Timely Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Major Surgical Procedures

Identifying Risks and Opportunities in Outpatient Surgical Patient Safety: A Qualitative Analysis of Veterans Health Administration Staff Perceptions

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about patient safety risks in outpatient surgery. Inpatient surgical adverse events (AEs) risk factors include patient- (e.g., advanced age), process- (e.g., inadequate preoperative assessment), or structure-related characteristics (e.g., low surgical volume); however, these factors may differ from outpatient care where surgeries are often elective and in younger/healthier patients. We undertook an exploratory qualitative research project to identify risk factors for AEs in outpatient surgery.

METHODS

We developed a conceptual framework of patient, process, and structure factors associated with surgical AEs on the basis of a literature review. This framework informed our semistructured interview guide with (1) open-ended questions about a specific outpatient AE that the participant experienced and (2) outpatient surgical patient safety risk factors in general. We interviewed nationwide Veterans Health Administration surgical staff. Results were coded on the basis of categories in the conceptual framework, and additional themes were identified using content analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen providers representing diverse surgical roles participated. Ten reported witnessing an AE, and everyone provided input on risk factors in our conceptual framework. We did not find evidence that patient race/age, surgical technique, or surgical volume affected patient safety. Emerging factors included patient compliance, postoperative patient assessments/instruction, operating room equipment needs, and safety culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical staff are familiar with AEs and patient safety problems in outpatient surgery. Our results show that processes of care undertaken by surgical providers, as opposed to immutable patient characteristics, may affect the occurrence of AEs. The factors we identified may facilitate more targeted research on outpatient surgical AEs.

Decreasing surgical site infections in pediatric stoma closures

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) operations represent a significant proportion of the surgical site infection (SSI) burden in pediatric patients, resulting in significant morbidity. We have previously demonstrated that a GI bundle decreases SSI rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges. Following this success, we hypothesized that by targeting the preoperative antibiotics for stoma closures based on organisms found in infected wounds, we could further decrease SSI rates.

METHODS

As part of a broad quality improvement effort to reduce SSI rates, we reviewed the responsible pathogens and their sensitivities as well as the preoperative antibiotic used, and found that 15% of wound infections were caused by enterococcus. Based on this information, starting in April 2017, we changed the prior preoperative antibiotic cefoxitin to ampicillin-sulbactam, which more accurately targeted the prevalent pathogens from April 2017 to October 2018.

RESULTS

The baseline SSI rate for all stoma takedown patients was 21.4% (25 of 119). After bundle implementation, this decreased to 7.9% (17 of 221; p = 0.03) over a period of 2.5 years. Then, after changing the preoperative antibiotics, our rate of SSI decreased further to 2.2% (1 of 44; p = 0.039) over a period of 1.5 years.

CONCLUSION

Significant reduction of SSI in GI surgery can be accomplished with several prevention strategies (our GI bundle). Then a change of the preoperative antibiotic choice, chosen based on causative wound infection organisms, may further decrease SSI rates. We recommend an institution specific analysis of wound infections and modification of preoperative antibiotics if the responsible organisms are resistant to the original antibiotic choice.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infections are known postoperative complications, yet the most preventable of healthcare-associated infections. Correct provision of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is crucial. Use of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC) has been reported to improve provision of SAP, and reduce infections postoperatively. To understand possible mechanisms and interactions generating such effects, we explored the underlying work processes of SAP provision and SSC performance at the intersection of perioperative procedures and actual team working.

DESIGN

An ethnographic study including observations and in-depth interviews. A combination of deductive and inductive content analysis of the data was conducted.

SETTING

Operating theatres with different surgical specialities, in three Norwegian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Observations of perioperative team working (40 hours) and in-depth interviews of 19 experienced perioperative team members were conducted. Interview participants followed a maximum variation purposive sampling strategy.

RESULTS

Analysis identified provision of SAP as a process of linked activities; sequenced, yet disconnected in time and space throughout the perioperative phase. Provision of SAP was handled in relation to several interactive factors: preparation and administration, prescription accuracy, diversity of prescription order systems, patient-specific conditions and changes in operating theatre schedules. However, prescription checks were performed either as formal SSC reviews of SAP items or as informal checks of relevant documents. In addition, use of cognitive reminders and clinical experiences were identified as mechanisms used to enable administration of SAP within the 60 min timeframe described in the SSC.

CONCLUSION

Provision of SAP was identified as a complex process. Yet, a key element in provision of SAP was the given 60 min. timeframe of administration before incision, provided in the SSC. Thus, the SSC seems beneficial in supporting timely SAP administration practice by either being a cognitive tool and/or as a cognitive intervention.

Effective methods to decrease surgical site infections in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries represent a significant proportion of the surgical site infection (SSI) burden in pediatric patients, resulting in significant morbidity. Previous studies have shown that perioperative bundles reduce SSIs, but few have focused on pediatric GI operations. We hypothesized that a GI bundle would decrease SSI rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges.

METHODS

After establishing baseline SSI rates, a GI bundle was created and implemented in November 2014. We prospectively collected data including demographics, procedure type, LOS, inpatient charges, bundle compliance, and SSI development. We analyzed SSI rates, LOS, and charges using process control charts.

RESULTS

The baseline SSI rate for all GI operations was 3.4%, which increased to 7.1%, then decreased to 4.7%. Midgut/hindgut and stoma closure SSI rates decreased from 11.3% to 8.0% (p<0.05) and 21.4% to 7.9%, respectively (p<0.05). Although overall LOS and charges were unchanged, average LOS for midgut/hindgut surgeries and stoma closures decreased from 20.3 to 13.6days (p=0.015) and 12.6 to 7.9days (p=0.04), respectively. Stoma closure charges decreased from $94,262 to $50,088 (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our perioperative GI bundle decreased SSI rates, primarily among midgut/hindgut operations. Bundle usage decreased LOS and charges most effectively in stoma closures.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Adherence to guidelines of antibiotic prophylactic use in surgery: a prospective cohort study in North West Bank, Palestine

Background

Surgical site infection is a major contributor to increased mortality and health care costs globally which can be reduced by appropriate antibiotic prophylactic use. In Palestine, there is no published data about preoperative antibiotic use. This study aims to find the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis use by evaluating time of the first dose, antibiotic selection and duration after surgery in three governmental hospitals in North West Bank/ Palestine during 2011.

Methods

After approval of Institutional Review Board, a prospective cohort study included a total of 400 abdominal, orthopedic, and gynecological operations which were performed during study period. Trained clinical pharmacists observed selected 301 operations and followed the patient’s files for the three intended study parameters. Compliance of prophylactic antibiotic administration was evaluated according to published guidelines of the American Society for Hospital Pharmacist. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 applying descriptive methods. Relationship between guideline compliance and selected operation factors such as type of surgery, patient care unit, and hospital shift, in addition to provider’s age, gender, experience, and specialization were examined applying chi square test. The statistically significant factors with p < 0.01 were further analyzed using logistic regression model.

Results

Overall compliance for the studied parameters was very low (2%); only 59.8% received their first dose in appropriate time, 18.5% had appropriate antibiotic selection, and 31.8% of patients received antibiotic in appropriate duration. The OBGYN department had much better compliance regarding timing and duration of antibiotic use (P < 0.001), however the proper antibiotic selection was best adhered to for the abdominal surgeries (OR = 3.64, P = 0.002). Male providers were statistically significantly much less adherent to the timing of antibiotic dose (OR = 0.28, p < 0.001), but better adherent in antibiotic selection (OR = 0.191, p = 0.028). Anesthetic technicians showed higher compliance than nurses in timing and duration of antibiotic use.

Conclusions

Lack of guidelines explains the low adherence to appropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Palestine, with high rate of broad spectrum antibiotic use, long duration and inappropriate time of first dose .We recommend adopting guidelines for prophylaxis and training all health care providers accordingly.

ProvenCare lung cancer: a multi-institutional improvement collaborative

Geisinger's ProvenCare™ Program (for elective coronary artery bypass surgery, total hip replacement, and others) has shown that the principles of reliability science, facilitated by a robust electronic health record and institutional commitment, allow the re-engineering of complicated clinical processes. This eliminates unwarranted variation and promotes the completion of evidence-based elements of care. It has not been established that ProvenCare can be generalized to other institutions. Now, under the auspices of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, ProvenCare has been adapted to a multi-institutional collaborative for the care of the patient with resectable lung cancer.

Diminishing surgical site infections after colorectal surgery with surgical care improvement project: is it time to move on?

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections are a major source of expense and morbidity after colon resection.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of a targeted intervention to improve compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures on the incidence of surgical site infection.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort of patients was prospectively monitored.

SETTING

The investigation was conducted at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients underwent open colon resection with anastomosis.

INTERVENTION

A multidisciplinary committee consisting of a surgeon, anesthesiologist, nurses, and quality specialists was convened in late 2004 and a series of initiatives were designed, implemented, and tracked to improve performance on the 4 infection-related components of the Surgical Care Improvement Project program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Compliance with the 4 Surgical Care Improvement Project process measures and the rate of surgical site infection were documented.

RESULTS

There was no improvement in the use of appropriate antibiotics (P = .66), administration within 1 hour of incision (P = .11), cessation within 24 hours (P = .36), or achievement of normothermia (P = .46). Similarly, there was no effect whatsoever on the incidence of surgical site infection over the study period (P = .84).

LIMITATIONS

The single-institution nature of the study limited its usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-year multidisciplinary program of targeted initiatives and interventions failed to improve compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures or to decrease surgical site infection at our institution where colon resections are performed almost exclusively by high-volume specialists. These efforts consumed considerable resources and expenditures, but were of little or no value in our setting.

Timing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis administration: complexities of analysis

Background

The timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration is a patient safety outcome that is recurrently tracked and reported. The interpretation of these data has important implications for patient safety practices. However, diverse data collection methods and approaches to analysis impede knowledge building in this field. This paper makes explicit several challenges to quantifying the timing of prophylactic antibiotics that we encountered during a recent study and offers a suggested protocol for resolving these challenges.

Challenges

Two clear challenges manifested during the data extraction process: the actual classification of antibiotic timing, and the additional complication of multiple antibiotic regimens with different timing classifications in a single case. A formalized protocol was developed for dealing with incomplete, ambiguous and unclear documentation. A hierarchical coding system was implemented for managing cases with multiple antibiotic regimens.

Interpretation

Researchers who are tracking prophylactic antibiotic timing as an outcome measure should be aware that documentation of antibiotic timing in the patient chart is frequently incomplete and unclear, and these inconsistencies should be accounted for in analyses. We have developed a systematic method for dealing with specific problematic patterns encountered in the data. We propose that the general adoption of a systematic approach to analysis of this type of data will allow for cross-study comparisons and ensure that interpretation of results is on the basis of timing practices rather than documentation practices.

Pharmacokinetics of topical and intravenous cefazolin in patients with clean surgical wounds

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infection is a common postoperative nosocomial infection. Surgeons frequently treat operative patients with protective antibiotics and often choose cefazolin as the drug. Treatment schemes include both preoperative intravenous dosing and intraoperative dosing by irrigation. This study was designed to measure cefazolin concentrations both in serum and in wound drain fluid after intravenous dosing and after irrigation.

METHODS

The authors conducted an institutional review board-approved study involving randomized allocation of breast reduction patients to group 1 (preoperative intravenous dosing) or group 2 (intraoperative dosing by irrigation). Each patient had serum and wound drainage specimens measured over time for cefazolin concentrations. Cefazolin dosing was based on preparations commonly used in the authors' hospital. Results from 24 patients are reported.

RESULTS

Patients treated by conventional preoperative intravenous dosing displayed the expected serum degradation curve. These patients also demonstrated wound drainage concentrations (peak, 22.49 microg/ml) for approximately 4 to 5 hours. Measured concentrations were above the minimum therapeutic concentration (8 microg/ml) for Staphylococcus aureus. Patients treated by wound irrigation also demonstrated serum concentrations above minimum therapeutic concentration. In addition, these patients' wound drain fluid demonstrated very high cefazolin concentrations (peak, 4185.93 microg/ml), which remained high for 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Protective cefazolin concentrations in the wound can be achieved by both intravenous and irrigation delivery. Wound irrigation produces higher concentrations for longer periods of time.

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Initiative to Reduce Infection in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Which Performance Measures Affect Outcome?

One component of the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) by: 1) timing the administration of prophylactic antibiotics (PAs) within 1 hour of incision; 2) using approved PA regimens; and 3) discontinuing PA within 24 hours. We sought to evaluate institutional compliance with SCIP recommendations in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and determine whether they affected the incidence of SSI. One hundred four elective colorectal cases were reviewed. In 58 patients (56%), PAs were administered within 1 hour of incision. In 71 cases (68%), the PA choice was considered compliant. There were a total of 12 SSIs (11.5%) overall. The incidence of SSI was significantly higher in cases in which PAs were not administered within 1 hour of incision (10 of 46 or 22% vs two of 58 or 3.5%, P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSI in patients who received compliant versus noncompliant PA (12.7% vs 9.1%, P = 0.75). Timely PA administration significantly reduces the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Efforts should focus on ensuring that PAs are given in a timely manner to reduce SSI in colorectal surgery.

Expanded Surgical Time Out: A Key to Real-Time Data Collection and Quality Improvement

Some of the concepts contained here have been discussed and incorporated in another publication, but the data are entirely unique to this manuscript. (See: Transforming the Surgical "Time-Out" Into a Comprehensive "Preparatory Pause." Backster A, Teo A, Swift M, MD, Polk HC Jr, MD, FACS, Harken AH, MD, FACS. J Cardiac Surg, in press.)

BACKGROUND

The increasing push for quality improvement coincides with the slowly growing use of surgical time out (STO) to lessen the likelihood of wrong-site operation. We believe that the use of STO as a reflective pause or a preoperative briefing has broader value. The purpose of this article is to describe one institution's experience with this technique and to validate its potential use by others.

STUDY DESIGN

An enhanced use of STO was conducted in a 400-bed teaching hospital in calendar year 2006. Before and after conducts and constructs were rated.

RESULTS

The institution found the technique to be of value, and substantially clarified and improved its performances with respect to prophylactic antibiotic choice and timing; appropriate maintenance of intraoperative temperature and glycemia; and institution of secondary issues, such as maintenance of beta-blockade and appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Surgeon leadership and real-time data collection became essential and helpful components.

CONCLUSIONS

Prompt feedback to surgeons is vital; identification of future targets for performance improvement is feasible, although useless measures are eliminated. Because surgeons grapple with pay-for-performance, STO is a useful safety, data, and quality improvement tool.