Contemporary General Surgery Resident Learning Experience in Pediatric Surgery

How far We Go For Surgery: Distance to Pediatric Surgical Care in Indiana

INTRODUCTION

Despite increasing numbers of pediatric surgery training programs, access to pediatric surgical care remains limited in non-academic and rural settings. We aimed to characterize demographic and patient factors associated with increased distance to selected pediatric surgical procedures in Indiana.

METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective review analyzed pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, umbilical hernia repair, pyloromyotomy, and video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures from 2019 through 2021. Data was obtained from an electronic medical record warehouse and the Indiana Hospital Association. Travel distance was calculated as driving distance between patient address and hospital ZIP codes. Statistics were performed in R, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.

RESULTS

There were 6835 operations performed, and half of all operations (46%) were performed at institutions with fellowship-trained pediatric surgeons. The median travel distance for all operations was 13 miles (range 0-182); the shortest was for laparoscopic appendectomy (9 miles, IQR[0-20]). The longest distances were for pyloromyotomy (51 miles, IQR[14-84]) and VATS procedures (57 miles, IQR[13-111]), of which, nearly all were performed at tertiary pediatric care centers (97% and 93%, respectively). There was a significant linear and quadratic effect of age on travel distance (p < 0.001), with younger patients requiring farther travel. On multivariable linear regression, age and procedure type had the largest effect on travel distance (Eta squared 0.03, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger age and more specialized procedures, including VATS and pyloromyotomy, were associated with increased travel distance. This highlights regionalization of these procedures to urban areas with pediatric care centers, while others are performed closer to home.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

Changing Landscape of Routine Pediatric Surgery for Rural and Urban Children: A Report From the Child Health Evaluation of Surgical Services (CHESS) Group

OBJECTIVE

To describe the changes to routine pediatric surgical care over the past 2 decades for children living in urban and rural environments.

BACKGROUND

A knowledge gaps exists regarding trends in the location where routine pediatric surgical care is provided to children from urban and rural environments over time.

METHODS

Children (age 0-18) undergoing 7 common surgeries were identified using State Inpatient Databases (SID, 2002-2017). Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes were used to classify patient and hospital zip codes. Multivariable regression models for distance traveled >60 miles and transfer status were used to compare rural and urban populations, adjusting for year, age, sex, race, and insurance status.

RESULTS

Among 143,467 children, 13% lived in rural zip codes. The distance traveled for care increased for both rural and urban children for all procedures but significantly more for the rural cohort (eg, 102% vs 30%, P <0.001, cholecystectomy). Transfers also increased for rural children (eg, transfers for appendectomy increased from 1% in 2002 to 23% in 2017, P <0.001). Factors associated with the need to travel >60 miles included year [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=2.18, 95% CI: 1.94-2.46: 2017 vs 2002], rural residence (aOR=6.55, 95% CI: 6.11-7.01), age less than 5 years (aOR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.92-2.46), and Medicaid insurance (aOR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.26-1.45). Factors associated with transfer included year (aOR=5.77, 95% CI: 5.26-6.33: 2017 vs 2002), rural residence (aOR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.56), age less than 10 years (aOR=2.34, 95% CI: 2.15-2.54), and Medicaid insurance (aOR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.42-1.46).

CONCLUSION

Rural children, younger age, and those on Medicaid disproportionately traveled greater distances and were more frequently transferred for common pediatric surgical procedures.

Distribution of acute appendicitis care in children: A statewide assessment of the surgeons and facilities providing surgical care

BACKGROUND

Pediatric appendicitis is managed by general and pediatric surgeons at both children's hospitals and non-children's hospitals. A statewide assessment of surgeons and facilities providing appendicitis care was performed to identify factors associated with location of surgical care.

METHODS

Children aged <18 years undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis in Wisconsin from 2018-2020 were identified through the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes using Wisconsin Hospital Association data. Patient residence and hospital locations were used to determine travel distance, rurality, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Among 3,604 children with appendicitis, 36.0% and 12.8% had an appendectomy at 2 major children's hospitals and 4 other children's hospitals, respectively, and 51.2% had an appendectomy at 99 non-children's hospitals. Pediatric surgeons performed 76.1% of appendectomies at children's hospitals and 2.9% at non-children's hospitals. Only 32.2% of patients received care at the hospital closest to their homes. Non-children's hospitals disproportionally cared for older, non-Hispanic White, and privately insured children, those with uncomplicated appendicitis, and those living in rural areas, in mid-socioeconomic status neighborhoods, and greater distances from children's hospitals (all P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, receipt of care at children's hospitals was associated with younger age, minority race, complicated appendicitis, shorter distance to children's hospitals, and urban residence.

CONCLUSION

Over half of surgical care for pediatric appendicitis occurred at non-children's hospitals, especially among older children and those living in rural areas far from children's hospitals. Future work is necessary to determine which children benefit most from care at children's hospitals and which can safely receive care at non-children's hospitals to avoid unnecessary time and resource utilization associated with travel to children's hospitals.