Combined nephrectomy and major hepatectomy: indications, outcomes, and recommendations

A case report of liver infiltration from a large renal cell carcinoma: Diagnostic and management enigma

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Renal cell carcinoma is the most lethal malignancy of urinary tract. Invasion of right lobe of liver by Renal cell carcinoma is rare and possess a treatment challenge. Simultaneous nephrectomy with right hepatectomy has been proposed as a part of multi-modality treatment approach. But its safety and feasibility is not well established.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein discuss a case of 30-year old female patient who underwent simultaneous nephrectomy with right hepatectomy along with single peritoneal metastasectomy for a huge Renal cell carcinoma of right kidney and infiltrating the right lobe of liver. Intra-operatively a single peritoneal nodule was present which came positive for malignancy on frozen section. Considering young age, good performance status and oligometastatic disease definitive procedure in the form of combined right nephrectomy and right hepatectomy was performed. She was discharged from the hospital on 6th post-operative day with an uneventful post-operative course.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The patients with locally advanced Renal cell carcinoma with involvement of adjacent organs require en block surgical resection in combination with targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The surgical management of patients with direct liver infiltration requires a right nephrectomy with some form of liver resection based on the extent of liver involvement to achieve a margin negative resection. In our case a plan of formal right hepatectomy was made as the tumor was infiltrating into segment VI, VII, and VIII.

CONCLUSION

The combined nephrectomy and right hepatectomy is safe and feasible for this type of huge RCC invading right hepatic lobe.

Morbidity and mortality of multivisceral resection with radical nephrectomy for locally advanced renal cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can rarely invade into adjacent abdominal viscera without clinical evidence of distant metastases. The role of multivisceral resection (MVR) of involved adjacent organs at the time of radical nephrectomy (RN) remains poorly described and quantified. Using a national database, we aimed to evaluate the association between RN+MVR and 30-day postoperative complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing RN for RCC with and without MVR between 2005 and 2020 using the ACS-NSQIP database. The primary outcome was a composite of any of the following 30-day major postoperative complications: mortality, reoperation, cardiac event, and neurologic event. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the composite primary outcome, as well as infectious and venous thromboembolic complications, unplanned intubation and ventilation, transfusion, readmission, and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Groups were balanced using propensity score matching. Likelihood of complications was assessed by conditional logistic regression adjusted for unbalanced total operation time. Postoperative complications were compared by Fisher's exact test among subtypes of resection.

RESULTS

A total of 12,417 patients were identified: 12,193 (98.2%) undergoing RN alone and 224 (1.8%) undergoing RN+MVR. Patients undergoing RN+MVR were more likely to experience major complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.74). However, there was no significant association between RN+MVR and postoperative mortality (OR 2.49; 95% CI 0.89-7.01). RN+MVR was associated with higher rates of reoperation (OR 7.85; 95% CI 2.38-25.8), sepsis (OR 5.45; 95% CI 1.83-16.2), surgical site infection (OR 4.41; 95% CI 2.14-9.07), blood transfusion (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.55-3.22), readmission (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.11-2.84), infectious complications (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.62-4.24), and longer hospital stay (5 days [IQR 3-8] vs. 4 days [IQR 3-7]; OR 2.31 [95% CI 2.13-3.03]).  There was no heterogeneity in the association between subtype of MVR and major complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Undergoing RN+MVR is associated with an increased risk of 30-day postoperative morbidity, including infectious complications, reoperation, blood transfusion, prolonged LOS, and readmission.

Renal Cell Carcinoma with or without Tumor Thrombus Invading the Liver, Pancreas and Duodenum

Simple Summary

Renal cell carcinoma rarely invades the surrounding visceral structures. While surgical extirpation has been the mainstay of treatment for the localized disease, the role of surgery in cases of venous involvement, adjacent invasion or distant metastasis remains controversial. Furthermore, the surgical option may represent a challenge. A large series of locally advanced renal cancer with involvement of the liver, pancreas, and/or duodenum, sometimes in conjunction with tumor thrombus extending inside the inferior vena cava is herein reported. Our series establishes the technical feasibility of this complex surgical procedure with acceptable complication rates, no perioperative death, and potential for durable response. With the use of new systemic therapy schedules, these patients will probably have a better opportunity of survival extension.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of a series of patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent radical nephrectomy, tumor thrombectomy, and visceral resection. Patients and methods: 18 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment in the period 2003-2019 were included. Neoplastic extension was found extending into the pancreas, duodenum, and liver in 9(50%), 2(11.1%), and 7(38.8%) patients, respectively. Seven patients (38.8%) presented also inferior vena cava tumor thrombus level I (n = 3), II (n = 2), or III (n = 2). The resection was tailored according to the degree of invasiveness. Demographics, clinical presentation, disease characteristics, surgical details, 30-day postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Median age was 56 years (range: 40–76). Median tumor size was 14.5 cm (range, 8.8–22), and 10 cm (range: 4–15) for those cases with pancreatico-duodenal and liver involvement, respectively. Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 475 mL (range: 100–4000) and resulted higher for those cases requiring thrombectomy (300 mL vs. 750 mL). Nine patients (50%) required transfusions with a median requirement of 4 units (range: 2–8). No perioperative deaths were registered in the first 30 days. Overall complication rate was 44.4%. Major complications were detected in 6/18 patients (33.3%). Overall median follow-up was 24 months (range: 0–108). Five-year OS (actuarial) rate was 89.9% and 75%, for 9/11 patients with pancreatico-duodenal involvement and 6/7 patients with liver invasion, respectively. Conclusion: Our series establishes the technical feasibility of this procedure with acceptable complication rates, no deaths, and potential for durable response.

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma patients with liver metastasis

It is widely accepted that renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with liver metastasis (LM) carries a dismal prognosis. We aimed to explore the value of cytoreductive nephrectomy among these patients. Patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to select the prognostic predictors of survival. Patients were divided into nephrectomy and non-nephrectomy groups. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analyses were applied to reduce the above factors' differences between the groups. Overall survival (OS) was compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Data from 683 patients were extracted from the database. The univariate Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression revealed that factors including age, histologic type, T and N stages, lung metastasis, brain metastasis, and nephrectomy were significant predictors of survival in the patients. After the PSM analyses, we found that nephrectomy prolonged OS. Nephrectomy can prolong OS in eligible RCC patients with LM.

Surgical management of hepato-pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

AIM

To investigate the outcomes of liver and pancreatic resections for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastatic disease.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single centre review of liver and/or pancreatic resections for RCC metastases between January 2003 and December 2015. Descriptive statistical analysis and survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier estimation were performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had 7 pancreatic and 7 liver resections, with median follow-up 33 mo (range: 3-98). Postoperative complications were recorded in 5 cases, with no postoperative mortality. Three patients after hepatic and 5 after pancreatic resection developed recurrent disease. Median overall survival was 94 mo (range: 23-94) after liver and 98 mo (range: 3-98) after pancreatic resection. Disease-free survival was 10 mo (range 3-55) after liver and 28 mo (range 3-53) after pancreatic resection.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that despite the high incidence of recurrence, long term survival can be achieved with resection of hepatic and pancreatic RCC metastases in selected cases and should be considered as a management option in patients with oligometastatic disease.

A safe combined nephrectomy and right lobectomy using the liver hanging maneuver for huge renal cell carcinoma directly invading the right lobe of the liver: report of a case

We herein discuss a patient who underwent simultaneous combined right nephrectomy and right lobectomy of the liver. A 64-year-old male was diagnosed with a huge right renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 13 cm in diameter, which was invading directly into the right hepatic lobe. This type of RCC has been rarely reported, and an anterior approach using the liver hanging maneuver was extremely useful during hepatic parenchymal dissection. The liver parenchymal dissection was performed prior to mobilization of the liver, because the mobilization of the right lobe of the liver was impossible. During the hepatic parenchymal resection, the liver was suspended with the tape and transected, and thereafter, retroperitoneal dissection, nephrectomy and right lobectomy of the liver were completed. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 12th postoperative day with an uneventful clinical course. The anterior approach using the liver hanging maneuver during hepatic parenchymal resection can be safe and feasible for huge RCC invading the right hepatic lobe.

Blood Loss and Massive Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Oncological Surgery: What Do We Know?

Patients with solid malignancies who were not candidates for tumor resections in the past are now presenting for extensive oncological resections. Cancer patients are at risk for thromboembolic complications due to an underlying hypercoagulable state; however, some patients may have an increased risk for bleeding due to the effects of chemotherapy, the administration of anticoagulant drugs, tumor-related fibrinolysis, tumor location, tumor vascularity, and extent of disease. A common potential complication of all complex oncological surgeries is massive intra- and postoperative hemorrhage and the subsequent risk for massive blood transfusion. This can be anticipated or unexpected. Several surgical and anesthesia interventions including preoperative tumor embolization, major vessel occlusion, hemodynamic manipulation, and perioperative antifibrinolytic therapy have been used to prevent or control blood loss with varying success. The exact incidence of massive blood transfusion in oncological surgery is largely unknown and/or underreported. The current literature mostly consists of purely descriptive observational studies. Thus, recommendation regarding specific perioperative intervention cannot be made at this point, and more research is warranted.

Liver directed therapy for renal cell carcinoma

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the liver portrays a poor prognosis and liver directed therapy remains controversial. We aimed to determine potential selection criteria for patients who might benefit from this strategy.

Materials and Methods: We evaluated 247 consecutive patients with RCC metastatic to the liver from a prospectively maintained database.

Results: Eighteen patients received liver directed therapy (18/247, 7%). Ten patients underwent liver resection (10/247, 4%) and eight patients underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA, 8/247, 3%). All were rendered free of disease in the liver. Five had synchronous liver disease and underwent synchronous resections with their primary. Mortality was 0%. Fourteen had single (surgery 7, RFA 7) and four (surgery 3, RFA 1) had multiple liver lesions, respectively. Median size of lesions was 5cm (0.5 - 10cm) and 2.5cm (1 - 6cm) in the surgery and RFA groups, respectively. Median DFI was 10 months, and no difference was observed in those with a longer vs. shorter than median DFI (p = 0.95); liver specific progression free survival for the surgery and RFA groups were 4 and 6 months, respectively (p= 0.93). 1, 3 and 5-year actuarial survivals for the whole group were 89%, 40%, 27%. Median survival for the surgery group was 24 (3 to 254+) months, and for the RFA group 15.6 (7-56+) months (p = 0.56). Metachronous liver disease was associated with prolonged survival (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Liver directed therapy for RCC is safe. For highly selected patients with metachronous liver RCC metastases, liver directed therapy should be considered in a multidisciplinary manner.