Inter-Anastomosis Drainage Tube Between the Pancreas and Jejunum: A Novel Technique for Preventing Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Augmented reality-assisted navigation system contributes to better intraoperative and short-time outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Augmented reality (AR)-assisted navigation system are currently good techniques for hepatectomy; however, its application and efficacy for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy have not been reported. This study sought to focus on and evaluate the advantages of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy guided by the AR-assisted navigation system in intraoperative and short-time outcomes.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from January 2018 to May 2022 were enrolled and divided into the AR and non-AR groups. Clinical baseline features, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, perioperative complications, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

AR-guided laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in the AR group ( n =41), whereas laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was carried out routinely in the non-AR group ( n =41). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P >0.05); Although the operation time of the AR group was longer than that of the non-AR group (420.15±94.38 vs. 348.98±76.15, P <0.001), the AR group had a less intraoperative blood loss (219.51±167.03 vs. 312.20±195.51, P =0.023), lower blood transfusion rate (24.4 vs. 65.9%, P <0.001), lower occurrence rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.2 vs. 46.3%, P =0.002) and bile leakage (0 vs. 14.6%, P =0.026), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.29±2.78 vs. 20.04±11.22, P <0.001) compared with the non-AR group.

CONCLUSION

AR-guided laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy has significant advantages in identifying important vascular structures, minimizing intraoperative damage, and reducing postoperative complications, suggesting that it is a safe, feasible method with a bright future in the clinical setting.

Pancreatic juice outflow in pancreatojejunostomy monitoring with the inter-anastomosis drainage tube; a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula remains the biggest problem in pancreatic surgery. We have previously reported a new pancreatojejunostomy method using an inter-anastomosis drainage (IAD) suction tube with Blumgart anastomosis for drainage of the pancreatic juice leaking from the branched pancreatic ducts. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of our novel method, in pancreatojejunostomy and investigate the nature of the inter-anastomosis space between jejunal wall and pancreas parenchyma.

METHODS

This retrospectively study consist of 282 pancreatoduodenectomy cases, including 86 reconstructions via the Blumgart method plus IAD (B + IAD group) and 196 cases reconstructed using the Blumgart method alone (B group). Postoperative outcomes and the amylase value and the volume of the drainage fluids were compared between the two groups. The IAD tube was placed to collect amylase-rich fluid from the inter-anastomosis space during operative procedure between the jejunal wall and pancreatic stump.

RESULTS

The daily IAD drainage volume and the amylase level was significantly higher in patients with a soft pancreas (vs hard pancreas; 16.5 vs. 10.0 mL/day, p = 0.012; 90,900 vs. 1634 IU/L, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean amylase value of IAD collection in 86 cases of B + IAD group was 63,100 IU/L. The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula grade B and C (23.2% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.55) and the hospital stay was similar between the groups (median 17 vs. 18 days, p = 0.55). In 176 patients with soft pancreas, the incidence of pancreatic fistula grade B and C (33.3% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.67) and the hospital stay was also similar between the groups (median 22.5 vs. 21 days, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive effect of the IAD method observed in the pilot cases was not reproduced in the current study. IAD tube objectively demonstrated the existence of amylase-rich discharge at the anastomosis site, and countermeasures to eliminate this liquid are highly desired for preventing pancreatic fistula, especially in patients with soft pancreatic texture. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Application of purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy for undilated pancreatic duct in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

To investigate the feasibility of purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy in complete laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with an undilated pancreatic duct.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 113 patients with undilated pancreatic ducts who had undergone laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy to analyze the perioperative outcomes.

Results

One hundred thirteen patients underwent successful LPD. The surgery time was 353 ± 41 min, the time required for pancreaticojejunostomy was 27 ± 5 min, and the hospital stay after surgery was 16 ± 8 days. Fifteen patients suffered postoperative complications, including twelve patients with pancreatic fistula, one with bile leakage, one with gastroparesis (complicated with abdominal infection), and one with abdominal bleeding. No perioperative death occurred.

Conclusions

Purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy is safe and feasible for patients with an undilated pancreatic duct.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01640-w.

A novel anastomosis technique facilitates pancreaticojejunostomy in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (with video)

BACKGROUND

While the best technique for pancreatic anastomosis during Whipple's procedure remains controversial, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has been rapidly increasing in popularity. Because of their feasibility and reliability, new pancreatic anastomosis techniques may have vital roles when adapted for LPD. Here, we describe a new pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) technique using three sutures (termed the "three sutures" PJ technique), which facilitates pancreatic anastomosis during total LPD.

METHODS

A total of 149 patients who underwent LPD using the "three sutures" PJ technique at three hospitals were included in this study (81 patients at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital [GDPH], 60 patients at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital [SMH], and 8 patients at Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University [AHGMU]). Data on the demographic characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative results (pancreatic fistula rate, mortality rate, and length of hospital stay) of these patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A surgical video showing the details of the "three sutures" PJ method was included. The mean operation times at GDPH, SMH, and AHGMU were 4.08 ± 0.99 h, 4.65 ± 1.53 h, and 4.67 ± 0.64 h, respectively, and the average PJ times were 17.96 ± 3.49 min, 18.19 ± 2.63 min, and 22.5 ± 3.96 min, respectively. The numbers of grade B pancreatic fistulas were 9 (11.11%), 2 (3.33%), and 1 (12.50%), respectively, and two patients had grade C fistulas, one each at GDPH and SMH. The numbers of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) were 10 (12.35%), 3 (5.00%), and 1 (12.50%) in each center, respectively. The overall rate of CR-POPF was 9.40% (14/149) among patients of all three centers. The perioperative mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The "three sutures" PJ technique for total LPD is a safe and reliable method, with a low risk of pancreatic fistula, short anastomosis time, and steep learning curve.

Do Drains Contribute to Pancreatic Fistulae? Analysis of over 5000 Pancreatectomy Patients

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting evidence exists from randomized controlled trials supporting both increased complications/fistulae and improved outcomes with drain placement after pancreatectomy. The objective was to determine drain practice patterns in the USA, and to identify if drain placement was associated with fistula formation.

METHODS

Demographic, perioperative, and patient outcome data were captured from the most recent annual NSQIP pancreatic demonstration project database, including components of the fistula risk score. Significant variables in univariate analysis were entered into adjusted logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 5013 pancreatectomy patients, 4343 (87%) underwent drain placement and 18% of patients experienced a pancreatic fistula. When controlled for other factors, drain placement was associated with ducts < 3 mm, soft glands, and blood transfusion within 72 h of surgery. Age, obesity, neoadjuvant radiation, preoperative INR level, and malignant histology lost significance in the adjusted model. Drained patients experienced higher readmission rates (17 vs. 14%; p < 0.05) and increased (20 vs. 8%; p < 0.01) pancreatic fistulae. Fistula was associated with obesity, no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, drain placement, < 3 mm duct diameter, soft gland, and longer operative times. Drain placement remained independently associated with fistula after both distal pancreatectomy (OR = 2.84 (1.70, 4.75); p < 0.01) and pancreatoduodenectomy (OR = 2.29 (1.28, 4.11); p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite randomized controlled clinical trial data supporting no drain placement, drains are currently placed in the vast majority (87%) of pancreatectomy patients from > 100 institutions in the USA, particularly those with soft glands, small ducts, and perioperative blood transfusions. When these factors are controlled for, drain placement remains independently associated with fistulae after both distal and proximal pancreatectomy.

Meta-analysis of invagination and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An update

OBJECTIVE

Duct-to-mucosa and invagination are two commonly used techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Previously, we conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of the two PJ techniques. Here, we added new evidence and updated our previous conclusion.

METHODS

We systematically searched multiple databases and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duct-to-mucosa and invagination techniques of PJ. The quality of evidence was assessed using Jadad score, and reporting bias was evaluated using funnel plots. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The primary outcome was pancreatic fistula, and the secondary outcomes included mortality, reoperation, morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. Trial sequential analysis was performed to calculate the required information size.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 850 participants were included. No significant difference was detected in the rates of pancreatic fistula (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.53), mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.18), reoperation (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.20) and morbidity (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.16) between the two groups. However, patients who underwent duct-to-mucosa PJ had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean difference -2.80, 95% CI -5.08 to -0.52). Trial sequential analysis showed that another 279 participants were needed for conclusive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the current evidence, duct-to-mucosa PJ did not decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other adverse events as compared to invagination PJ; however, it did reduce postoperative hospital stay. Further RCTs are needed.

Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct

PURPOSE

We performed three-dimensional (3D) surgical simulation of pancreatic surgery, including the size and location of the main pancreatic duct on the resected pancreatic surface.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 162 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery. This cohort was sequentially divided into a "without-3D" group (n = 81) and a "with-3D" group (n = 81). We compared the pancreatic duct diameter and its location, using nine sections in a grid pattern, with the intraoperative findings. The perioperative outcomes were also compared between patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and those who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the main pancreatic duct diameter between the 3D-simulated values and the operative findings. The 3D-simulated main pancreatic duct location was consistent with its actual location in 80 % of patients (65/81). In comparing the PD and DP groups, the intraoperative blood loss was 1174 ± 867 and 817 ± 925 ml in the without-3D group, and 828 ± 739 and 307 ± 192 ml in the with-3D group, respectively (p = 0.024, 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The 3D surgical simulation provided useful information to promote our understanding of the pancreatic anatomy, including details on the size and location of the main pancreatic duct.