Identifying Core Principles of Palliative Care Consultation in Surgical Patients and Potential Knowledge Gaps for Surgeons

Missed Opportunities For Use Of Advanced Care Planning And Palliative Care In Open Aortic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Major vascular surgery, including open aortic procedures, is associated with having a 30-day mortality rate greater than 6% and a perioperative complication rate greater than 50%. Published literature suggests that patients undergoing high-risk procedures benefit from having a care plan in place to not only maximize quality of life but also to ensure medical interventions align with care goals. Currently, there is a paucity of published data on the prevalence of goals of care conversations, advance care planning documentation, and palliative care evaluations in patients undergoing high-risk vascular operations.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent open aortic surgery at a tertiary care academic medical center from July 2014 to March 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type and timing of advanced care planning (ACP), palliative care evaluations, and clinical outcomes during the periprocedural period were recorded. For patients who died during the study period, the use of palliative care prior to death were noted. Patients who received ACP or palliative care were compared with those who did not.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 192 patients who underwent major open aortic surgery. The mean age was 63 years (SD 12.3) and the majority of patients were male (73.4%) and white (64.1%). Thirty-nine (20.6%) operations were classified as emergent. At the time of their operation, 16.7% (n=32) of patients had an ACP document on file. Of the 38 documents on file, most were durable power of attorney (DPOA) (86.8%) documents while a smaller percentage were physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) (13.2%). There were no patients with Do Not Resuscitate and/or Intubate (DNR/DNI), living will, or organ/tissue donation orders noted in their chart prior to surgery. One percent (n=2) of patients had a palliative evaluation prior to their operation. During the perioperative period, an additional 2 (1%) of patients had advanced care planning documentation and 7 (3.7%) of patients underwent palliative care evaluation. Fifteen percent of patients (n=28) died during the perioperative period and an additional 21 patients died by the end of the study period for a total mortality of 25.2% in the study population. Among patients that died during the perioperative period, 28.6% (n=8 out of 28) received palliative care. Overall, 28.6% of all study patients that died (n=14 out of 49) received a palliative care evaluation prior to or during their terminal hospitalization. Patients who had ACP documents or who received palliative care consultations prior to surgery were older (p=0.01), more likely to be on Medicare or Medicaid (p=0.004), and more likely to have a history of solid organ malignancy (p=0.03). The median interval between surgery and receiving palliative care was 20 (IQR 3-71) days. The median interval between palliative care and death was 5 (IQR 2-13) days. Patients who utilized ACP or PC were more likely to die at home (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite a high mortality and morbidity rate, ACP documentation is poor for patients undergoing major open aortic surgery. Palliative care interventions tend to be performed closer to the end of life, suggesting a missed opportunity to define goals of care.

Palliative Intervention for Malignant Bowel Obstruction Comes at a Cost: A National Inpatient Study

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is associated with poor outcomes. Optimal management for palliation remains unclear. This study aims to characterize nonoperative, procedural, and operative management strategies for MBO and evaluate its association with mortality and cost.Materials and Methods: ICD-10 coding identified patient admissions from the 2018 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for MBO with PC from gastrointestinal or ovarian primary cancers. Management was categorized as nonoperative, procedural, or surgical. Multivariate analysis was used to associate treatment with mortality and cost.Results: 356,316 patient admissions were identified, with a mean age of 63 years. Gender, race, and insurance status were similar among groups. Length of stay (LOS) was longest in the surgical group (surgical: 17 days; procedural: 14 days; nonoperative: 7 days; P = .001). In comparison to nonoperative, procedural and surgical patients had statistically higher hospital charges, post-discharge medical needs, palliative care consults, and admission to rehab centers. Mortality was 7% in nonoperative, 9% in procedural, and 8% in surgical (P = .007) groups. In adjusted analyses, older age, palliative care consult, and non-Medicare payer status were associated with higher mortality. Compared to nonoperative, procedural and surgical groups resulted in increased costs (procedural: $17K more; surgical: $30K more).Conclusions: Admissions for procedural and surgical treatment of MBO are associated with increased LOS, hospital costs, and discharge needs. Optimal management remains challenging. Clinicians must examine all options prior to recommending palliative interventions given a trend towards higher resource utilization and mortality.

Comparing Pediatric Surgeons' and Palliative Care Pediatricians' Palliative Care Practices and Perspectives in Pediatric Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

The nature of interactions between surgical and pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams caring for seriously ill children is unknown. This study compares pediatric surgeons' and PPC physicians' perspectives and practices regarding PPC in surgical patients.

METHODS

A survey was administered to members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association and Pediatric Interest Group of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four pediatric surgeons (31% female, 17.2 mean years of experience) and 71 PPC physicians (69% female, 10.1 mean years of experience) participated. Forty-three percent of surgeons reported consulting PPC often for children with serious illnesses. However, most PPC physicians (67%), said they are rarely/never consulted by surgeons (p = 0.002). PPC physicians were more likely to report that PPC involvement was too late (43% vs 21%, p = 0.005). More surgeons than PPC physicians felt that an appropriate time for PPC consultation was during serious illness deterioration (30% vs 7%, p = 0.05), whereas PPC physicians preferred consultation at diagnosis (54% vs 34%, p = 0.05). More PPC physicians (67%) than surgeons (17%) agreed that invasive interventions could be considered a form of PPC (p = 0.002). The most reported barrier to PPC consultation by surgeons (29%) was concern that parents would think the surgical team was giving up. PPC physicians were more likely to perceive barriers to consultation by surgeons than surgeons themselves (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While pediatric surgeons value PPC involvement, surgical culture and misperception of parental resistance to PPC involvement lead to palliative care consultation only when illness acuity and severity are high, the possibility of curability is low, and death seems imminent. Seeking to understand patient and family priorities in care, managing patient and parental psychological distress, and treating non-surgical symptoms are areas where PPC can improve patient care. Barriers to PPC use and self-reported knowledge gaps in PPC provision may be mitigated by formalized PPC training for surgeons and intentional collaboration between the two groups.

TYPE OF STUDY

Survey.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Enhancing the Adult and Paediatric Palliative Care System: Spanish Professionals' and Family Caregivers' Suggestions for Comprehensive Improvement

This research critically explores deficiencies in the palliative care system, focusing on evaluation and treatment aspects for both adult and paediatric patients. Using a qualitative methodology, the study engages healthcare professionals and family caregivers to uncover perspectives on the existing state of palliative care. Conducted through three focus groups and a semi-structured in-depth interview with participants recruited from Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital, this research illustrates critical issues, highlighting the insufficient healthcare workforce and resources to meet the comprehensive needs of patients and their families. Recommendations include holistic care addressing social, emotional, psychological, socio-familiar, and economic dimensions, supported by embedded support groups and the enforcement of relationships with palliative associations. This study also advocates for improved health institutional coordination, social worker support, and ongoing health professional satisfaction monitoring. In paediatric care, specific demands involve specialised units, medical team continuity, 24 h paediatrician care, and a more professional paediatric approach. Beyond problem identification, this study offers valuable insights for shaping health policies and tools, incorporating new indicators and introducing grief bereavement support in clinical reports, contributing to the advancement of patient evaluation in palliative care.

Frailty and Preoperative Palliative Care in Surgical Oncology

In this paper, we discuss surgical palliative care for patients with cancer through the lens of frailty and the preoperative context. Historically, palliative care principles such as complex symptom management, high-risk decision-making and communication have played an important role in preoperative discussions of oncologic surgery for both palliative and curative intent. There is increasing motivation among surgeons to integrate palliative care into the perioperative period in order to more effectively and comprehensively address potential adverse functional and quality of life outcomes. We discuss how the concept of frailty, and various instruments to measure frailty, have impacted perioperative decision-making, review the roots of surgical risk stratification and counseling on acceptable perioperative risk, and explore the preoperative setting as a possible avenue by which primary and specialty palliative care integration may have beneficial impact for patients considering oncologic resections.

Development of a Core Outcome Set for the research and assessment of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction is experienced by 15% of people with advanced cancer, preventing them from eating and drinking and causing pain, nausea and vomiting. Surgery is not always appropriate. Management options include tube or stent drainage of intestinal contents and symptom control using medication. Published literature describing palliative interventions uses a broad range of outcome measures, few of which are patient-relevant. This hinders evidence synthesis, and fails to consider the perspectives of people undergoing treatment.

AIMS

To develop a Core Outcome Set for the assessment of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction with clinician, patient and caregiver involvement, using COMET methodology (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials).

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies, a rapid review of the qualitative literature and in-depth patient and clinician interviews were conducted to identify a comprehensive list of outcomes. Outcomes were compared and consolidated by the study Steering Group and Patient and Public Involvement contributors, and presented to an international clinical Expert Panel for review. Outcomes from the finalised list were rated for importance in a three-round international Delphi process: results of two survey rounds were circulated to respondents, and two separate consensus meetings were conducted with clinicians and with patients and caregivers via virtual conferencing, using live polling to reach agreement on a Core Outcome Set.

RESULTS

130 unique outcomes were identified. Following the independent Expert Panel review, 82 outcomes were taken into round 1 of the Delphi survey; 24 outcomes reached criteria for critical importance across all stakeholder groups and none reached criteria for dropping. All outcomes rated critically important were taken forward for re-rating in round 2 and all other outcomes dropped. In round 2, all outcomes were voted critically important by at least one stakeholder group. Round 2 outcomes were presented again at online consensus meetings, categorised as high ranking (n = 9), middle ranking (n = 7) or low ranking (n = 8). Stakeholders reached agreement on 16 core outcomes across four key domains: Symptom control, Life impact, Treatment outcomes, and Communication and patient preferences.

CONCLUSION

Use of this Core Outcome Set can help to address current challenges in making sense of the evidence around treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction to date, and underpin a more robust future approach. Clearer communication and an honest understanding between all stakeholders will help to provide a basis for responsible decision-making in this distressing situation in clinical practice.

Training surgeons to optimize communication and symptom management in patients with life-limiting conditions: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgeons routinely care for patients with life-limiting illness, requiring communication and symptom management skills supported by appropriate training. The objective of this study was to appraise and synthesize studies that assessed surgeon-directed training interventions that aimed to optimize communication and symptom management for patients with life-limiting illness.

METHODS

A PRISMA-concordant systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until October 2022 for studies reporting on the evaluation of surgeon-training interventions intending to improve surgeons' communication or symptom management of patients with life-limiting disease. Data on the design, trainer and patient participants, and the intervention were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 7794 articles, 46 were included. Most studies employed a before-after approach (29 studies) and nine included control groups with five being randomized studies. General surgery was the most frequently included sub-specialty (22 studies). Trainers were described in 25 of 46 studies. Most training interventions aimed to improve communication skills (45 studies) and 13 different training interventions were described. Eight studies reported a measurable improvement in patient care, such as increased documentation of advance care discussions. Most study outcomes focused on surgeons' knowledge (12 studies), skills (21 studies), and confidence/comfort (18 studies) in palliative communication skills. Studies had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Whilst interventions exist to improve the training of surgeons managing patients with life-threatening conditions, evidence is limited, and studies measure the direct impact on patient care insufficiently. Improved research is needed to lead to better methods for training surgeons to benefit patients.

Palliative and Supportive Care Consultation for Patients With Malignant Gastrointestinal Obstruction is Associated With Broad Interdisciplinary Management

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess rates of palliative care (PC) involvement in the care of patients with malignant gastrointestinal obstruction (GIO) and its influence on interdisciplinary team involvement.

BACKGROUND

Malignant GIO is an advanced oncologic diagnosis with associated poor prognosis. Data regarding PC and interdisciplinary team involvement in these patients is lacking.

METHODS

We identified consecutive surgical consultations for GIO in cancer patients at a single institution from August 2017 to July 2019. Clinical characteristics were collected. Rates of PC consultation, ACP discussion, code status change to do not resuscitate, and interdisciplinary service consultation were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 200 patients with consultations for GIO, of whom 114 (57%) had malignant GIO and were included in our study. Of these patients, 95 (83%) had stage IV disease; 68 (60%) had peritoneal metastasis, and 70 (61%) had other intra-abdominal recurrence or metastasis. PC consultation was obtained in 69 patients (61%). PC consultation was associated with higher rates of ACP discussion (64% vs 29%; P < 0.001), code status change to do not resuscitate (30% vs 2%; P < 0.001), nonsurgical procedure (46% vs 11%; P < 0.001), discharge to hospice (30% vs 7%; P < 0.001), and involvement of spiritual care (48% vs 22%; P = 0.01), social work (77% vs 42%, P < 0.001), psychology/psychiatry (42% vs 4%, P < 0.001), nutrition (86% vs 62%, P = 0.006), physical therapy (54% vs 31%, P = 0.02), and occupational therapy (42% vs 16%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

PC consultation benefits patients with malignant GIO by facilitating comprehensive interdisciplinary care, ACP discussions, and transition to hospice care, where appropriate. Diagnosis of malignant GIO should be a trigger for PC consultation or, in facilities with limited PC resources, consideration of deliberately broad interdisciplinary consultation.

Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe the palliative care consultation practices in an academic head and neck surgery practice.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a palliative care database and the health record for all palliative care consultations of patients suffering from advanced stage head and neck cancer within a 21-month period.

RESULTS

Ten head and neck cancer patients received palliative care consults while on the otolaryngology service. One consultation occurred preoperatively; nine occurred postoperatively, on a median of hospital day 9. At the time of referral, seven patients were in the ICU and three were on a surgical floor. Code status de-escalation occurred in six patients and psycho-socio-spiritual suffering was supported in all consultations. Nine patients died within six months, with a median post-consultation survival of 35 days. Of these, two died in an ICU, five were discharged to hospice, one to a SNF, and one to a LTACH.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care consultation in this advanced head and neck cancer cohort was commonly late, however, significant suffering was mitigated following most consults. Palliative care specialists are experts at eliciting patient values, determining acceptable tradeoffs and suffering limitations by employing a shared decision-making process that ends with a patient-centered value-congruent treatment recommendation. Oftentimes, this embraces curative-intent or palliative surgery, along with contingency plans for unacceptable value-incongruent postoperative outcomes. Enhanced awareness of the benefits of embracing concordant palliative care in advanced head and neck cancer patients may help overcome the significant barriers to involving palliative care experts earlier.

Palliative Care Consultation is Associated with Decreased Rates of In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Major Amputation

OBJECTIVE

Despite advancements in medical care and surgical techniques, major amputation continues to be associated with risks for morbidity and mortality. Palliative care programs may help alleviate symptoms and align patients' goals and the care they receive with their treatment plan. Access to specialty Palliative medicine among vascular surgery patients is limited . Here, we aim to describe utilization and impact of formal palliative care consultation for patients receiving major amputations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, secondary data analysis project examining the records of patients who received major amputations by the vascular surgery team between 2016 and 2021. Demographics, operative, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome variable was palliative care consultation during index admission (the admission in which the patient received their first major amputation). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality as well as code status at time of death, if death occurred during the index admission, location of death, and discharge destination RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 292 patients (39% female, 53% Black, mean age 63) who received a lower extremity major amputation. Most patients (65%) underwent amputation for limb ischemia. One-year mortality after first major amputation was 29%. Average length of stay was 20 days. Thirty-five (12%) patients received a palliative care consultation during the hospitalization in which they received their first major amputation. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive a palliative care consult during their index admission if they had undergone a through knee amputation (OR = 2.89, p = 0.039) or acute limb ischemia (OR = 4.25, p = 0.005). A formal palliative care consult was associated with lower likelihood of in-hospital death and increased likelihood of discharge to hospice (OR = 0.248, p = 0.0167, OR1.283, p < 0.001).There were not statistically significant differences in the code status of patients who received a palliative care consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large academic medical center, palliative medicine consultation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among patients with advanced vascular disease and major limb amputation. These data will hopefully stimulate much needed prospective research to develop and test tools to identify patients in need and derive evidence about the impact of palliative care services.

Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in the Neutropenic Immunocompromised Patient

Surgeons encounter neutropenic patients through elective or emergency consultation with increasing regularity. As medical management continues to extend the lives of patients with benign hematologic diseases, hematologic malignancies, solid malignancies, or iatrogenic neutropenia, more patients are presenting with infectious complications caused and/or complicated by their neutropenia. This leaves surgeons in the difficult position of managing medically fragile patients with unusual presentations of common disease processes. These patients often fall outside of classical guidelines and treatment pathways. Many studies addressing these issues are retrospective and non-randomized. Here, we review common emergency gastrointestinal surgery scenarios and their management in the setting of a neutropenic patient. While biliary disease, appendicitis, anorectal disease, and perforations will be covered in detail, an extensive appreciation of a patient's medical or oncologic disease course and appropriate utilization of consultants such as interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and hematology is often necessary.

Barriers to Equitable Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients with Cancer

Over the past half century, palliative care has grown to become a pillar of clinical oncology. Its practice revolves around relieving suffering and optimizing quality of life, not just dealing with end-of-life decisions. Despite evidence that palliative care has the potential to reduce health care utilization and improve advance care planning without affecting mortality, palliative care remains inequitably accessible and underutilized. Furthermore, it is still too often introduced late in the care of patients receiving surgical intervention. This article summarizes the numerous and complex barriers to equitable palliative care utilization among patients with cancer. Potential strategies for dismantling these barriers are also discussed.

Underutilization of Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Advanced peripheral arterial disease is associated with an overall annual mortality between 20-40%. Amputees are at particularly high risk for perioperative and long-term mortality and may benefit from palliative care programs to improve quality of life and to align medical treatments with their goals of care. As studies of palliative care in vascular patients are scarce, we sought to examine palliative care utilization using below knee amputation (BKA) as a surrogate for advanced peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

All patients who underwent below knee amputation over a 5-year period at a single large academic medical center were identified through chart review. Demographics, preoperative conditions, intraoperative factors, and perioperative outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was palliative care consultation at the time of the amputation. The secondary outcomes included one-year mortality and palliative care consultation prior to death.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 111 patients (76 men, 35 women) who received BKA for chronic limb threatening ischemia. Three patients (2.7%) received palliative care consultations at the time of their amputation. Of these, one had been obtained remotely for an oncologic condition and the others for surgical decision-making. Follow-up was available for 73 patients. One-year mortality was 21.9% (n = 16) at a mean of 102 ± 86 days after BKA. Among patients who died within 1 year of their amputation, 37.5% (n = 6) received palliative care consultations prior to their death. The median interval between amputation and palliative consultation was 26 (IQR 14-81) days. The median interval between palliative consultation and death was 9 (IQR 4-39) days.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care services were rarely provided to patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease. When obtained, consultations occurred closer to death than to amputation suggesting a missed opportunity to receive the benefits of early evaluation. Future studies can be aimed at identifying a cohort of vascular patients who would most benefit from early palliative evaluation and determining if palliative consultations alter health care utilization patterns and outcomes for vascular patients.