55) in CSU. Continuing omalizumab treatment for 24 weeks increased response rates in patients who were unresponsive at week 12.

CONCLUSION

CIndU seem to be more resistant to standard doses of AHs and higher doses of AHs are required for the control of symptoms. The same guidelines for CSU may be implemented to patients with CIndU.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice - 2016 Year in Review

As editors, we concluded that it would be helpful to our readers to write a Year in Review article that highlights the Review, Original, and Clinical Communication articles published in 2016 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. We summarized articles on the topics of asthma, rhinitis/rhinosinusitis, food allergy, anaphylaxis, drug allergy, urticarial/angioedema, eosinophilic disorders, and immunodeficiency. Within each topic, epidemiologic findings are presented, relevant aspects of prevention are described, and diagnostic and therapeutic advances are enumerated. Diagnostic tools described include history, skin tests, and in vitro tests. Treatments discussed include behavioral therapy, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We hope this review will help you, our readers, consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of your patients.

Biologics in Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined as wheals, angioedema, or both, that last more than 6 weeks. Second-generation antihistamines are considered the first-line therapy for CU. Unfortunately, many patients will fail antihistamines and require alternative therapy, including immune response modifiers or biologics. Multiple biological agents have been evaluated for use in antihistamine-refractory CU, including omalizumab, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin; omalizumab is the most efficacious. Because of the success of omalizumab, multiple new biologics that are directed at the IgE pathway are under investigation. This review summarizes the relevant data regarding the efficacy of biologics in antihistamine-refractory CU.

Omalizumab in the Treatment of Chronic Inducible Urticaria

Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits immunoglobulin E. It has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria refractory to other treatments. Its use in the management of chronic inducible urticaria (a type triggered by certain stimuli) is still considered off-label, although this use has been discussed in some consensus papers. This review brings together case reports and case series describing the use of omalizumab to treat chronic inducible urticaria. We analyze the most important aspects of the cases and the outcomes reported. The results seem to position omalizumab as a potentially effective, safe treatment alternative in some cases of chronic inducible urticaria.