1
|
D’Souza J, Richards S, Eglinton T, Frizelle F. Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293806. [PMID: 37972100 PMCID: PMC10653493 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. These are considered preventable, although the true extent is yet to be defined. In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due to significant heterogeneity in this field of research. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to identify the clinically relevant predictors of UR after colorectal surgery. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Embase) to search for published studies in English between 1996 and 2022. The search strategy returned 625 studies for screening of which, 150 were duplicates, and 305 were excluded for irrelevance. An additional 150 studies were excluded based on methodology and definition criteria. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and for the meta-analysis. Independent meta-extraction was conducted by multiple reviewers (JD & SR) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was defined as UR within 30 days of index discharge after colorectal surgery. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS The reported 30-day UR rate ranged from 6% to 22.8%. Increased comorbidity was the strongest preoperative risk factor for UR (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51). Stoma formation was the strongest operative risk factor (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.72). The occurrence of postoperative complications was the strongest postoperative and overall risk factor for UR (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.21-7.61). CONCLUSIONS Increased comorbidity, stoma formation, and postoperative complications are clinically relevant predictors of UR after CRS. These risk factors are readily identifiable before discharge and serve as clinically relevant targets for readmission risk-reducing strategies. Successful readmission prediction may facilitate the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel D’Souza
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Simon Richards
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Timothy Eglinton
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Frank Frizelle
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sebastian S, Segal JP, Hedin C, Pellino G, Kotze PG, Adamina M, Campmans-Kuijpers M, Davies J, de Vries AC, Casbas AG, El-Hussuna A, Juillerat P, Meade S, Millán M, Spinelli A. ECCO Topical Review: Roadmap to Optimal Peri-Operative Care in IBD. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:153-169. [PMID: 36055337 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimize outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of IBD healthcare providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology. RESULTS A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation, and immediate postoperative care. CONCLUSION Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaji Sebastian
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Northern Hospital Epping, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná [PUCPR], Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marjo Campmans-Kuijpers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ana Gutiérrez Casbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, ISABIAL and CIBERehd, Alicante, Spain
| | - Alaa El-Hussuna
- OpenSourceResearch organisation (osrc.network), Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Susanna Meade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Monica Millán
- General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vigorita V, Cano-Valderrama O, Celentano V, Vinci D, Millán M, Spinelli A, Pellino G. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Benefit from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery [ERAS] Protocol: A Systematic Review with Practical Implications. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:845-851. [PMID: 34935916 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery [ERAS] is widely adopted in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with demonstrated benefits. Few studies have assessed the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ERAS in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. The aim of this study was to investigate the current adoption and outcomes of ERAS in IBD. METHODS This PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the literature included all articles reporting on adult patients with IBD who underwent colorectal surgery within an ERAS pathway. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. Endpoints included ERAS adoption, perioperative outcomes, and ERAS items more consistently reported, with associated evidence levels [EL] [PROSPERO CRD42021238653]. RESULTS Out of 217 studies, 16 totalling 2347 patients were included. The median number of patients treated was 50.5. Malnutrition and anaemia optimisation were only included as ERAS items in six and four articles, respectively. Most of the studies included the following items: drinking clear fluids until 2 h before the surgery, fluid restriction, nausea prophylaxis, early feeding, and early mobilisation. Only two studies included postoperative stoma-team and IBD-team evaluation before discharge. Highest EL were observed for ileocaecal Crohn's disease resection [EL2]. Median in-hospital stay was 5.2 [2.9-10.7] days. Surgical site infections and anastomotic leaks ranged between 3.1-23.5% and 0-3.4%, respectively. Complications occurred in 5.7-48%, and mortality did not exceed 1%. CONCLUSIONS Evidence on ERAS in IBD is lacking, but this group of patients might benefit from consistent adoption of the pathway. Future studies should define if IBD-specific ERAS pathways and selection criteria are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Vigorita
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.,General Surgery Research Group, SERGAS-UVIGO, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute [IIS Galicia Sur], Vigo, Spain
| | - Oscar Cano-Valderrama
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.,General Surgery Research Group, SERGAS-UVIGO, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute [IIS Galicia Sur], Vigo, Spain
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Millán
- General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe deValencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alyabsi M, Charlton M, Meza J, Islam KMM, Soliman A, Watanabe-Galloway S. Comparison of Urban-Rural Readmission Rates After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Findings From a Privately Insured Population. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211027169. [PMID: 34387106 PMCID: PMC8369964 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211027169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the 30-day readmission rate of a privately insured population diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had primary tumor resection in rural and urban communities. METHODS Claims data of people aged <65 with a diagnosis of CRC between 2012 and 2016 and enrolled in a private health plan administered by BlueCross BlueShield of Nebraska were analyzed. Readmission was defined as the number of discharged patients who were readmitted within 30 days, divided by all discharged patients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the factors associated with readmission. RESULTS The urban population had a higher readmission rate (11%) than the rural population (8%). Although the adjusted odds ratio showed that there is no difference in readmission between rural and urban residents, patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of >1 were more likely than those without CCI to be readmitted (OR 3.59, 1.41-9.11). Patients with open vs. laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.80, 1.39-5.63) and those with an obstructed or perforated colon vs. none (OR 7.17, 3.75-13.72) were more likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSIONS Readmission after CRC surgery occurs frequently. Interventions that target the identified risk factors should reduce readmission rates in this privately insured population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesnad Alyabsi
- Population Health Research Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mary Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jane Meza
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - K. M. Monirul Islam
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Amr Soliman
- Community Health and Social Medicine, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmission rate is an important quality metric and has been recognized as a key measure of hospital value-based purchasing programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the risk factors for hospital readmission with a focus on potentially preventable early readmissions within 48 hours of discharge. DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a tertiary academic facility with a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. PATIENTS Consecutive patients undergoing elective major colorectal resections between 2011 and 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Univariable and multivariable risk factors for overall and early (<48 hours) readmissions were identified. Specific surgical and medical reasons for readmission were compared between early and late readmissions. RESULTS In total, 526 of 4204 patients (12.5%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Independent risk factors were ASA score (≥3; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2), excess perioperative weight gain (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3), ileostomy (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1-2), and transfusion (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.4-3), or reoperation (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 7.4-17.5) during the index stay. No potentially preventable risk factor for early readmission (128 patients, 24.3% of all readmissions, 3% of total cohort) was identified, and index hospital stay of ≤3 days was not associated with increased readmission (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2). Although ileus and small-bowel obstruction (early: 43.8% vs late: 15.5%, p < 0.001) were leading causes for early readmissions, deep infections (3.9% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (0% vs 5%, p = 0.006) were mainly observed during readmissions after 48 hours. LIMITATIONS Risk of underreporting due to loss of follow-up and the potential co-occurrence of complications were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS Early hospital readmission was mainly due to ileus or bowel obstruction, whereas late readmissions were related to deep infections and acute kidney injury. A suspicious attitude toward potential ileus-related symptoms before discharge and dedicated education for ostomy patients are important. A short index hospital stay was not associated with increased readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B237. REINGRESOS DENTRO DE LAS 48 HORAS POSTERIORES AL ALTA: RAZONES, FACTORES DE RIESGO Y POSIBLES MEJORAS: La tasa de reingreso hospitalario es una métrica de calidad importante y ha sido reconocida como una medida clave de los programas hospitalarios de compras basadas en el valor.Evaluar los factores de riesgo para el reingreso hospitalario con énfasis en reingresos tempranos potencialmente prevenibles dentro de las 48 horas posteriores al alta.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Institución académica terciaria con programa de recuperación mejorada estandarizado.Pacientes consecutivos sometidos a resecciones colorrectales mayores electivas entre 2011 y 2016.Se identificaron factores de riesgo uni y multivariables para reingresos totales y tempranos (<48 horas). Se compararon razones médicas y quirúrgicas específicas para el reingreso entre reingresos tempranos y tardíos.En total, 526/4204 pacientes (12,5%) fueron readmitidos dentro de los 30 días posteriores al alta. Los factores de riesgo independientes fueron puntuación ASA (≥3, OR 1.5; IC 95% 1.1-2), aumento de peso perioperatorio excesivo (OR 1.7; IC 95% 1.3-2.3), ileostomía (OR 1.4, IC 95%: 1-2) y transfusión (OR 2, IC 95% 1.4-3) o reoperación (OR 11.4; IC 95% 7.4-17.5) durante la estadía índice. No se identificó ningún factor de riesgo potencialmente prevenible para el reingreso temprano (128 pacientes, 24.3% de todos los reingresos, 3% de la cohorte total), y la estadía hospitalaria índice de ≤ 3 días no se asoció con un aumento en el reingreso (OR 0.9; IC 95% 0.7-1.2) Mientras que el íleo / obstrucción del intestino delgado (temprano: 43.8% vs. tardío: 15.5%, p < 0.001) fueron las principales causas de reingresos tempranos, infecciones profundas (3.9% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001) y lesión renal aguda (0 vs 5%, p = 0.006) se observaron principalmente durante los reingresos después de 48 horas.Riesgo de subregistro debido a la pérdida en el seguimiento, posible co-ocurrencia de complicaciones.El reingreso hospitalario temprano se debió principalmente a íleo u obstrucción intestinal, mientras que los reingresos tardíos se relacionaron con infecciones profundas y lesión renal aguda. Es importante tener una actitud suspicaz hacia los posibles síntomas relacionados con el íleo antes del alta y una educación específica para los pacientes con ostomía. La estadía hospitalaria índice corta no se asoció con mayores tasas de reingreso. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B237.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bicudo-Salomão A, Salomão RDF, Cuerva MP, Martins MS, Dock-Nascimento DB, Aguilar-Nascimento JED. FACTORS RELATED TO THE REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN COLORECTAL SURGERY WITHIN PERIOPERATIVE CARE RECOMMENDED BY THE ACERTO PROTOCOL. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 32:e1477. [PMID: 31859930 PMCID: PMC6918738 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background: Perioperative care multimodal protocol significantly improve outcome in surgery. Aim: To investigate risk factors to various endpoints in patients submitted to elective colorectal operations under the ACERTO protocol. Methods: Cohort study analyzing through a logistic regression model able to assess independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality, patients submitted to elective open colon and/or rectum resection and primary anastomosis who were either exposed or non-exposed to demographic, clinical, and ACERTO interventions. Results: Two hundred thirty four patients were analyzed and submitted to 156 (66.7%) rectal and 78 (33.3%) colonic procedures. The length of hospital postoperative stay (LOS) ≥ 7 days was related to rectal surgery and high NNIS risk index; preoperative fasting ≤4 h (OR=0.250; CI95=0.114-0.551) and intravenous volume of crystalloid infused > 30ml/kg/day (OR=0.290; CI95=0.119-0.706). The risk of postoperative site infection (SSI) was approximately four times greater in malnourished; eight in rectal surgery and four in high NNIS index. The duration of preoperative fasting ≤4 h was a protective factor by reducing by 81.3% the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). An increased risk for anastomotic fistula was found in malnutrition, rectal surgery and high NNIS index. Conversely, preoperative fasting ≤4 h (OR=0.11; CI95=0.05-0.25; p<0.0001) decreased the risk of fistula. Factors associated with pneumonia-atelectasis were cancer and rectal surgery, while preoperative fasting ≤ 4 h (OR=0.10; CI95=0.04-0.24; p<0.0001) and intravenous crystalloid ≤ 30 ml/kg/day (OR=0.36; CI95=0.13-0.97, p=0.044) shown to decrease the risk. Mortality was lower with preoperative fasting ≤4 h and intravenous crystalloids infused ≤30 ml/kg/day. Conclusion: This study allows to conclude that rectal procedures, high NNIS index, preoperative fasting higher than 4 h and intravenous fluids greater than 30 ml/kg/day during the first 48 h after surgery are independent risk factors for: 1) prolonged LOS; 2) surgical site infection and anastomotic fistula associated with malnutrition; 3) postoperative pneumonia-atelectasis; and 4) postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Bicudo-Salomão
- Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
| | | | - Mariani Parra Cuerva
- Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
| | - Michelle Santos Martins
- Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fisher AV, Campbell-Flohr SA, Sell L, Osterhaus E, Acher AW, Leahy-Gross K, Brenny-Fitzpatrick M, Kind AJH, Carayon P, Abbott DE, Winslow ER, Greenberg CC, Fernandes-Taylor S, Weber SM. Adaptation and Implementation of a Transitional Care Protocol for Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Surgery. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018; 44:741-750. [PMID: 30097384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional care protocols are effective at reducing readmission for medical patients, yet no evidence-based protocols exist for surgical patients. A transitional care protocol was adapted to meet the needs of patients discharged to home after major abdominal surgery. APPROACH The Coordinated-Transitional Care (C-TraC) protocol, initially designed for medical patients, was used as the initial framework for the development of a surgery-specific protocol (sC-TraC). Adaptation was accomplished using a modification of the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) model, which has four phases: (1) preconditions, (2) preimplementation, (3) implementation, and (4) maintenance and evolution. A random sample of five patients each month was selected to complete a phone survey regarding patient satisfaction. Preimplementation planning allowed for integration with current systems, avoided duplication of processes, and defined goals for the protocol. The adapted protocol specifically addressed surgical issues such as nutrition, fever, ostomy output, dehydration, drain character/output, and wound appearance. After protocol launch, the rapid iterative adaptation process led to changes in phone call timing, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discharge instructions. OUTCOMES Survey responders reported 100% overall satisfaction with the transitional care program. KEY INSIGHTS The adaptable nature of sC-TraC may allow for low-resource hospitals, such as rural or inner-city medical centers, to use the methodology provided in this study for implementation of local phone-based transitional care protocols. In addition, as the C-TraC program has begun to disseminate nationally across US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and rural health settings, sC-TraC may be implemented using the existing transitional care infrastructure in place at these hospitals.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang J, Xiao J, Feng J, Li K. One-year Unplanned Readmission After Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Western China. J INVEST SURG 2018; 32:602-606. [PMID: 29851535 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1443176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Readmissions are common after colorectal cancer surgery. There are limited data related one-year unplanned readmission after colorectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to ascertain the incidence rate of unplanned readmission in Western China, identify causes and risk factors of one-year unplanned readmission (UR) in patients who underwent enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study using a CRC surgery database of patients treated in West China Hospital was performed. Patients who underwent enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal cancer surgery between January 2013 and May 2016 were investigated. The postoperative follow-up data were all routinely recorded for up to one year or more, the one-year unplanned readmission rate after initial discharge and major reasons for UR were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analyses was used to identify risk factors of UR. Results: A total of 446 patients were included, with 18.6% of patients readmitted. In a multivariable analysis, preoperative comorbidity was associated with the largest risk of readmission (odds ratio, 2.91[95% CI, 1.32- 6.99]). The main reason of readmission within 30 days after discharge was wound bleeding or infection. While intestinal obstruction was the major cause for readmission after 3 months of discharge. Conclusions: One-year unplanned readmission occurs frequently after CRC in Western China and is strongly associated with preoperative comorbidity. Attention should be paid to wound healing at the early stage of discharge, and bowel obstruction 3 months after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Sichuan , P.R.China
| | - Jun Xiao
- Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Sichuan , P.R.China
| | - Jinhua Feng
- Department of Gastrointestinal, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Sichuan , P.R.China
| | - Ka Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Sichuan , P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:641-648. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1667-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2017] [Accepted: 07/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
10
|
Decreasing readmissions by focusing on complications and underlying reasons. Am J Surg 2017; 215:557-562. [PMID: 28760355 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze demographics and outcomes of patients focusing on 30-day readmission status and identify procedure-specific risk factors. METHODS Patients undergoing abdominal colorectal surgery (2011-2013) were identified Demographics and outcomes including in-hospital complications were compared based on readmission status. RESULTS A total of 6637 patients were identified with a mean age of 51.2(±17.1) years. Seven hundred and seventy five(11.7%) patients were readmitted at least once within 30-day. The most common index procedures related to readmission were stoma closure (n = 127/775, 16.4%) and total colectomy (n = 105/775, 13.6%). Readmitted patients had longer length of index hospital stay (LOS)(8.2 ± 5.9 vs 7.9 ± 6.9 days,p < 0.001) and operative time(167 ± 104 vs 144 ± 95 min, p < 0.001), higher intraoperative(2% vs 1%,p = 0.04) and in-hospital complication rates(36% vs 28%,p < 0.001). Main reasons for readmissions were gastrointestinal-related causes(n = 222, 29%), small bowel obstruction (n = 133,17%), wound-related complications(n = 108,14%), and dehydration(n = 93,12%). Median readmission LOS was 4(1-71)days and 54%(n = 407) of readmissions occurred within 7 days of discharge. CONCLUSION Increased postoperative complications may be the main preventable underlying reason for increased risk of hospital readmission after colorectal surgery. Preventive measures to decrease complications and actions to identify high risk patients for complications would help to reduce readmissions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors associated with readmission stratified by the day of postdischarge rehospitalization after colorectal surgery have not been characterized previously. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify factors leading to readmission on a day-to-day basis after discharge from colorectal surgery. DESIGN This was a retrospective analysis of patients readmitted within 30-days after colorectal surgery. Reasons and factors associated with readmission each day after discharge were evaluated. Early readmitted patients (day 0-5 postdischarge) were compared with those readmitted later (day 6-29 postdischarge). SETTINGS The study was conducted at a tertiary center. PATIENTS Patients included those who had undergone primary colorectal resection from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012-2013). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The study intended to identify factors associated with any early versus late hospital readmission and to evaluate diagnoses for unplanned readmissions on a day-to-day basis after discharge. RESULTS For 69,222 elective colorectal procedures, 7476 patients (10.8%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. Early (median, 3 days) and late (median, 11 days) readmissions were 3278 (43.8%) and 4198 (56.2%). Except for sex, patient demographics were similar between groups. Neurologic comorbidity; wound disruption; sepsis or septic shock; unplanned reintubation and reoperation; anastomotic leak and ileus; and neurological, cardiovascular, and pulmonary complications were significantly higher in the early readmission, whereas disseminated malignancy, stoma creation, and renal/urological complications were significantly higher in the late readmission group. On multivariable analysis, early readmission was significantly associated with male patients, wound disruption, sepsis or septic shock, reoperation, reintubation, and postoperative neurological complications. Disseminated malignancy, ostomy creation, and postoperative renal dysfunction/urological infection were associated with delayed readmission. LIMITATIONS Thirty-day readmissions and reasons for unplanned rehospitalizations were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Differing factors are associated with early versus late readmission after colorectal resection. These data suggest that early readmission is intricately related to patient and operative complexity and hence may be inevitable, whereas delayed hospital presentation is associated with identifiable perioperative predictors at the time of discharge and hence more likely to be targetable.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopy are being increasingly investigated, although data on its efficacy in benign colorectal surgery are scarce. OBJECTIVE We compared the early postoperative outcome in robot-assisted IPAA with open surgery procedures. DESIGN This was an observational study based on prospectively collected data obtained from chart reviews. SETTING The single-center data set covers patients operated on from January 13, 2004, to September 16, 2014, at a specialist center. PATIENTS Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Study end points included the duration of operation, admission length, complications (Clavien-Dindo), reoperations, and readmissions. RESULTS Eighty-one robot-assisted and 170 open IPAA procedures were performed. The duration of operation was significantly longer for robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures (mean difference, 154 minutes; CI, 140-170). During a mean follow-up of 102 days, no significant differences in the distribution of complications were found (Spearman p = 0.12; p = 0.07), and no postoperative deaths occurred in either group. Postoperative admission length was shorter following robot-assisted procedures (mean difference, -1.9; CI, -3.5 to -0.3), whereas 40% of patients were readmitted, compared with 26% of patients who had open surgery (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.1-3.4). Pouch failure occurred in 3 patients (1 following robot-assisted laparoscopy; 2 following open surgery). On multivariate regression analyses, robot-assisted laparoscopy was associated with a significantly longer duration of operation (mean difference, 159 minutes; CI, 144-174), and more readmissions for any cause (OR, 2; CI, 1.1-3.7). LIMITATIONS This was a nonrandomized, single-center observational study. CONCLUSION In this implementation phase, robot-assisted IPAA surgery offers acceptable short-term outcomes. The limitations of this observational study call for randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up and exploration of functional results.
Collapse
|
13
|
Esemuede IO, Gabre-Kidan A, Fowler DL, Kiran RP. Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30:1489-94. [PMID: 26264049 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic colorectal resection (LC) is associated with known recovery benefits and earlier discharge when compared to open colorectal resection (OC). Whether earlier discharge leads to a paradoxical increase in readmission has not been well characterized. The aim of this study is to compare the risk of readmission after the two procedures in a large, nationally representative sample. METHODS Patients who underwent colorectal resection in 2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. LC and OC patients were compared for patient factors, complications, and readmission rates. A multivariable analysis controlling for significant factors was performed to evaluate factors associated with readmission. RESULTS Of 30,428 patients who underwent colorectal resection, 40.2% underwent LC. Length of stay (LOS) after LC was shorter than after OC (5.7 vs. 9.7 days, p < 0.001). LC was associated with a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections (SSI), bleeding, reoperation, 30-day mortality, and complications. Risk of readmission was greater for patients undergoing proctectomy than colectomy (12.7 vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.001), but was lower after laparoscopic than open for both procedures after controlling for confounding factors. Obesity, DM, operating time ≥180 min, steroid use, and ASA class 3-5 were found to be associated with readmission. CONCLUSION Despite its technical complexity, LC can be performed without concerns for increased complications or readmission. The shorter length of stay and the lower risk of readmissions underline the true benefits of the laparoscopic approach for colorectal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iyare O Esemuede
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 7 South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Alodia Gabre-Kidan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 7 South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Dennis L Fowler
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 7 South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 7 South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Damle RN, Alavi K. Risk factors for 30-d readmission after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Surg Res 2015. [PMID: 26216748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission rates after colorectal surgery remain an ongoing clinical concern. Recent initiation of penalties for excess readmissions in medical patients has encouraged surgeons to reduce readmissions for surgical patients. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature for the purpose of identifying patient-related risk factors for 30-d readmissions after colorectal surgery. METHODS PubMed and Web of Science were queried for relevant English-language studies published before January 1, 2015, evaluating 30-d hospital readmissions after colorectal surgery in adult patients. Studies were included in this review only if they used a multivariable model to assess various patient-associated predictors and were excluded if the study size was less than 100 patients. RESULTS A total of 20 clinical research studies made up of 8 (40%) chart reviews and 12 (60%) administrative data met inclusion criteria. Most studies took place in the United States, and a variety of procedures (e.g., colectomy, rectal resection, stoma creation) and indications for surgery (e.g., cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease) were evaluated. The average ages of included patients was between 37 and 78 y and 36%-97% were men. Readmission rates ranged from 9%-25%. Overall, older age, comorbid conditions, preoperative immunosuppressive therapy, postoperative complications, and nonhome discharge were the most consistent and strongest predictors of readmission. CONCLUSIONS These identifiable risk factors highlight targets for interventions in an effort to reduce unplanned readmissions. Determining the most efficacious and cost-efficient means to reduce these preventable hospitalizations could save millions of valuable health care dollars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle N Damle
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clinical and financial impact of hospital readmissions after colorectal resection: predictors, outcomes, and costs. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57:1421-9. [PMID: 25380009 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After passage of the Affordable Care Act, 30 -day hospital readmissions have come under greater scrutiny. Excess readmissions for certain medical conditions and procedures now result in penalizations on all Medicare reimbursements. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work was to define the risk factors, outcomes, and costs of 30-day readmissions after colorectal surgery. DESIGN Adults undergoing colorectal surgery were studied using data from the University HealthSystem Consortium. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify patient-related risk factors for, and 30-day outcomes of, readmission after colorectal surgery. SETTINGS This study was conducted at an academic hospital and its affiliates. PATIENTS Adults ≥18 years of age who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer, diverticular disease, IBD, or benign tumors between 2008 and 2011 were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Readmission within 30 days of index discharge was the main outcome measured. RESULTS A total of 70,484 patients survived the index hospitalization after colorectal surgery; 9632 (13.7%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The strongest independent predictors of readmission were length of stay ≥4 days (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.32-1.57), stoma (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.46-1.51), and discharge to skilled nursing (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.49-1.76) or rehabilitation facility (OR 2.93; 95% CI 2.53-3.40). Of those readmitted, half of the readmissions occurred within 7 days, 13% required the intensive care unit, 6% had a reoperation, and 2% died during the readmission stay. The median combined total direct hospital cost was more than 2 times higher ($26,917 vs $13,817; p < 0.001) for readmitted than for nonreadmitted patients. LIMITATIONS Follow-up was limited to 30 days after initial discharge. CONCLUSIONS Readmissions after colorectal resection occur frequently and incur a significant financial burden on the health-care system. Future studies aimed at targeted interventions for high-risk patients may reduce readmissions and curb escalating health-care costs.
Collapse
|
16
|
Preventable Readmissions to Surgical Services: Lessons Learned and Targets for Improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219:382-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2013] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|