Quality of Life in the Elderly with Rectal Cancer

Quality of life assessment for rectal cancer patients: A comparison between sphincter preservation and permanent colostomy

"This study aims to compare the quality of life in patients with rectal cancer between sphincter preservation and permanent colostomy. The present study is a cross-sectional study that was performed on 120 patients (60 cases in the sphincter maintenance group and 60 cases in the permanent colostomy group) who underwent surgery from February 2017 to November 2016. Quality of life assessment was provided with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Finally, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS23 software. According to the results of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, there was no statistically significant difference in patients' quality of life in terms of performance in the study groups (P˃0.05). Symptoms such as nausea, pain, shortness of breath, sleep disturbance, loss of appetite, constipation and economic problems in the study groups were not statistically significant (P˃0.05). But the mean symptoms of fatigue (P=0.038) and diarrhea (P=0.037) were significantly higher in the sphincter maintenance group than the permanent colostomy group. The mean score of patients' quality of life was 53.43 ± 8.40 in the sphincter retention group and 52.23 ± 11.45 in the permanent colostomy group (P = 0.556). According to the results, the quality of life in the two surgical methods of sphincter preservation and permanent colostomy was not statistically significant. Therefore, treatment decisions should be made by informing patients, both based on their preferences and the physician's clinical judgment."

The impact of postoperative complications on health-related quality of life in older patients with rectal cancer; a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

As result of the aging population and increasing rectal cancer incidence, more older patients undergo treatment for rectal cancer. This study compares treatment course, postoperative complications, and quality of life (QOL) between older and younger patients with rectal cancer and evaluates the impact of postoperative complications on QOL in the elderly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer participating in a prospective colorectal cancer cohort and referred for radiotherapy between 2013 and 2016 were included. QOL was assessed with the cancer questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) before treatment and at three, six, and twelve months. Outcomes were compared between older patients (≥70years) and younger patients (<70years) and stratified by presence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 115 (33%) older patients and 230 (67%) younger patients were included. Compared to younger patients, older patients underwent significantly more often short-course radiation with delayed surgery (6.1% and 19.1% respectively) and less often chemoradiation (62.6% and 39.1% respectively), and were more likely to undergo a Hartmann procedure with permanent stoma (3.5% and 13.0% respectively) instead of sphincter-sparing surgery (43.9% and 29.6% respectively). Postoperative complication rates were similar (38.5% in older patients versus 34.7% in younger patients). Older patients had worse physical functioning at six and twelve months after diagnosis compared to younger patients. Presence of postoperative complications had a significant stronger impact on physical- and role functioning in older patients.

CONCLUSION

Older patients undergo more often a tailored treatment approach for rectal cancer than younger patients. With this tailored approach, similar postoperative complication rates and QOL are achieved. However, postoperative complications have a larger negative impact on physical- and role functioning in older patients which indicates a need for better prediction of postoperative complications in the elderly.

Patient's age should not play a key role in clinical decisions on surgical treatment of rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant treatments have decreased morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of aging on the choice, feasibility and safety of various treatment modalities in patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 2003-2006, a total of 274 rectal cancers were diagnosed at Turku University Central Hospital. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment modalities chosen, and complications were recorded, and patients were followed up prospectively for 1-3 years after treatment. Patients were then divided into two groups: under 75 (n=181) and 75 years or older (n=93) at the moment of diagnosis. Patient data in the two age groups were analysed and compared with each other.

RESULTS

Of the total of 274 patients with rectal cancer, 243 (89%) underwent surgery. The percentage of patients operated was higher (p=0.03) in the younger (92%) than in the older group (83%). The main reasons for non-operative or palliative treatment were severe concomitant diseases and metastasized cancer. Preoperative radiation therapy was given more often (p<0.01) to young (72%) than old (27%) patients. With these selections, there was no difference in 30-day postoperative mortality (1% vs 1%, ns) or postoperative complications (22% vs 34%, ns) between two groups.

CONCLUSION

With preoperative selection, patients over 75 with rectal cancer are suitable for major surgery, as morbidity and mortality rates are comparable to those in younger patients.

A systematic review of the use and validation of health-related quality of life instruments in older cancer patients

AIM

The aim of this paper is to systematically review the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in older cancer patients.

METHOD

A systematic review of 5 databases and 3 research registers identified studies reporting the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in cancer patients aged over 65 years from 1995 to mid 2007.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies reported the use of HRQOL measures in older people, using a range of generic and disease-specific instruments. Little work was reported in patients aged over 80 years. All studies exhibited methodological limitations. Fourteen studies were identified with variable evidence on the psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of identified instruments.

CONCLUSION

Our review identified that the development, validation and use of HRQOL instruments often ignore the specific needs of older people. This review highlights the need for a HRQOL instrument specifically designed to capture the issues and concerns most relevant to older cancer patients.