Management of Patients with Abdominal Malignancy after Remote Jejunoileal Bypass: Surgical Considerations Decades Later

A unique case report of jejunoileal bypass reversal with review of the literature

•

 Jejunoileal bypass is a surgery of the past however still affects patients being see by surgeons today.

•

The pathophysiology is complicated and it should be known these patients suffer from chronic kidney disease, liver failure, chronic diarrhea and many vitamin deficiencies.

•

Bypass reverseal can help preserve kidney function but may not reverse damages already done.

•

From our experience, Bypassed bowel incorporation back into enteric tract can produced a immune response causing functional obstruction only relieved by removal of this bowel.

Introduction

Jejunoileal bypass (JIB) was an effective treatment for morbid obesity in the 1970s, but shortly after it fell out of favor due to horrific side effects, including liver failure, nephrolithiasis and drastic vitamin deficiencies. Although there are few living people with JIB, the management of these patients can be challenging.

Case presentation

We describe a case of a 58-year-old female with a history of JIB 46 years prior who had an impending renal failure due to nephrolithiasis. She underwent a jejunostomy feeding tube prior to reversal. After reversal, our patient developed failure to thrive with functional obstruction of the newly incorporated small bowel. This bypassed bowel underwent a severe inflammatory transformation after the introduction of enteric feeds, suggesting an immunological type response to antigens in food. It wasn’t until a long and debilitating 12 months and resection of this inflamed bowel that our patient was able to regain bowel function and gain weight.

Conclusion

Jejunoileal bypass is an archaic procedure for morbid obesity. Due to its debilitating and at times lethal side effects, it has been replaced with newer techniques. Despite advances, there are still patients out there who have had a jejunoileal bypass. This case report and review of the literature details our experience with this procedure.

Liver failure following biliopancreatic diversions: a narrative review

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:

Occurrences of liver failure following jejunoileal bypass were extensively reported in the past and were one of the main factors that led to abandonment of this procedure. The newer predominantly malabsorptive procedures called biliopancreatic diversions (BPDs) have also been implicated in several cases of acute and subacute liver failure. The aim here was to review the current available evidence on occurrences of liver failure following BPDs.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

Narrative review; bariatric surgery service of a public university hospital.

METHODS:

A review of the literature was conducted through an online search of medical databases.

RESULTS:

Associations between BPDs and liver failure have only infrequently been reported in the literature. However, they appear to be more than merely anecdotal. The pathophysiological mechanisms remain obscure, but they seem to be related to rapid weight loss, protein malnutrition, deficits of hepatotrophic factors, high circulating levels of free fatty acids and bacterial overgrowth in the bypassed bowel segments. Reversal of the BPD may ameliorate the liver impairment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although infrequent, liver failure remains a concern following BPDs. Careful follow-up is required in individuals who undergo any BPD.

Does Gastric Surgery (Such as Bariatric Surgery) Impact the Risk of Intestinal Inflammation?

Background

The prevalence of morbid obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is on the rise in association with a Western lifestyle. Both conditions are characterized by chronic inflammation. Bariatric surgery (BS) is a recommended and widely used approach to address severe obesity and its related comorbidities. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most frequently performed procedures worldwide. Evidence is scarce on outcomes of BS in IBD patients.

Summary

Systemic and adipose-tissue inflammation seems to decrease following BS. Different studies observed decreased serum levels of inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, MCP-1, and TNF-α) along with a reduction of insulin resistance both after RYGBP and SG. Several authors documented postbariatric improvement of concomitant chronic inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, gout, and psoriasis). There are only few retrospective case series on outcomes of BS in IBD patients. These studies reported safety and feasibility of BS and improvement in IBD status, manifested by prolonged disease remission and decreased use of pharmacotherapy. Weight loss outcomes were excellent and similar to those of non-IBD patients. The preferred surgical approach for morbidly obese IBD patients is SG in order to avoid potential drawbacks of RYGBP, such as malabsorption, intestinal manipulation, and augmentation of technical difficulties for future IBD surgery. Seven cases of newly diagnosed IBD after BS have been reported, which are more likely to result from postoperative intestinal microbial dysbiosis than from directly induced inflammation.

Key Messages

This review summarizes the outcomes of BS in IBD patients. SG is the preferable technique for morbidly obese IBD patients, who have potentially a double benefit from BS: weight loss and IBD remission. Further research is necessary to clarify the common pathophysiology of chronic inflammation in morbid obesity and in IBD. Postbariatric changes in gut microbiota should also be assessed to understand whether they promote IBD development or not.