1
|
Innes K, Ahmed I, Hudson J, Hernández R, Gillies K, Bruce R, Bell V, Avenell A, Blazeby J, Brazzelli M, Cotton S, Croal B, Forrest M, MacLennan G, Murchie P, Wileman S, Ramsay C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-151. [PMID: 38943314 PMCID: PMC11228691 DOI: 10.3310/mnby3104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Gallstone disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder in industrialised societies. The prevalence of gallstones in the adult population is estimated to be approximately 10-15%, and around 80% remain asymptomatic. At present, cholecystectomy is the default option for people with symptomatic gallstone disease. Objectives To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of observation/conservative management compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones in secondary care. Design Parallel group, multicentre patient randomised superiority pragmatic trial with up to 24 months follow-up and embedded qualitative research. Within-trial cost-utility and 10-year Markov model analyses. Development of a core outcome set for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. Setting Secondary care elective settings. Participants Adults with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease referred to a secondary care setting were considered for inclusion. Interventions Participants were randomised 1: 1 at clinic to receive either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or observation/conservative management. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was quality of life measured by area under the curve over 18 months using the Short Form-36 bodily pain domain. Secondary outcomes included the Otago gallstones' condition-specific questionnaire, Short Form-36 domains (excluding bodily pain), area under the curve over 24 months for Short Form-36 bodily pain domain, persistent symptoms, complications and need for further treatment. No outcomes were blinded to allocation. Results Between August 2016 and November 2019, 434 participants were randomised (217 in each group) from 20 United Kingdom centres. By 24 months, 64 (29.5%) in the observation/conservative management group and 153 (70.5%) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group had received surgery, median time to surgery of 9.0 months (interquartile range, 5.6-15.0) and 4.7 months (interquartile range 2.6-7.9), respectively. At 18 months, the mean Short Form-36 norm-based bodily pain score was 49.4 (standard deviation 11.7) in the observation/conservative management group and 50.4 (standard deviation 11.6) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The mean area under the curve over 18 months was 46.8 for both groups with no difference: mean difference -0.0, 95% confidence interval (-1.7 to 1.7); p-value 0.996; n = 203 observation/conservative, n = 205 cholecystectomy. There was no evidence of differences in quality of life, complications or need for further treatment at up to 24 months follow-up. Condition-specific quality of life at 24 months favoured cholecystectomy: mean difference 9.0, 95% confidence interval (4.1 to 14.0), p < 0.001 with a similar pattern for the persistent symptoms score. Within-trial cost-utility analysis found observation/conservative management over 24 months was less costly than cholecystectomy (mean difference -£1033). A non-significant quality-adjusted life-year difference of -0.019 favouring cholecystectomy resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £55,235. The Markov model continued to favour observation/conservative management, but some scenarios reversed the findings due to uncertainties in longer-term quality of life. The core outcome set included 11 critically important outcomes from both patients and healthcare professionals. Conclusions The results suggested that in the short term (up to 24 months) observation/conservative management may be a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in selected patients, but subsequent surgeries in the randomised groups and differences in quality of life beyond 24 months could reverse this finding. Future research should focus on longer-term follow-up data and identification of the cohort of patients that should be routinely offered surgery. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN55215960. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/192/71) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 26. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Innes
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rebecca Bruce
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Victoria Bell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Center for Surgical Research, NIHR Bristol and Western Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Seonaidh Cotton
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Mark Forrest
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Samantha Wileman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khullar OV, Perez A, Dixon M, Binongo JN, Sancheti MS, Pickens A, Gillespie T, Force SD, Fernandez FG. Routine Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment Into Thoracic Surgery Practice. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:526-532. [PMID: 35561801 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessment is a necessary component of surgical outcome assessment and patient care. This study examined the success of routine PROs assessment in an academic-based thoracic surgery practice. METHODS PROs, measuring pain intensity, physical function, and dyspnea, were routinely obtained using the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) on all thoracic surgery patients beginning in April 2018 through January 2021. Questionnaires were administered electronically through a web-based platform at home or during the office visit. Completion rates and barriers were measured. RESULTS A total of 9725 thoracic surgery office visits occurred during this time frame. PROs data were obtained in 6899 visits from a total of 3551 patients. The mean number of questions answered per survey was 22.4 ± 2.2. Overall questionnaire completion rate was 65.7%. A significant decline in survey completion was noted in April 2020, after which adjustments were made to allow for questionnaire completion through a mobile health platform. Overall monthly questionnaire completion rates ranged from 20% (April 2020) to 90% (October 2018). Mean T scores were dyspnea, 41.6 ± 12.3; physical function, 42.7 ± 10.5; and pain intensity, 52.8 ± 10.3. CONCLUSIONS PROs can be assessed effectively in a thoracic surgery clinic setting, with minimal disruption of clinical activities. Future efforts should focus on facilitating PROs collection from disadvantaged patient populations and scaling implementation across programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onkar V Khullar
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Aubriana Perez
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Meredith Dixon
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jose N Binongo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Manu S Sancheti
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allan Pickens
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Theresa Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Seth D Force
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Felix G Fernandez
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Melly C, McGeehan G, O’Connor N, Johnston A, Bass G, Mohseni S, Donohoe C, Bucholc M, Sugrue M. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6603491. [PMID: 35668711 PMCID: PMC9171002 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. Results A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. Conclusions This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gearoid McGeehan
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Donegal, Ireland
- University of Limerick School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Niall O’Connor
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Alison Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Gary Bass
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery Orebro University Hospital, & School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Claire Donohoe
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, St James’ Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Magda Bucholc
- Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus, Derry-Londonderry, UK
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Donegal, Ireland
- EU INTERREG Centre for Personalized Medicine, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus, Derry-Londonderry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cruickshank M, Newlands R, Blazeby J, Ahmed I, Bekheit M, Brazzelli M, Croal B, Innes K, Ramsay C, Gillies K. Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045568. [PMID: 34168025 PMCID: PMC8231013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many completed trials of interventions for uncomplicated gallstone disease are not as helpful as they could be due to lack of standardisation across studies, outcome definition, collection and reporting. This heterogeneity of outcomes across studies hampers useful synthesis of primary studies and ultimately negatively impacts on decision making by all stakeholders. Core outcome sets offer a potential solution to this problem of heterogeneity and concerns over whether the 'right' outcomes are being measured. One of the first steps in core outcome set generation is to identify the range of outcomes reported (in the literature or by patients directly) that are considered important. OBJECTIVES To develop a systematic map that examines the variation in outcome reporting of interventions for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, and to identify other outcomes of importance to patients with gallstones not previously measured or reported in interventional studies. RESULTS The literature search identified 794 potentially relevant titles and abstracts of which 137 were deemed eligible for inclusion. A total of 129 randomised controlled trials, 4 gallstone disease specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 8 qualitative studies were included. This was supplemented with data from 6 individual interviews, 1 focus group (n=5 participants) and analysis of 20 consultations. A total of 386 individual recorded outcomes were identified across the combined evidence: 330 outcomes (which were reported 1147 times) from trials evaluating interventions, 22 outcomes from PROMs, 17 outcomes from existing qualitative studies and 17 outcomes from primary qualitative research. Areas of overlap between the evidence sources existed but also the primary research contributed new, unreported in this context, outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study took a rigorous approach to catalogue and map the outcomes of importance in gallstone disease to enhance the development of the COS 'long' list. A COS for uncomplicated gallstone disease that considers the views of all relevant stakeholders is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira Cruickshank
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rumana Newlands
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol Department of Social Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mohamed Bekheit
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Surgery, ElKabbary Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bernard Croal
- Clinical Biochemistry, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Innes
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao JJ, Syn NL, Chong C, Tan HL, Ng JYX, Yap A, Kabir T, Goh BKP. Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients. Surgery 2021; 170:994-1003. [PMID: 34023139 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most randomized trials on minimally invasive cholecystectomy have been conducted with standard (3/4-port) laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy serving as the control group. However, there exists a dearth of head-to-head trials that directly compare different minimally invasive techniques for cholecystectomy (eg, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus needlescopic cholecystectomy). Hence, it remains largely unknown how the different minimally invasive cholecystectomy techniques fare up against one another. METHODS To minimize selection and confounding biases, only randomized controlled trials were considered for inclusion. Perioperative outcomes were compared using frequentist network meta-analyses. The interpretation of the results was driven by treatment effects and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. A sensitivity analysis was also undertaken focusing on a subgroup of randomized controlled trials, which recruited patients with only uncomplicated cholecystitis. RESULTS Ninety-six eligible randomized controlled trials comprising 11,083 patients were identified. Risk of intra-abdominal infection or abscess, bile duct injury, bile leak, and open conversion did not differ significantly between minimally invasive techniques. Needlescopic cholecystectomy was associated with the lowest rates of wound infection (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.977) with an odds ratio of 0.095 (95% confidence interval: 0.023-0.39), 0.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.98), 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.99), 0.36 (95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.98) compared to open cholecystectomy, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mini-laparotomy, and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, respectively. Mini-laparotomy was associated with the shortest operative time (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.981) by a mean difference of 22.20 (95% confidence interval: 13.79-30.62), 12.17 (95% confidence interval: 1.80-22.54), 9.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.59-16.54), and 8.36 (95% confidence interval: -1.79 to 18.52) minutes when compared to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, needlescopic cholecystectomy, standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open cholecystectomy, respectively. Needlescopic cholecystectomy appeared to be associated with the shortest hospitalization (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.717) and lowest postoperative pain (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.928). CONCLUSION Perioperative outcomes differed across minimally invasive techniques and, in some instances, afforded superior outcomes compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that there may be equipoise for exploring further the utility of novel minimally invasive techniques and potentially incorporating them into the general surgery training curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. http://twitter.com/ARWMD
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. http://twitter.com/ARWMD
| | - Cheryl Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Leong Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Julia Yu Xin Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ashton Yap
- Townsville Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tousif Kabir
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali Alshahri TM, Abounozha S, Ibrahim R. Is single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy superior to standard cholecystectomy in post-operative pain? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 63:102123. [PMID: 33643645 PMCID: PMC7895687 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: is single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy superior to standard cholecystectomy in post-operative pain? Using the reported search, 8083 papers were found. 8 studies were deemed to be suitable to answer the question. The outcomes assessed were post-operative pain differ in single or standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, all study used VAS (visual analogue scale). The evidence showed no difference in post-operative pain for patients went for single laparoscopic in compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No difference in post-operative pain for patients who had single laparoscopic compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. May differ in hospital stay and cosmesis but not for post-operative pain. If your main concern is post-operative pain evidence not supporting any technique over other.
Collapse
|
7
|
Favaro MDL, Moran SBS, Iamarino APM, Herrero BM, Gabor S, Ribeiro Junior MAF. During which period should we avoid cholecystectomy in patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2020; 18:eAO5393. [PMID: 33111809 PMCID: PMC9586429 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the period during which we should avoid cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. METHODS A retrospective analysis of electronic medical charts of 532 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, between March 2013 and December 2017. RESULTS Approximately one-third of patients underwent the procedure between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The conversion rate was 3.8%. The need for abdominal drainage and the finding of biliary tract injury after surgery were observed in 15.1% and 1.9% of patients, respectively. The length of stay was significantly shorter among patients undergoing surgery more than 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. These patients had a median length of stay of one day, whereas the median length of stay in the group undergoing the procedure between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was 2 days. CONCLUSION The period during which we should avoid cholecystectomy is between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Silvio Gabor
- Universidade de Santo Amaro, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Zhao S, Chen L. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:4315-4329. [PMID: 31620914 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07198-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed this study to compare the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC). METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials comparing SILC versus MPLC. We evaluated the pooled outcomes for complications, pain scores, and surgery-related events. This study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS A total of 48 randomized controlled trials involving 2838 patients in the SILC group and 2956 patients in the MPLC group were included in this study. Our results showed that SILC was associated with a higher incidence of incisional hernia (relative risk = 2.51; 95% confidence interval = 1.23-5.12; p = 0.01) and longer operation time (mean difference = 15.27 min; 95% confidence interval = 9.67-20.87; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between SILC and MPLC regarding bile duct injury, bile leakage, wound infection, conversion to open surgery, retained common bile duct stones, total complication rate, and estimated blood loss. No difference was observed in postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale between the two groups at four time points (6 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postprocedure). CONCLUSIONS Based on the current evidence, SILC did not result in better outcomes compared with MPLC and both were equivalent regarding complications. Considering the additional surgical technology and longer operation time, SILC should be chosen with careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Lyu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang, China. .,Department of General Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, 322100, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yunxiao Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sicong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stubenrouch FE, Cohen ES, Bossuyt PMM, Koelemay MJW, van der Vet PCR, Ubbink DT. Systematic review of reporting benefits and harms of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials. BJS Open 2020; 4:171-181. [PMID: 32207574 PMCID: PMC7093777 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardized reporting methods facilitate comparisons between studies. Reporting of data on benefits and harms of treatments in surgical RCTs should support clinical decision-making. Correct and complete reporting of the outcomes of clinical trials is mandatory to appreciate available evidence and to inform patients properly before asking informed consent. METHODS RCTs published between January 2005 and January 2017 in 15 leading journals comparing a surgical treatment with any other treatment were reviewed systematically. The CONSORT checklist, including the extension for harms, was used to appraise the publications. Beneficial and harmful treatment outcomes, their definitions and their precision measures were extracted. RESULTS Of 1200 RCTs screened, 88 trials were included. For the differences in effect size of beneficial outcomes, 68 per cent of the trials reported a P value only but not a 95 per cent confidence interval. For harmful effects, this was 67 per cent. Only five of the 88 trials (6 per cent) reported a number needed to treat, and no study a number needed to harm. Only 61 per cent of the trials reported on both the beneficial and harmful outcomes of the intervention studied in the same paper. CONCLUSION Despite CONSORT guidelines, current reporting of benefits and harms in surgical trials does not facilitate clear communication of treatment outcomes with patients. Researchers, reviewers and journal editors should ensure proper reporting of treatment benefits and harms in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. E. Stubenrouch
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - E. S. Cohen
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - P. M. M. Bossuyt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - M. J. W. Koelemay
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - D. T. Ubbink
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lowndes BR, Abdelrahman AM, Thiels CA, Mohamed AO, McConico AL, Bingener J, Hallbeck MS. Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2019; 78:277-285. [PMID: 29960648 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port) using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany R Lowndes
- Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Amro M Abdelrahman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cornelius A Thiels
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amani O Mohamed
- Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrea L McConico
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Juliane Bingener
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Susan Hallbeck
- Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Daliya P, Gemmill EH, Lobo DN, Parsons SL. A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and quality of life reporting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:228-245. [PMID: 31245403 PMCID: PMC6561890 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.03.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a valuable means of measuring outcomes subjectively from a patient's perspective, facilitating the assessment of service quality across healthcare providers, and assisting patients and clinicians in shared decision making. The primary aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise all historic studies evaluating patient reported quality of life, in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. The secondary aim was to perform a quality assessment of cholecystectomy-specific PROM-validation studies. A literature review was performed in PubMed, Google ScholarTM, the Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases up to September 2017. Study characteristics, PROM-specific details and a bias assessment were summarised for non-validation studies. A COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) analysis was performed to assess the methodological quality of identified PROM-validation studies. Fifty one studies were found to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although 94.1% of these studies included PROMs as a primary outcome measure, <20% provided level 1 evidence through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). There was significant variation in the selection and reporting of PROMs, with no studies declaring patient involvement in PROM selection, and 88.2% of studies failing to document the management of missing data points, or non-returned surveys (33.3%). In the 6 PROM-validation studies identified, only 5 psychometric properties were evaluated, the findings of which were limited due to the small number of studies. This systematic review identifies a lack in consistency of study design and PRO reporting in clinical trials. Whilst an increasing number of studies are being performed to evaluate PROs, a lack of adherence to existing PRO administration and reporting guidelines is continuing to negatively affect study quality. We recommend that future clinical trials utilizing PROs should adhere to established comprehensive guidelines as described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prita Daliya
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Elizabeth H. Gemmill
- Department of General Surgery, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust, King’s Mill Hospital, Sutton-in-Ashfield NG17 4JL, UK
| | - Dileep N. Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
- MRC/ARUK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UK, UK
| | - Simon L. Parsons
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
- Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Guillaumes S, Ardid J, Trias M, Bachero I, Martrat A. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study. Hernia 2019; 23:1205-1213. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
13
|
Incidence of incisional hernias following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Hernia 2018; 23:91-100. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1853-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
14
|
Ito E, Takai A, Imai Y, Otani H, Onishi Y, Yamamoto Y, Ogawa K, Tohyama T, Fukuhara S, Takada Y. Quality of life after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, clinical trial. Surgery 2018; 165:353-359. [PMID: 30314725 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy continues as to whether single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the somewhat larger incision at the umbilicus, may lead to a worse postoperative quality of life and more pain compared with the more classic 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare single-incision and 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the perspective of quality of life. METHODS This study was a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized clinical trial. A total of 120 patients who were scheduled to undergo elective cholecystectomy were randomly assigned 1:1 into the single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy or the 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and then assessed continuously for 2 weeks during the postoperative period. The primary outcome was quality of life, defined as the time to resume normal daily activities. Postoperative pain was also assessed. To explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects, we assessed the interactions of sex, age, and working status on recovery time. RESULTS A total of 58 patients in the single-incision group and 53 in the 4-port group (n = 111, 47 male, mean age 57 years) were analyzed. The mean time to resume daily activities was 10.2 days and 8.8 days, respectively, for single-incision and 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (95% confidence interval -0.4 to 3.2, P = .12). Similarly, the time to relief from postoperative pain did not differ significantly between the groups. Statistically insignificant but qualitative interactions were noted; in the subgroups of women, full-time workers, and patients younger than 60 years, recovery tended to be slower after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION Postoperative quality of life did not differ substantially between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients younger than 60 years, women, and full-time workers tended to have a somewhat slower recovery after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eitaro Ito
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Takai
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Imai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Uwajima City Hospital, Uwajima, Ehime, Japan
| | - Hiromi Otani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Onishi
- Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research (iHope International), Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kohei Ogawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| | - Taiji Tohyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| | - Shunichi Fukuhara
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasutsugu Takada
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Favaro MDL, Gabor S, Pedroso RFP, Ribeiro L, Rosa OM, Ribeiro-Junior MAF. SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 31:e1388. [PMID: 30133680 PMCID: PMC6097110 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background: The search for less traumatic surgical procedures without compromising
efficacy and safety, together with the technological advances and greater
experience of the teams, led to the development of operative techniques with
increasingly smaller incisions, the so-called “minimally invasive
surgeries”. Aim: To evaluate the technical aspects and results of single port
cholecystectomy. Method: Were analyzed 170 patients between 18-74 years submitted to
videolaparoscopic cholecystectomies by single port, regardless of elective
or urgent indication, without restriction of patient selection. Results: Among the 170 operations, 158 were exclusively performed by single port, and
the conversion rate was 7% (inclusion of other accessory trocars or
conversion to multiportal). Conversion to open surgery occurred in three
cases (1.76%). The mean surgical time was 67.97 min, showing a marked
decrease when was reached close to 50 cases and a stabilization after 100
surgeries. The overall complication rate was 10%, with minor complications
such as: incisional pain, hematomas, granulomas, port access hernias
(9.41%). Conclusion: Single port cholecystectomy can, after standardization and surgical team
training, be a safe surgical procedure associated with a recognized
aesthetic advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murillo de Lima Favaro
- General Surgery Department, University of Santo Amaro.,Private Clinic, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Silvio Gabor
- General Surgery Department, University of Santo Amaro.,Private Clinic, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Ligia Ribeiro
- General Surgery Department, University of Santo Amaro
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Arezzo A, Passera R, Forcignanò E, Rapetti L, Cirocchi R, Morino M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2018. [PMID: 29523982 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6143-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last decade, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) has gained popularity, although it is not evident if benefits of this procedure overcome the potential increased risk. Aim of the study is to compare the outcome of SLC with conventional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only. METHODS A systematic Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials literature search of articles on SLC and MLC for any indication was performed in June 2017. The main outcomes measured were overall adverse events, pain score (VAS), cosmetic results, quality of life, and incisional hernias. Linear regression was used to model the effect of each procedure on the different outcomes. RESULTS Forty-six trials were included and data from 5141 participants were analysed; 2444 underwent SLC and 2697 MLC, respectively. Mortality reported was nil in both treatment groups. Overall adverse events were higher in the SLC group (RR 1.41; p < 0.001) compared to MLC group, as well severe adverse events (RR 2.06; p < 0.001) and even mild adverse events (RR 1.23; p = 0.041). This was confirmed also when only trials including 4-port techniques (RR 1.37, p = 0.004) or 3-port techniques were considered (RR 1.89, p = 0.020). The pain score showed a standardized mean difference (SMD) of - 0.36 (p < 0.001) in favour of SLC. Cosmetic outcome by time point scored a SMD of 1.49 (p < 0.001) in favour of SLC. Incisional hernias occurred more frequently (RR 2.97, p = 0.005) in the SLC group. CONCLUSIONS Despite SLC offers a better cosmetic outcome and reduction of pain, the consistent higher rate of adverse events, both severe and mild, together with the higher rate of incisional hernias, should suggest to reconsider the application of single incision techniques when performing cholecystectomy with the existing technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - R Passera
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - E Forcignanò
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - L Rapetti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - M Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mueck KM, Cherla DV, Taylor A, Ko TC, Liang MK, Kao LS. Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes after Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 226:183-193.e5. [PMID: 29154921 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Krislynn M Mueck
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice (C-STEP), Departments of Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
| | - Deepa V Cherla
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice (C-STEP), Departments of Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Amy Taylor
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Tien C Ko
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Mike K Liang
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice (C-STEP), Departments of Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice (C-STEP), Departments of Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION). Surg Endosc 2017; 32:14-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5717-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
19
|
Hallbeck MS, Lowndes BR, McCrory B, Morrow MM, Kaufman KR, LaGrange CA. Kinematic and ergonomic assessment of laparoendoscopic single-site surgical instruments during simulator training tasks. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2017; 62:118-130. [PMID: 28411722 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
While laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) appears to be feasible and safe, instrument triangulation, tissue handling, and other bimanual tasks are difficult even for experienced surgeons. Novel technologies emerged to overcome LESS' procedural and ergonomic difficulties of "tunnel vision" and "instrument clashing." Surgeon kinematics, self-reported workload and upper body discomfort were used to compare straight, bent and two articulating instruments while performing two basic surgical tasks in a LESS simulator. All instruments resulted in bilateral elevation and rotation of the shoulders, excessive forearm motion and flexion and ulnar deviation of wrists. Surgeons' adopted non-neutral upper extremity postures and performed excessive joint excursions to compensate for reduced freedom of movement at the single insertion site and to operate the instrument mechanisms. LESS' cosmetic benefits continue to impact laparoscopic surgery and by enabling performance through improved instruments, ergonomic improvement for LESS can reduce negative impact on surgeon well-being and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Susan Hallbeck
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
| | - Bethany R Lowndes
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
| | - Bernadette McCrory
- Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Melissa M Morrow
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kenton R Kaufman
- Division of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Chad A LaGrange
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Use in Surgical Care: A Scoping Study. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224:245-254.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
21
|
Caron JP. Single incision mesh incisional hernioplasty in the horse: Significant clinical benefits? EQUINE VET EDUC 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/eve.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. P. Caron
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences; College of Veterinary Medicine; Michigan State University; East Lansing USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Scientific surgery. Br J Surg 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|