Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Randomized Trial on the Number of Axillary Nodes Removed for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Axillary Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND.

CONCLUSION

A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.

Omission of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes

PURPOSE

The ACOSOG Z0011 (Z11) trial assessed the benefit of axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases; however, Z11 excluded patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. We analyzed trends in ALND omission in patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs.

METHODS

Women with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy between 2018 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database were included using SLN codes initiated in 2018. Patients with stage IV disease, recurrent breast cancer, and who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine the proportion who received ALND and factors associated with ALND omission. A subgroup analysis was performed among patients who met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria (BCS, T1/T2 breast cancer).

RESULTS

We identified 3654 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. ALND was omitted in 37% of patients, and omission significantly increased from 2018 to 2020 (29% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). Older age, lower grade tumors, no radiation, non-academic facility, BCS, more SLNs examined and fewer positive SLNs were significantly associated with ALND omission. 942 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria. ALND was omitted in 49% of these patients, and omission increased from 2018 to 2020 (44% vs. 49%, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs do not undergo ALND; omission of ALND increased from 2018 to 2020. Studies assessing oncologic outcomes of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who do and do not receive ALND are required.

Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer in 2024

Axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer (BC) in 2024 is becoming increasingly specific, moving away from the previous 'one size fits all' radical approach. The goal is to spare morbidity whilst maintaining oncologic safety. In the upfront surgery setting, a first landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the omission of any surgical axillary staging in patients with unremarkable clinical examination and axillary ultrasound showed non-inferiority to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB). The study population consisted of 87.8% postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC. Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer and up to two positive SLNs can safely be spared axillary dissection (ALND) even in the context of mastectomy or extranodal extension. In patients enrolled in the TAXIS trial, adjuvant systemic treatment was shown to be similar with or without ALND despite the loss of staging information. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), targeted lymph node removal with or without SLNB showed a lower false-negative rate to determine nodal pathological complete response (pCR) compared to SLNB alone. However, oncologic outcomes do not appear to differ in patients with nodal pCR determined by either one of the two concepts, according to a recently published global, retrospective, real-world study. Real-world studies generally have a lower level of evidence than RCTs, but they are feasible quickly and with a large sample size. Another global real-world study provides evidence that even patients with residual isolated tumor cells can be safely spared from ALND. In general, few indications for ALND remain. Three randomized controlled trials are ongoing for patients with clinically node-positive BC in the upfront surgery setting and residual disease after NACT. Pending the results of these trials, ALND remains indicated in these patients.

Adherence Rate to Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Z0011 Trial Based on Breast Cancer Subtype

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 (ACOSOG Z0011 or Z11) trial demonstrated no survival advantage with completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with T1-2 breast cancer, 1 to 2 positive SLNs who received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. More than 70% of the cohort had estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors. There is paucity of data on the adherence rate to Z11, as well as a dearth of data on the applicability of Z11 for the different subtypes. We conducted a large hospital-based study to evaluate the adherence rate to Z11 based on subtypes.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Cancer Database was queried to evaluate 33,859 patients diagnosed with T1-2, N1, and M0 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with negative margins, and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy between 2012 and 2018. Patients were classified into 3 groups: (1) ER+/HER2-, (2) ER-/HER2-, and (3) HER2+ regardless of ER status. The revised Scope of the Regional Lymph Node Surgery 2012 was used to classify patients into those who underwent an SLN or ALND. Differences in use of ALND by subtypes were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS). A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, ER-/HER2-, and HER2+ tumors, the rate of ALND was 43.6%, 50.2%, and 47.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS for SLN and ALND for the entire cohort was 94.0% and 93.1% (p = 0.0004); for ER+/HER2-, it was 95.4% and 94.7% (p = 0.04); for ER-/HER2-, it was 84.1% and 84.3% (p = 0.41); for HER2+, it was 94.2% and 93.2% (p = 0.20). Multivariable cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated no significant survival differences between SLN and ALND (p = 0.776).

CONCLUSIONS

Z11 is applicable for women with early N1 disease, regardless of subtypes. ALND did not confer a survival advantage over SLN. Despite this, up to 50% of patients who fit Z11 criteria continue to undergo ALND.

The Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Female Patients With T3-4c Breast Cancer and 1-2 Positive Lymph Nodes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients diagnosed with cT3-4c breast cancer with no more than 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes.

METHODS

Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, this retrospective study identified patients diagnosed with T3-4c breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. These patients were then categorized into 2 groups: the SLNB group, which underwent examination of 1-5 regional lymph nodes and the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group, which underwent examination of ≥10 regional lymph nodes. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assess the efficacy of SLNB in cT3-4c patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis, with 423 and 716 patients in the SLNB and ALND groups, respectively. The 10-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates in the SLNB group were 66.1% and 76.3%, respectively, compared with 66.0% and 73.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.80-1.25, P = .997) and BCSS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.83-1.41, P = .551). Even after 1:1 propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.65-1.16, P = .341) and BCSS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.59-1.16, P = .266) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that SLNB does not adversely affect the survival of cT3-4c breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel lymph node metastases.

Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer

This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone is Adequate for Chemotherapy Decisions in Postmenopausal Early-Stage Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer with One to Three Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

The RxPONDER trial randomized patients with cT1-3N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR⁺HER2^-) breast cancer and one to three positive nodes and Recurrence Score (RS) < 26 to endocrine therapy (ET) or chemoendocrine therapy (CET) with equivalent survival in postmenopausal women. In current practice, cN0 patients with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) do not undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), raising concerns about applying these data in patients who may have additional nodal disease.

METHODS

We identified institutional [Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (DF/BCC), 2016-2020] and national [National Cancer Database (NCDB), 2012-2017] cohorts of women aged 50-75 years with cT1-3N0 HR⁺HER2^- breast cancer and RS < 26 treated with upfront surgery with one to three positive SLN. Axillary nodal burden and outcomes were assessed on the basis of the number of positive nodes and CET use.

RESULTS

A total of 197 and 13,499 HR⁺HER2^- eligible patients with one to three positive SLN and RS < 26 were identified in the DF/BCC and NCDB databases, respectively, and 12.7% of DF/BCC and 32.4% of NCDB patients had ALND. Of these, only 12.0 and 4.9% had more than three total positive nodes, respectively. Rates of CET were 6.6% in DF/BCC and 20.9% in NCDB patients. In the NCDB, similar adjusted 4-year overall survival was seen between patients treated with CET or ET for any number of positive nodes (98.1-99.9%, all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women with cT1-3N0 HR⁺HER2^- breast cancer and RS < 26 with one to three positive SLN are unlikely to have more than three total positive nodes. CET decisions should continue to be based on SLN biopsy as ALND is unlikely to change treatment recommendations or outcomes.

Trends in axillary surgery and clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis

Background

There is a lack of studies examining the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis, especially for the patients with 3–5 node metastases.

Methods

Breast cancer patients with 1–5 sentinel node metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2016. Our study presented the trend of axillary surgery and assessed the long-term survival of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for those patients.

Results

Of the 41,996 patients diagnosed with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation included, 34,940 had 1-2 sentinel node metastases and 7056 had 3-5 sentinel node metastases. The percentage of patients undergoing SLNB alone increased from 22.4% in 2000 to 81.0% in 2016 for patients with 1–2 sentinel node metastases, and quadrupled from 5.2% in 2009 to 20.6% in 2016 for those with 3–5 sentinel node metastases. Completion of ALND did not benefit the long-term survival of 1–2 sentinel node metastasis patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, P = 0.539), but improved the long-term survival of 3–5 node metastasis patients (HR = 0.73, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the inferiority of SLNB to ALND in all subgroups of 3–5 sentinel node metastases.

Conclusion

For patients with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was an efficient and safe surgical choice for 1–2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3–5 sentinel node metastases. It is worth noting that for patients with 3–5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled after 2009.

•

Using SEER database, the research presents the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with 1-2 and 3-5 sentinel nodes metastasis.

•

For patients with T1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was efficient for 1–2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3–5 sentinel node metastases.

•

Among patients with 3–5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled from 2009 to 2016.

Preservation of Axillary Lymph Nodes Compared with Complete Dissection in T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients Presenting One or Two Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: The SINODAR-ONE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The SINODAR-ONE trial is a prospective noninferiority multicenter randomized study aimed at assessing the role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients undergoing either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy for T1-2 breast cancer (BC) and presenting one or two macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The endpoints were to evaluate whether SLN biopsy (SLNB) only was associated with worsening of the prognosis compared with ALND in terms of overall survival (OS) and relapse.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either removal of ≥ 10 axillary level I/II non-SLNs followed by adjuvant therapy (standard arm) or no further axillary treatment (experimental arm).

RESULTS

The trial started in April 2015 and ceased in April 2020, involving 889 patients. Median follow-up was 34.0 months. There were eight deaths (ALND, 4; SNLB only, 4), with 5-year cumulative mortality of 5.8% and 2.1% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.984). There were 26 recurrences (ALND 11; SNLB only, 15), with 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence of 6.9% and 3.3% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.444). Only one axillary lymph node recurrence was observed in each arm. The 5-year OS rates were 98.9% and 98.8%, in the ALND and SNLB-only arm, respectively (p = 0.936).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-year survival and relapse rates of T1-2 BC patients with one or two macrometastatic SLNs treated with SLNB only, and adjuvant therapy, were not inferior to those of patients treated with ALND. These results do not support the use of routine ALND.

Survival and recurrence with or without axillary dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis

To evaluate overall survival and locoregional recurrence between patients with invasive breast tumours and sentinel node metastasis undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone and those undergoing complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with invasive breast carcinoma who underwent lumpectomy at a public university hospital in Brazil between 2008 and 2018. We evaluated the overall survival and the locoregional recurrence using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, respectively. Overall, 97 participants who underwent lumpectomy were enroled; 41 in the ALND group, and 56 in the SLND group, according to Z0011 criteria. Only 17% of the patients in the ALND group had an additional biopsy-proven axillary disease, and 83% were treated with complete dissection unnecessarily. The 5-year survival rates were 80.1% and 87.5% for SLND and ALND, respectively (p = 0.376). Locoregional recurrence was rare (1.7% and 7.3% in the SLND and ALND, respectively; p = 0.3075). Overall survival and locoregional recurrence were similar between the two groups. The de-escalation of ALND to SLND in women with metastasis in the sentinel lymph node treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy that meet the Z0011 criteria is feasible even in developing countries.

Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1-2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

Following publication of the AMAROS trial, we sought to optimize axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) + axillary radiation (AxRT) utilization in cT1-2N0 patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after mastectomy.

METHODS

In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group implemented a protocol to omit intraoperative SLN evaluation for mastectomy patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer likely to be recommended PMRT if found to have 1-2 positive SLNs (age ≤ 60 years and/or high-risk features defined as estrogen receptor-negative and/or positive for lymphovascular invasion). We prospectively evaluated axillary management, short-term complications, and oncologic outcomes in patients with 1-2 positive SLNs.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to December 2018, 479 of 560 (85%) cT1-2N0 breast cancers treated with mastectomy were potential candidates for PMRT. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted in 344 (72%), thus following the protocol. Overall, 121 cases had 1-2 positive SLNs: 17 (14%) were managed with observation, 5 (4%) PMRT alone, 59 (49%) PMRT + AxRT, 16 (13%) ALND alone, and 24 (20%) ALND + PMRT. Protocol compliance resulted in less ALND (8% vs. 24%) and less ALND + PMRT (9% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). At median follow-up of 24 months, there was one regional and four distant recurrences, with no regional recurrences or differences in disease-free survival in patients treated with ALND versus PMRT + AxRT (100% vs. 98%, p = 0.67). Similarly, there were no differences in complication rates (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting intraoperative SLN evaluation in cT1-2N0 mastectomy patients who would be candidates for PMRT if found to have positive nodes decreased rates of ALND and minimized use of ALND + PMRT without compromising outcomes.

Trends and Outcomes Associated With Axillary Management of Males With Clinical N0 Breast Cancer-An NCDB Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is standard of care for women with clinically N0 breast cancer. However, there are no randomized controlled studies in men determining optimal surgical axillary management.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, males diagnosed from 2006-2016 with clinical T1-4 N0 tumors treated with primary surgery were identified and categorized by axillary management. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between two timeframes, 2006-2011 and 2012-2016. Survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 2,646 males meeting criteria. Use of SLNB increased (65.9%-72.8%, P < 0.01). For those who underwent ALND, administration of radiation (31.1% versus 48.8%, P < 0.01) and endocrine therapy (70.2% versus 80.7%, P < 0.01) increased. There was no difference in survival between timeframes (P = 0.42). For those who underwent SLNB, tumor grade (P = 0.02) and pathologic T stage (P < 0.01) were higher and more patients underwent mastectomy (74.9% versus 79.4%, P = 0.02). Administration of chemotherapy decreased (35.1% versus 27.2%, P < 0.01) and endocrine therapy increased (72.1% versus 81.3%, P < 0.01). Survival of those who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) diagnosed 2012-2016 was worse than those diagnosed 2006-2011 (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SLNB alone has increased while ALND has declined in males with clinically N0 breast cancer. However, patients who underwent SLNB alone in the later time period had worse clinical characteristics and experienced differences in adjuvant therapy. This suggests increased acceptance of the use of SLNB for axillary management. Further analysis is warranted to evaluate methods of axillary staging and the impact on outcomes in males with breast cancer.

National trends for axillary lymph node dissection and survival outcomes for clinical T3/T4 node-negative breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with positive lymph nodes

PURPOSE

Previous studies have suggested axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be omitted in early breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with positive lymph nodes (LNs). We assessed the national utilization of ALND and overall survival (OS) for larger, locally advanced tumors in patients undergoing mastectomy with positive LNs.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016 was queried for mastectomy patients with clinical T3/T4, N0 tumors, and 1-2 positive LNs. Trends and outcomes for ALND were compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone.

RESULTS

Thousand nine hundred and seventeen women were included. The proportion of ALND decreased from 70% pre-Z0011 to 52% post-Z0011. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, ALND had better OS compared to SLNB alone (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.01), chemotherapy (p < 0.01), and hormonal therapy (p < 0.01) were associated with better OS. In patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) ALND improved OS on multivariate analysis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This is the first large database study to demonstrate a national trend to forego ALND in mastectomy patients with large or locally advanced tumors (T3/T4abc) and 1-2 positive lymph nodes. This study suggests a survival benefit for ALND, particularly in patients receiving ART. Careful consideration and further investigations should be performed prior to omitting ALND this patient population.

Locoregional Management of the Axilla in Mastectomy Patients with One or Two Positive Sentinel Nodes: The Role of Intraoperative Pathology

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding optimal management of the axilla in clinically node-negative (cN0) mastectomy patients with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (+SLNs). We evaluated the influence of frozen-section pathology on axillary management and recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied cN0 breast cancer patients treated from 2008 to 2018 with mastectomy and SLN surgery with one or two +SLNs. Patients with one or two +SLNs identified on frozen-section intraoperatively (FS+SLN) were compared to those with one or two +SLNs not detected by frozen section (FS-SLN). Recurrence rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 2295 cN0 mastectomy patients, 338 patients had one or two +SLNs: 108 (32%) FS-SLN and 230 (68%) FS+SLN. In the FS+SLN cases, completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was more frequent (97% vs. 39%; P < .001), and median SLN metastasis size (5 vs. 1.3 mm; P < .001) and likelihood of positive non-SLNs (31% vs. 14%; P = .02) were greater compared with FS-SLN cases. Across all 338 patients, 40% had SLN surgery alone, and 47% of cALND patients received post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). At a median follow-up of 61 months, no axillary recurrences were observed among FS-SLN patients. Among FS+SLN patients, 97% proceeded to cALND but 49% avoided PMRT; three regional nodal recurrences were observed (all in patients treated with cALND, of whom two received PMRT).

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy patients with one or two FS+SLNs have a higher nodal disease burden than FS-SLN patients. The majority of FS+SLN patients underwent cALND, and 51% received PMRT with very low 5-year regional nodal recurrence rates. A substantial proportion of FS-SLN patients successfully avoided both cALND and PMRT. Frozen-section pathology analysis can guide de-escalation of axillary management.

Uptake of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at Minority Serving Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

Most minorities receive cancer care at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) that have been associated with disparate treatment between Black and White patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine the uptake of clinical trials that have changed axillary management in breast cancer patients at MSH and non-MSH cancer centers.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients eligible for the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 and Z1071 trials, and mastectomy patients fulfilling the European AMAROS trial. Uptake of trial results (omission of axillary lymph node dissection) was analyzed between patients treated at MSHs and non-MSHs and adjusted for patient, tumor, and facility factors. MSHs were defined as the top decile of hospitals according to the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients treated.

RESULTS

Of 7167 patients eligible for Z0011, 4546 for Z0171, and 9433 for AMAROS from 2015 to 2016, clinical trial uptake was seen in 1195 (74.6%) MSH and 4056 (72.9%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.173) for Z0011, 588 (41.9%) MSH and 1366 (43.5%) non-MSH patients for Z1071 (p = 0.302), and 272 (11.7%) MSH and 996 (14.0%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.005) for AMAROS. On adjusted analyses, MSH status was not significant for uptake of any of the three trials. Black race, socioeconomic status, and insurance were not associated with clinical trial uptake.

CONCLUSION

The uptake of three landmark clinical trials of axillary management in breast cancer was not different at MSH and non-MSH centers despite adjustment for social determinants of health. At the Commission on Cancer-accredited centers in this analysis, MSH status did not affect the uptake of evidence-based care.

Analyzing non-sentinel axillary metastases in patients with T3-T4 cN0 early breast cancer and tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes undergoing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy

Purpose

In the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, completing axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) did not benefit patients with T1–T2 cN0 early breast cancer and 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCT). This paper reports cALND rates in the clinical routine for patients who had higher (T3–T4) tumor stages and/or underwent mastectomy but otherwise met the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Aim of this study is to determine cALND time trends and non-sentinel axillary metastases (NSAM) rates to estimate occult axillary tumor burden.

Methods

Data were included from patients treated in 179 German breast cancer centers between 2008 and 2015. Time-trend rates were analyzed for cALND of patients with T3–T4 tumors separated for BCT and mastectomy and regarding presence of axillary macrometastases or micrometastases.

Results

Data were available for 188,909 patients, of whom 19,009 were identified with 1–2 positive SLN. Those 19,009 patients were separated into 4 cohorts: (1) Patients with T1–T2 tumors receiving BCT (ACOSOG Z0011 eligible; n = 13,741), (2) T1–T2 with mastectomy (n = 4093), (3) T3–T4 with BCT (n = 269), (4) T3–T4 with mastectomy (n = 906). Among patients with T3–T4 tumors, cALND rates declined from 2008 to 2015: from 88.2 to 62.6% for patients receiving mastectomy and from 96.6 to 58.1% in patients receiving BCT. Overall rates for any NSAM after cALND for cohorts 1–4 were 33.4%, 42.3%, 46.9%, 58.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

The cALND rates have decreased substantially in routine care in patients with ‘extended’ ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Axillary tumor burden is higher in these patients than in the ACOSOG Z0011 trial.

Deimplementation of the Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery

Importance

Overtreatment of early-stage breast cancer results in increased morbidity and cost without improving survival. Major surgical organizations participating in the Choosing Wisely campaign identified 4 breast cancer operations as low value: (1) axillary lymph node dissection for limited nodal disease in patients receiving lumpectomy and radiation, (2) re-excision for close but negative lumpectomy margins for invasive cancer, (3) contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients at average risk with unilateral cancer, and (4) sentinel lymph node biopsy in women 70 years or older with hormone receptor-positive cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the extent to which these procedures have been deimplemented, determine the implications of decreased use, and recognize possible barriers and facilitators to deimplementation.

Evidence Review

A systematic review of published literature on use trends in breast surgery was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The Ovid, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases were searched for original research with relevance to the Choosing Wisely recommendations of interest. Eligible studies were examined for data about use, and any patient-level, clinician-level, or system-level factors associated with use.

Findings

Concordant with recommendations, national rates of axillary lymph node dissection for patients with limited nodal disease have decreased by approximately 50% (from 44% in 2011 to 30% to 34% in 2012 and 25% to 28% in 2013), and national rates of lumpectomy margin re-excision have decreased by nearly 40% (from 16% to 34% before to 14% to 18% after publication of a consensus statement). Conversely, national rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy continue to rise each year, accounting for up to 30% of all mastectomies for breast cancer (range in all mastectomy cases: 2010-2012, 28%-30%; 1998, <2%), and rates of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women 70 years or older with low-risk breast cancer are persistently greater than 80% (range, 80%-88%). Factors associated with high rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy use are younger age, white race, increased socioeconomic status, and the availability of breast reconstruction; limited data exist on factors associated with high rates of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women 70 years or older. Successful deimplementation of axillary lymph node dissection and lumpectomy margin re-excision were associated with decreased costs and improved patient-centered outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review demonstrates variable deimplementation of 4 low-value surgical procedures in patients with breast cancer. Addressing specific patient-level, clinician-level, and system-level barriers to deimplementation is necessary to encourage shared decision-making and reduce overtreatment.

National Trend of Axillary Management in Clinical T3/T4 N0 Patients Having Breast Conserving Therapy

BACKGROUND

The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has essentially eliminated axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast conserving therapy (BCT) patients with clinical T1/T2 and 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Currently, ALND is recommended for positive SLNs unless ACOSOG Z0011 criteria are applicable. We aimed to assess the national trends and axillary management before and after the publication of ACOSOG Z0011 for larger tumors.

METHODS

An IRB-approved study evaluated the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016. Women with clinical T3/T4, N0 who otherwise fit ACOSOG Z0011 criteria were included. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy or known nodal disease was excluded. Clinicopathologic data were compared between two timeframes based on ACOSOZ Z0011 publication and by axillary management. Patients were categorized into SLNB alone (1-5 lymph nodes examined) and ALND (≥10 lymph nodes examined) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 230 women fit inclusion criteria, of whom 36% underwent ALND. ALND use decreased from 54% in 2006 to 14% in 2016 (P < 0.01). Comparing ALND to SLNB alone within the pre-Z0011 era, comprehensive community cancer programs had higher proportions of ALND, whereas academic centers had higher rates of SLND alone (P = 0.03). Comparing similar axillary management between eras, SLNB-alone patients in the post-Z0011 era had higher pT and pN stages, were less likely to be Her2 positive, and were more likely to receive systemic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a national trend to forgo ALND in women who have tumors larger than those included in the Z0011 criteria without any clear clinicopathologic indications.

Assessment of Technical Skills in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

OBJECTIVE

A simulator to enable safe practice and assessment of ALND has been designed, and face, content and construct validity has been investigated.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

The reduction in the number of ALNDs conducted has led to decreased resident exposure and confidence.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter observational study was carried out between July 2017 and August 2018. Following model development, 30 surgeons of varying experience (n = "experts,' n = 11 "senior residents,' and n = 10 "junior residents") were asked to perform a simulated ALND. Face and content validity questionnaires were administered immediately after ALND. All ALND procedures were retrospectively assessed by 2 attending breast surgeons, blinded to operator identity, using a video-based assessment tool, and an end product assessment tool.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences between groups were observed across all operative subphases on the axillary clearance assessment tool (P < 0.001). Significant differences between groups were observed for overall procedure quality (P < 0.05) and total number of lymph nodes harvested (P < 0.001). However, operator grade could not be distinguished across other end product variables such as axillary vein damage (P = 0.864) and long thoracic nerve injury (P = 0.094). Overall, participants indicated that the simulator has good anatomical (median score >7) and procedural realism (median score >7).

CONCLUSIONS

Video-based analysis demonstrates construct validity for ALND assessment. Given reduced ALND exposure, this simulation is a useful adjunct for both technical skills training and formative Deanery or Faculty administered assessments.

Impact of surgical intervention trials on healthcare: A systematic review of assessment methods, healthcare outcomes, and determinants

BACKGROUND

Frameworks used in research impact evaluation studies vary widely and it remains unclear which methods are most appropriate for evaluating research impact in the field of surgical research. Therefore, we aimed to identify and review the methods used to assess the impact of surgical intervention trials on healthcare and to identify determinants for surgical impact.

METHODS

We searched journal databases up to March 10, 2020 for papers assessing the impact of surgical effectiveness trials on healthcare. Two researchers independently screened the papers for eligibility and performed a Risk of Bias assessment. Characteristics of both impact papers and trial papers were summarized. Univariate analyses were performed to identify determinants for finding research impact, which was defined as a change in healthcare practice.

RESULTS

Sixty-one impact assessments were performed in 37 included impact papers. Some surgical trial papers were evaluated in more than one impact paper, which provides a total of 38 evaluated trial papers. Most impact papers were published after 2010 (n = 29). Medical records (n = 10), administrative databases (n = 22), and physician's opinion through surveys (n = 5) were used for data collection. Those data were analyzed purely descriptively (n = 3), comparing data before and after publication (n = 29), or through time series analyses (n = 5). Significant healthcare impact was observed 49 times and more often in more recent publications. Having impact was positively associated with using medical records or administrative databases (ref.: surveys), a longer timeframe for impact evaluation and more months between the publication of the trial paper and the impact paper, data collection in North America (ref.: Europe), no economic evaluation of the intervention, finding no significant difference in surgical outcomes, and suggesting de-implementation in the original trial paper.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Research impact evaluation receives growing interest, but still a small number of impact papers per year was identified. The analysis showed that characteristics of both surgical trial papers and impact papers were associated with finding research impact. We advise to collect data from either medical records or administrative databases, with an evaluation time frame of at least 4 years since trial publication.

Patterns of Axillary Management in Stages 2 and 3 Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer by Initial Treatment Approach

BACKGROUND

Data regarding axillary management after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) are lacking. This study examined axillary management of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients based on initial treatment with NET, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), or upfront surgery.

METHODS

Patients with stage 2 or 3 HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated between 2012 and 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database. The study examined axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or upfront ALND] by initial treatment stratified by cN0/N1 using pairwise comparisons and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 92,204 eligible patients, 2138 (2.3%) received NET, 11,014 (12%) received NAC, and 79,052 (85.7%) received surgery. Among 60,998 cN0 patients, attempted SLNB was more likely for surgery patients (86.2%, 47,159/54,684) and NET patients (85.8%, 1342/1564) than for NAC patients (79.9%, 3793/4750) (both p < 0.001). Among 31,206 cN1 patients, attempted SLNB was more likely for the surgery patients (46.0%, 11,201/24,368) than for the NET patients (41.8%, 240/574; p = 0.05) or the NAC patients (39.8%, 2491/6264; p < 0.0001). The differences between surgery and NET did not persist in the adjusted analyses. Among both the cN0 patients (n = 13,856) and the cN1 patients (n = 8688) with pN1 disease shown by SLNB, the NET patients were treated with ALND less frequently than those receiving NAC or surgery (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). In the multivariate analysis, for the patients with pN1 disease shown by SLNB, NET use was associated with increased odds of undergoing SLNB alone [cN0 patients: odds ratio (OR), 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.64; cN1 patients: OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.00-2.10].

CONCLUSIONS

For stages 2 and 3 HR+/HER2- patients, SLNB use after NET was similar to that for upfront surgery. Among those with pN1 disease, the NET patients were less likely to undergo ALND. Additional outcomes data are needed to guide axillary management after NET.

Axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: Is the staging information worthwhile for patients?

AIMS

The Z0011 randomized trial demonstrated no significant difference in axillary recurrence rate or survival with or without axillary dissection in patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. However, there is continuing controversy regarding the generalizability of its results, and axillary dissection provides additional pathologic staging information that may guide adjuvant therapy. Thus, axillary dissection after positive sentinel node biopsy is being further investigated in an actively recruiting randomized trial. We elicited patients' preferences for axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection after positive sentinel node biopsy for early breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone axillary dissection after positive sentinel node biopsy as part of breast conserving therapy were provided with a validated, self-rated questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised two trade-off questions to determine the maximum chance of developing arm side-effects from axillary dissection to justify the benefit of additional axillary staging information. Social, demographic, and clinical details were collected.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine of the 126 eligible patients returned the questionnaire and 76 completed the trade-off assessment. The median age of participants was 62 years. The median numbers of sentinel and axillary nodes removed were 2 and 12, respectively. Forty-seven percent of participants had arm swelling or tenderness of any severity. Seventy-five percent of participants would have axillary dissection even if the chance of arm side-effects like they had experienced was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with early breast cancer preferred axillary dissection after positive sentinel node biopsy for the additional staging information even though there was no survival benefit from axillary dissection.

Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy: An evidence-based update in a European breast center

The surgical approach to the axilla in breast cancer has been a controversial issue for more than three decades. Data from recently published trials have provided practice-changing recommendations in this scenario. However, further controversies have been triggered in the surgical community, resulting in heterogeneous diffusion of these recommendations. The development of clinical guidelines for the management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer is a work in progress. A multidisciplinary team discussion was held at the research hospital Policlinico San Matteo from the Università degli Studi di Pavia with the aim to update recommendations for the management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. An evidence-based approach is presented. Our multidisciplinary panel determined that axillary dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy may be avoided in cN0 patients with micro/macrometastasis to ≤2 sentinel nodes, with age ≥40y, lesions ≤3 cm, who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have planned breast conservation (BCS) with whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). Cases with gross (>2 mm) ECE in SLNs are evaluated on individual basis for completion ALND, axillary radiotherapy or omission of both. Patients fulfilling the criteria listed above who undergo mastectomy, may also avoid axillary dissection after multidisciplinary discussion of individual cases for consideration of axillary irradiation. Women 70 years or older with hormone receptors positive invasive lesions ≤3 cm, clinically negative nodes, and serious or multiple comorbidities who undergo BCS with WBRT, may forgo axillary staging/surgery (if mastectomy or larger tumor, comorbidities and life expectancy are taken into account).

Effect of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial on axillary management in breast cancer patients in the Australian setting

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial demonstrated that early breast cancer patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes treated with breast-conserving surgery and breast radiotherapy had no additional oncologic benefit of proceeding to an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The extent to which practice has changed in Australia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the Z0011 trial on the management of positive axillary sentinel nodes at an Australian institutional level. We reviewed all breast cancer cases treated at the Sydney Adventist Hospital over a 10-year period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. Patients who fulfilled the Z0011 trial criteria were selected. These patients were divided into two groups according to the year of surgery, before and after 1 January 2011 when the Z0011 study was published. Clinicopathologic data and axillary surgical management were compared. Of the 237 patients fulfilling the Z0011 trial criteria, there were 73 patients before and 158 patients after 1 January 2011. In the earlier group the rate of proceeding to an ALND following a positive sentinel node was 78.1% compared to 43.7% in the latter group (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decline in the rate of ALND over this 10-year period (r = -0.79, P = 0.006). The Z0011 trial has influenced the surgical management of the axilla leading to a significant reduction in the rate of an ALND in patients fulfilling the Z0011 trial criteria at our institution.

Evolution in practice patterns of axillary management following mastectomy in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes

PURPOSE

The optimal management of breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) who undergo mastectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns of patients with positive SLNs who undergo mastectomy using a large population-based database.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy between 2006 and 2014 who had 1-2 positive SLNs. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Axillary management included SLN dissection (SLND) alone, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) alone, and ALND + PMRT. Trends of axillary management and patient characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

Among 12,190 patients who met study criteria, the use of ALND dropped with a corresponding increase in other approaches. In 2006, 34% of patients had SLND alone, 47% ALND, 8% PMRT and 11% ALND + PMRT. By 2014, 37% had SLND, 23% ALND, 27% PMRT and 13% ALND + PMRT. Patients who underwent SLND alone were older (mean 60.6 years) with more comorbidities (Charlson-Deyo score > 2), smaller primary tumors (mean 2.1 cm), well-differentiated histology, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative tumors, without lymphovascular invasion (all P values < 0.01). Treatment with SLND alone was more likely if patients had only one positive SLN (P < 0.001) or micrometastatic disease (P < 0.001), and were treated at community centers compared with academic centers (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with positive SLNs has evolved over time with decreased use of ALND and increased use of radiation. Some patient subsets are underrepresented in recent clinical trials, and therefore, future trials should focus on these patients.

Trends in axillary lymph node dissection for early-stage breast cancer in Europe: Impact of evidence on practice

BACKGROUND

Data from recently published trials have provided practice-changing recommendations for the surgical approach to the axilla in breast cancer. Patients with T1-2 lesions, treated with breast conservation, who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have 1-2 positive sentinel nodes (Z0011-criteria) may avoid axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We aim to describe the dissemination of this practice in Europe over an extended period of time.

METHODS

Our source of data was the eusomaDB, a central data warehouse of prospectively collected information of the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA). We identified cases fulfilling Z0011-criteria from 2005 to 2016 from 34 European breast centers and report trends in ALND. Data derived from Germany, Italy, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and Netherlands.

RESULTS

6671 patients fulfilled Z0011-criteria. Rates of ALND showed a statistically significant decrease from 2010 (89%) to 2011 (73%), reaching 46% in 2016 (p < 0.001). After multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher probability of ALND were earlier year of surgery, younger age, increasing tumor size and grade, and being operated in Italy (p < 0.001). The minimum and maximal rates of ALND in the most recent two-year period (2015-2016) were 0% and 83% in two centers located in different countries (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates, a decrease in rates of ALND that started after year 2010 through the end of the study period. Wide differences were observed among centers and countries indicating the need to spread unified clinical guidelines in Europe to allow for homogeneous evidence-based practice patterns.

Retrospectively validating the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial in a large Asian Z0011-eligible cohort

PURPOSE

The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary dissection (ALND) could be omitted during breast-conserving therapy for cT1-2N0 breast cancers with 1-2 metastatic SLNs. However, that result has not been validated in a larger cohort and the significance of the small number of SLNs remains unclear. This study aimed to validate the Z0011 results within an Asian Z0011-eligible cohort and determine whether the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influenced the Z0011-based outcomes.

METHODS

Data from Asian patients who fulfilled the Z0011 criteria were collected from five hospitals. Disease recurrence (DR) was compared between patients who underwent ALND or SLN dissection (SLND) alone. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce the effects of potential selection biases.

RESULTS

During 2010-2016, 1750 Asian patients had 1-2 SLN metastases and fulfilled the Z0011 criteria. These patients included 707 cases treated using SLND alone (40%) and 967 patients with ≤ 2 SLNs (55%). Ninety-five patients (5.4%) experienced DR at a median interval of 50 months, although the rates of DR were similar in the ALND and SLND groups. The adjusted hazard ratios for DR after ALND omission were 0.95 (95% CI 0.55-1.64) among the entire cohort and 0.83 (95% CI 0.34-2.03) among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Asian Z0011-eligible cohort, ALND omission did not increase risk of DR, even among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Therefore, the Z0011 strategy might be safely applied in Asia, and a small number of SLNs did not significantly influence this strategy.

Does the number of removed axillary lymphnodes in high risk breast cancer patients influence the survival?

Background

The decision making process for axillary dissection has changed in recent years for patients with early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph nodes (LN). The question now arises, what is the optimal surgical treatment for patients with positive axillary LN (pN+). This article tries to answer the following questions:

Is there a survival benefit for breast cancer patients with 3 or more positive LN (pN3+) and with more than 10 removed LN?

Is there a survival benefit for high risk breast cancer patients (triple negative or Her2 + breast cancer) and with 3 or more positive LN (pN3+) with more than 10 removed LN?

In pN + patients is the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) of pN+/pN removed impaired if 10 or less LN are removed?

Methods

A retrospective database analysis of the multi center cohort database BRENDA (breast cancer under evidence based guidelines) with data from 9625 patients from 17 breast centers was carried out. Guideline adherence was defined by the 2008 German National consensus guidelines.

Results

2992 out of 9625 patients had histological confirmed positive lymph nodes. The most important factors for survival were intrinsic sub types, tumor size and guideline adherent chemo- and hormonal treatment (and age at diagnosis for overall survival (OAS)). Uni-and multivariable analyses for recurrence free survival (RFS) and OAS showed no significant survival benefit when removing more than 10 lymph nodes even for high-risk patients. The mean and median of LNR were significantly higher in the pN+ patients with ≤10 excised LN compared to patients with > 10 excised LN. LNR was in both, uni-and multivariable, analysis a highly significant prognostic factor for RFS and OAS in both subgroups of pN + patients with less respective more than 10 excised LN. Multivariable COX regression analysis was adjusted by age, tumor size, intrinsic sub types and guideline adherent adjuvant systemic therapy.

Conclusion

The removal of more than 10 LN did not result in a significant survival benefit even in high risk pN + breast cancer patients.

NSQIP Analysis of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Rates for Breast Cancer: Implications for Resident and Fellow Participation

INTRODUCTION

Management of the axilla in invasive breast cancer (IBC) has shifted away from more radical surgery such as axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), towards less invasive procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy. Because of this shift, we hypothesize that there has been a national downward trend in ALND procedures, subsequently impacting surgical trainee exposure to this procedure using the ACS-NSQIP database to evaluate this.

METHODS

Women with IBC were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2007 to 2014. Procedures including ALND were identified using CPT codes. This number was divided by total cases, given a varying number of participating institutions each year. Next, cases involving resident participation were identified and divided by training level: junior (post graduate year-[PGY] 1-2), senior (PGY 3-5) and fellow (PGY ≥ 6). Two tailed z tests were used to compare proportions, with significance determined when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 128,372 women were identified with IBC with 36,844 ALND. ALND rates decreased by an average of 2.43% yearly from 2007 to 2014. Resident participation significantly drops in 2011, from 49.3% before to 29.4% after (p < 0.01). Junior residents experienced a significant decrease in participation rate (43.3%-32.2%, p < 0.05). Senior residents and fellows experienced an upward trend in their participation, although not significant (51.2%-56.3%, p = 0.35, and 5.6%-11.6%, p = 0.056, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the ACS-NSQIP database, we demonstrate the downward trend in rate of ALND for IBC with subsequent decrease in resident participation. Junior residents experienced a significant decrease in their participation with no significant change for senior or fellow-level trainees. Awareness of this trend is important when creating future surgical curriculum changes for general surgery and fellowship training programs.

Multidisciplinary Management of the Axilla in Patients with cT1-T2 N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Primary Mastectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-Institution Series

BACKGROUND

The after mapping of the axilla: radiotherapy or surgery (AMAROS) trial concluded that for patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), axillary radiotherapy (AxRT) provides equivalent locoregional control and a lower incidence of lymphedema compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The study prospectively assessed how often ALND could be replaced by AxRT in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing mastectomy for cT1-2 N0 breast cancer.

METHODS

In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group agreed to omit routine intraoperative SLN evaluation for cT1-2 N0 patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and potentially eligible for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), including those 60 years of age or younger and those older than 60 years with high-risk features. Patients with one or two positive SLNs on final pathology were reviewed to determine whether PMRT including the full axilla was an appropriate alternative to ALND.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to December 2016, 154 patients met the study criteria, and 114 (74%) formed the final study cohort. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted for 76 patients (67%). Of these patients, 20 (26%) had one or two positive SLNs, and 14 of these patients received PMRT + AxRT as an alternative to ALND. Three patients returned for ALND, and three patients were observed. On univariate analysis, tumor size, LVI, number of positive lymph nodes, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receipt of PMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

For the majority of patients with one or two positive SLNs, ALND was avoided in favor of PMRT + AxRT. With appropriate multidisciplinary strategies, intraoperative evaluation of the SLN and immediate ALND can be avoided for patients meeting the AMAROS criteria and eligible for PMRT.

Expanding Implementation of ACOSOG Z0011 in Surgeon Practice

BACKGROUND

After publication of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, surgeons at our institution limited axillary surgery to sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in 76% of patients meeting trial eligibility criteria. Our study objective was to assess incorporation of the trial data into practice 5 years later.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical T1-2, N0 invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving surgery were included. Comparisons were made between patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and those that had no further surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients were included. Twelve percent (48/396) had positive SLNs; ALND was performed in 8% (4/48). Patients who underwent ALND were more likely to have 2 positive SLNs (50%, 2/4 vs. 2%, 1/44; P = .02) and microscopic extranodal extension (75%, 3/4 vs. 18%, 8/44; P = .03) than those that did not undergo ALND. Patients who underwent ALND also had a higher nomogram-predicted probability of having additional positive non-SLNs (53%) than those who had SLND alone (22%) (P = .0002). No patients had intraoperative assessment of SLNs performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of omitting ALND in ACOSOG Z0011-eligible patients has expanded over 5 years. Clinicopathologic features continue to impact this decision. Intraoperative SLN assessment is no longer performed.

Application of ACOSOG Z1071: Effect of Results on Patient Care and Surgical Decision-Making

BACKGROUND

The ACOSOG (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group) Z1071 assessed the feasibility of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in node-positive patients who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Historically, adoption of clinical research into practice takes years. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of Z1071 on our practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of Z1071's influence on a single institution's practice. Patients with biopsy-proven positive axillary lymph nodes before NACT were eligible for the study. After NACT, patients with nodal response according to imaging and exam were candidates for SLNB. Two cohorts were stratified according to diagnosis date before and after Z1071 results were presented on December 5, 2012 at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Fisher exact tests and nonparametric rank tests were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

The pre-Z1071 cohort included 74 patients and the post-Z1071 cohort 56 for a total of 130 patients. Post-Z1071, 73% (41/56) underwent a SLNB with an average of 4 nodes removed. Moreover, 27% (15/56) of patients had an axillary lymph node dissection as first intervention post-Z1071, compared with 99% (73/74) pre-Z1071. Axillary pathologic complete response pre-Z1071 was 35% (26/74) and post-Z1071 was 27% (15/56) (P = .35).

CONCLUSION

This report shows that meaningful practice changes can be implemented rapidly. Changes in practice generated by clinical trial results should be monitored and outcomes followed.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review and Update

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a standard staging tool in the surgical management of breast cancer. The positive impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on postoperative negative outcomes in breast cancer patients, without compromising the oncological outcomes, is its major advantage. It has evolved over the last few decades and has proven its utility beyond early breast cancer. Its applicability and efficacy in patients with clinically positive axilla who have had a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being aggressively evaluated at present. This article discusses how sentinel lymph node biopsy has evolved and is becoming a useful tool in new clinical scenarios of breast cancer management.

The State of Surgical Axillary Management and Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Early-stage Invasive Breast Cancer in the Modern Era

BACKGROUND

For clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been shown in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 to be sufficient for women with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes with no added benefit for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Z0011 specified whole breast radiotherapy (RT) using standard tangential fields; however, later analysis showed variation in field design. We assessed nationwide practice patterns and examined factors associated with patients undergoing completion ALND and subsequent radiation field design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery, axillary staging, and whole breast RT in 2012 to 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine axillary management and RT, adjusting for demographic and clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

Among 83,555 patients meeting criteria, 9.3% underwent upfront ALND, 75.8% underwent SLNB only, and 14.9% underwent SLNB with completion ALND. From 2012 to 2013, upfront SLNB increased from 90.1% to 91.4% (odds ratio, 1.14; P < .001). Among 9474 patients that underwent SLNB with 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes, 31.2% received completion ALND. Among patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes, SLNB increased from 65.8% to 72.1% from 2012 to 2013 (P < .001). For patients with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes that underwent SLNB only, 63.4% underwent breast RT, whereas 36.6% received breast and nodal RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide practice patterns of axillary management vary. Despite an increasing rate of SLNB, many patients still receive upfront and completion ALND. Furthermore, there is significant variation in RT field design, and modern treatment guidelines are warranted for this patient population.

Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 (ACOSOG Z0011) trial were first reported in 2005 with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Longer follow-up was necessary because the majority of the patients had estrogen receptor-positive tumors that may recur later in the disease course (the ACOSOG is now part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the 10-year overall survival of patients with sentinel lymph node metastases treated with breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is noninferior to that of women treated with axillary dissection.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The ACOSOG Z0011 phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from May 1999 to December 2004 at 115 sites (both academic and community medical centers). The last date of follow-up was September 29, 2015, in the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) trial. Eligible patients were women with clinical T1 or T2 invasive breast cancer, no palpable axillary adenopathy, and 1 or 2 sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients had planned lumpectomy, planned tangential whole-breast irradiation, and adjuvant systemic therapy. Third-field radiation was prohibited.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was overall survival with a noninferiority hazard ratio (HR) margin of 1.3. The secondary outcome was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 891 women who were randomized (median age, 55 years), 856 (96%) completed the trial (446 in the SLND alone group and 445 in the ALND group). At a median follow-up of 9.3 years (interquartile range, 6.93-10.34 years), the 10-year overall survival was 86.3% in the SLND alone group and 83.6% in the ALND group (HR, 0.85 [1-sided 95% CI, 0-1.16]; noninferiority P = .02). The 10-year disease-free survival was 80.2% in the SLND alone group and 78.2% in the ALND group (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.62-1.17]; P = .32). Between year 5 and year 10, 1 regional recurrence was seen in the SLND alone group vs none in the ALND group. Ten-year regional recurrence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among women with T1 or T2 invasive primary breast cancer, no palpable axillary adenopathy, and 1 or 2 sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases, 10-year overall survival for patients treated with sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to overall survival for those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. These findings do not support routine use of axillary lymph node dissection in this patient population based on 10-year outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003855.

Current approach of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer

The surgical approach of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer has witnessed considerable evolution during the past 25 years. The previously undisputed gold standard of axillary-lymph-node dissection for staging has now been replaced by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for patients with clinically negative axilla. For selected patients with limited sentinel-lymph-node involvement, completion axillary-lymph-node dissection can be omitted or replaced by axillary radiotherapy, reducing morbidity. The clinical interest of axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing and this approach might contribute to morbidity reduction, and to the further tailoring of future systemic and locoregional treatment decisions by response assessment. Refinement of the sentinel-lymph-node biopsy technique might overcome the slightly impaired success rates in this setting. New techniques for lymphatic mapping attempt to further simplify the procedure. In view of the declining influence of axillary nodal status on adjuvant therapy decision-making, ongoing clinical trials will evaluate whether sentinel-lymph-node biopsy can be avoided altogether in selected patients.

Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Mastectomy Without Axillary Therapy

PURPOSE

Early-stage breast cancer patients with minimal axillary disease identified by sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) have low regional recurrence rates when treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (XRT) and many avoid a completion axillary lymph node dissection (CLND). As the incidence of total mastectomy (TM) has increased, it has become important to characterize which TM patients with a positive SLN may not benefit from further axillary treatment.

METHODS

An institutional database was utilized to identify patients treated with a TM for invasive breast cancer and who had a positive SLN from 1994 to 2010. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed. Regional recurrence rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 525 patients with invasive breast cancer and a positive SLN were treated with TM, including 58 patients who did not have CLND or XRT and 12 patients who did not have CLND but did receive XRT. Median follow-up was 66 months. The incidence of regional recurrence was not significantly different for patients who received no further axillary treatment compared to those who underwent CLND without XRT or those treated with XRT without CLND (10 years rate: 3.8 vs. 1.6 and 0 % respectively). RFS and OS were not significantly different among patients who received no further axillary treatment compared to those who underwent CLND, XRT, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

In select patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with mastectomy with a positive SLN, CLND may be avoided without adversely affecting recurrence or survival.

Breast cancer-specific mortality in small-sized tumor with node-positive breast cancer: a nation-wide study in Korean breast cancer society

Tumor size and number of lymph node (LN) metastases are well known as the most important prognostic factors of breast cancer. We hypothesized that very small breast cancers with LN metastasis represent a progressive biologic behavior and evaluated tumor size stratified by LN metastasis. Data between 1990 and 2010 were obtained retrospectively from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry with inclusion criteria of female, non-metastatic, unilateral, and T1/2 breast cancer. We collected the following variables: age at surgery, tumor size, number of LN metastases, nuclear grade (NG), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status. Patient characteristics were compared by means of independent t-tests for continuous variables and the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves, with corresponding results of log-rank tests, were constructed for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Five- and eight-year breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was obtained in groups of 300 patients, followed by smoothing according to the confidence interval using the lowess method. We identified 39,826 breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1433 (3.6 %) patients died due to breast cancer. The median follow-up duration was 63.4 (3-255) months. In the multivariate analysis, age at surgery, NG, LVI, subtype, and tumor size-nodal interactions were independently associated with BCSM. The N1 group had lower BCSS for T1a than T1b. The N2+ group also had lower BCSS for T1b than T1c or T2. In the N1 group of tumors smaller than 10 mm, 5- and 8-year BCSM decreased with larger tumor size. Patients with very small tumors with LN metastasis have decreased BCSM according to increase tumor size. Small tumors with LN metastasis could have aggressive biological behavior.