Postoperative Outcomes after Index vs Interval Cholecystectomy for Perforated Cholecystitis

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder perforation occurs in 2% to 11% of patients with acute cholecystitis, with associated mortality estimated to be at 12% to 42%. Because of its low incidence, the data on management remain sparse. There is a lack of evidence to suggest whether early or delayed cholecystectomy is superior in the treatment of perforated cholecystitis. We hypothesize that an early definitive operation is associated with decreased total hospital length of stay (THLOS).

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from the American College of Surgery, we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation on an urgent or emergent basis from 2012 to 2021. We divided them into those who underwent early (<2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation) and delayed cholecystectomy (≥2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation). Our primary outcome was the THLOS. We created multivariate regression models to assess for the association of early versus delayed operation and THLOS.

RESULTS

The THLOS was found to be 2.94 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group (p < 0.05). In those who did not present with sepsis on admission, the THLOS was noted to be 4.71 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group (p < 0.05). Early versus delayed operation was not associated with a difference in the postoperative length of stay, 30-day postoperative complications, rate of readmission, and reoperation, regardless of preoperative sepsis status.

CONCLUSION

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation is associated with decreased THLOS, and there were no other differences in outcomes compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with gallbladder perforation would likely benefit from an early operation within 2 days of admission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care management; Level IV.

Reduced preoperative serum choline esterase levels and fecal peritoneal contamination as potential predictors for the leakage of intestinal sutures after source control in secondary peritonitis

BACKGROUND

The high rate of stoma placement during emergency laparotomy for secondary peritonitis is a paradigm in need of change in the current fast-track surgical setting. Despite growing evidence for the feasibility of primary bowel reconstruction in a peritonitic environment, little data substantiate a surgeons' choice between a stoma and an anastomosis. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to identify pre- and intraoperative parameters that predict the leakage risk for enteric sutures placed during source control surgery (SCS) for secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2020, 497 patients underwent SCS for secondary peritonitis, of whom 187 received a primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract without a diverting stoma. In 47 (25.1%) patients postoperative leakage of the enteric sutures was directly confirmed during revision surgery or by computed tomography. Quantifiable predictors of intestinal suture outcome were detected by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Length of intensive care, in-hospital mortality and failure of release to the initial home environment were significantly higher in patients with enteric suture leakage following SCS compared to patients with intact anastomoses (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0026 and p =0.0009, respectively). Reduced serum choline esterase (sCHE) levels and a high extent of peritonitis were identified as independent risk factors for insufficiency of enteric sutures placed during emergency laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative sCHE < 4.5 kU/L and generalized fecal peritonitis associate with a significantly higher incidence of enteric suture insufficiency after primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract in a peritonitic abdomen. These parameters may guide surgeons when choosing the optimal surgical procedure in the emergency setting.

Comparison of the effects of ampulla-guided realignment and conventional gallbladder triangle anatomy in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of ampulla-guided realignment and conventional gallbladder triangle anatomy in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC).

METHODS

From June 2021 to August 2022, data from 100 patients undergoing DLC at Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (LC with the ampulla-guided realignment) and the control group (conventional LC with triangular gallbladder anatomy), with 50 patients per group. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, hospitalization time, bile duct injury rate, operation conversion rate, and incidence of postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The pain response and daily activities of the patients in the two groups were evaluated 48 h after the operation.

RESULTS

The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, hospital stay, operation conversion rate, pain degree at 24 and 48 h after operation, bile duct injury incidence, and total postoperative complication rate were shorter or lower in the experimental group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The Barthel index scores of both groups were higher 48 h after the operation than before the operation, and the experimental group was higher than the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ampulla-guided alignment in DLC surgery was more beneficial in promoting postoperative recovery, reducing postoperative pain response, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and reducing bile duct injury.

Impact of the affordable care act's medicaid expansion on presentation stage and perioperative outcomes of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Medicaid expansion has improved healthcare coverage and preventive health service use. To what extent this has resulted in earlier stage colorectal cancer diagnoses and impacted perioperative outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective difference-in-difference study using the National Cancer Database on adults (40-64) with Medicaid or no insurance, diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinomas before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2018) expansion. The primary outcome was early-stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage 0-1) diagnosis. The secondary outcomes were rate of local excision, emergency surgery, postoperative length of stay, rates of minimally invasive surgery, postoperative mortality, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in early-stage diagnoses for patients with colorectal cancers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.43), an increase in local excision (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.69), and a decreased rate of emergent surgery (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97) and 90-day mortality (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97). Additionally, patients in expansion states postexpansion had an improved 5-year OS (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance coverage expansion may be particularly important for optimizing stage of diagnosis, subsequent survival, and perioperative outcomes for socioeconomically vulnerable patients.