Should a routine metastatic workup be performed for all patients with pathologic N2/N3 breast cancer?

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer

As the proportion of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer increases, the role of imaging for staging and surveillance purposes should be determined based on evidence-based guidelines. It is important to understand the indications for extent of disease evaluation and staging, as unnecessary imaging can delay care and even result in adverse outcomes. In asymptomatic patients that received treatment for curative intent, there is no role for imaging to screen for distant recurrence. Routine surveillance with an annual 2-D mammogram and/or tomosynthesis is recommended to detect an in-breast recurrence or a new primary breast cancer in women with a history of breast cancer, and MRI is increasingly used as an additional screening tool in this population, especially in women with dense breasts. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer

Background

In Ontario, there is no clearly defined standard of care for staging for distant metastasis in women with newly diagnosed and biopsy-confirmed breast cancer whose clinical presentation is suggestive of early-stage disease. This guideline addresses baseline imaging investigations for women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic for distant metastasis.

Methods

The medline and embase databases were systematically searched for evidence from January 2000 to April 2019, and the best available evidence was used to draft recommendations relevant to the use of baseline imaging investigation in women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic. Final approval of this practice guideline was obtained from both the Staging in Early Stage Breast Cancer Advisory Committee and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care.

Recommendations

These recommendations apply to all women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer (originating in the breast) who have no symptoms of distant metastasis Staging tests using conventional anatomic imaging [chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (ct)] or metabolic imaging modalities [integrated positron-emission tomography (pet)/ct, integrated pet/magnetic resonance imaging (mri), bone scintigraphy] should not be routinely ordered for women newly diagnosed with clinical stage i or stage ii breast cancer who have no symptoms of distant metastasis, regardless of biomarker status. In women newly diagnosed with stage iii breast cancer, baseline staging tests using either anatomic imaging (chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomen-pelvis ct) or metabolic imaging modalities (pet/ct, pet/mri, bone scintigraphy) should be considered regardless of whether the patient is symptomatic for distant metastasis and regardless of biomarker profile.

Clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules in patients with breast cancer

Patients with breast cancer are increasingly likely to have chest computed tomography (CT) performed. In many cases, small lung nodules will be detected, raising concern for metastases and causing considerable patient anxiety. The majority of these nodules, however, are benign, though the specific probability of malignancy is uncertain in any given case. Therefore, we analyzed the results of chest CT scans of a large number of patients with breast cancer, to determine characteristics and clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules. 3313 patients were investigated, and 4889 CT scans from 1325 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 1325 patients, 812 (59 %) had at least one noncalcified lung nodule, of which 330 (41 %) had malignant nodules, 197 (24 %) had large (≥10 mm) nodules, and 586 (72 %) had multiple nodules. Large nodules were more often malignant than benign (P < 0.001). In patients with multiple large nodules, the rate of malignancy rate was 83 %, and most of these were metastases. In the case of very small (2-4 mm) nodules, the malignancy rates for solitary and multiple nodules were 8 and 20 %, respectively. Lung metastases were more likely with breast cancer cell grade 3 (22 %) than grade 1-2 (10 %) (P < 0.001) and when patients were clinical stage 2-3 (14 %) than stage 0-1 (7.9 %) (P = 0.03). Lung metastases are highly likely in patients with multiple nodules greater than 10 mm. Higher cancer cell grades and clinical stage are also related to an increased likelihood of lung metastases. The great majority of small lung nodules in breast cancer patients are benign.

Variation in metastatic workup for patients with invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite guidelines, surgeons vary in the metastatic workup they order for their breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Surgeons were surveyed as to their practices in ordering staging studies for their breast cancer patients using a Web-based survey. Nonparametric analyses were performed to determine factors associated with guideline adherence.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three surgeons responded to the survey; 55.8% had practices with ≥50% breast patients; 7.3% of respondents stated they always did a metastatic workup before surgery, 8.6% never did; only 52.4% ordered a metastatic workup only in patients with clinical stage III disease. Surgeons who had ≥50% breast-related practices were more likely to follow these guidelines (P = .031). Only 17% stated that a computed tomography chest/abdomen and bone scan was their "usual" metastatic workup.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 40% of surgeons perform metastatic workup when they are not indicated, and few adhere to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in terms of the tests ordered.