Surgeon-driven thyroid interrogation of patients presenting with primary hyperparathyroidism

Improving Diagnostic Performance for Thyroid Nodules Classified as Bethesda Category III or IV: How and by Whom Ultrasonography Should be Performed

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate if the association of Bethesda system and a 3-categories Ultrasonography (US) risk stratification system proposed by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi improves the performance of cytology alone in III or IV categories and if further variables such as US provider (radiologist; endocrinologist, or endocrine surgeon both coming from a dedicated team) influence the accuracy of the diagnostic.

METHODS

570 consecutive patients with complete clinical records, affected by Bethesda III or IV nodules, have been addressed to two public referral surgical centers of Western Sicily. Age, sex, autoimmunity, nodule size, and US provider were recorded. Fisher's exact test was used for the univariate analysis; Odd's ratios were calculated for the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

248 patients had malignancy at histology, 322 were benign. The mean age was 52 years for the malignancy group and 58 y for the benign group (P < 0.001). At univariate analysis, autoimmunity was correlated with benign group (P < 0.001), and US risk 2 and 3 were correlated with malignancy (nearly 10-folds, P < 0.001); In addition, no difference was found concerning nodule size. At multivariate analysis, US risk 2 and 3 were strong predictors of malignancy (P < 0.0001) especially if cytology was Bethesda IV; endocrinologist and surgeon were more accurate in predicting malignancy compared with the radiologist (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of indeterminate nodules, the American College of Endocrinology/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi US risk stratification system strongly improves the results of Bethesda system especially when performed from dedicated endocrinologist or endocrine surgeon.

Long-term therapeutic outcomes of papillary thyroid carcinoma with concomitant hyperparathyroidism: A single center case-control study

Background

Papillary thyroid carcinoma occasionally presents with concomitant hyperparathyroidism; however, the clinical significance has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cancer prognosis following a multimodality therapy.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study using prospectively maintained data from a medical center thyroid cancer database between 1980 and 2013. The study cohort comprised patients with concomitant papillary thyroid carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism. Patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma only were matched using the propensity score method. Therapeutic outcomes, including the non-remission rate of papillary thyroid carcinoma and patient mortality, were compared.

Results

We identified 27 study participants from 2537 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma, with 10 patients having primary hyperparathyroidism and 17 having renal hyperparathyroidism. Eighty-five percent of the cohort was found to have tumor–node–metastasis stage I disease. During a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, we identified 3 disease non-remission and 4 mortality events. The non-remission risk did not increase (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–6.40; p = 0.47); however, the overall mortality risk significantly increased (HR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.11–17.75; p = 0.04). All mortality events were not thyroid cancer related, including two identified cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusions

Patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who present with concomitant hyperparathyroidism are usually diagnosed at an early cancer stage with compatible therapeutic outcomes. However, hyperparathyroidism-related comorbidity may decrease long-term survival.