Geographical distribution of allergy/immunology providers in the United States and association with median income

Health Promotion of Early and Sustained Allergenic Food Introduction for the Prevention of Food Allergy

Observational studies and landmark randomized control trials support early and sustained allergenic food introduction in infancy as an effective preventive strategy against food allergy development. Despite a consensus regarding the intended goals of early and sustained allergenic food introduction, there have been myriad policy recommendations among health authorities in how to achieve both individual and population-level health outcomes for food allergy prevention. This clinical management review provides an overview on the data that informs early and sustained allergenic food introduction strategies, suggestions on how to advise allergenic food introduction, principles of prevention programs as they relate to food allergy prevention, and health promotion and systems-level challenges that impede achievement of food allergy prevention goals.

Patients' and Caregivers' Preferences for Mental Health Care and Support in Atopic Dermatitis

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has large mental health impacts for patients and caregivers, yet their preferences regarding how to relieve these impacts are poorly understood. Objective: To understand patients' and caregivers' preferences for AD-related mental health care and support. Methods: We surveyed 279 adult AD patients and 154 caregivers of children with AD across 26 countries regarding their AD-related mental health burden, preferred strategies for improving AD-related mental health, and experiences with mental health care in AD. Results: Caregivers reported significantly worse overall mental health (P = 0.01) and anxiety (P = 0.03) than adult patients when controlling for AD severity. Among adult patients, 58% selected treating the AD, 51% managing itch, 44% wearing clothing to cover up skin, 43% avoiding social situations, and 41% spending time alone, as strategies they felt would improve their own AD-related mental health. Caregivers selected managing itch and treating the AD most frequently for both their own (76% and 75%, respectively) and their children's (75% and 61%) mental health. Adult patients were less satisfied with mental health care from mental health providers versus nonmental health providers (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Effective AD management is the preferred method for improving mental health among patients as well as caregivers, who may experience the greatest mental health impacts. Self-care strategies should be considered in a shared decision-making approach.

A comparison of healthcare utilization and outcomes following skin vs. serum-specific IgE allergy testing

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost, healthcare utilization, and outcomes between skin and serum-specific IgE (sIgE) allergy testing.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used IBM® MarketScan claims data, from which commercially insured individuals who initiated allergy testing between January 1 and December 31, 2018 with at least 12 months of enrollment data before and after index testing date were included. Cost of allergy testing per patient was estimated by testing pattern: skin only, sIgE only, or both. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare healthcare utilization and outcomes, including office visits, allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) visits between skin and sIgE testing at 1-year post testing (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The cohort included 168,862 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (19.5) years; 100,666 (59.7%) were female. Over half of patients (56.4%, n = 95,179) had skin only testing, followed by 57,291 patients with sIgE only testing and 16,212 patients with both testing. The average cost of allergy testing per person in the first year was $430 (95% CI $426-433) in patients with skin only testing, $187 (95% CI $183-190) in patients with sIgE only testing, and $532 (95% CI $522-542) in patients with both testing. At 1-year follow-up post testing, there were slight increases in allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and notable decreases in ED visits by 17.0-17.4% and in UC visits by 10.9-12.6% for all groups (all p < 0.01). Patients with sIgE-only testing had 3.2 fewer allergist/immunologist visits than patients with skin-only testing at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Their healthcare utilization and outcomes were otherwise comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergy testing, regardless of the testing method used, is associated with decreases in ED and UC visits at 1-year follow-up. sIgE allergy testing is associated with lower testing cost and fewer allergist/immunologist visits, compared to skin testing.

Cost of Serum Versus Skin Allergy Testing Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries in the United States

Background: Testing for allergic sensitization can be achieved similarly via skin or serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing, although the costs of each method differ. Objective: This study compared cost and utilization of allergy testing utilizing skin vs sIgE testing and whether equal access (parity) to both testing methods affects overall allergy testing costs among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States. Methods: Allergy test utilization and payment data were analyzed using 100% 2019 Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Beneficiaries with any sIgE test, skin prick test, or intradermal skin test associated with ICD-10 codes of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergy were included. Aggregate and per-beneficiary testing cost, number of allergens tested, and number of allergy-related specialist visits incurred were estimated by the testing patterns of sIgE only, skin prick only, intradermal only, skin prick and intradermal, and sIgE plus prick and/or intradermal. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) with parity for all allergy tests and those which restricted sIgE testing were compared. Multivariate linear regression was performed on the association between testing patterns and each cost and utilization measure, controlling for parity, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and dual-eligible status. Results: We analyzed 270 831 patients and 327 263 allergy-related claims. Total payment for all allergy tests was $71 380 866, including $15 903 954 for sIgE tests, $42 223 930 for skin prick tests, and $13 252 982 for intradermal tests. Beneficiaries receiving sIgE tests had only 1.8 fewer allergist visits than those with skin prick tests only (0.8 vs 2.6). Cost of testing per beneficiary was also lower in sIgE testing only compared with skin prick tests only ($161 vs $247). Multivariable regression results showed per-beneficiary payments for allergy testing were on average $22 lower in MACs with parity compared with MACs without parity. Discussion: Serum specific IgE testing is associated with lower costs and fewer allergy specialist visits compared with skin testing. Insurance coverage with parity toward sIgE and skin testing is associated with lower overall costs of allergy testing. Conclusion: Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States, sIgE testing may be more cost effective compared with skin testing in the management of allergic disease.

Provision of Food Allergy Care in the United Kingdom and United States: Current Issues and Future Directions

Food allergy (FA) is a growing issue worldwide. The United Kingdom and United States are high-income, industrialized countries with reported increases in FA prevalence over the past few decades. This review compares delivery of FA care in the United Kingdom and United States and each country's response to the heightened demand and disparities for FA services. In the United Kingdom, allergy specialists are scarce and general practitioners (GPs) provide most allergy care. Whereas the United States has more allergists per capita than the United Kingdom, there is still a shortage of allergy services owing to the greater reliance on specialist care for FA in America and wide geographic variation in access to allergist services. Currently, generalists in these countries lack the specialty training and equipment to diagnose and manage FA optimally. Moving forward, the United Kingdom aims to enhance training for GPs so they may provide better quality frontline allergy care. In addition, the United Kingdom is implementing a new tier of semi-specialized GPs and increasing cross-center collaboration through clinical networks. The United Kingdom and United States aim to increase the number of FA specialists, which is critical at a time of rapidly expanding management options for allergic and immunologic diseases requiring clinical expertise and shared decision-making to select appropriate therapies. While these countries aim to grow their supply of quality FA services actively, further efforts to build clinical networks and perhaps recruit international medical graduates and expand telehealth services are necessary to reduce disparities in access to care. For the United Kingdom in particular, increasing quality services will require additional support from the leadership of the centralized National Health Service, which remains challenging.

Low frequency of allergy referral for penicillin allergy evaluation in an urban Boston primary care setting

Background

A key strategy to combat the public health crisis of antimicrobial resistance is to use appropriate antibiotics, which is difficult in patients with a penicillin allergy label.

Objective

Our aim was to investigate racial and ethnic differences related to penicillin allergy labeling and referral to allergy/immunology in primary care.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of Tufts Medical Center's Boston-based primary care patients in 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine demographic associations with (1) penicillin allergy label and (2) allergist referral.

Results

Of 21,918 primary care patients, 2,391 (11%) had a penicillin allergy label; of these, 249 (10%) had an allergist referral. In multivariable logistic regression models, older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.06 [95% CI = 1.04-1.09]) and female sex (aOR = 1.58 [95% CI = 1.44-1.74]) were associated with higher odds of penicillin allergy label carriage. Black race (aOR = 0.77 [95% CI = 0.69-0.87]) and Asian race (aOR = 0.47 [95% CI = 0.41-0.53]) were associated with lower odds of penicillin allergy label carriage. In multivariable regression, allergist referral was associated with female sex (aOR = 1.52 [95% CI = 1.10-2.10]) and Black race (aOR = 1.74 [95% CI = 1.25-2.45]). Of 93 patients (37%) who completed their allergy visit, 26 (28%) had received penicillin allergy evaluation or were scheduled to receive a penicillin allergy evaluation at a future visit.

Conclusions

There were racial differences in penicillin allergy labeling and referral. Allergy referral for penicillin allergy assessment was rare. Larger studies are needed to assess penicillin allergy labeling and delabeling with an equity focus on optimizing patient health outcomes.

Cost assessment of allergy procedures to improve high-value care implementation

Background: Oral challenges and desensitizations are regularly performed by allergy/immunology physicians. However, there is limited research that has evaluated their cost-effectiveness and overall health-care-related value. Objective: The objective was to analyze the costs of oral challenges and desensitizations by clinician type (including allergy/immunology physicians, other physicians, and certified registered nurse practitioners [CRNP] and physician assistants [PA]), and by geographic distribution in the United States. Methods: By using a de-identified commercial database of medical encounters, we identified all claims for outpatient oral challenges and desensitizations in 2017 and grouped them separately by clinician type and by U.S. Census region. We used analysis of variance to test for cost differences between these two groupings. Results: Allergy/immunology physicians performed the majority of oral challenges (74.36%) with a mean cost of $161, significantly less than that of other physicians ($280). Allergy/immunology physicians also performed the majority of desensitizations (84.48%) with a mean cost of $335, significantly higher than that of CRNPs/PAs ($280); other physicians were reimbursed significantly more than both groups ($410). By geographic region, the mean costs of oral challenges in the Northeast ($212) and the West ($210) were significantly higher than those of other regions, whereas the mean cost of desensitizations was significantly highest in the West ($381). Conclusion: Allergy/immunology physicians and CRNPs/PAs cost the least with respect to oral challenges, whereas CRNPs/PAs cost the least with respect to desensitizations. The Northeast and the West regions provided the highest cost for oral challenges, whereas the West was most expensive in terms of desensitizations. Further knowledge and examination of these reimbursement patterns are crucial in understanding their relative value and the impact on delivery of high-value care.