Asthma Is Associated With Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with asthma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2013 reported increased risks of congenital malformations, neonatal death and neonatal hospitalization amongst infants born to women with asthma compared to infants born to mothers without asthma.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to update the evidence on the associations between maternal asthma and adverse neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We performed an English-language MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and COCHRANE search with the terms (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies published from March 2012 until September 2023 reporting at least one outcome of interest (congenital malformations, stillbirth, neonatal death, perinatal mortality, neonatal hospitalization, transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal sepsis) in a population of women with and without asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The study was reported following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Quality of individual studies was assessed by two reviewers independently using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random effects models (≥3 studies) or fixed effect models (≤2 studies) were used with restricted maximum likelihood to calculate relative risk (RR) from prevalence data and the inverse generic variance method where adjusted odds ratios (aORs) from individual studies were combined.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 18 new studies were included, along with the 22 studies from the 2013 review. Previously observed increased risks remained for perinatal mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.23 n = 16 studies; aOR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.17 n = 6), congenital malformations (RR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.32-1.40 n = 17; aOR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.38-1.47 n = 6), and neonatal hospitalization (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.30 n = 12; aOR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.07-1.16 n = 3) amongst infants born to mothers with asthma, while the risk for neonatal death was no longer significant (RR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.95-1.84 n = 8). Previously reported non-significant risks for major congenital malformations (RR1.18, 95% CI: 1.15-1.21; aOR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.15-1.26 n = 3) and respiratory distress syndrome (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34 n = 4; aOR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18 n = 2) reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals should remain aware of the increased risks to neonates being born to mothers with asthma.

Asthma and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A Mendelian randomization study

Background

Multiple empirical investigations have indicated a connection between asthma and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Nevertheless, the effects of asthma on APOs remain uncertain.

Methods

We performed bi-directional Univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) analyses using combined information obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data that is publicly accessible. The principal approach used to analyze the causal association between asthma or age when diagnosed and APOs was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method. The two types of data regarding exposure originate from the IEU Open GWAS project, which includes 56,167 and 47,222 European asthma patients, respectively. The data of four APOs were acquired via the GWAS dataset of the FinnGen collaboration. In addition, we implemented multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR), controlling for confounding factors such as smoking status, frequent drinking, body mass index (BMI), and live birth quantity. Furthermore, we executed several meticulous sensitivity studies to ascertain the reliability of our MR results.

Results

Following the implementation of the Bonferroni adjustment, the UVMR assessment revealed that in the IVW model, asthma was significantly linked to an elevated risk of spontaneous abortion (SA) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.115; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.031-1.206; P = 0.006) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR: 1.125; 95 % CI: 1.037-1.220; P = 0.005). However, there was no causal correlation between asthma and preterm birth (PTB) (OR: 0.979; 95 % CI: 0.897-1.068; P = 0.629) or preeclampsia (PE) (OR: 1.059; 95 % CI: 0.951-1.179; P = 0.297). After adjusting for confounding factors, including smoking status, frequent drinking, BMI, and live birth quantity, the MVMR analysis shows a statistically significant causal relationship between asthma and SA or GDM. Furthermore, our investigation's findings did not reveal a substantial correlation between the age of asthma onset based on genetics and the likelihood of SA or GDM. The inverse MR outcomes indicate a lack of causal connection linking APOs to the incidence of asthma. The validity of these findings were verified by sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

The evidence provided by this study proves that genetically determined asthma is linked to a higher likelihood of SA and GDM. Further research is required to examine potential pathways. However, no conclusive evidence has been found to support the increased risk of SA and GDM in early asthma diagnosis or the interaction between asthma and PTB or PE, indicating that confounding factors may affect the results of previous observational studies.

Managing Asthma During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in pregnancy and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Asthma symptoms worsen in approximately 40% of women, and exacerbations requiring medical intervention occur in at least 20% of women. Factors associated with exacerbation and worsening asthma include multiparity, obesity, Black race, exacerbations before pregnancy, and poor asthma control. Exacerbations are associated with further increased risks for poor perinatal outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA) status, as well as an increase in the development of asthma in early childhood. Common medications used for asthma, including short-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, are considered safe to use in pregnancy. Whereas guidelines generally suggest traditional step therapy for managing asthma in pregnancy, there are alternative models of care and management approaches that may be effective in pregnancy, but require more research. These include single-inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy, treatment adjustment with FeNO, treatable traits personalized medicine approaches, and telemedicine. Little is known about changes to asthma in the postpartum period. However, low adherence to medication and the potential effects of postpartum depression on asthma exacerbation risk warrant further research.

GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

Fertility Challenges in Asthmatic Women: Examining the Complexities of Pregnancy Loss, Infertility, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Asthma is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition affecting a significant portion of women of reproductive age. While the impact of asthma on general health and well-being has been extensively studied, its association with fertility challenges in women remains an area of growing concern. This review article explores the complexities surrounding fertility challenges in asthmatic women, specifically focusing on pregnancy loss, infertility, and the utilization of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Various factors contribute to the heightened risk of pregnancy loss in asthmatic women, including the systemic inflammation associated with asthma, suboptimal asthma control, medication usage, and comorbidities. The review highlights the need for multidisciplinary management approaches to optimize asthma control before and during pregnancy, reducing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, the review investigates the potential impact of asthma on female fertility and the underlying mechanisms involved. Asthma-related factors, such as chronic inflammation, altered hormonal balance, and medication effects, may disrupt the delicate reproductive processes, leading to infertility. It emphasizes the importance of comprehensive fertility evaluations and personalized treatment strategies for asthmatic women experiencing difficulties conceiving. Additionally, the article explores the utilization of ARTs, including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in asthmatic women. It discusses the safety considerations and potential challenges associated with these techniques, such as the impact of asthma medications on oocyte quality, the effects of hormonal stimulation on asthma control, and the risk of exacerbations during the IVF process. The review underscores the importance of collaborative efforts among healthcare providers, including allergists, pulmonologists, obstetricians, and fertility specialists, to ensure optimal management of asthmatic women seeking to conceive. It emphasizes the significance of preconception counseling, meticulous asthma control, appropriate medication management, and individualized fertility treatments to enhance the reproductive outcomes in this population.